Abstract
The discussion section explains the meaning of results to the readers, and addresses the implications of the findings emanating from the particular study. Authors should compare their results with previous reports, and attempt to explain similarities and differences. It is useful to outline the limitations and strengths of the study, and suggest a future line of work. A concise, convincing and meticulous discussion with scholarly referencing is the key to a lasting impression.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dewan P, Gupta P. Writing the Title, abstract and introduction: looks matter! Indian Pediatr. 2016;53:235–41.
Mukherjee A, Lodha R. Writing the results. Indian Pediatr. 2016;53:409–15.
Drotar D. Editorial: How to write an effective results and discussion for the Journal of Pediatric Psychology. J Pediatr Psychol. 2009;34:339–43
Annesley TM. The discussion section: your closing argument. Clin Chem. 2010;56:1671–4.
Hess DR. How to write an effective discussion. Respir Care. 2004;49:1238–41.
Hoberman A, Chesney RW; RIVUR Trial Investigators. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for children with vesicoureteral reflux. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1072–3.
Gulati A, Sinha A, Gupta A, Kanitkar M, Sreenivas V, Sharma J, et al. Treatment with tacrolimus and prednisolone is preferable to intravenous cyclophospha-mide as the initial therapy for children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Kidney Int. 2012;82:1130–5.
Fivez T, Kerklaan D, Mesotten D, Verbruggen S, Wouters PJ, Vanhorebeek I, et al. Early versus late parenteral nutrition in critically ill children. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:1111–22.
Sanli O, Erdem S, Tefik T. How to write a discussion section? Turk J Urol. 2013;39(Suppl 1):20–4.
Foote M. The proof of the pudding: how to report results and write a good discussion. Chest. 2009;135:866–8.
Kotsis SV, Chung KC. A guide for writing in the scientific forum. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:1763–71.
Derish P, Eastwood S. A clarity clinic for surgical writing. J Surg Res. 2008;147:50–8.
Morgan PP. Perfecting the manuscript: getting the right words in the right place. Can Med Assoc J. 1983;128:769–73.
Indian Pediatrics. Instruction to Authors. Available from: http://indianpediatrics.net/author1.htm. Accessed August 21, 2016.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bagga, A. Discussion: The heart of the paper. Indian Pediatr 53, 901–904 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-016-0955-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-016-0955-4