Skip to main content
Log in

Antecedents of Pro-LGBT Advocacy among Sexual Minority and Heterosexual College Students

  • Published:
Sexuality Research and Social Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Utilizing the resource model of political participation, we identify the antecedents of willingness to sign a petition supporting employment protections for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people among sexual minority and heterosexual college students. Through secondary data analysis, we investigate the role of sociodemographic, mobilizing context, and framing variables, including various LGBT-related attitudes that have never been integrated in a single regression of LGBT activism. Results from a sample of sexual minority (n = 367) and heterosexual (n = 1,707) college students suggest that the majority of students from both sexual orientation groups are willing to sign a petition for LGBT rights. Although the impact of framing variables, such as transphobia and liberal identity, were most influential among both groups, the relevance of some framing antecedents (i.e., heterosexist attitudes and the disclosure of sexual identities) was specific to each sexuality. Before the inclusion of framing factors, knowing LGBT peers and observing heterosexist discrimination inspired greater activism among both sexuality groups as did being female and a graduate student; however, the significance of religious factors were only important among heterosexual students. Implications for future research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alimahomed, S. (2010). Thinking outside the rainbow: women of color redefining queer politics and identity. Social Identities, 16(2), 151–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, R. W. (1999). Gay politics, urban politics: identity and economics in the urban setting. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balsam, K. F., Molina, Y., Beadnell, B., Simoni, J., & Walters, K. (2011). Measuring multiple minority stress: the LGBT people of color microaggressions scale. Cultural Diversity and ethnic Minority Psychology, 17(2), 163–174.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, S., & Fisher, S. (2003). The states and the differing impetus for divergent paths on same-sex marriage, 1990–2001. Policy Studies Journal, 31(3), 331–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, D. C., & Pollack, L. M. (2005). Whose gay community? Social class, sexual self-expression, and gay community involvement. The Sociological Quarterly, 46(3), 437–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barth, J., Overby, L. M., & Huffmon, S. H. (2009). Community context, personal contact, and support for an anti-gay rights referendum. Political Research Quarterly, 62(2), 355–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: an overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, M. (1997). Celebration and suppression: the strategic uses of identity by the lesbian and gay movement. American Journal of Sociology, 10(3), 531–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, H. E., Verba, S., & Schlozman, K. L. (1995). Beyond SES: a resource model of political participation. The American Political Science Review, 89(2), 271–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, P. R. (2003). The shifting foundations of public opinion about gay rights. Journal of Politics, 65(4), 1208–1220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camp, B. J. (2008). Mobilizing the base and embarrassing the opposition: defense of marriage referenda and cross-cutting electoral cleavages. Sociological Perspectives, 51(4), 713–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffé, H., & Bolzendahl, C. (2010). Same game, different rules? Gender differences in political participation. Sex Roles, 62(5), 318–333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. (2008). Black feminist thought: knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corning, A. F., & Myers, D. J. (2002). Individual orientation toward engagement in social action. Political Psychology, 23(4), 703–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, R. J. (2002). Citizen politics: public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies (3rd ed.). New York: Chatham House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diehr, P., Lumley, T., Emerson, S., & Chen, L. (2002). The importance of the normality assumption in large public health data sets. Annual Review of Public Health, 23, 151–169.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2009). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, L. E. (1999). Motivation for collective action: group consciousness as mediator of personality, life experiences, and women's rights activism. Political Psychology, 20(3), 611–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbaz, G. (1996). Measuring AIDS activism. Humanity & Society, 20(3), 44–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldridge, V. L., Mack, L., & Swank, E. (2006). Explaining comfort with homosexuality in rural America. Journal of Homosexuality, 51(2), 39–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eliason, M. J. (1996). Identity formation for lesbian, bisexual, and gay persons. Journal of Homosexuality, 30(3), 31–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fingerhut, A. W. (2011). Straight allies: what predicts heterosexuals' alliance with the LGBT community? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(9), 2230–2248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fingerhut, A. W., Peplau, L. A., & Gable, S. L. (2010). Identity, minority stress, and psychological well-being among gay men and lesbians. Psychology & Sexuality, 1(2), 101–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, D. J., & McEneaney, E. H. (1999). The individualization of society and the liberalization of state policies on same-sex sexual relations, 1984–1995. Social Forces, 77(3), 911–941.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, C., & Leaper, C. (2010). Sexual minority college women's experiences with discrimination: relations with identity and collective action. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(2), 152–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gitlin, T. (2003). The whole world is watching: mass media in the making & unmaking of the new left. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, S. B., & Davis, D. S. (2010). Heterosexual allies: a descriptive profile. Equity & Excellence in Education, 43(4), 478–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gortmaker, V. J., & Brown, R. D. (2006). Out of the college closet: differences in perceptions and experiences among out and closeted lesbian and gay students. College Student Journal, 40(3), 606–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habarth, J. M. (2008). Thinking straight: heteronormativity and associated outcomes across sexual orientation. PhD Dissertation, University of Michigan.

  • Haider-Markel, D. P., & Joslyn, M. R. (2008). Beliefs about the origins of homosexuality and support for gay rights: an empirical test of attribution theory. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(2), 291–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harder, J., & Krosnick, J. A. (2008). Who do people vote? A psychological analysis of the cause of voter turnout. Journal of Social Issues, 64(3), 525–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M. (1992). The social context of hate crimes: notes on cultural heterosexism. In G. Herek & K. T. Berrill (Eds.), Hate crimes (pp. 89–104). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M. (2004). Beyond ‘homophobia’: thinking about sexual prejudice and stigma in the twenty-first century. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 1(2), 6–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M., Norton, A., Allen, T., & Sims, C. (2010). Demographic, psychological, and social characteristics of self-identified lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults in a US probability sample. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 7(3), 176–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hertzog, M. (1996). The lavender vote: lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals in American electoral politics (1st Printing). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, D. B., & Willoughby, B. L. B. (2005). The development and validation of the genderism and transphobia scale. Sex Roles, 53(7), 531–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyers, L. (2007). Resisting prejudice every day: exploring women's assertive responses to anti-black racism, anti-semitism, heterosexism, and sexism. Sex Roles, 56(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, W. G. (1991). Ideological identification and issue attitudes. American Journal of Political Science, 35(1), 178–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, M. K., & Andersen, E. A. (2003). The importance of social and political context: the case of AIDS activism. Political Behavior, 25(2), 177–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. C. (2003). Characteristics of a group of lesbian and gay radical street activists. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 14(4), 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., Nosek, B. A., & Gosling, S. D. (2008). Ideology: its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(2), 126–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalton, G. (2009). Methods for oversampling rare subpopulations in social surveys. Survey Methodology, 35(2), 125–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klawitter, M. M., & Flatt, V. (1998). The effects of state and local antidiscrimination policies on earnings for gays and lesbians. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 17(4), 658–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konik, J., & Stewart, A. (2004). Sexual identity development in the context of compulsory heterosexuality. Journal of Personality, 72(4), 815–844.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lax, J. R., & Phillips, J. H. (2009). Gay rights in the states: public opinion and policy responsiveness. American Political Science Review, 103(3), 367–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leighley, J. E., & Vedlitz, A. (1999). Race, ethnicity, and political participation: competing models and contrasting explanations. The Journal of Politics, 61(4), 1092–1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, G. B., Rogers, M. A., & Sherrill, K. (2011). Lesbian, gay, and bisexual voters in the 2000 U.S. presidential election. Politics & Policy, 39(5), 655–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lien, P. (1998). Does the gender gap in political attitudes and behavior vary across racial groups? Political Research Quarterly, 51(4), 869–894.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardi, E. L. (1999). Integration within a transgender social network and its effect upon members' social and political activity. Journal of Homosexuality, 37(1), 109–126.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, D., & Paulsen, R. (1993). Specifying the relationship between social ties and activism. American Journal of Sociology, 99(3), 640–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 674–697.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, S., & Stewart, A. (2012). Privileged allies in lesbian and gay rights activism: gender, generation, and resistance to heteronormativity. Journal of Social Issues, 68, 162–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, M. A., & Morrison, T. G. (2011). Sexual orientation bias toward gay men and lesbian women: modern homonegative attitudes and their association with discriminatory behavioral intentions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(11), 2573–2599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, L. R., Cadge, W., & Harrison, J. T. (2006). Religion and public opinion about same-sex marriage. Social Science Quarterly, 87(2), 340–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pappas, C., Mendez, J., & Herrick, R. (2009). The negative effects of populism on gay and lesbian rights. Social Science Quarterly, 90(1), 150–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passy, F. (2001). Socialization, connection, and the structure/agency gap: a specification of the impact of networks on participation in social movements. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 6(2), 173–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrie, M. (2004). A research note on the determinants of protest participation: examining socialization and biographical availability. Sociological Spectrum, 24(5), 553–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pharr, S. (1997). Homophobia: a weapon of sexism. Berkeley: Chardon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rankin, S., & Reason, R. (2008). Transformational tapestry model: a comprehensive approach to transforming campus climate. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 1(4), 262–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, A. (1980). Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs, 5(4), 631–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riggle, E. D., Rostosky, S. S., & Reedy, C. S. (2005). Online surveys for BGLT research: issues and techniques. Journal of Homosexuality, 49(2), 1–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rimmerman, C. A. (2008). The lesbian and gay movements: assimilation or liberation? Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollins, J., & Hirsch, H. N. (2003). Sexual identities and political engagements: a queer survey. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State, & Society, 10(3), 290–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schussman, A., & Soule, S. A. (2005). Process and protest: accounting for individual protest participation. Social Forces, 84(2), 1083–1108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverschanz, P., Cortina, L. M., Konik, J., & Magley, V. J. (2008). Slurs, snubs, and queer jokes: incidence and impact of heterosexist harassment in academia. Sex Roles, 58(3–4), 179–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, B., Loewy, M., Stürmer, S., Weber, U., Freytag, P., Habig, C., et al. (1998). Collective identification and social movement participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 646–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stake, J. (2007). Predictors of change in feminist activism through women's and gender studies. Sex Roles, 57(1), 43–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stotzer, R. (2009). Straight allies: supportive attitudes toward lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals in a college sample. Sex Roles, 60(1), 67–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swank, E., & Raiz, L. (2010). Predicting the support of same-sex relationship rights among social work students. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 22(1–2), 149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swank, E., & Fahs, B. (2011). Pathways to political activism among Americans who have same-sex sexual contact. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 8(2), 126–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swank, E., & Fahs, B. (2012). Resources, social networks, and collective action frames of college Students who join the gay and lesbian rights movement. Journal of Homosexuality, 59(1), 67–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swank, E., & Fahs, B. (2013). An intersectional analysis of gender and race for sexual minorities who engage in gay and lesbian rights activism. Sex Roles, 68(11–12), 660–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swank, E., Fahs, B., & Frost, D. M. (2013). Region, social identities, and disclosure practices as predictors of heterosexist discrimination against sexual minorities in the United States. Sociological Inquiry, 83(2), 238–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, V., Kimport, K., Van Dyke, N., & Andersen, E. A. (2009). Culture and mobilization: tactical repertoires, same-sex weddings, and the impact on gay activism. American Sociological Review, 74(6), 865–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tester, G. M. (2004). Resources, identity, and the role of threat: the case of AIDS mobilization, 1981–1986. Research in Political Sociology, 13, 45–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilcsik, A. (2011). Pride and prejudice: employment discrimination against openly gay men in the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 117(2), 586–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. J., Shields, T. G., & Sharp, D. (2001). Changes and continuities in the determinants of older adults' voter turnout 1952–1996. The Gerontologist, 41(6), 805–818.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyke, N. (1998). Hotbeds of activism: locations of student protest. Social Problems, 45(2), 205–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldner, L. K. (2001). Lesbian and gay political activism: an analysis of variables predicting political participation. Research in Political Sociology, 9, 59–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walls, N. E. (2008). Toward a multidimensional understanding of heterosexism: the changing nature of prejudice. Journal of Homosexuality, 55(1), 1–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodford, M. R. (2010). Same-sex marriage and beyond. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Service, 22(1-2), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodford, M., & Bella, L. (2003). Are we ready to take a stand? Educating social work students about heterosexism – fostering antioppressive practice. In W. Shera (Ed.), Emerging perspectives on anti-oppressive practice (pp. 413–430). Toronto: Canadian Scholars Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodford, M. R., Chonody, J., Scherrer, K., Silverschanz, P., & Kulick, A. (2012a). The “persuadable middle” on same-sex marriage: formative research to build support among heterosexual college students. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 9(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodford, M. R., Howell, M. L., Silverschanz, P., & Yu, L. (2012b). “That’s so gay!” Examining the covariates of hearing this expression among gay, lesbian, and bisexual college students. Journal of American College Health, 60(6), 429–434.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woodford, M. R., Krentzman, A., & Gattis, M. (2012c). Alcohol and drug use among sexual minority college students and their heterosexual counterparts: the effects of experiencing and witnessing incivility and hostility on campus. Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation, 3(1), 11–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodford, M. R., Silverschanz, P., Swank, E., Scherrer, K., & Raiz, L. (2012d). Predictors of U.S. heterosexual university students’ attitudes toward lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people. Journal of LGBT Youth, 9(4), 297–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodford, M. R., Atteberry, B., Derr, M. A., & Howell, M. (in press a). Endorsement for civil rights for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people among heterosexual college students: Informing socially just policy advocacy. Journal of Community Practice.

  • Woodford, M. R., Han, Y., Craig, S., Lim, C, & Matney, M. M. (in press b). Discrimination and mental health among sexual minority college students: The type and form of discrimination does matter. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health.

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding supporting this study was provided by the National Center for Institutional Diversity, University of Michigan and the Curtis Center, School of Social Work, University of Michigan. Colin Lim's contributions were supported by a Graduate Student Research Assistantship, University of Michigan, awarded to Dr. Woodford. Thank you to the participants and the study advisory committee.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael R. Woodford.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Swank, E., Woodford, M.R. & Lim, C. Antecedents of Pro-LGBT Advocacy among Sexual Minority and Heterosexual College Students. Sex Res Soc Policy 10, 317–332 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-013-0136-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-013-0136-3

Keywords

Navigation