Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Australian Lesbian and Gay Foster Carers Negotiating the Child Protection System: Strengths and Challenges

  • Published:
Sexuality Research and Social Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Whilst a growing number of Australian foster care agencies are actively recruiting lesbians and gay men as potential foster carers, few agencies have policies for working with this population. Drawing on interviews and focus groups conducted with lesbian and gay foster carers from across four Australian states, the thematic analysis of narratives presented in this paper provides clear directions for developing policy. Carers reported considerable skill in negotiating placements and an awareness of the relatively tenuous position that they held within foster care systems. Many spoke of an overarching narrative of ‘justified suspicion’ when it came to engaging with agency workers and that they were often dependent upon the goodwill of individual social workers. Yet despite these challenges, lesbian and gay carers spoke in general of the unique and important skills they bring to care provision. The findings suggest that policy changes are required so as to (1) challenge heteronormativity and develop policies that clearly outline the implications of homophobic behaviour, (2) encourage reflexivity about best practice amongst workers and (3) provide clear guidelines about the inclusion of lesbian and gay foster carers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2010). Child protection Australia 2008–09. Canberra: AIHW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, J. G., & Delfabbro, P. H. (2004). Children in foster care. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bolivar, A. (2002). “De nobis ipse silemus?”: epistemology of biographical narrative research in education. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 4(1). Retrieved November 7, 2010, from http://redie.uabc.mx/vol4no1/contentsbolivar.html.

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, D., & Goldberg, S. (2001). Gay and lesbian adoptive and foster placements: can they meet the needs of waiting children? Social Work, 46, 147–157.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Centre for Excellence in Child and Family Welfare. (2009). Guidelines for recruiting and supporting lesbian and gay carers. Melbourne: CECFW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, S. (2000). ‘Good lesbian, bad lesbian…’: regulating heterosexuality in fostering and adoption assessments. Child and Family Social Work, 5, 157–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, S. (2005a). Lesbian and gay foster care and adoption: a brief UK history. Adoption and Fostering, 29, 42–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, S. (2005b). Queer genealogies: tales of conformity and rebellion amongst lesbian and gay foster carers and adopters. Qualitative Social Work, 4, 293–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, S., & McDermott, J. (1999). Lesbian and gay fostering and adoption: extraordinary yet ordinary. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehr, V. (1999). Queer family values: debunking the myth of the nuclear family. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lev, A. I. (2004). The complete lesbian and gay parenting guide. New York: Berkley Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallon, G. P. (2006). Lesbian and gay foster and adoptive parents. Washington: Child Welfare League of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthew, J. D., & Cramer, E. P. (2006). Envisaging the adoption process to strengthen gay- and lesbian-headed families: recommendations for adoption professionals. Child Welfare, 85, 317–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischler, E. G. (1995). Models of narrative analysis. A typology. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 5, 87–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, D. (2006). The story of a gay foster parent. Child Welfare, 85, 123–132.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peel, E. (2001). Mundane heterosexism: understanding incidents of the everyday. Women’s Studies International Forum, 24, 541–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, K. (2008). Dancing our own steps: a queer families’ project. International Journal of Narrative Therapy and Community Work, 2, 61–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riessman, C. K. (2002). Doing justice. Positioning the interpreter in narrative work. In W. Patterson (Ed.), Strategic narrative: new perspectives on the power of personal and cultural storytelling (pp. 195–216). Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, D. W. (2006a). 'This reads like a conspiracy theory', or; Mundane heterosexism hurts too! Lesbian and Gay Psychology Review, 7, 310–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, D. W. (2006b). Developmentalism and the rhetoric of ‘best interests of the child’: challenging constructions of families and children in foster care. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 2, 57–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, D. W. (2007). Re-assessing the foster care system: examining the impact of heterosexism on lesbian and gay applicants. Hypatia, 22, 192–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, D. W. (2008). Attachment theory as a 'practice of heterosexism': resisting the psychologisation of lesbian and gay foster carers. In J. Nathanson & C. Tuley (Eds.), Mother knows best: talking back to the baby ‘experts’ (pp. 148–157). Toronto: Demeter Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, D. W. (2009). Race privilege and its role in the ‘disappearance’ of birth families and adoptive children in debates over adoption by non-heterosexual people in Australia. In D. Cuthbert & C. Spark (Eds.), Other people’s children: adoption in Australia (pp. 161–175). Melbourne: Australian Scholarly Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, D. W. (2010a). Perceptions of support among Australian lesbian and gay foster carers. In M. Morrison, D. T. McDermott, M. A. Carrigan, & T. G. Morrison (Eds.), Sexual minority research in the new millenium. New York: Nova Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, D. W. (2010b). Pragmatic imbalances: Australian lesbian and gay foster carers. In P. Gerber & A. Sifris (Eds.), Current trends in the regulation of same-sex relationships. Annandale: Federation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, D. W. (2010c). What about the children! Masculinities, sexualities and hegemony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, D. W., & Augoustinos, M. (2009). Institutional stressors and individual strengths: policy and practice directions for working with Australian lesbian and gay foster carers. Practice: Social Work in Action, 21, 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zetterqvist-Nelson, K. (2006). The construction of an open time dimension in narrative about the becoming of lesbian and gay families: an act of resistance. Lesbian and Gay Psychology Review, 7, 8–18.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I begin by acknowledging the sovereignty of the Kaurna people, the First Nations people upon whose land I live in Adelaide, South Australia. Thanks to Faith, Tracey and Vanessa for helping to make this project happen. This project was support by a Flinders University Faculty Research Support Grant #03696.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Damien W. Riggs.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Riggs, D.W. Australian Lesbian and Gay Foster Carers Negotiating the Child Protection System: Strengths and Challenges. Sex Res Soc Policy 8, 215–226 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-011-0059-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-011-0059-9

Keywords

Navigation