Abstract
Heterosexually identified individuals can serve a crucial role as allies in eliminating sexual prejudice and the resulting policies that discriminate against lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people. However, few studies have systematically examined the development of heterosexual allies. Consensual qualitative research methods (Hill et al., The Counseling Psychologist, 25, 517–572, 1997) were used to analyze individual interviews conducted with a community sample of 12 heterosexually identified participants who demonstrated ally commitment through some form of LGBT activism. Findings revealed six domains that best described the development of these heterosexual allies. Participants described early role models, an evolving recognition and understanding of privilege and oppression, and conflict between an awareness of sexual prejudice and deeply held values of justice and equality. Participants also described barriers to LGBT activism and the rewards of ally work. The authors discuss implications for heterosexual ally development and, ultimately, for social justice and equality.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The community context for this study was a midsize city in a Southern state that had recently passed by large majority an amendment to the state constitution limiting marriage to “one man and one woman.” As of April 2009, a total of 30 states have passed such amendments restricting marriage.
References
Broido, E. M. (2000a). The development of social justice allies during college: a phenomenological investigation. Journal of College Student Development, 41, 3–18.
Broido, E. M. (2000b). Ways of being an ally to lesbian, gay, and bisexual students. In V. A. Wall & N. J. Evans (Eds.), Toward acceptance: sexual orientation issues on campus (pp. 345–370). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Colby, A., & Damon, W. (1994). Some do care: contemporary lives of moral commitment. New York: Free Press.
Cranton, P. (1994). Understanding and promoting transformative learning: a guide for educators of adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Cranton, P. (2002). Teaching for transformation. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 93, 63–71.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dillon, F. R., Worthington, R. L., Bielston Savoy, H., Rooney, S. C., Becker-Schutte, A. M., & Guerra, R. (2004). On becoming allies: a qualitative study of lesbian-, gay-, and bisexual-affirmative counselor training. Counselor Education and Supervision, 43, 162–178.
DiStefano, T. M., Croteau, J. M., Anderson, M. Z., Kampa-Kokesch, S., & Bullard, M. A. (2000). Experiences of being heterosexual allies to lesbian, gay, and bisexual people: a qualitative exploration. Journal of College Counseling, 3, 131–141.
Dworkin, S. H., & Yi, H. (2003). LGBT identity, violence, and social justice: the psychological is political. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 25, 269–279.
Eichstedt, J. L. (2001). Problematic White identities and a search for racial justice. Sociological Forum, 16, 445–470.
Eliason, M. J. (1995). Accounts of sexual identity formation in heterosexual students. Sex Roles, 32, 821–834.
Faver, C. A. (2001). Rights, responsibility, and relationship: motivations for women’s social activism. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work, 16, 314–336.
Fox, D. R. (2003). Awareness is good, but action is better. The Counseling Psychologist, 31, 299–304.
Helms, J. E. (Ed.). (1990). Black and White racial identity: theory, research, and practice. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
Helms, J. E. (1995). An update of Helms’s White and people of color racial identity models. In J. G. Ponterotto, J. M. Casas, L. A. Suzuki, & C. M. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural counseling (pp. 181–198). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Herdt, G. M., Young, J., Kertzner, R. M., Foreman, M., Diaz, R., Ryan, C., et al. (2004). Proceedings from a panel—homosexuality: from declassification to decriminalization. Where do we go from here? Sexuality Research and Social Policy: Journal of NSRC, 1(3), 71–81.
Herek, G. M. (1988). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: correlates and gender differences. Journal of Sex Research, 25, 451–477.
Herek, G. M. (2000). The psychology of sexual prejudice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 19–22.
Herek, G. M. (2002). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward bisexual men and women in the United States. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 264–274.
Herek, G. M. (2006). Legal recognition of same-sex relationship in the United States: a social science perspective. American Psychologist, 61, 607–621.
Hill, C. E., Thompson, B. J., & Williams, E. N. (1997). A guide to conducting consensual qualitative research. The Counseling Psychologist, 25, 517–572.
Hill, C. E., Knox, S., Thompson, B. J., Williams, E. N., Hess, S. A., & Ladany, N. (2005). Consensual qualitative research: an update. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 196–205.
Kimmel, M. S. (2003). Masculinity as homophobia: Fear, shame, and silence in the construction of gender identity. In M. S. Kimmel & A. L. Ferber (Eds.), Privilege: a reader (pp. 51–78). Cambridge, MA: Westview.
Kivel, P. (1992). Men’s work: how to stop violence that tears our lives apart. Center City, MN: Hazelden.
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Loeb, P. R. (1994). Generation at the crossroads: Apathy and action on the American campus. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers.
Mezirow, J., & Associates. (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Pharr, S. (1988). Homophobia: a weapon of sexism. Inverness, CA: Chardon.
Prilleltensky, I. (1997). Values, assumptions, and practices: assessing the moral implications of psychological discourse and action. American Psychologist, 52, 517–535.
Rich, A. (1980). Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 5, 631–660.
Russell, G. M., & Ruckert, S. (2004). Multiple pathways to activism: The case of heterosexual allies. In G. M. Russell (Chair) (Ed.), Voices of heterosexual allies: Public discourse, activism, and research. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Honolulu, Hawaii.
Saguy, T., Dovidio, J. F., & Pratto, F. (2008). Beyond contact: intergroup contact in the context of power relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 432–445.
Schlosser, L. Z., Knox, S., Moskovitz, A. R., & Hill, C. E. (2003). A qualitative examination of graduate advising relationships: the advisee perspective. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50, 178–188.
Seidman, S. (2009). Critique of compulsory heterosexuality. Sexuality Research & Social Policy: Journal of NSRC, 6(1), 18–28.
Stevenson, M. R. (2007). Public policy, mental health, and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender clients. In K. J. Bieschke, R. M. Perez, & K. A. DeBord (Eds.), Handbook of counseling and psychotherapy with lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender clients (2nd ed., pp. 379–397). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Sullivan, P. (1998). Sexual identity development: The importance of target or dominant group membership. In R. L. Sanlo (Ed.), Working with lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender college students: a handbook for faculty and administrators (pp. 3–12). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
Tatum, B. D. (1994). Teaching White students about racism: the search for White allies and the restoration of hope. Teachers College Record, 95, 462–476.
Washington, J., & Evans, N. J. (1991). Becoming an ally. In N. J. Evans & V. A. Wall (Eds.), Beyond tolerance: gays, lesbians, and bisexuals on campus (pp. 195–204). Alexandria, VA: American Association for Counseling and Development.
Worthington, R. L., Savoy, H. B., Dillon, F. R., & Vernaglia, E. R. (2002). Heterosexual identity development: a multidimensional model of individual and social identity. The Counseling Psychologist, 30, 496–531.
Acknowledgments
This article is based on the first author’s 2007 dissertation, completed under the direction of the second author at the University of Kentucky. This research was funded in part by the American Psychological Association’s Division 44 Maylon Smith Scholarship Award (2005); additional funding was provided by University of Kentucky’s Arvle and Ellen Turner Thacker Endowment Fund (2005). Results of this study were first made public through a poster presentation at the 2006 American Psychological Association Annual Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana. For transcribing the data, we owe a debt of gratitude to Phyllis Hoovler. Finally, we thank the study participants, whose sharing of their experiences contributed to a deeper understanding of ally activism.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Duhigg, J.M., Rostosky, S.S., Gray, B.E. et al. Development of Heterosexuals into Sexual-Minority Allies: A Qualitative Exploration. Sex Res Soc Policy 7, 2–14 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-010-0005-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-010-0005-2