Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prevalence of visual–functional mismatch regarding coronary artery stenosis in the CVIT-DEFER registry

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The fractional flow reserve (FFR) is considered to be a reliable index for the assessment of clinically relevant coronary artery stenosis. However, mismatch in assessing the severity of coronary stenosis between coronary angiography and the FFR has been pointed out. The cardiovascular intervention therapeutics (CVIT)-DEFER registry is a prospective multicenter registry study that has enrolled 3,228 consecutive patients among 3,804 patients with angiographically moderate coronary artery lesions in whom FFR analysis was clinically indicated. The demographic and angiographic parameters associated with an FFR ≤0.8 were analyzed, and the incidence of discrepancy between the angiographic severity of coronary stenosis and the FFR was assessed. Based on the visual assessment, 1,609 (42.9 %) lesions were categorized as showing 50 % stenosis, 1,882 lesions (50.2 %) as 75 % stenosis, and 257 lesions (6.9 %) as 90 % stenosis. Angiographic–FFR “mismatch,” which was defined as visual stenosis ≥75 % with FFR >0.80, was found in 43.4 % of lesions, while reverse angiographic mismatch (visual stenosis <75 % with FFR ≤0.8) was found in 23.2 %. The independent predictors for “angiographic–FFR mismatch” were the presence of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) history, one-vessel disease, non-left anterior descending artery (LAD) location, non-diffuse lesion, non-ostial lesion, and non-tandem lesion. Conversely, “reverse angiographic mismatch” was independently associated with the multivessel disease, LAD location, and diffuse lesion. The FFR is not only influenced by luminal stenosis but also by coronary artery morphology and the amount of jeopardized myocardium. Angiographic–FFR mismatch is frequent in patients with moderate coronary stenosis, which suggests the clinical importance of using physiological assessment to guide PCI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pijls NH, van Son JA, Kirkeeide RL, De Bruyne B, Gould KL. Experimental basis of determining maximum coronary, myocardial, and collateral blood flow by pressure measurements for assessing functional stenosis severity before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation. 1993;87:1354–67.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pijls NH, Van Gelder B, Van der Voort P, Peels K, Bracke FA, Bonnier HJ, et al. Fractional flow reserve: a useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow. Circulation. 1995;92:3183–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. De Bruyne B, Bartunek J, Sys SU, Pijls NHJ, Heyndrickx GR, Wijns W. Simultaneous coronary pressure and flow velocity measurements in humans: feasibility, reproducibility, and hemodynamic dependence of coronary flow velocity reserve, hyperemic flow versus pressure slope index, and fractional flow reserve. Circulation. 1996;94:1842–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tonino PAL, De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van’t Veer M, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding PCI in patients with multivessel coronary disease (FAME study). N Engl J Med. 2009;360:213–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pijls NH, Fearon WF, Tonino PA, Siebert U, Ikeno F, Bornschein B, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (fractional flow reserve versus angiography for multivessel evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:177–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, Kalson B, Barbato E, Tonino PAL, Pireth Z, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:991–1001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pijls NHJ, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, Boersma E, Bech JW, van’t Veer M, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally non-significant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:2105–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Park SJ, Kang SJ, Ahn JM, Shim EB, Kim YT, Yun SC, et al. Visual–functional mismatch between coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol Interv. 2012;5:1029–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Seo MK, Koo BK, Kim JH, Shin DH, Yang HM, Park KW, et al. Comparison of hyperemic efficacy between central and peripheral venous adenosine infusion for fractional flow reserve measurement. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5:401–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Barbato E, Bartunek J, Bech JW, Wijns W, Heyndrickx GR. Intracoronary and intravenous adenosine 5′-triphosphate, adenosine, papaverine, and contrast medium to assess fractional flow reserve in humans. Circulation. 2003;107:1877–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yong AS, Ng AC, Brieger D, Lowe HC, Ng MK, Kritharides L. Three-dimensional and two-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography, and their prediction of reduced fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:345–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zir LM, Miller SW, Dinsmore RE, Gilbert JP, Harthorne JW. Interobserver variability in coronary angiography. Circulation. 1976;53:627–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Boden WE, O’Rourke RA, Teo KK, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1503–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, Colombo A, Holmes DR, Mack MJ, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:961–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Leone AM, De Caterina AR, Basile E, Gardi A, Laezza D, Mazzari MA, et al. Influence of the amount of myocardium subtended by a stenosis on fractional flow. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6:29–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tonino PAL, Fearon WF, De Bruyne B, Oldroyd KG, Leesar MA, Ver Lee PN, et al. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:2816–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Brosh D, Higano ST, Lennon RJ, Holmes DR, Lerman A. Effect of lesion length on fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary lesions. Am Heart J. 2005;150:338–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masato Nakamura.

Additional information

For the CVIT-DEFER registry.

Appendix: Associate institutions

Appendix: Associate institutions

(in alphabetical order)

  1. 1.

    Aichi Medical University Hospital

  2. 2.

    Akashi City Hospital

  3. 3.

    Akita Medical Center

  4. 4.

    Cardiovascular Center Hokkaido Ohno Hospital

  5. 5.

    Caress Sapporo Hokko Memorial Hospital

  6. 6.

    Caress Sapporo Tokeidai Memorial Hospital

  7. 7.

    Chiba Tokushukai Hospital of Interventional Cardiology

  8. 8.

    Chigasaki Municipal Hospital

  9. 9.

    Chikamori Hospital

  10. 10.

    Chubu Rosai Hospital

  11. 11.

    Dokkyo Medical University

  12. 12.

    Ebina General Hospital

  13. 13.

    Edogawa Hospital

  14. 14.

    Fujita Health University Hospital

  15. 15.

    Fukui Prefectural Hospital

  16. 16.

    Fukuoka City Medical Association Hospital

  17. 17.

    Fukuoka Tokushukai Medical Center

  18. 18.

    Fukuyama City Hospital

  19. 19.

    Gifu Heart Center

  20. 20.

    Hakodate City Hospital

  21. 21.

    Hakujikai Memorial Hospital

  22. 22.

    Handa City Hospital

  23. 23.

    Higashi Takarazuka Satoh Hospital

  24. 24.

    Hiratsuka Kyosai Hospital

  25. 25.

    Hirosaki University School of Medicine & Hospital

  26. 26.

    Hiroshima City Asa Hospital

  27. 27.

    Hiroshima City Hospital

  28. 28.

    Hiroshima General Hospital of West Japan Railway Company

  29. 29.

    Hokkaido Social Insurance Hospital

  30. 30.

    Hokkaidoh Chuo Rosai Hospital

  31. 31.

    Hyogo College of Medicine

  32. 32.

    Ibaraki Prefectural Central Hospital

  33. 33.

    Ibaraki Seinan Medical Center Hospital

  34. 34.

    International Goodwill Hospital

  35. 35.

    Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital

  36. 36.

    IUHW Atami Hospital

  37. 37.

    Iwaki Kyouritsu Hospital

  38. 38.

    Iwate Medical University Hospital

  39. 39.

    Iwate Prefectural Central Hospital

  40. 40.

    Japan Red Cross Hadano Hospital

  41. 41.

    Japan Red Cross Kyoto Daini Hospital

  42. 42.

    Japan Red Cross Matsue Hospital

  43. 43.

    Japan Red Cross Osaka Hospital

  44. 44.

    Japan Red Cross Otsu Hospital

  45. 45.

    Japan Red Cross Shobara Hospital

  46. 46.

    Japanese Red Cross Karatsu Hospital

  47. 47.

    Japanese Red Cross Musashino Hospital

  48. 48.

    Japanese Red Cross Okayama Hospital

  49. 49.

    Japanese Red Cross Wakayama Medical Center

  50. 50.

    Juntendo University Shizuoka Hospital

  51. 51.

    Kagawa Prefectural Central Hospital

  52. 52.

    Kainan Hospital

  53. 53.

    Kameda Medical Center

  54. 54.

    Kanagawa Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center

  55. 55.

    Kanoya Heart Center

  56. 56.

    Kansai Medical University Takii Hospital

  57. 57.

    Kasugai Municipal Hospital

  58. 58.

    Kawasaki Medical School Hospital

  59. 59.

    Kinki University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine

  60. 60.

    Kitaibaraki City Hospital

  61. 61.

    Kitasato University Medical Center

  62. 62.

    Kizawa Memorial Hospital

  63. 63.

    KKR Sapporo Medical Center

  64. 64.

    Kobe Rousai Hospital

  65. 65.

    Kobe University Hospital

  66. 66.

    Kokura Memorial Hospital

  67. 67.

    Komaki City Hospital

  68. 68.

    Kouseiren Takaoka Hospital

  69. 69.

    Kuki General Hospital

  70. 70.

    Kurashiki Central Hospital

  71. 71.

    Kurume University Hospital

  72. 72.

    Kyoto University Hospital

  73. 73.

    Kyushu Kousei Nenkin Hospital

  74. 74.

    Matsue City Hospital

  75. 75.

    Matsue Seikyo General Hospital

  76. 76.

    Mie Heart Center

  77. 77.

    Mie University Hospital

  78. 78.

    Miki City Hospital

  79. 79.

    Misato Central General Hospital

  80. 80.

    Misyuku Hospital

  81. 81.

    Mito Saiseikai General Hospital

  82. 82.

    Mitsubishi Kyoto Hospital

  83. 83.

    Mitsui Memorial Hospital

  84. 84.

    Miyagi Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center

  85. 85.

    Miyagi East Department of Cardiology

  86. 86.

    National Hospital Organization Hakodate National Hospital

  87. 87.

    National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center

  88. 88.

    National Hospital Organization Takasaki General Medical Center

  89. 89.

    Nihon University School of Medicine, Itabashi Hospital

  90. 90.

    Nihonkai General Hospital

  91. 91.

    Niigata City General Hospital

  92. 92.

    Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital

  93. 93.

    Nishiarai Heart Center Hospital

  94. 94.

    Nishinomiya Watanabe Cardiovascular Center

  95. 95.

    Obihiro Hospital

  96. 96.

    Oe Kyodou Hospital

  97. 97.

    Ogikubo Hospital

  98. 98.

    Oita Oka Hospital

  99. 99.

    Oita University Hospital

  100. 100.

    Oitaken Kouseiren Tsurumi Hospital

  101. 101.

    Okamura Memorial Hospital

  102. 102.

    Okinawa Prefectural Chubu Hospital

  103. 103.

    Osaka City General Hospital

  104. 104.

    Osaka Saiseikai Nakatsu Hospital

  105. 105.

    Osaka University Hospital

  106. 106.

    Osaki Citizen Hospital

  107. 107.

    Rakuwakai Marutamachi Hospital

  108. 108.

    Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital

  109. 109.

    Saga Prefectural Medical Center Koseikan

  110. 110.

    Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital

  111. 111.

    Saitama Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center

  112. 112.

    Saitama Eastern Cardiovascular Hospital

  113. 113.

    Sakakibara Memorial Hospital

  114. 114.

    Sakurabashi Watanabe Hospital

  115. 115.

    Sapporo Cardiovascular Clinic

  116. 116.

    Sassa General Hospital

  117. 117.

    Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital

  118. 118.

    Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital

  119. 119.

    Sendai City Hospital

  120. 120.

    Sendai Open Hospital

  121. 121.

    Shimada Municipal Hospital

  122. 122.

    Shimane Prefectural Central Hospital

  123. 123.

    Shimane University Hospital

  124. 124.

    Shinbeppu Hospital

  125. 125.

    Shinkawabashi Hospital

  126. 126.

    Shinshu University Hospital

  127. 127.

    Shirane Tokushukai Hospital

  128. 128.

    Shiroyama Hospital

  129. 129.

    Shonai Amarume Hospital

  130. 130.

    Social Insurance Chukyo Hospital

  131. 131.

    St. Marianna University School of Medicine Hospital

  132. 132.

    Steel Memorial Muroran Hospital

  133. 133.

    Surugadai Nihon University Hospital

  134. 134.

    Suzuka Central General Hospital

  135. 135.

    TACHIKAWA Medical Center

  136. 136.

    Tachikawa Sougo Hospital

  137. 137.

    Teikyo University Hospital

  138. 138.

    Teniwa Keijinkai Hospital

  139. 139.

    Tenyokai Chuo Hospital

  140. 140.

    The Cardiovascular Institute

  141. 141.

    The University of Tokyo Hospital

  142. 142.

    Toho University Ohashi Medecal Center

  143. 143.

    Tokushima Prefectural Central Hospital

  144. 144.

    Tokushima University Hospital

  145. 145.

    Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital

  146. 146.

    Tokyo Medical University Hachioji Medical Center

  147. 147.

    Tokyo Medical University Hospital

  148. 148.

    Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital

  149. 149.

    Tokyo Metropolitan Hiroo General Hospital

  150. 150.

    Tokyo Metropolitan Tama Medical Center

  151. 151.

    Toshima Hospital

  152. 152.

    Tottori Prefectural Central Hospital

  153. 153.

    Tottori University Hospital

  154. 154.

    Toyohashi Municipal Hospital

  155. 155.

    Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital

  156. 156.

    University of Tsukuba Hospital

  157. 157.

    Uwajima City Hospital

  158. 158.

    Wakayama Medical University Hospital

  159. 159.

    Yamaguchi Rousai Hospital

  160. 160.

    Yamato Seiwa Hospital

  161. 161.

    Yokohama Asahi Chuo General Hospital

  162. 162.

    Yokohama Central Hospital

  163. 163.

    Yokohama City University Hospital

  164. 164.

    Yokohama City University Medical Hospital

  165. 165.

    Yokohama Sakae Kyosai Hospital

  166. 166.

    Yokohamashintoshi Neurosurgical Hospital

  167. 167.

    Yokosuka Kyosai Hospital

  168. 168.

    Yotsuba Circulation Clinic

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nakamura, M., Yamagishi, M., Ueno, T. et al. Prevalence of visual–functional mismatch regarding coronary artery stenosis in the CVIT-DEFER registry. Cardiovasc Interv and Ther 29, 300–308 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-014-0259-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-014-0259-3

Keywords

Navigation