Skip to main content
Log in

Awareness and interest in biospecimen donation for cancer research: views from gatekeepers and prospective participants in the Latino community

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Community Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Latinos are one of the fastest-growing population groups in the USA, and are underrepresented in scientific research and even more so in genetic research. The disproportionately lower number of certain subpopulations participating in biomedical research has a significant impact on the representativeness of scientific outcomes. We established a collaboration with scientists at a designated National Cancer Institute comprehensive cancer center to test the feasibility of community-based approaches for engaging Latinos in biospecimen donation for cancer genomic research. A methods triangulation approach was applied to gain a deeper understanding from the community, that included key informant interviews with Latino community leaders (N = 6), four focus groups (N = 22) with members of the Latino community, and the use of an audience response system within the focus groups to capture quantitative data. Overall, the majority of participants had never participated in biospecimen donation; however, despite being unaware of the biobank, they expressed willingness to participate as a way to help advance research. Themes included: Confusion on what biospecimen donation process entails; Barriers to and incentives for participation; Strategies and locations for reaching the Latino community. Clear communication of the “public good” as it relates to biospecimen donation by healthy/non-patient participants is a less clearly conceptualized message; yet, the significance of delivering this message is important to gaining participation and increasing the diversity of samples available for cancer genomic studies from a broader community context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beskow LM, Dean E (2008) Informed consent for biorepositories: assessing prospective participants’ understanding and opinions. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17(6):1440–1451

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borkan J (1999) Immersion/crystallization. In: Crabtree BF, Miller WL (eds) Doing qualitative research, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 179–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand AM, Probst-Hensch NM (2007) Biobanking for epidemiological research and public health. Pathobiology 74(4):227–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Erwin DO, Jandorf L, Thelemaque LD, Pulley L, Trevino M, Saad-Harfouche FG, Horowitz C (2012) Esperanza y vida: Familias suludables empiezan con mujeres saludables: hope & life: healthy families begin with healthy women. In: Elk R, Landrine H (eds) Interventions to reduce cancer disparities: research funded by the American cancer society. Spinger Publishing Company, New York, pp 339–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Erwin DO, Johnson VA, Feliciano-Libid L, Zamora D, Jandorf L (2005) Incorporating cultural constructs and demographic diversity in the research and development of a Latina breast and cervical cancer education program. J Cancer Educ 20(1):39–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Erwin DO, Trevino M, Saad-Harfouche FG, Rodriguez EM, Gage E, Jandorf L (2010) Contextualizing diversity and culture within cancer control interventions for Latinas: changing interventions, not cultures. Soc Sci Med 71(4):693–701

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ford BM, Evans JS, Stoffel EM, Balmana J, Regan MM, Syngal S (2006) Factors associated with enrollment in cancer genetics research. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15(7):1355–1359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gamito EJ, Burhansstipanov L, Krebs LU, Bemis L, Bradley A (2005) The use of an electronic audience response system for data collection. J Cancer Educ 20(1 Suppl):80–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman RE, Kingdon C, Wasser J, Clarkt MA, Goldberg R, Papandonatos GD, Koren G (2008) Rhode islanders’ attitudes towards the development of a statewide genetic biobank. Personal Med 5(4):339–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haga SB, Beskow LM (2008) Ethical, legal, and social implications of biobanks for genetics research. Adv Genet 60:505–544

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halverson CM, Ross LF (2012) Engaging African-Americans about biobanks and the return of research results. J Commununity Genet 3(4):275–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jandorf L, Bursac Z, Pulley L, Trevino M, Castillo A, Erwin DO (2008) Breast and cervical cancer screening among Latinas attending culturally specific educational programs. Prog Community Health Partnersh 2(3):195–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jandorf L, Ellison J, Shelton R, Thelemaque L, Castillo A, Mendez EI, Erwin DO (2012) Esperanza y vida: a culturally and linguistically customized breast and cervical education program for diverse Latinas at three different United States sites. J Health Commun 17(2):160–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Katz RV, Wang MQ, Green BL, Kressin NR, Claudio C, Russell SL, Sommervil C (2008) Participation in biomedical research studies and cancer screenings: perceptions of risks to minorities compared with whites. Cancer Control 15(4):344–351

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke AA, Halverson C, Ross LF (2012) Biobank participation and returning research results: perspectives from a deliberative engagement in south side Chicago. Am J Med Genet A 158(5):1029–1037

    Google Scholar 

  • Luque JS, Quinn GP, Montel-Ishino FA, Arevalo M, Bynum SA, Noel-Thomas S, et al., Tampa Bay Community Cancer Network Partners (2011) Formative research on perceptions of biobanking: what community members think. J Cancer Educ 27(1):91–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Meslin EM, Garba I (2011) Biobanking and public health: is a human rights approach the tie that binds? Hum Genet 130(3):451–463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • National Cancer Institute (2010) The nation’s investment in cancer research: an annual plan and budget proposal fiscal year 2011 (no. 10-7545)

  • National Cancer Institute (2011) CNP centers activities. Center to Reduce Health Disparities. http://crchd.cancer.gov/research/cnpc/activities.html. Accessed 4 April 2012

  • Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Saad-Harfouche FG, Jandorf L, Gage E, Thelemaque LD, Colon J, Castillo AG, Erwin DO (2011) Esperanza y vida: training lay health advisors and cancer survivors to promote breast and cervical cancer screening in Latinas. J Community Health 36(2):219–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sudarsan NR, Jandorf L, Erwin DO (2011) Multi-site implementation of health education programs for Latinas. J Community Health 36(2):193–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas GS (2009) Buffalo named third-poorest city in U.S. Business First; September 29th 2009. http://www.bizjournals.com/buffalo/stories/2009/09/28/daily18.html. Accessed 18 April 2013

  • Thomas SB, Quinn SC (2008) Poverty and elimination of urban health disparities. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1136(1):111–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tutton R (2009) Biobanks and the inclusion of racial/ethnic minorities. Race/Ethn: Multidiscip Glob Contexts 3(1):75–95

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Data.Census 2010 demographic profile highlights. http://factfinder.census.gov. Accessed 13 April 2013

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Medically underserved areas and populations (MUA/Ps) (1995) http://bhpr.hrsa.gov/shortage/muaps/. Accessed 09 April 2013

  • Western New York Public Health Alliance (2005) The western New York public health alliance health risk assessment update, 2004–2005. The Public Health Observatory and The Department of Family Medicine, Buffalo

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Jomary Colon and the Latino community partners of Buffalo, NY for their assistance in this research. This study was supported in part by the Western New York Cancer Coalition (WNYC2) Center to Reduce Disparities grant: NIH/NCI/CRCHD U54CA153598-01. The Roswell Park Cancer Institute DataBank and Biorepository is a CCSG Shared Resource supported by P30CA016056-27. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Cancer Institute or the National Institutes of Health. Sections of the manuscript were presented as podium presentations at the following meetings: Cancer, Culture, & Literacy Conference, May 18, 2012, in Clearwater Beach, FL; and at the American Association for Cancer Research Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved, October 27, 2012, in San Diego, CA.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

The research reported in this manuscript was approved by the Roswell Park Cancer Institute Institutional Review Board and is in compliance with the ethical standards and current laws in the USA where all of the research was conducted.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisa Marie Rodriguez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rodriguez, E.M., Torres, E.T. & Erwin, D.O. Awareness and interest in biospecimen donation for cancer research: views from gatekeepers and prospective participants in the Latino community. J Community Genet 4, 461–468 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-013-0152-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-013-0152-2

Keywords

Navigation