Skip to main content
Log in

Biobanking for research: a survey of patient population attitudes and understanding

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Community Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Population-based biobanks are a critical resource for genetic research. It is important to know what potential participants understand about the risks and benefits of providing samples in order to ensure adequate informed consent. Kaiser Permanente Colorado (KPCO) is currently planning a biobank where adult members would be asked to contribute an additional tube of blood during a routine blood draw. Adult KPCO members in clinic waiting rooms were asked to read an informational brochure and informed consent form. Respondents then completed a survey to evaluate their understanding of the materials, willingness to provide a blood sample to a biobank, and facilitators and barriers to participation. Two hundred three members participated in the survey, of whom 69 % indicated willingness to contribute to a biobank. Nearly all understood that they would not be paid for any products resulting from the use of their blood and would not receive results from their samples (91 and 84 %, respectively). Seventy-four percent would donate a sample because, “it is important to contribute to research,” and over half the participants (56 %) said they had no concerns about contributing to a biobank. Of those with concerns, 35 % said information security was a reason. In multivariate models, older age and trust in KPCO were significant predictors of willingness to participate (p = 0.03 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Data from this survey indicate an overall willingness to participate in a biobank, provide possible barriers to participation, and identify ways to improve informational materials to ensure adequate informed consent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison P (1999) Logistic regression using the SAS system, 1st edn. SAS Institute, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick PE, McKenzie KD, Beasley A, Sheehan JD (2009) Patients attending tertiary referral urology clinics: willingness to participate in tissue banking. BJU Int 104:209–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard KA, Smith KS, Chen C, McMullen C, Johnson C (2009) Biobank recruitment: motivations for nonparticipation. Biopreserv Biobank 7:119–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnsson L, Helgesson G, Rafnar T et al (2010) Hypothetical and factual willingness to participate in biobank research. Eur J Hum Genet 18:1261–1264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser J (2002) Biobanks. Population databases boom, from Iceland to the U.S. Science 298:1158–1161

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman D, Murphy J, Scott J, Hudson K (2008) Subjects matter: a survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study. Genet Med 10:831–839

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman DJ, Murphy-Bollinger J, Scott J, Hudson KL (2009) Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research. Am J Hum Genet 85:643–654

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kettis-Lindblad A, Ring L, Viberth E, Hansson MG (2006) Genetic research and donation of tissue samples to biobanks. What do potential sample donors in the Swedish general public think? EurJ Publ Health 16:433–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke AA, Wolf WA, Hebert-Beirne J, Smith ME (2010) Public and biobank participant attitudes toward genetic research participation and data sharing. Publ Health Genomics 13:368–377

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCarty CA, Chapman-Stone D, Derfus T, Giampietro PF, Fost N (2008) Community consultation and communication for a population-based DNA biobank: the Marshfield clinic personalized medicine research project. A J Med Gen A 146A:3026–3033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire AL, Hamilton JA, Lunstroth R, McCullough LB, Goldman A (2008) DNA data sharing: research participants’ perspectives. Genet Med 10:46–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McQuillan GM, Porter KS, Agelli M, Kington R (2003) Consent for genetic research in a general population: the NHANES experience. Genet Med 5:35–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy J, Scott J, Kaufman D et al (2008) Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research. Am J Bioeth 8:36–43

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ormond KE, Cirino AL, Helenowski IB, Chisholm RL, Wolf WA (2009) Assessing the understanding of biobank participants. Am J Med Genet A 149A:188–198

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz MD, Rothenberg K, Joseph L, Benkendorf J, Lerman C (2001) Consent to the use of stored DNA for genetics research: a survey of attitudes in the Jewish population. Am J Med Genet 98:336–342

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simon CM, L’heureux J, Murray JC et al (2011) Active choice but not too active: public perspectives on biobank consent models. Genet Med 13:821–831

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tupasela A, Sihvo S, Snell K et al (2010) Attitudes towards biomedical use of tissue sample collections, consent, and biobanks among Finns. ScandJ Publ Health 38:46–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang SS, Fridinger F, Sheedy KM, Khoury MJ (2001) Public attitudes regarding the donation and storage of blood specimens for genetic research. Community Genet 4:18–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wong ML, Chia KS, Yam WM, Teodoro GR, Lau KW (2004) Willingness to donate blood samples for genetic research: a survey from a community in Singapore. Clin Genet 65:45–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was funded by and conducted through the Center for Excellence in Cancer and Genomics in the Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alanna Kulchak Rahm.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rahm, A.K., Wrenn, M., Carroll, N.M. et al. Biobanking for research: a survey of patient population attitudes and understanding. J Community Genet 4, 445–450 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-013-0146-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-013-0146-0

Keywords

Navigation