Abstract
This study aims to assess quality of life (QoL), functional outcome, and social impact following ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis (UC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) since Indian data is limited. Data was collected prospectively from patients who underwent IPAA for UC or FAP from 2004 to 2013. QoL and functional outcome at 1, 3, and 5 years after surgery, return to work, and change of job (social impact) were documented. QoL was assessed using the validated Cleveland Global Quality of Life (CGQL) score, the normal score being 1.0. Twenty-five patients were analyzed. Mean CGQL scores before surgery and at 1, 3, and 5 years were 0.5, 0.63, 0.73, and 0.8, respectively. FAP patients had better scores at 3 and 5 years. Only 40 % returned to same job. Sixty-four percent returned to work within a year. The median number of bowel movements per 24 h was less for FAP patients at 3 and 5 years. UC patients on long-term steroids had poorer function at 3 years. Long-term QoL and functional outcomes following IPAA are acceptable. Initial deterioration in QoL, mainly in FAP and long-term adverse social impact in both groups should not be underestimated. UC patients on long-term steroids showed delayed improvement in pouch function.
References
Farouk R, Pemberton JH, Wolff BG, et al. Functional outcomes after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis. Ann Surg. 2000;231:919–26.
Pemberton JH, Phillips SF, Ready RR, et al. Quality of life after Brooke ileostomy and ieal pouch anal anastomosis. Ann Surg. 1989;209:620–8.
Marcello PW, Roberts PL, Schoetz DJ, et al. Long-term results of the ileo-anal pouch procedure. Arch Surg. 1993;128:500–4.
Delaney CP, Fazio VW, Remzi FH, et al. Prospective, age-related analysis of surgical results, functional outcome, and quality of life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Ann Surg. 2003;238:221–8.
Sagar PM, Lewis W, Holdsworth PJ, Johnston D, Mitchell C, MacFie J. Quality of life after restorative proctocolectomy with pelvic ileal reservoir compares favorably with that of patients with medically treated colitis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36:584–92.
Fazio VW, O'Riordain MG, Lavery IC, et al. Long-term functional outcome and quality of life after stapled restorative proctocolectomy. Ann Surg. 1999;230:575–86.
Sagar PM, Holdsworth PJ, Johnston D. Correlation between laboratory findings and clinical outcome after restorative proctocolectomy: serial studies in 20 patients with end-to-end pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg. 1991;78:67–70.
Somashekar U, Gupta S, Soin A, Nundy S. Functional outcome and quality of life following restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis in Indians. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2010;25:967–73.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge Dr. V A Iyoob, Associate Professor, Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Medical College, Trivandrum, as some of the cases were operated upon by him.
Conflict of interest
SR, RR, RSS, NB, APK, and NS all declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethics statement
The authors declare that the study was performed in a manner to conform with the Helsinki declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 and 2008 concerning human and animal rights, and the authors followed the policy concerning informed consent as shown on Springer.com.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Raviram, S., Rajan, R., Sindhu, R.S. et al. Quality of life, social impact and functional outcome following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Indian J Gastroenterol 34, 252–255 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-015-0560-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-015-0560-9