Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Mediator Model of Sunscreen Use: A Longitudinal Analysis of Social-Cognitive Predictors and Mediators

  • Published:
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Sun safety behaviors to prevent skin cancer, such as sunscreen use, are difficult to adopt and maintain.

Purpose

Most social-cognitive theories assume that the intention to change a behavior is the best predictor of actual change. But unforeseen barriers emerge, or people give in to temptations, such as getting a tan despite their initial good intentions. The Health Action Process Approach proposed by Schwarzer (Appl Psychol 57:1–29, 1) is used to explore the self-regulatory mechanisms of sunscreen use.

Method

An international longitudinal survey was conducted with 524 individuals. Intentions, positive outcome expectancies, distal self-efficacy, and risk perception were assessed at time 1, whereas intention, planning, and proximal self-efficacy were measured 2 weeks later at time 2. Sunscreen use was reported at 3-month follow-up (time 3).

Results

A structural equation model fit the data well. Positive outcome expectancies, risk perception, and self-efficacy predicted the behavioral intention. Self-efficacy and planning predicted sunscreen use, and planning mediated the relation between intended and performed sunscreen use.

Conclusion

The findings contribute to the understanding of psychological mechanisms in health behavior change. They also point to the particular role of mediator variables in the context of sun protection behaviors, which may have implications for designing skin cancer preventive interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schwarzer R. Modeling health behavior change: how to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Appl Psychol. 2008;57:1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lens MB, Dawes M. Global perspectives of contemporary epidemiological trends of cutaneous malignant melanoma. Br J Dermatol. 2004;150:179–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Abdulla FR, Feldman SR, Williford PM, Krowchuck D, Kaur M. Tanning and skin cancer. Ped Dermatol. 2005;22:501–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gonzalez S, Fernandez-Lorente M, Gilaberte-Calzada Y. The latest on skin protection. Clin Dermatol. 2008;26:614–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Green AC, Williams GM. Point: sunscreen use is a safe and effective approach to skin cancer prevention. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2007;16:1921–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. World Health Organization. Sun protection. Simple precautions in the sun. 2010. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/uv/sun_protection/en/.

  7. Saraiya M, Glanz K, Briss P, Nichols P, White C, Das D, et al. Interventions to prevent skin cancer by reducing exposure to ultraviolet radiation. A systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2004;27:422–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kasparian NA, McLoone JK, Meiser B. Skin cancer-related prevention and screening behaviors: a review of the literature. J Behav Med. 2009;32:406–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. De Vries H, Willems K, Mesters I, Reubsaet A. Skin cancer prevention behaviors during summer holidays in 14- and 18-year-old Belgian adolescents. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2006;15:431–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lippke S, Ziegelmann JP. Theory-based health behavior change: developing, testing and applying theories for evidence-based interventions. Appl Psychol Int Rev. 2008;57:698–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Abraham C, Sheeran P. Understanding and changing health behavior: from health beliefs to self-regulation. In: Norman P, Abraham C, Conner M, editors. Understanding and changing health behavior. Amsterdam: Harwood; 2000. p. 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Orbell S, Sheeran P. “Inclined abstainers”: a problem for predicting health-related behaviour. Br J Soc Psychol. 1998;37:151–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Luszczynska A, Schwarzer R, Lippke S, Mazurkiewicz M. Self-efficacy as a moderator of the planning–behaviour relationship in interventions designed to promote physical activity. Psychol Health. 2011;26:151–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Scholz U, Schüz B, Ziegelmann JP, Lippke S, Schwarzer R. Beyond behavioural intentions: planning mediates between intentions and physical activity. Br J Health Psychol. 2008;13:479–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gollwitzer PM, Sheeran P. Implementation intentions and goal achievement: a meta-analysis of effects and processes. Adv Exp Soc Psychol. 2006;38:69–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chapman J, Armitage CJ, Norman P. Comparing implementation intention interventions in relation to young adults’ intake of fruit and vegetables. Psychol Health. 2009;24:317–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Luszczynska A. Effects of an implementation intention intervention on physical activity after MI are mediated by cognitive processes, change in forming action plans. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62:900–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wiedemann A, Lippke S, Reuter T, Ziegelmann JP, Schüz B. The more the better? The number of plans predicts health behaviour change. App Psychol Health Well Being. 2011;3:87–106. doi:10.1111/j.1758-0854.2010.01042.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gutiérrez-Doña B, Lippke S, Renner B, Kwon S, Schwarzer R. How self-efficacy and planning predict dietary behaviors in Costa Rican and South Korean women: a moderated mediation analysis. App Psychol Health Well Being. 2009;1:91–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Luszczynska A, Cao DS, Mallach N, Pietron K, Mazurkiewicz M, Schwarzer R. Intentions, planning, and self-efficacy predict physical activity in Chinese and Polish adolescents: two moderated mediation analyses. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2010;10:265–78.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Renner B, Kwon S, Yang BH, Paik KC, Kim SH, Roh S, et al. Social-cognitive predictors of dietary behaviors in South Korean men and women. Int J Behav Med. 2008;15:4–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ziegelmann JP, Lippke S. Planning and strategy use in health behavior change: a life-span view. Int J Behav Med. 2007;14:30–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jackson KM, Aiken LS. A psychological model of sun protection and sunbathing in young women: the impact of health beliefs, attitudes, norms, and self efficacy for sun protection. Health Psychol. 2000;19:469–78.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Turrisi R, Hillhouse J, Gebert C, Grimes J. Examination of cognitive variables relevant to sunscreen use. J Beh Med. 1999;22:493–509.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bränström R, Ullen H, Brandberg Y. Attitudes, subjective norms and perception of behavioral control as predictors of sun related behavior in Swedish adults. Prev Med. 2004;39:992–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. De Vries H, Lezwijn J, Hol M, Honing C. Skin cancer prevention: behaviour and motives of Dutch adolescents. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2005;14:39–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mahler HIM, Fitzpatrick B, Parker P, Lapin A. The relative effects of a health-based versus an appearance-based intervention designed to increase sunscreen use. Am J Health Promotion. 1997;11:426–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Myers LB, Horswill MS. Social cognitive predictors of sun protection intention and behavior. Behav Med. 2006;32:57–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Eid M. Sun exposure and skin cancer prevention. In: Smelser NJ, Baltes PB, editors. International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2001. p. 15278–81.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Paul C, Tzelepis F, Parffit N, Girgis A. How to improve adolescents’ sun protection behaviour? Age and gender issues. Am J Health Behav. 2008;32:387–98.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Jones F, Abraham C, Harris P, Schulz J, Chrispin C. Modeling the cognitive prerequisites of sunscreen use in Australian and UK samples. Psychol Health. 2001;16:191–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Van Osch L, Reubsaet A, Lechner L, Candel M, Mercken L, De Vries H. Predicting parental sunscreen use: disentangling the role of action planning in the behavior–intention relationship. Psychol Health. 2007;23:1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Carmel S, Shani E, Rosenberg L. The role of age and an expended health belief model in predicting skin cancer protective behaviour. Health Edu Research. 1994;9:433–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Grunfeld EA. What influences university students intentions to practice safe sun exposure behaviors? J Adolesc Health. 2004;35:486–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mcclendon BT, Prentice-Dunn S. Reducing skin cancer risk: an intervention based on protection motivation theory. J Health Psychol. 2001;6:321–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kristjansoon S, Bränström R, Ullen H, Helgason AR. Transtheoretical model: the investigation of adolescents’ sunbathing behavior. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2003;12:501–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Graham JW. Missing data analysis: making it work in the real world. Ann Rev Psychol. 2009;60:549–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Pagoto S, McChargue D, Fuqua RW. Effects of a multicomponent intervention on motivation and sun protection behaviors among Midwestern beachgoers. Health Psychol. 2003;22:429–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Prentice-Dunn S, McMath BF, Cramer RJ. Protection motivation theory and stages of change in sun protection behavior. J Health Psychol. 2009;14:297–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Craciun C, Schüz N, Lippke S, Schwarzer R. Risk perception moderates how intentions are translated into sunscreen use. J Behav Med. 2010;33:392–8. doi:10.1007/s10865-010-9269-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Dwyer T, Blizzard L, Gies PH, Ashbolt R, Roy C. Assessment of habitual sun exposure in adolescents via questionnaire—a comparison with objective measurement using polysulphone badges. Melanoma Res. 1996;6:231–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Shoveller JA, Lovato CY, Young RA, Moffat B. Exploring the development of sun-tanning behavior: a grounded theory study of adolescents’ decision-making experiences with becoming a sun tanner. Int J Behav Med. 2003;10:299–314.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Cook C, Heath F, Thompson RL. A meta-analysis of response rates in web- or internet-based surveys. Edu Psychol Measurement. 2000;60:821–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catrinel Craciun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Craciun, C., Schüz, N., Lippke, S. et al. A Mediator Model of Sunscreen Use: A Longitudinal Analysis of Social-Cognitive Predictors and Mediators. Int.J. Behav. Med. 19, 65–72 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-011-9153-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-011-9153-x

Keywords

Navigation