Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Social Support and Optimism in Relation to the Oral Health of Young Adults

  • Published:
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Psychosocial factors largely external to the individual—such as social support and those that are inherently dispositional, like optimism—may both play a role in determining oral health outcomes and serve to buffer the effect of each other.

Purpose

The aim of this study was to assess associations of social support and optimism on oral health.

Method

In 2005–2006, n = 1,859 persons around 30 years old were surveyed to collect data on social support, optimism, oral health-related quality of life, and caries experience.

Results

Unadjusted analyses found high social support associated (P < 0.05) with fewer (mean ± SE) decayed teeth (0.6 ± 0.1) and less negative impact on quality of life (2.7 ± 0.2) compared to low support (1.0 ± 0.2 and 4.5 ± 0.4 respectively). High optimism was associated with fewer missing teeth (2.1 ± 0.2) and less negative impact on quality of life (2.1 ± 0.2) compared to low optimism (2.9 ± 0.2 and 3.8 ± 0.2, respectively). Multivariate regressions adjusted for dental visiting, toothbrushing, sex, income, work status and education showed social support and optimism had (P < 0.05) negative associations with missing teeth (β = −1.0) and caries experience (β = −1.5) for high support/high optimism compared to low support/low optimism. All three non-reference combinations of support/optimism showed negative associations (β = −1.6 to −2.4) with impact of problems compared to low support/low optimism.

Conclusions

Social support and optimism were associated with oral health. Impact of dental problems showed buffering of high support when optimism was low, and high optimism when support was low.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dahlem NW, Zimet GD, Walker RR. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support: a confirmation study. J Clin Psychol. 1991;47:756–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ylostalo PV, Ek E, Laitinen J, Knuuttila ML. Optimism and life satisfaction as determinants for dental and general health behaviour—oral health habits linked to cardiovascular risk factors. J Dent Res. 2003;82:194–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaplan RM, Sallis JF, Patterson TL. Health and human behaviour. Singapore: McGraw-Hill; 1993. Chapter 7.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hanson BS, Liedberg B, Owall B. Social network, social support and dental status in elderly Swedish men. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1994;22:331–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ylostalo PV, Knuuttila MLE. Coping and optimism in relation to dental health behaviour—a study among finnish young adults. Eur J Oral Sci. 2003;111:477–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Berkman LF, Glass T. Social integration, social networks, social support, and health. In: Berkman LF, Kawachi I, editors. Social epidemiology. (chapter 7). NY: Oxford University Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Scheier MF, Carver CS. Optimism, coping and health: assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychol. 1985;4:219–47.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Newton JT, Bower EJ. The social determinants of oral health: new approaches to conceptualising and researching complex causal networks. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2005;33:25–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Young C. Are young people leaving home earlier or later? J Aust Popul Assoc. 1996;13:125–52.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Roberts-Thomson KF, Stewart JF. Access to dental care by young South Australian adults. Aust Dent J. 2003;48:169–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dillman DA. Mail and telephone surveys. The total design method. NY: Wiley; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  12. NIDR. Oral health surveys of the National Institute of Dental Research. Diagnostic criteria and procedures. Washington: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Slade GD. Derivation and validation of a short-form oral health impact profile. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1997;25:284–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fleiss JL. The design and analysis of clinical experiments. NY: Wiley; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mangione TW. Mail surveys. Improving the quality. CA: Sage; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yammarino FJ, Skinner SJ, Childers TL. Understanding mail survey response behaviour. A meta-analysis. Public Opin Q. 1991;55:613–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Asch DA, Jedrziewski MK, Christakis NA. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:1129–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Allister JH, Spencer AJ, Brennan DS. Provision of orthodontic care to adolescents in South Australia: the type, the provider and place of treatment. Aust Dent J. 1996;41:405–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Topping G, Assaf A. Strong evidence that daily use of fluoride toothpaste prevents caries. Evid Based Dent. 2005;6:32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Slade GD, Spencer AJ, Roberts-Thomson KF. Australia’s dental generations. The national survey of adult oral health 2004–06. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Watson D, Pennebaker JK. Health complaints, stress, and distress: exploring the central role of negative affectivity. Psychol Rev. 1989;96:234–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kressin NR, Spiro 3rd A, Skinner KM. Negative affectivity and health-related quality of life. Med Care. 2000;38:858–67.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kressin NR, Reisine S, Spiro 3rd A, Jones JA. Is negative affectivity associated with oral quality of life? Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2001;29:412–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Brennan DS, Singh KA, Spencer AJ, Roberts-Thomson KF. Positive and negative affect and oral health related quality of life. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4:83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by a Research and Development Grants Advisory Committee grant, the South Australian Dental Service, and South Australian Health Commission in 1988–1989; and a National Health and Medical Research Council project grant (299057) in 2005–2006 and Career Development Award (627037).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Simon Brennan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brennan, D.S., Spencer, A.J. Social Support and Optimism in Relation to the Oral Health of Young Adults. Int.J. Behav. Med. 19, 56–64 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-010-9136-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-010-9136-3

Keywords

Navigation