Skip to main content
Log in

The Body Image Avoidance Questionnaire: Assessment of its Construct Validity in a Community Sample of French Adolescents

  • Published:
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Among the few instruments used to measure the behavioral component of body image disturbances, the Body Image Avoidance Questionnaire (BIAQ) is the most widely used. Despite the wide utilization of this instrument, it is currently unknown whether it is appropriate for male and female adolescents from middle and junior high schools.

Purpose

The main objective of the present series of studies was to test the construct validity of the BIAQ in a community sample of French adolescents.

Method

The content, factor, and convergent validity of the BIAQ were verified in the context of four independent studies conducted on a total sample of 945 adolescents.

Results

The first study showed that the content and formulation of the French BIAQ items were adequate for children and adolescents. The following three studies provided support for the factor validity, measurement invariance (across sex), reliability, and convergent validity of the French BIAQ. Regarding the measurement invariance tests, the results revealed that the models were invariant up to the levels of the latent means structures. Post hoc probing of these differences showed a significant higher latent mean score of the global BIAQ scale in females (in samples 2 and 3).

Discussion

The present results provide preliminary evidence regarding the construct validity of the BIAQ in a community sample of French adolescents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ricciardelli LA, McCabe MP. Children’s body image concerns and eating disturbance: a review of the literature. Clin Psychol Rev. 2001;21:325–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Smolak L. Body image in children and adolescents: where do we go from here? Body Image. 2004;1:15–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Banfield SS, McCabe MP. An evaluation of the construct of body image. Adolescence. 2002;37:373–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jarry KL, Ip K. The effectiveness of stand-alone cognitive–behavioural therapy for body image: a meta-analysis. Body Image. 2005;2:317–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vocks S, Legenbauer T, Rüddel H, Troje NF. Static and dynamic body image in bulimia nervosa: mental representation of body dimensions and biological motion patterns. Int J Eat Disord. 2007;40:59–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Slade PD. What is body image? Behav Res Ther. 1994;32:497–502.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cash TE, Green GK. Body weight and body image among college women: perception, cognition, and affect. J Pers Assess. 1986;50:290–301.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cash TE, Henry PE. Women’s body images: the results of a national survey in the USA. Sex Roles. 1995;33:19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosen JC, Srebnik D, Saltzberg E, Wendt S. Development of a body image avoidance questionnaire. Psychol Assess. 1991;3:32–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosen JC. Body image disorder: Definition, development, and contribution to eating disorders. In: Crowther JH, Tennenbaum DL, Hobfoll SE, Parris-Stephens MA, editors. The etiology of bulimia nervosa: The individual and familial context. Washington, DC: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation; 1992. p. 157–77.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tissot AM, Crowther JH. Self-oriented and socially prescribed perfectionism: risk factors within an integrative model for bulimic symptomatology. J Soc Clin Psychol. 2008;27:734–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fairburn CG, Cooper Z, Shafran R. Cognitive behaviour therapy for eating disorders: a “transdiagnostic” theory and treatment. Behav Res Ther. 2003;41:509–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Thompson JK, Heinberg L, Marshall K. The physical appearance behavior test (PA-BAT): preliminary findings. Behav Ther. 1994;17:9–10.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Reas DL, Whisenhunt BL, Netemeyer R, Williamson DA. Development of the body checking questionnaire: a self-report measure of body checking behaviors. Int J Eat Disord. 2002;31:324–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shafran R, Fairburn C, Robinson P, Lask B. Body checking and its avoidance in eating disorders. Int J Eat Disord. 2004;35:93–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Riva G, Molinari E. Replicated factor analysis of the Italian version of the body image avoidance questionnaire. Percept Mot Skills. 1998;86:1071–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Legenbauer T, Vocks S, Schütt-Strömel S. Validierung einer deutschsprachigen Version des Body Image Avoidance Questionnaire BIAQ. Diagnostica. 2007;53:218–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Byrne BM. Factor analytic models: viewing the structure of an assessment instrument from three perspectives. J Pers Assess. 2005;85:17–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stice E. Risk and maintenance factors for eating pathology: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull. 2002;128:825–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Thompson AM, Chad KE. The relationship of social physique anxiety to risk for developing an eating disorder in young females. J Adolesc Health. 2002;31:183–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tiggemann M. Body dissatisfaction and adolescent self-esteem: prospective findings. Body Image. 2005;2:129–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cole TJ, Bellizzi M, Flegal K, Dietz W. Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. Br Med J. 2000;320:1240–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Cole TJ, Flegal K, Nicholls D, Jackson A. Body mass index cut offs to define thinness in children and adolescents: international survey. Br Med J. 2007;335:194–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Garner DM, Olmstead MP, Bohr Y, Garfinkel PE. The Eating Attitude Test: psychometric features and clinical correlates. Psychol Med. 1982;12:871–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rosenberg M. Society and the adolescent self-image. New Jersey, NJ: Princeton University; 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hart EH, Leary MR, Rejeski WJ. The measurement of social physique anxiété. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 1989;11:94–104.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cole TJ. A method for assessing age-standardized weight-for-height in children seen cross-sectionally. Ann Hum Biol. 1979;6:249–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Brislin RW. The wording of translation of research instruments. In: Triandis HC, Berry LW, editors. Files methods in cross-cultural research. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon; 1986. p. 137–64.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Van de Vrijver FJR, Hambleton RK. Translating tests: some practical guidelines. Eur Psychol. 1996;1:89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Leichner P, Steiger H, Puentes-Neuman G, Perreault M, Gottheil N. Validation d’une échelle d’attitudes alimentaires auprès d’une population québécoise francophone. Revue Canadienne de Psychiatrie. 1994;39:49–54.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Vallières EF, Vallerand RJ. Traduction et validation canadienne-francaise de l’échelle de l’estime de soi de Rosenberg. Int J Psychol. 1990;25:305–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Vallerand RJ. Vers une méthodologie de validation transculturelle de questionnaires psychologiques : implications pour la recherche en langue française. Can Psychol. 1989;4:662–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Arbuckle J, Wothke W. AMOS 4.0 User’s Guide. Chicago, IL: Smallwaters; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Chen FF, Sousa KH, West SG. Testing measurement invariance of second-order factor models. Struct Equ Modeling. 2005;12:471–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hu L-T, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999;6:1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Vandenberg RJ, Lance CE. A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organ Res Methods. 2000;3:4–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. MacCallum RC, Browne MW, Sugawara HM. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychol Methods. 1996;1:130–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen FF. Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Struct Equ Modeling. 2007;14:464–504.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Cheung GW, Rensvold RB. Evaluating goodness-of fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Struct Equ Modeling. 2002;9:233–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Bagozzi RP, Kimmel SK. A comparison of leading theories for the prediction of goal directed behaviours. Br J Soc Psychol. 1995;34:437–61.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Meredith W, Teresi JA. An essay on measurement and factorial invariance. Med Care. 2006;44:S69–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Streiner DL. Starting at the beginning: an introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. J Pers Assess. 2003;80:99–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Benjet C, Hernández-Guzmán L. A short-term longitudinal study of pubertal change, gender, and psychological well-being of Mexican earl adolescents. J Youth Adolesc. 2002;31:429–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Collège Capron, Lycée Amiral de Grasse, Collège Jules Romains, Lycée Thierry Maulnier, Collège Roustan, Lycée Professionnel Magnan, Lycée Professionnel des Eucalyptus, Collège Fersen, Lycée Professionnel Benjamin Morel, Collège la Sine, Collège Louis Nucéra, and Lycée du Parc Impérial for their invaluable assistance in data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christophe Maïano.

Additional information

Since both contributed equally to the preparation of this paper, the order of appearance of the first and second authors (Christophe Maïano and Alexandre J.S. Morin) was determined at random: both should be considered first authors. This manuscript was prepared while Alexandre J.S. Morin was a visiting scholar at the University of Aix-Marseille II.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maïano, C., Morin, A.J.S., Monthuy-Blanc, J. et al. The Body Image Avoidance Questionnaire: Assessment of its Construct Validity in a Community Sample of French Adolescents. Int.J. Behav. Med. 16, 125–135 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-009-9035-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-009-9035-7

Keywords

Navigation