Skip to main content
Log in

Maternal mental health in families of children with spina bifida

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to compare mental health of mothers of children with spina bifida with mothers of able-bodied controls.

Methods

Eighty-one mothers of children with spina bifida aged 1–18 years completed the General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12) and Parenting Stress Index Short Form (PSI/SF). The controls were 69 mothers of children with acute, non-disabling illnesses. Each child’s adaptive skills were assessed using the Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scales (VABS). Logistic regression analysis was used to determine factors related to a high GHQ score (≥3) in all patients.

Results

Compared to the controls, mothers of children with spina bifida had lower educational levels and were more likely to be the main caregivers and not working. Nineteen (23.5%) of them had a high GHQ score compared to 5 (7.2%) of the controls. They also had significantly higher scores for total PSI/SF and the parent domain, difficult child (DC) and parent-child dysfunctional interaction subscales. Children with spina bifida had lower scores for the composite VABS and communication, socialization, daily living skills and motor sub-domain than the controls. Spina bifida (odds ratio [OR] 4.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.30–14.23), higher DC scores (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.00–1.16), and higher life stress scores (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.01–1.71) were associated with a high GHQ score.

Conclusion

Spina bifida, recent stressful life change events and maternal perception of a child as ‘difficult’ are associated with poor maternal psychological health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ong LC, Lim YN, Sofiah A. Malaysian children with spina bifida: relationship between functional outcome and level of lesion. Singapore Med J 2002;43:12–17.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vermaes IP, Janssens JM, Bosman AM, Gerris JR. Parents’ psychological adjustment in families of children with spina bifida: a meta-analysis. BMC Pediatrics 2005;5:32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Holmbeck GN, Greenley RN, Coakley RM, Greco J, Hagstrom J. Family functioning in children and adolescents with spina bifida: an evidence-based review of research and interventions. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2006;27:249–277.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Goldberg D, Williams P. A user’s guide to the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor: NFER-Nelson Publishing Co. Ltd, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Abidin RR. Parenting stress Index/Short Form. New York: Psychological Assessment Resources Inc., 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Maniam T, Ding LM, Lim TO, Toh CL, Aziz A, Sararak S, et al. Psychiatric morbidity in adults. In: National Health and Morbidity Survey. Kuala Lumpur: Public Health Institute, Ministry of Health Malaysia, 1999: Vol. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sparrow SS, Balla DA, Cichetti DV. Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales. Interview Edition — Survey Form Manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Holmbeck GN, Gorey-Ferguson L, Hudson T, Seefeldt T, Shapera W, Turner T, et al. Maternal, paternal and marital functioning in families of preadolescents with spina bifida. J Pediatr Psychol 1997;22:167–181.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dorner S. The relationship of physical handicap to stress in families with an adolescent with spina bifida. Dev Med Child Neurol 1975;17:765–776.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wiegner S, Donders J. Predictors of parental distress after congenital disabilities. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2000;21:271–277.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Grosse SD, Flores AL, Ouyang L, Robbins JM, Tilford JM. Impact of spina bifida on parental caregivers: findings from a survey of Arkansas families. J Fam Child Stud 2009;18:574–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kronenberger WG, Thompson RJ Jr. Medical stress, appraised stress, and the psychological adjustment of mothers of children with myelomeningocele. J Dev Behav Pediatr 1992;13:405–411.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fagan J, Schor D. Mothers of children with spina bifida: factors related to maternal psychosocial functioning. Am J Orthopsychiatry 1993;63:146–152.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lemanek KL, Jones ML, Liebermann B. Mothers of children with spina bifida: adaptational and stress processing. Child Health Care 2000;29:19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tew B, Laurence KM. Some sources of stress found in mothers of spina bifida children. Br J Prev Soc Med 1975;29:27–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. King G, King S, Rosenbaum P, Goffin R. Family-centered caregiving and well-being of parents of children with disabilities: linking process with outcome. J Pediatr Psychol 1999;24:41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Barakat LP, Linney JA. Optimism, appraisals, and coping in the adjustment of mothers and their children with spina bifida. J Child Fam Stud 1995;4:303–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shehu BB, Ameh EA, Ismail NJ. Spina bifida cystica: selective management in Zaria, Nigeria. Ann Trop Paediatr 2000;20:239–242.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Friedman D, Holmbeck GN, Jandasek B, Zukerman J, Abad M. Parent functioning in families with preadolescents with spina bifida. J Family Psychol 2004;18:609–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lai Choo Ong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ong, L.C., Norshireen, N.A.R. & Chandran, V. Maternal mental health in families of children with spina bifida. World J Pediatr 7, 54–59 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12519-011-0246-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12519-011-0246-z

Key words

Navigation