Top

Tijdschrift voor Psychotherapie

Gepubliceerd in:

01-01-2015 | Artikelen

Het geheim van de smid

Visie van de behandelaar in de ggz op werkzame factoren in therapie

Auteurs: Yael Meijer, Else de Haan

Gepubliceerd in: Tijdschrift voor Psychotherapie | Uitgave 1/2015

Samenvatting

De discussie over de werkzame factoren van een behandeling is binnen wetenschap en maatschappij niet nieuw. Opvallend is echter, dat de behandelaar zelf nauwelijks in deze discussie betrokken wordt, terwijl deze juist degene is die invloed heeft op diverse werkzame factoren. Dit onderzoek richt zich op behandelaren en hun visie op de werkzame factoren binnen de eigen behandelingen. Er namen meer dan driehonderd behandelaren deel aan het onderzoek. Bekeken werd wat hun visie was, of zij handelden naar hun visie en of achtergrondkenmerken van invloed waren op deze visie. Tot slot werd er gekeken in welke mate de visie van de behandelaren over werkzame factoren overeenkomt met de bevindingen van wetenschappelijk onderzoek. Uit de resultaten blijkt dat behandelaren de behandelrelatie als meest belangrijke werkzame factor beoordelen. Effectmeting, een belangrijk aspect van Routine Outcome Monitoring, wordt nauwelijks genoemd. Er blijkt weinig verschil in visie tussen behandelaren en deze komt grotendeels overeen met de huidige stand van zaken binnen de wetenschap. De kloof is echter nog niet geheel gedicht. Behandelaren blijken de waarde van metingen (en het effect ervan op de behandeluitkomst) onvoldoende te onderkennen. Op dat vlak valt nog een wereld te winnen.

vorige artikel Waarom duurt burn-out zo lang?

volgende artikel Schaamte in groepstherapie

Nederlands Instituut voor Psychologie, Vereniging voor Gedragstherapie en Cognitieve therapie, Nederlands Psychoanalytisch Genootschap

Meta-analyses zijn opgenomen in de literatuurlijst.

Ahn, H. & Wampold, B.E. (2001). Where oh where are the specific ingredients? A meta analysis of component studies in counseling and psychotherapy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 251–257.CrossRef

Barak, M.E.M., Travis, D.J., Pyun, H. & Xie, B. (2009). The impact of supervision on worker outcomes. Social Service Review, 83, 3–32.CrossRef

Bohart, A.C., Elliot, R., Greenberg, L.S. & Watson, J.C. (2002). Empathy. In J.C. Norcross (Ed.), Psychotherapy relatonships that work: therapist contributions and responsiveness to patients (pp. 89–108). New York: Oxford University Press.

Butler, A.C., Chapman, J.E., Forman, E.M. & Beck, A.T. (2004). The empirical status of cognitive-behavioral therapy: A review of meta-analyses. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 43, 930–959.CrossRef

Cella, M., Stahl, D., Reme, S.E. & Chalder, T. (2011). Therapist effects in routine psychotherapy practice: an account from chronic fatigue syndrome. Psychotherapy Research, 21, 168–78.PubMedCrossRef

Colijn, S., Snijders, H. & Trijsburg, W. (2009). Universele Therapiefactoren. In S. Colijn, H. Snijders, M. Thunnissen, S. Bögels &, W. Trijsburg (red.), Leerboek psychotherapie (pp. 160–168). Utrecht: de Tijdstroom.

Crits-Christoph, P., Baranackie, K., Kurcias, J., Beck, A., Carroll, K., Perry, K., Luborsky, L., McLellan, A., Woody, G., Thompson, L., Gallagher, D. & Zitrine, C. (1991). Meta analysis of therapist effects in psychotherapy outcome studies. Psychotherapy Research, 1, 81–91.CrossRef

Diener, M.J., Hilsenroth, M.J. & Wienberger, J. (2007). Therapist affect focus and patient outcomes in psychodynamic psychotherapy: a meta-analysis. American Journal of Psychiatry, 164, 936–941.PubMedCrossRef

Duncan, B.L., Miller, S.D., Wampold, B.E. & Hubble, M.A. (2010). The heart and soul of change (2nd ed.). Washington DC: APA.

Elliot, R., Bohart, A.C., Watson, J.C. & Greenberg, L.S. (2011). Empathy. Psychotherapy, 48, 43–49.CrossRef

Farber, B.A. & Doolin, E.M. (2011). Positive regard. Psychotherapy, 48, 58–64.PubMedCrossRef

Field, A (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3d ed). Londen: Sage.

Flückiger, C., Del Re, A.C., Wampold, B.E., Symonds, D. & Horvath, A.O. (2012). How central is the alliance in psychotherapy? A multilevel longitudinal meta-analysis. Journal of Conseling Psychology, 59, 10–17.CrossRef

Freitas, G.J. (2002). The impact of psychotherapy supervison on client outcome: a critical examination of 2 decades of research. Psychotherapy, 39, 354–367.CrossRef

Ghose, T. (2008). Organizational- and individual-level correlates of posttreatment substance use: a multilevel analysis. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 34, 249–262.PubMedCrossRef

Glass, C.R., Arnkoff, D.B. & Shapiro, S.J. (2001). Expectations and preferences. Psychotherapy: theory, research, practice, training, 38, 455–461.CrossRef

Greenberg, L.S., Watson, J.C., Elliot, R. & Bohart, A.C. (2001). Empathy. Psychotherapy, 38, 380–384.CrossRef

Griner, D. & Smith, T.B. (2006). Culturally adapted mental health intervention: a meta-analytic review. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 43, 531–548.CrossRef

Hofmann, S.G., Sawyer, A.T., Witt, A.A. & Oh, D. (2010). The effect of mindfulness-based therapy on anxiety and depression: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78, 169–183.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Huey, S.J. Jr. & Polo, A.J. (2008). Evidence-based psychosocial treatments for ethnic minority youth. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 37, 262–301.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Jong, K. de (2012). De rol van de behandelaar: de ‘vergeten’ factor in ROM. Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie, 54, 197–200.PubMed

Karver, M.S., Handelsman, J.B., Fields, S. & Bickman, L. (2006). Meta-analysis of therapeutic relationship variables in youth and family therapy: The evidence for different relationship variables in the child and adolescent treatment outcome literature. Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 50–65.PubMedCrossRef

Knaup, C., Koesters, M., Schoefer, D., Becker, T. & Puschner, B. (2009). Effect of feedback of treatment outcome in specialist mental healthcare: meta-analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 195, 15–22.PubMedCrossRef

Lambert, M.J. (2010). Yes, it is time for clinicians to routinely monitor treatment outcome. In B.L. Duncan, S.D. Miller, B.E. Wampold &, M.A. Hubble (Eds.), The heart and soul of change (pp. 239-267) (2nd ed). Washington DC: APA.

Lambert, M.J. & Hawkins, E.J. (2004). Measuring Outcome in professional practice: considerations in selecting and using brief outcome instruments. Research and Practice, 35, 492–499.

Lambert, M.J. & Shimokawa, K. (2011). Collecting client feedback. Psychotherapy, 48, 72–79.PubMedCrossRef

Leichsenring F., Rabung, S. & Leibing, E. (2004). The efficacy of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy in specific psychiatric disorders. A meta-analysis. Archive of General Psychiatry, 61, 1208–1216.CrossRef

Linden, D. van der & Graag, I. de (2010). State of the art. Bekendheid met en gebruik van evidence based interventies in de jeugd-ggz. Utrecht: Trimbos-instituut.

Maramba, G.G., Nagayama, H. & Gordon, C. (2002). Meta-analyses of ethnic match as a predictor of dropout, utilization, and level of functioning. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 8, 290–297.PubMedCrossRef

Martin, D.J., Garske, J.P. & Davis, M.K. (2000). Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 438–450.PubMedCrossRef

McLeod, B.D. (2011). Research highlights relation of the alliance with outcomes in youth psychotherapy: a meta-analysis review article. Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 603–616.PubMedCrossRef

Messer, S.B. & Wampold, B.E. (2006). Let’s face facts: common factors are more potent than specific therapy ingredients. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9, 21–25.

Munder, T., Flückiger, C., Gerger, H., Wampold, B.E. & Barth, J. (2012). Is the allegiance effect an epiphenomenon of true efficacy differences between treatments? A meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 59, 631–637.PubMedCrossRef

Norcross, J. (2002). Psychotherapy relationships that work: therapist contributions and responsiveness to patient needs. New York: Oxford University Press.

Norcross, J. & Wampold, B.E. (2011). Evidence-based therapy relationships: research conclusions and clinical practices. Psychotherapy, 48, 98–102.PubMedCrossRef

Pijnenburg, H. (2010). Werkzame factoren in de zorg voor jeugd. In H. Pijnenburg, J. Hermanns, T. van Yperen &, G. Hutschemaekers (red.), Zorgen dat het werkt (pp. 11–54). Amsterdam: SWP.

Schmidt, F., Chomyez, S., Houlding, C., Kruse, A. & Franks, J. (2014). The association between therapeutic alliance and treatment outcomes in a group Triple P intervention. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23, 1337–1350.CrossRef

Sexton, T.L., Ridley, C.R. & Kleiner, A.J. (2004). Beyond common factors. Multilevel process models of therapeutic change. Journal of Marriage and Family Therapy, 30, 131–149.CrossRef

Shimokawa, K., Lambert, M.J. & Smart, D.W. (2010). Enhancing treatment outcome of patients at risk of treatment failure: Meta-analytic and mega-analytic review of a psychotherapy quality assurance system. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78, 298–311.PubMedCrossRef

Shin, S., Chow, C., Camacho-Gonsalves, T., Levy, R.J., Allen, I.E. & Leff, H.S. (2005). A meta-analytic review of racial-ethnic matching for african american and caucasian american clients and clinicians. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 45–56.CrossRef

Shirk, S.R. & Karver, M. (2003). Prediction of treatment outcome from relationship variables in child and adolescent therapy: a meta-analytic. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 452–464.PubMedCrossRef

Shirk, S.R., Karver, M.S. & Brown, R. (2011). The alliance in child and adolescent psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 48, 17–24.PubMedCrossRef

Sprenkle, D.H. & Blow, A.J. (2004). Common factors and our sacred models. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 30, 113–129.PubMedCrossRef

Stewart, R.E. & Chambless, D.L. (2009). Cognitive behavioral therapy for adult anxiety disorders in clinical practice: a meta analysis of effectiveness studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77, 595–606.PubMedCrossRef

Swift, J.K. & Callahan, J.L. (2009). The impact of client treatment preferences on outcome: a meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65, 368–381.PubMedCrossRef

Tryon, G.S. & Winograd, G. (2011). Goal consensus and collaboration. Psychotherapy, 48, 50–57.PubMedCrossRef

Wampold, B.E. (2001). The great psychotherapy debate. Models, methods and findings. Londen: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Wampold, B.E. & Brown, J. (2005). Estimating variability in outcomes attributable to therapists: a naturalistic study of outcomes in managed care. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 914–23.PubMedCrossRef

Webb, C.A., DeRubeis, R.J. & Barber, J.P. (2010). Therapist adherence/competence and treatment outcome: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78, 200–211.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Weisz, J.R., Jensen Doss, A. & Hawley, K.M. (2006). Evidence-based youth psychotherapies versus usual clinical care: a meta-analysis of direct comparisons. American Psychologist, 61, 671–689.PubMedCrossRef

Weisz, J.R., McCarty, C.A. & Valeri, S.M. (2006). Effects of psychotherapy for depression in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 132–149.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Yoo, J. & Brooks, D. (2005). The role of organizational variables in predicting service effectiveness: an analysis of a multilevel model. Research on Social Work Practice, 15, 267–277.CrossRef

Titel: Het geheim van de smid
Visie van de behandelaar in de ggz op werkzame factoren in therapie
Auteurs: Yael Meijer
Else de Haan
Publicatiedatum: 01-01-2015
Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Gepubliceerd in: Tijdschrift voor Psychotherapie / Uitgave 1/2015
Print ISSN: 0165-1188
Elektronisch ISSN: 1876-5637
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12485-015-0003-1

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Samenvatting

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2015

Bijeenkomsten

Repliek

Inleiding

Remke van Staveren (2013). Patiëntgericht communiceren in de ggz. Utrecht: de Tijdstroom. 258 p., € 32,-

Waarom duurt burn-out zo lang?