Implementation of the 2015 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis in the Netherlands

One of the oldest cardiac diseases, infective endocarditis (IE), remains one of the most fatal manifestations of heart disease [1]. Despite considerable progress in diagnosis and treatment, the in-hospital mortality of IE continues to be about 20%, essentially unchanged during the past decades [2].

The importance of IE is reflected in the frequent publication of new guidelines, for instance by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) [1]. In 2017, the Dutch Society of Cardiology created a working group—funded by the Quality Foundation of the Dutch Medical Specialists (SKMS)—to investigate whether and how the recommendations summarised in the most recent ESC guidelines on IE could be implemented most effectively in the Netherlands. To investigate current Dutch IE practices, the working group conducted a short country-wide survey. The medical topics raised in the survey are presented in Tab. 1. This report summarises the findings and recommendations of the working group.

Although widespread antibiotic prophylaxis for IE has long been considered effective, the policy for liberal use of antibiotic prophylaxis has gradually changed to more restricted indications. Of note, the 2008 guidelines of the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) from the UK recommended that antibiotic prophylaxis should be abandoned completely [3]. However, this recommendation was revised after a patient with aortic valve prosthesis died from IE after undergoing a dental procedure without—in line with the NICE guidelines—the use of prophylaxis. The NICE guidelines from 2016 recommend dentists to inform the patient about the level of risk and let him or her decide whether or not to receive antibiotic prophylaxis [4]. The strategy currently endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association (AHA) and ESC reserves antibiotic prophylaxis for individuals with cardiac disease at high risk of IE, e.g. for patients with a prosthetic valve, a history of IE, or with cyanotic congenital heart disease undergoing a dental procedure with a high risk of bacteraemia (usually involving perforation of the gingiva) [1, 5]. Of course, proper oral hygiene is strongly promoted universally. The working group decided to endorse the recommendations of the ESC guidelines on prophylaxis in high-risk subjects without changes or comments [1].

Nasal carriers of Staphylococcus aureus have more infections after cardiac surgery [6], and the pre-operative eradication of this micro-organism is thus important. To this end, two options are available. In the first, all subjects—without additional testing—are treated locally with an antibiotic ointment, usually mupirocin. Another option is to screen every patient, and to treat S. aureus carriers only. The ESC guidelines recommend only the latter procedure. But the merits of the two methods are of course comparable, and this is—according to the survey—reflected by the concomitant use of both approaches for decolonisation of S. aureus in Dutch hospitals. Therefore, the text of the recommendation in Tab. 7 of the guidelines was (slightly) adapted as follows: ‘Preoperative screening and/or treatment of nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus is recommended before elective cardiac surgery in order to treat carriers’, while the last recommendation of the same table (‘Systemic local treatment without screening of Staphylococcus aureus’ is not recommended) was deleted.

While the modified Duke criteria, which rely heavily on positive blood cultures and findings compatible with IE at echocardiography [7], remain the mainstay for diagnosing IE, current guidelines reflect the increasing importance of more advanced imaging techniques [1]. In particular, computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography with CT (PET-CT) and magnetic resonance imaging have emerged as valuable additional imaging techniques that provide complementary diagnostic information to echocardiography [1]. Available data—also from the Netherlands—indicate increased diagnostic accuracy when these techniques are added to the modified Duke criteria, especially in prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) [8‐10]. The guidelines provide detailed recommendations on the use of various imaging techniques in both native valve IE and PVE, as well in the diagnosis of cardiac-device-related endocarditis [7, 8]. The working group has combined the text and figures that describe these recommendations in the ESC guidelines into a single scheme (Fig. 2).

The diagnostic accuracy of the modified Duke criteria—which merge the presence of an infective syndrome and endocardial involvement, classically employing echocardiography—is only moderate, in particular in IE of a prosthetic valve [1, 11, 12]. Advanced imaging techniques—as described above—may not only be helpful in the detection of endocardial lesions when added to echocardiography, but also in establishing the presence of (clinically silent) vascular phenomena such as embolic events and infectious aneurysm [13]. Acknowledging this, the most recent ESC guidelines have added the identification of paravalvular lesions by CT and, in the setting of PVE, abnormal activity near the site of the prosthesis on ¹⁸F‑fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F‑FDG) PET/CT or radiolabelled leucocyte single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT, as a ‘major’ criterion for IE. The currently applicable two major and five minor criteria for IE are described in Tab. 2. Examples of positive echocardiogram, ¹⁸F‑FDG PET/CT and cardiac CT are demonstrated in Fig. 3.

There are major differences between European countries in the use of antimicrobial therapy and consequently in the antibiotic resistance patterns of pathogens. The Netherlands has the lowest rate of antibiotic use in Europe. The result is a stable level of antimicrobial resistance, whereas most countries experience increasing levels each year. European guidelines for antimicrobial therapy therefore cannot be simply adhered to but have to be tailored to individual countries. Recommendations for antibiotic therapy in the Netherlands are provided by the Stichting Werkgroep Antibiotica Beleid (SWAB; Dutch Working Party on Antibiotic Policy). Importantly, SWAB recently updated their guidelines for antibiotic treatment for IE, on the basis of an in-depth comparison of the most recent ESC and the AHA IE guidelines. In cases of discordance between the recommendations in these documents, SWAB guidance is based on a formal literature review on best current Dutch practice, taking into consideration national resistance patterns and dosing habits. For all these reasons, the working group recommended the employment of the SWAB guidelines for subsequent use in the Netherlands [20].

Heart failure resulting from valvular regurgitation or obstruction, uncontrolled infection and embolic events occurring under adequate antibiotic treatment constitute major complications of IE and may require surgical treatment [1, 21‐24]. The working group endorsed the ESC indications for cardiac surgery without modifications. However, the timing of the surgical procedure was left to the discretion of the specialists involved. In accordance with the recommendations of the ESC guidelines, complex IE patients should be referred early to a regional centre with cardio-thoracic facilities. Such cases include, but are not limited to, IE patients with congenital heart disease, PVE, pregnant women, patients with heart failure, uncontrolled infection, rhythm abnormalities or stroke.