Skip to main content
Log in

Groepsprocessen bij jongeren: over pesten en ander probleemgedrag

  • Artikelen
  • Published:
Kind & Adolescent

Samenvatting

Dankzij longitudinale sociale-netwerkanalyse zijn onderzoekers steeds beter in staat om te bepalen waarom jongeren veel op elkaar lijken. Gelijkenis in gedrag kan het gevolg zijn van twee processen: selectie en invloed. In het eerste deel van dit artikel wordt een overzicht gegeven van onderzoek naar dynamiek in netwerk en gedrag. De bestudeerde netwerken gaan over positieve relaties (vriendschappen). In het tweede deel wordt ingegaan op negatieve relaties tussen jongeren: dader-slachtofferrelaties bij pesten. Hierbij wordt het KiVa antipestprogramma besproken. Uit de eerste beschrijvende resultaten blijkt dat pesten op KiVa-scholen afneemt met meer dan de helft. Op controlescholen neemt het pesten af met een derde. Ondanks deze afname mogen KiVa-scholen nu niet op hun lauweren gaan rusten. Op KiVa-scholen wordt nog steeds 13,5 procent van de leerlingen gepest. Onderzoek is nodig om inzicht te krijgen in gevallen waar het programma niet werkt. Dit kan leiden tot het opzetten van aanvullende interventies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figuur 1
Figuur 2
Figuur 3
Figuur 4
Figuur 5
Figuur 6

Literatuur

  • Berger, C., & Dijkstra, J. K. (2013). Competition, envy, or snobbism? How popularity and friendships shape antipathy networks of adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 586-595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De la Haye, K., Green, H. D., Kennedy, D., Pollard, M., & Tucker, J. (2013). Selection and influence mechanisms associated with marijuana initiation and use in adolescent friendship networks. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 474-486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLay, D., Laursen, B., Kiuru, N., Nurmi, J.-E., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2013). Selecting and retaining friends on the basis of cigarette smoking similarity. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 464-473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, J. K., Berger, C., & Lindenberg, S. (2011). Do physical and relational aggression explain adolescents’ friendship selection? The competing roles of network characteristics, gender, and social status. Aggressive Behavior, 37, 417-429.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, J. K., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Borch, C. (2013). Popularity and adolescent friendship networks: Selection and influence dynamics. Developmental Psychology, 49, 1242-1252.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, J. K., Gest, S. D., Lindenberg, S., Veenstra, R., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2012). Testing three explanations of the emergence of weapon carrying in peer context. The role of aggression, victimization, and the social network. Journal of Adolescent Health, 48, 371-376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, J. K., Lindenberg, S., Veenstra, R., Steglich, C., Isaacs, J., Card, N. A., & Hodges, E. V. E. (2010). Influence and selection processes in weapon carrying during adolescence: The roles of status, aggression, and vulnerability. Criminology, 48, 187-220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giletta, M., Burk, W., Scholte, R., Engels, R., & Prinstein, M. J. (2013). Direct and indirect peer socialization of adolescent nonsuicidal self-injury. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 450-463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goossens, F., Vermande, M., & Van der Meulen, M. (Eds.). (2012). Pesten op school: Achtergronden en interventies. Amsterdam: Boom/Lemma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallinan, M. T. (1980). Patterns of cliquing among youth. In H. C. Foot, A. J. Chapman, & J. R. Smith (Eds.), Friendship and social relations in children (pp. 321-342). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huisman, C., & Bruggeman, J. (2012). The social network, socioeconomic background, and school type of adolescent smokers. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 36, 329-338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huitsing, G., Van Duijn, M. A. J., Snijders, T. A. B., Wang, P., Sainio, M., Salmivalli, C., & Veenstra, R. (2012). Univariate and multivariate models of positive and negative networks: Liking, disliking, and bully-victim relationships social networks. Social Networks, 34, 645-657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huitsing, G., & Veenstra, R. (2012). Bullying in classrooms: Participant roles from a social network perspective. Aggressive Behavior, 38, 494-509.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karna, A., Voeten, M., Little, T. D., Poskiparta, E., Kaljonen, A., & Salmivalli, C. (2011). A large-scale evaluation of the KiVa antibullying program: grade 4-6. Child Development, 82, 311-330.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, M., Van Zalk, M., & Stattin, H. (2012). Psychopathic traits moderate peer influence on adolescent delinquency. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53, 826-836.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kiesner, J., Poulin, F., & Nicotra, E. (2003). Peer relations across contexts: Individual-network homophily and network inclusion in and after school. Child Development, 74(5), 1328-1343.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kiuru, N., Burk, W. J., Laursen, B., Nurmi, J.-E., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2012). Is depression contagious? A test of alternative peer socialization mechanisms of depressive symptoms in adolescent peer networks. Journal of Adolescent Health, 50, 250-255.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knecht, A., Snijders, T. A. B., Baerveldt, C., Steglich, C. E. G., & Raub, W. (2010). Friendship and delinquency: Selection and influence processes in early adolescence. Social Development, 19, 494-514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Light, J. M., Greenan, C. C., Rusby, J. C., Nies, K. M., & Snijders, T. A. B. (2013). Onset to first alcohol use in early adolescence: A network diffusion model. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 487-499.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Logis, H., Rodkin, P. C., Gest, S. D., & Ahn, H.-J. (2013). Popularity as an organizing factor of preadolescent friendship networks: Beyond prosocial and aggressive behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 413-423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathys, C., Burk, W. J., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2013). Popularity as moderator of peer selection and socialization of adolescent alcohol, marijuana, and tobacco use. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 513-523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415-444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercken, L., Snijders, T. A. B., Steglich, C. E. G., & De Vries, H. (2009). Dynamics of adolescent friendship networks and smoking behavior: Social network analyses in six European countries. Social Science and Medicine, 69, 1506-1514.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mercken, L., Steglich, C., Sinclair, P., Holliday, J., & Moore, L. (2012). A longitudinal social network analysis of peer influence, peer selection, and smoking behavior among adolescents in British schools. Health Psychology, 31, 450-459.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Molano, A., Jones, S., Brown, J., & Aber, J. L. (2013). Selection and socialization of aggressive and prosocial behavior: The moderating role of social-cognitive processes. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 424-436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olweus, D. (1996). The revised Olweus bully/victim questionnaire. Bergen, Norway: University of Bergen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, D. W., Ragan, D. T., Wallace, L., Gest, S. D., Feinberg, M. E., & Moody, J. (2013). Peers and the emergence of alcohol use: Influence and selection processes in adolescent friendship networks. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 500-512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, K., & Slee, P. T. (1991). Bullying among Australian school-children: Reported behavior and attitudes toward victims. Journal of Social Psychology, 131, 615-627.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, A. J. (2002). Co-rumination in the friendships of girls and boys. Child Development, 73, 1830-1843.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rulison, K. L., Gest, S. D., & Loken, E. (2013). Dynamic social networks and physical aggression: The moderating role of gender and social status among peers. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 437-449.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sainio, M., Veenstra, R., Huitsing, G., & Salmivalli, C. (2011). Victims and their defenders: A dyadic approach. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35, 144-151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmivalli, C., Garandeau, C. F., & Veenstra, R. (2012). KiVa anti-bullying program: Implications for school adjustment. In A. M. Ryan & G. W. Ladd (Eds.), Peer relationships and adjustment at school (pp. 279-307). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmivalli, C., Karna, A., & Poskiparta, E. (2010). Development, evaluation, and diffusion of a national antibullying program, KiVa. In B. Doll, W. Pfohl, & J. Yoon (Eds.), Handbook of youth prevention science (pp. 240-254). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmivalli, C., & Peets, K. (2009). Bullies, victims, and bully-victim relationships in middle childhood and early adolescence. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 322-340). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sijtsema, J. J., Ojanen, T., Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Hawley, P. H., & Little, T. D. (2010). Forms and functions of aggression in adolescent friendship selection and influence: A longitudinal social network analysis. Social Development, 19, 515-534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snijders, T. A. B., Van de Bunt, G. G., & Steglich, C. E. G. (2010). Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks, 32, 44-60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steglich, C., Snijders, T. A. B., & Pearson, M. (2010). Dynamic networks and behavior: Separating selection from influence. Sociological Methodology, 41, 329-393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, Y., Burk, W. J., Stattin, H., & Kerr, M. (2012). Peer selection and influence of delinquent behavior of immigrant and nonimmigrant youths: Does context matter? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 36, 178-185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swearer, S. M., Espelage, D. L., Vaillancourt, T., & Hymel, S. (2010).What can be done about school bullying? Educational Researcher, 39, 38-47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Workum, N., Scholte, R. H. J., Cillessen, A. H. N., Lodder, G. M. A., & Giletta, M. (2013). Selection, deselection, and socialization processes of happiness in adolescent friendship networks. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 563-573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Zalk, M. H. W., Kerr, M., Branje, S. J. T., Stattin, H., & Meeus, W. H. J. (2010). It takes three: Selection, influence, and de-selection processes of depression in adolescent friendship networks. Developmental Psychology, 46, 927-938.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Veenstra, R., Huitsing, G., Koens, R., Munniksma, F., Oldenburg, B., Van der Ploeg, R., .. . Velthausz, F. (2013). Het KiVa antipestprogramma: Signaleren en tegengaan van pesten. Kind en Adolescent Praktijk, 12, 76-84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Huitsing, G., Sainio, M., & Salmivalli, C. (2014). The role of teachers in bullying: The relation between antibullying attitudes, efficacy, and efforts to reduce bullying. Journal of Educational Psychology, (DOI: 10.1037/a0036110).

  • Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Munniksma, A., & Dijkstra, J. K. (2010). The complex relation between bullying, victimization, acceptance, and rejection: Giving special attention to status, affection, and sex differences. Child Development, 81, 480-486.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Zijlstra, B. J. H., DeWinter, A. F., Verhulst, F. C., & Ormel, J. (2007). The dyadic nature of bullying and victimization: Testing a dual perspective theory. Child Development, 78, 1843-1854.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Veenstra, R., & Steglich, C. (2012). Actor-based model for network and behavior dynamics. In B. Laursen, T. D. Little, & N. A. Card (Eds.), Handbook of developmental research methods (pp. 598-618). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenstra, R., Verlinden, M., Huitsing, G., Verhulst, F. C., & Tiemeier, H. (2013). Behind bullying and defending: Same-sex and other-sex relations and its associations with acceptance and rejection. Aggressive Behavior, 39, 462-471.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weerman, F. (2011). Delinquent peers in context: A longitudinal network analysis of selection and influence effects. Criminology, 49, 253-286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to René Veenstra.

Additional information

Prof. dr. R. Veenstra is hoogleraar Sociologie, in het bijzonder Sociale Ontwikkeling, bij de Rijksuniversiteit Groningen. Grote Rozenstraat 31, 9712 tg Groningen. E-mail: d.r.veenstra@rug.nl.

Dit artikel biedt een verkorte weergave van de oratie die de auteur uitsprak bij zijn inauguratie als hoogleraar. De volledige versie van de oratie en de technische verantwoording is te downloaden van www.gmw.rug.nl/~veenstra/oratie

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Veenstra, R. Groepsprocessen bij jongeren: over pesten en ander probleemgedrag. KIND ADOLESC. 35, 86–99 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12453-014-0013-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12453-014-0013-8

Navigation