Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Parent and child neurocognitive functioning predict response to behavioral parent training for youth with ADHD

  • Original Article
  • Published:
ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders

Abstract

Parental cognitive functioning is thought to play a key role in parenting behavior and may inform response to behavioral intervention. This open-label pilot study examined the extent to which parent and child cognition impacted response to behavioral parent training for children with ADHD. Fifty-four participants (27 parent–child dyads; Mages = 10.6 and 45.2 for children and parents, respectively) completed tasks assessing visuospatial and phonological working memory, inhibitory control, and choice-reaction speed at pre-treatment. Drift diffusion modeling decomposed choice-reaction time data into indicators of processing speed (drift rate) and response caution (boundary separation). Parents completed a 10-week manualized behavioral parent training program. Primary outcomes were pre- and post-treatment child ADHD and conduct problem severity, and parent-reported relational frustration and parenting confidence. Bayesian multiple regressions assessed parent and child cognitive processes as predictors of post-treatment outcomes, controlling for pre-treatment behavior. Better child visuospatial and phonological WM and higher parental response caution were associated with greater reductions in inattention. For conduct problems, better parental self-regulation (stronger inhibitory control and greater response caution) predicted fewer post-treatment conduct problems. Higher parental response caution also predicted lower post-treatment relational frustration and higher parental confidence. Bayesian evidence supported no relation between parent and child cognitive functions and treatment-related changes in hyperactivity. This pilot study demonstrates that cognitive processes central to etiologic theories of ADHD and models of parenting behavior can be successfully integrated into treatment outcome research to inform which families are most likely to benefit from behavioral interventions. This study demonstrates the feasibility of bridging the translational research gap between basic and applied clinical science and facilitates research on the role of cognition in psychosocial interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. SSD was also computed due to the current debate in the literature regarding the optimal metric for estimating inhibitory control (Alderson et al. 2007). The pattern of results was the same for SSD and SSRT.

  2. When child and parent age and child medication status are included as covariates, the best-fitting model includes PHWM, inhibitory control, drift rate, and boundary separation (BF10 = 51.08).

  3. When child and parent age and child medication status are included as covariates, the best-fitting model includes VSWM, inhibitory control, drift rate, and boundary separation (BF10 = 9.47).

  4. When child and parent age and child medication status are included as covariates, the best-fitting model includes drift rate and boundary separation (BF10 = 14.70).

  5. Parent working memory was included in the best-fitting model for predicting treatment-related improvements in parenting confidence but failed to provide sufficient evidence as an individual predictor (i.e., its BF10 of 2.4 fell below the accepted threshold of 3.0). Similarly, parent working memory improved model fit for predicting treatment-related improvements in child conduct problems and parent relational frustration, but only when demographic covariates were included, suggesting that these findings may not be particularly robust. We thus emphasize findings from our a priori rather than exploratory models, while noting this inconsistency as an important area for future research.

References

  • Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA (2001) Manual for the Achenbach system of empirically based assessment school-age forms profiles. Aseba, Burlington, VT

    Google Scholar 

  • Adalio CJ, Owens EB, McBurnett K, Hinshaw SP, Pfiffner LJ (2018) Processing speed predicts behavioral treatment outcomes in children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder predominantly inattentive type. J Abnormal Child Psychol 46(4):701–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alderson RM, Rapport MD, Kofler MJ (2007) Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and behavioral inhibition: a meta-analysis review of the Stop-Signal paradigm. J Abnorm Child Psychol 35:745–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkley RA (1997a) Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychol Bull 121:65–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkley RA (1997b) Defiant children. Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Canivez GL, Watkins MW, Dombrowski SC (2016) Factor structure of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fifth Edition: exploratory factor analyses with the 16 primary and secondary subtests. Psychol Assess 28:975–986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castellanos FX, Tannock R (2002) Neuroscience of attention-deficits/hyperactivity disorder: the search for endophenotypes. Nat Rev Neurosci 3:617–628

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chacko A, Wymbs BT, Wymbs FA, Pelham WE, Swanger-Gagne MS, Girio E, Pirvics L, Herbst L, Guzzo J, Phillips C, O’Connor B (2009) Enhancing traditional behavioral parent training for single mothers of children with ADHD. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 38:206–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chronis-Tuscano A, O’Brien KA, Johnston C, Jones HA, Clarke TL, Raggi VL, Rooney ME, Diaz Y, Pian J, Seymour KE (2011) The relation between maternal ADHD symptoms & improvement in child behavior following brief behavioral parent training is mediated by changes in negative parenting. J Abnorm Child Psychol 39:1047–1057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chronis-Tuscano A, Wang CH, Woods KE, Strickland J, Stein MA (2017) Parent ADHD and evidence-based treatment for their children: review and directions for future research. J Abnorm Child Psychol 45:501–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crandall A, Deater-Deckard K, Riley AW (2015) Maternal emotion and cognitive control capacities an parenting: a conceptual framework. Dev Rev 36:105–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosbie J, Arnold P, Paterson A, Swanson J, Dupuis A, Li X, Shan J, Goodale T, Tam C, Strug LJ, Schachar RJ (2013) Response inhibition and ADHD traits: correlates and heritability in a community sample. J Abnorm Child Psychol 41:497–507

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deater-Deckard K, Sewell MD, Petrill SA, Thompson LA (2010) Maternal working memory and reactive negativity in parenting. Psychol Sci 21:75–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DuPaul GJ, Power TJ, Anastopoulos AD, Reid R (2016) ADHD rating scale? 5 for children and adolescents: checklists, norms, and clinical interpretation. Guilford Publications

  • Evans SW, Owens JS, Wymbs BT, Ray AR (2018) Evidence-based psychosocial treatments for children and adolescents with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 47(2):157–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fair DA, Bathula D, Nikolas MA, Nigg JT (2012) Distinct neuropsychological subgroups in typically developing youth inform heterogeneity in children with ADHD. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:6769–6774

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Faraone SV, Perlis RH, Doyle AE, Smoller JW, Goralnick JJ, Holmgren MA, Sklar P (2005) Molecular genetics of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Biol Psychiat 57:1313–1323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fosco WD, White CN, Hawk LW Jr (2017) Acute stimulant treatment and reinforcement increase the speed of information accumulation in children with ADHD. J Abnorm Child Psychol 45:911–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadow KD, Sprafkin JN (2002) Child symptom inventory 4: screening and norms manual. Checkmate Plus, Stony Brook, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawk LW, Fosco WD, Colder CR, Waxmonsky JG, Pelham WE, Rosch KS (2018) How do stimulant treatments for ADHD work? Evidence for mediation by improved cognitive function. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12917

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hinshaw SP (2007) Moderators and mediators of treatment outcome for youth with ADHD: understanding for whom and how interventions work. Ambul Pediatr 7:91–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JASP Team (2017) JASP. Version 0.8.1. [Computer Software]

  • Johnston C, Mash EJ, Miller N, Ninowski JE (2012) Parenting in adults with attention- deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Clin Psychol Rev 32:215–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamphaus RW, Reynolds CR (2006) PRQ: parenting relationship questionnaire. Pearson, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Karalunas SL, Huang-Pollock CL, Nigg JT (2012) Decomposing attention- deficit/hyperactivity disorder-related effects in response speed and variability. Neuropsychology 26:684–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karalunas SL, Gustafsson HC, Dieckmann NF, Tipsord J, Mitchell SH, Nigg JT (2017) Heterogeneity in development of aspects of working memory predicts longitudinal attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptom change. J Abnorm Psychol 126(6):774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasper LJ, Alderson RM, Hudec KL (2012) Moderators of working memory deficits in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): a meta-analytic review. Clin Psychol Rev 32:605–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman J, Birmaher B, Brent D, Rao UMA, Flynn C, Moreci P, Williamson D, Ryan N (1997) K-SADS-PL: initial reliability and validity data. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 36:980–988

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kofler, MJ, Sarver DE, Austin K, Schaefer H, Holland E, Aduen PA, Wells EL, Soto EF, Irwin L, Chatschneider C, Lonigan CJ (in press) Can working memory training work for ADHD? Development of central executive training and comparison with behavioral parent training. J Consult Clin Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000308

  • Kofler MJ, Rapport MD, Bolden J, Sarver DE, Raiker JS (2010) ADHD and working memory: the impact of central executive deficits and exceeding storage/rehearsal capacity on observed inattentive behavior. J Abnorm Child Psychol 38:149–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer HC, Wilson GT, Fairburn CG, Agras WS (2002) Mediators and moderators of treatment effects in randomized clinical trials. Arch Gen Psychiatry 59:877–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerche V, Voss A, Nagler M (2017) How many trials are required for parameter estimation in diffusion modeling? A comparison of different optimization criteria. Behav Res Methods 49:513–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipszyc J, Schachar R (2010) Inhibitory control and psychopathology: a meta-analysis of the stop signal task. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 16:1064–1076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luman M, Oosterlaan J, Sergeant JA (2005) The impact of reinforcement contingencies on AD/HD: a review and theoretical appraisal. Clin Psychol Rev 25:183–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazursky-Horowitz, H, Thomas SR, Woods KE, Chrabaszcz JS, Deater-Deckard K, Chronis-Tuscano A (2017) Maternal executive functioning and scaffolding in families of children with and without parent-reported ADHD. J Abnormal Child Psychol 1–13

  • Miočević M, MacKinnon DP, Levy R (2017) Power in Bayesian mediation analysis for small sample research. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J 1–18

  • Molitor SJ, Langberg JM (2017) Using task performance to inform treatment planning for youth with ADHD: a systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev 58:157–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nigg JT, Gustafsson HC, Karalunas SL, Ryabinin P, McWeeney S, Faraone SV, Mooney MA, Fair DA, Wilmot B (2018) Working memory and vigilance as multivariate endophenotypes related to common genetic risk for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 57(3):175–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens EB, Hinshaw SP, Kraemer HC, Eugene AL, Abikoff HB, Cantwell DP, Conners CK, Elliott G, Greenhill LL, Hechtman L, Hoza B (2003) Which treatment for whom for ADHD? Moderators of treatment response in the MTA. J Consult Clin Psychol 71:540–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapport MD, Alderson RM, Kofler MJ, Sarver DE, Bolden J, Sims V (2008) Working memory deficits in boys with Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: the contribution of central executive and subsystem processes. J Abnorm Child Psychol 36:825–837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapport MD, Bolden J, Kofler MJ, Sarver DE, Raiker JS, Alderson RM (2009) Hyperactivity in boys with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): a ubiquitous core symptom or manifestation of working memory deficits? J Abnorm Child Psychol 37(4):521–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds CR, Kamphaus RW (2004) BASC-2: behavior assessment system for children. American Guidance Service, Circle Pines, MN

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouder JN, Morey RD (2012) Default Bayes factors for model selection in regression. Multivar Behav Res 47:877–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer A, Obradović J (2017) Unique contributions of emotion regulation and executive functions in predicting the quality of parent–child interaction behaviors. J Fam Psychol 31:150–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder HR, Miyake A, Hankin BL (2015) Advancing understanding of executive function impairments and psychopathology: bridging the gap between clinical and cognitive approaches. Front Psychol 6:328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonuga-Barke EJS, Daley D, Thompson M (2002) Does maternal ADHD reduce the effectiveness of parent training for preschool children’s ADHD? J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 41:696–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarle SJ, Alderson RM, Patros CH, Lea SE, Hudec KL, Arrington EF (2017) Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and phonological working memory: methodological variability affects clinical and experimental performance metrics. Neuropsychology 31:383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbruggen F, Chambers CD, Logan GD (2013) Fictitious inhibitory differences: how skewness and slowing distort the estimation of stopping latencies. Psychol Sci 24:352–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voss A, Voss J, Lerche V (2015) Assessing cognitive processes with diffusion model analyses: a tutorial based on fast-dm-30. Front Psychol 6:336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagenmakers EJ, Marsman M, Jamil T, Ly A, Verhagen AJ, Love J, Morey RD (2016) Bayesian statistical inference for psychological science. Part I: theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychon Bull Rev 25:169–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler D Psychological, Psychological Corporation (2011) WASI-II: Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence, 2nd edn. Psychological Corporation, San Antonio

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells EL, Kofler MJ, Soto EF, Schaefer HS, Sarver DE (2018) Assessing working memory in children with ADHD: minor administration and scoring changes may improve digit span backward’s construct validity. Res Dev Disabil 72:166–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a UVa Curry School of Education Foundation grant from the Galant family (PI: Kofler). During manuscript preparation, the authors were supported by the National Institutes of Health (R34 MH102499-01; PI: Kofler) and the Mississippi Council on Developmental Disabilities (4680-DD17-HE; PI: Sarver). The sponsors had no role in design and conduct of the study, collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data, or reparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. The authors wish to acknowledge the children and families who participated in the study, as well as the efforts of Dr. Hillary Schaefer, Erin Lunsford, and the many research assistants who contributed to the project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dustin E. Sarver.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights

This study was approved by the institution’s IRB. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed/assent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 23 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fosco, W.D., Sarver, D.E., Kofler, M.J. et al. Parent and child neurocognitive functioning predict response to behavioral parent training for youth with ADHD. ADHD Atten Def Hyp Disord 10, 285–295 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12402-018-0259-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12402-018-0259-8

Keywords

Navigation