Abstract
In this article we describe a human–robot interaction study, focusing on tactile aspects of interaction, in which children with autism interacted with the child-like humanoid robot KASPAR. KASPAR was equipped with touch sensors in order to be able to distinguish gentle from harsh touch, and to respond accordingly. The study investigated a novel scenario for robot-assisted play, with the goal to increase body awareness of children with autism spectrum condition (hereafter ASC) by teaching them how to identify human body parts, and to promote a triadic relationship between the child, the robot and the experimenter. Data obtained from the video analysis of the experimental sessions showed that children treated KASPAR as an object of shared attention with the experimenter, and performed more gentle touches on the robot along the sessions. The children also learned to identify body parts. The study showed the potential that teaching children with autism about body parts and appropriate physical interaction using a humanoid robot has, and highlighted the issues of scenario development, data collection and data analysis that will inform future studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Merzenich MM (1984) Functional maps of skin sensations. In: Brown CC (ed) The many facets of touch, vol 10. Johnson and Johnson Pediatric, Skillman
Montagu A (1971) Touching: the human significance of the skin. Columbia University Press, New York
Tronick EZ, Morelli GA, Ivey PK (1992) The efe forager infant and toddler’s pattern of social relationships: multiple and simultaneous. Dev Psychol 28(4):568–577
Knapp M, Hall J (2009) Nonverbal communication in human interaction. Wadsworth Publishing Co, Belmont
Dautenhahn K, Nehaniv C, Walters M, Robins B, Kose-Bagci H, Mirza N, Blow M (2009) Kaspar—a minimally expressive humanoid robot for human-robot interaction research. Appl Bionics Biomech 6(3–4):369–397
Costa S, Lehmann H, Robins B, Dautenhahn K, Soares F (2013) Where is your nose? -developing body awareness skills among children with autism using a humanoid robot. In: ACHI 2013, the sixth international conference on advances in computer-human interactions, pp 117–122
Rahimi M, Karwowski W (1992) Human-robot interaction. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Argall B, Billard A (2010) A survey of tactile human-robot interactions. Robotics Autonomous Syst 58(10):1159–1176
Marti P, Pollini A, Rullo A, Shibata T (2005) Engaging with artificial pets. In: Proceedings of the 2005 annual conference on European association of cognitive ergonomics. University of Athens, pp 99–106
Stiehl W, Lieberman J, Breazeal C, Basel L, Lalla L, Wolf M (2005) Design of a therapeutic robotic compan- ion for relational, affective touch. In: IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication, 2005, pp 408-415
Libin A, Libin E (2004) Person-robot interactions from the robopsychologists’ point of view: the robotic psychology and robotherapy approach. Proce IEEE 92(11):1789–1803
Wada K, Shibata T (2006) Robot therapy in a care house—its sociopsychological and physiological effects on the residents. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, (ICRA), 2006, pp 3966–3971
Wada K, Shibata T (2007) Living with seal robots—its sociopsychological and physiological influences on the elderly at a care house. IEEE Transa Robotics 23(5):972–980
Wood LJ, Dautenhahn K, Rainer A, Robins B, Lehmann H, Syrdal DS (2013) Robot-mediated interviews-how effective is a humanoid robot as a tool for interviewing young children? PloS One 8(3):e59448
Robins B, Amirabdollahian F, Ji Z, Dautenhahn K (2010) Tactile interaction with a humanoid robot for children with autism: a case study analysis involving user requirements and results of an initial implementation. In: 18th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication RO-MAN
Wainer J, Dautenhahn K, Robins B, Amirabdollahian F (2010) Collaborating with kaspar: Using an autonomous humanoid robot to foster cooperative dyadic play among children with autism. In: 2010 10th IEEE-RAS international conference on humanoid robots (humanoids), pp 631–638
Robins B, Dautenhahn K (2014) Tactile interactions with a humanoid robot: novel play scenario implementations with children with autism. Int J Soc Robotics 14(1):1–19
Robins B, Dautenhahn K (2010) Developing play scenarios for tactile interaction with a humanoid robot: a case study exploration with children with autism. In Social robotics. Springer, 2010, pp 243–252
Robins B, Amirabdollahian F, Dautenhahn K (2013) Investigating child-robot tactile interactions: a taxonomical classification of tactile behaviour of children with autism towards a humanoid robot. In: The sixth international conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions (ACHI), 2013, pp 89–94
Robins B, Dautenhahn K, Dickerson P (2012) Embodiment and cognitive learning-can a humanoid robot help children with autism to learn about tactile social behaviour in Social Robotics. Springer, Chengdu
Koegel R, Egel A, Dunlap G (1980) Learning characteristics of autistic children, Methods of instruction with severely handicapped students. Brookes Publishers, Baltimore
Mesibov G, Shea V, Schopler E (2004) The TEACCH approach to autism spectrum disorders. Springer, New York
Do2Learn. (2012) Parts of me. [Online]. Available: http://www.do2learn.com/games/songs/PartsofMe/index.htm
Robins B, Dautenhahn K, Dickerson P (2009) From iso- lation to communication: a case study evaluation of robot assisted play for children with autism with a minimally expressive humanoid robot. In: Advances in ccomputer– human interactions, 2009. ACHI’09. Second Interna- tional Conferences on. IEEE, 2009, pp 205–211
Robins B, Dautenhahn K, Nehaniv CL, Mirza NA, François D, Olsson L (2005) Sustaining inter- action dynamics and engagement in dyadic child-robot interaction kinesics: lessons learnt from an exploratory study. In: EEE international work- shop on robot and human interactive communication ROMAN, pp 716-722
Robins B, Ferrari E, Dautenhahn K (2008) Developing scenarios for robot assisted play. In: The 17th IEEE international symposium onrobot and human interactive communication, 2008, pp 180–186
Kose-Bagci H, Ferrari E, Dautenhahn K, Syrdal DS, Nehaniv CL (2009) Effects of embodiment and gestures on social interaction in drumming games with a humanoid robot. Adv Robotics 23(14):1951–1996
Kose-Bagci H, Dautenhahn K, Syrdal DS, Nehaniv CL (2010) Drum-mate: interaction dynamics and gestures in human-humanoid drumming experiments. Connect Sci 22(2):103–134
Kelley JF (1984) An iterative design methodology for user-friendly natural language office information applications. ACM Trans Inf Syst 2(1):26–41
Pease B, Pease A (2008) The definitive book of body language. Random House Publishing Group, 2008. [Online]. http://books.google.pt/books?id=z5d_8bAyW8AC
Bakeman R, Gottman J (1997) Observing interaction: an introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Woodward AL (2005) Infants understanding of the actions involved in joint attention, Eilan N, et al, pp 110–128
Robins B, Dickerson P, Stribling P, Dautenhahn K (2004) Robot-mediated joint attention in children with autism: a case study in robot-human interaction. Interact Stud 5(2):161–198
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the professionals, and the students of the school, and their parents for their participation in the project. The authors are also grateful to the Portuguese Foundation (FCT) for funding through the R&D project RIPD/ADA/109407/2009, the Doctorate Grant SFRH/BD/71600/2010, and the funding from FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-022674.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Costa, S., Lehmann, H., Dautenhahn, K. et al. Using a Humanoid Robot to Elicit Body Awareness and Appropriate Physical Interaction in Children with Autism. Int J of Soc Robotics 7, 265–278 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-014-0250-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-014-0250-2