Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Classroom Strategies Designed to Reduce Child Problem Behavior and Increase Peer Inclusiveness: Does Teacher Use Predict Students’ Sociometric Ratings?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
School Mental Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Establishing a positive peer climate in the elementary school classroom is an important goal for educators. This pilot study examined if children’s liking and disliking of their classroom peers are predicted by teachers’ use of practices designed to address child disruptive behaviors that are off-putting to peers, and practices designed to enhance peer inclusivity. Whereas teacher practices to foster good peer relationships are useful for all students, they are particularly important for those with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms, as these children are often poorly regarded by classmates. Thus, we explored the moderating effect of child ADHD symptom status. Participants were 194 children (grades K-4) in the classrooms of 12 teachers. The teachers were helping our study team revise the Making Socially Accepting Inclusive Classrooms (MOSAIC) program for use in general education classrooms. The MOSAIC program contains a set of teacher strategies to encourage students’ increased liking and decreased disliking of one another, which was measured by sociometric ratings. Teachers’ use of MOSAIC strategies was observed and self-reported over a school year. Results indicated that teacher practices designed to improve children’s classroom behaviors, as well as practices that encouraged peers to be more inclusive, each predicted children receiving better sociometric ratings at the end of the year after accounting for ratings at the beginning of the year. Some practices appeared uniquely efficacious for children with elevated ADHD symptoms, whereas others were useful for all children but had accentuated benefits for typical children. Implications for practitioners are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balázs, J., & Keresztény, Á. (2014). Subthreshold attention deficit hyperactivity in children and adolescents: A systematic review. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry,23, 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-013-0514-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buhs, E. S., Ladd, G. W., & Herald, S. L. (2006). Peer exclusion and victimization: Processes that mediate the relation between peer group rejection and children’s classroom engagement and achievement? Journal of Educational Psychology,98, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, L. (2004). The role of classroom norms in contextualizing the relations of children’s social behaviors to peer acceptance. Developmental Psychology,40, 691–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.5.691.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, L., Liu, H., Fung, K. Y., Wang, Y., Wen, Z., Li, H., et al. (2007). The mediating and moderating effects of teacher preference on the relations between students’ social behaviors and peer acceptance. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly: Journal of Developmental Psychology,53, 603–630. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2008.0006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment,6, 284–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cillessen, A. H. N., & Bukowski, W. M. (2018). Sociometric perspectives. In W. M. Bukowski, B. Laursen, & K. H. Rubin (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (2nd ed., pp. 63–84). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology,18, 557–570. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.18.4.557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dishion, T. J., & Kavanagh, K. (2003). Intervening in adolescent problem behavior: A family-centered approach. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll, K. C., & Pianta, R. C. (2010). Banking time in head start: Early efficacy of an intervention designed to promote supportive teacher–child relationships. Early Education and Development,21, 38–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409280802657449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DuPaul, G. J., Power, T. J., Anastopoulous, A. D., & Reid, R. (1998). ADHD rating scale-IV: Checklists, norms, and clinical interpretation. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, M., Atkins, M., Culinan, D., Kutash, K., & Weaver, R. (2008). Reducing behavior problems in the elementary school classroom. IES Practice Guide. (NCEE 2008-012). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, T. W., Lines, M. M., & Hamm, J. V. (2011). Revealing the invisible hand: The role of teachers in children’s peer experiences. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology,32, 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2011.04.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasser, L., Grütter, J., & Torchetti, L. (2018). Inclusive classroom norms, children’s sympathy, and intended inclusion toward students with hyperactive behavior. Journal of School Psychology,71, 72–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2018.10.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, R. (1997). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,38, 581–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, S. (2005). Analyzing grouped data with hierarchical linear modeling. Children and Youth Services Review,27, 637–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2004.11.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrist, A. W., & Bradley, K. D. (2003). “You can’t say you can’t play”: Intervening in the process of social exclusion in the kindergarten classroom. Early Childhood Research Quarterly,18, 185–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0885-2006(03)00024-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoza, B., Gerdes, A. C., Mrug, S., Hinshaw, S. P., Bukowski, W. M., Gold, J. A., et al. (2005). Peer-assessed outcomes in the multimodal treatment study of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology,34, 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp3401_7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoza, B., Mrug, S., Gerdes, A. C., Hinshaw, S. P., Bukowski, W. M., Gold, J. A., et al. (2005). What aspects of peer relationships are impaired in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,73, 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.73.3.411.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J. N., & Cavell, T. A. (1999). Influence of the teacher–student relationship in childhood conduct problems: A prospective study. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology,28, 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp2802_5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J. N., & Im, M. H. (2016). Teacher–student relationship and peer disliking and liking across grades 1–4. Child Development,87, 593–611. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12477.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, L. N., Floress, M. T., & Reinke, W. (2015). Rates and types of teacher praise: A review and future directions. Psychology in the Schools,52, 463–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, G. W., Kochenderfer-Ladd, B., & Sechler, C. M. (2014). Classroom peer relations as a context for social and scholastic development. In S. H. Landry & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Wellbeing in children and families (Vol. I, pp. 243–270). London: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAuliffe, M., Hubbard, J., & Romano, L. (2009). The role of teacher cognition and behavior in children’s peer relations. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology,37, 665–677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-009-9305-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McKown, C., Gumbiner, L. M., & Johnson, J. (2011). Diagnostic efficiency of several methods of identifying socially rejected children and effect of participation rate on classification accuracy. Journal of School Psychology,49, 573–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2011.06.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mikami, A. Y., Griggs, M. S., Lerner, M. D., Emeh, C. C., Reuland, M. M., Jack, A., et al. (2013). A randomized trial of a classroom intervention to increase peers’ social inclusion of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,81, 100–112. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029654.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mikami, A. Y., Griggs, M. S., Reuland, M. M., & Gregory, A. (2012). Teacher practices as predictors of children’s classroom social preference. Journal of School Psychology,50, 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2011.08.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mikami, A. Y., & Mercer, S. H. (2017). Teacher behaviors toward children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder predict peers’ initial liking and disliking impressions in a summer camp setting. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology,36, 506–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikami, A. Y., Münch, L. P., & Hudec, K. L. (2018). Associations between peer functioning and verbal ability among children with and without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders,26, 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426617693380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikami, A. Y., & Normand, S. (2015). The importance of social contextual factors in peer relationships of children with ADHD. Current Developmental Disorders Reports,2, 30–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikami, A. Y., Reuland, M. M., Griggs, M. S., & Jia, M. (2013). Collateral effects of a peer relationship intervention for children with ADHD on typically developing classmates. School Psychology Review,42, 458–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peets, K., Hodges, E. V. E., Kikas, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2007). Hostile attributions and behavioral strategies in children: Does relationship type matter? Developmental Psychology,43, 889–900. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.4.889.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonsen, B., Fairbanks, S., Briesch, A., Myers, D., & Sugai, G. (2008). Evidence-based practices in classroom management: Considerations for research to practice. Education and Treatment of Children,31, 351–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wentzel, K. R., Battle, A., Russell, S. L., & Looney, L. B. (2010). Social supports from teachers and peers as predictors of academic and social motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology,35, 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.03.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by funding from the Institute of Education Sciences (Goal 2) (Grant No. R324A160053). We would like to thank the children and teachers who participated in this study, and the graduate and undergraduate students in the Mikami and Owens laboratories who assisted with data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amori Yee Mikami.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mikami, A.Y., Owens, J.S., Hudec, K.L. et al. Classroom Strategies Designed to Reduce Child Problem Behavior and Increase Peer Inclusiveness: Does Teacher Use Predict Students’ Sociometric Ratings?. School Mental Health 12, 250–264 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-019-09352-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-019-09352-y

Keywords

Navigation