Skip to main content
Log in

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears and cuff tear arthropathy: a systematic review

  • Review
  • Published:
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To report the outcomes and complications of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (MIRCT) and cuff tear arthropathy (CTA).

Methods

A systematic review of the literature contained in Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, Google Scholar and Ovid databases was conducted on May 1, 2016, according to PRISMA guidelines. The key words “reverse total shoulder arthroplasty” or “reverse total shoulder prostheses” with “rotator cuff tears”; “failed rotator cuff surgery”; “massive rotator cuff tears”; “irreparable rotator cuff tears”; “cuff tear arthropathy”; “outcomes”; “complications” were matched. All articles reporting outcomes and complications of RSA for the management of MIRCT or CTA were included. The comparison between preoperative and postoperative clinical scores, as well as range of motion (ROM), was performed using the Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test. P values lower than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Seven articles were included in our qualitative synthesis. A statistically significant improvement in all clinical scores and ROM was found comparing the preoperative value with the postoperative value. The degrees of retroversion of the humeral stem of the RSA do not influence the functional outcomes in a statistically significant fashion. There were 17.4% of complications. The most frequent was heterotopic ossification, occurring in 6.6% of patients. Revision surgery was necessary in 7.3% of patients.

Conclusions

RSA restores pain-free ROM and improves function of the shoulder in patients with MIRCT or CTA. However, complications occur in a high percentage of patients. The lack of level I studies limits the real understanding of the potentials and limitations of RSA for the management of MIRCT and CTA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Longo UG et al (2011) Synthetic augmentation for massive rotator cuff tears. Sports Med Arthrosc 19(4):360–365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cofield RH (1985) Rotator cuff disease of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67(6):974–979

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gerber C et al (1988) Latissimus dorsi transfer for the treatment of massive tears of the rotator cuff. A preliminary report. Clin Orthop Relat Res 232:51–61

    Google Scholar 

  4. Neer CS, Craig EV, Fukuda H (1983) Cuff-tear arthropathy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65(9):1232–1244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gerber C, Maquieira G, Espinosa N (2006) Latissimus dorsi transfer for the treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(1):113–120

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Longo UG et al (2012) Conservative treatment and rotator cuff tear progression. Med Sport Sci 57:90–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ackland DC et al (2010) Moment arms of the shoulder musculature after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(5):1221–1230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Boileau P et al (2006) Neer Award 2005: the Grammont reverse shoulder prosthesis: results in cuff tear arthritis, fracture sequelae, and revision arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15(5):527–540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kontaxis A, Johnson GR (2009) The biomechanics of reverse anatomy shoulder replacement—a modelling study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 24(3):254–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mohammed AA, Frostick SP (2016) Linked shoulder replacement: current design problems and a new design proposal. Musculoskelet Surg 100(1):25–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nalbone L et al (2014) Optimal positioning of the humeral component in the reverse shoulder prosthesis. Musculoskelet Surg 98(2):135–142

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Randelli P et al (2014) Optimal glenoid component inclination in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. How to improve implant stability. Musculoskelet Surg 98 Suppl 1:15–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Boileau P et al (2006) Arthroplasty of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88(5):562–575

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gutiérrez S et al (2007) Center of rotation affects abduction range of motion of reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 458:78–82

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gutiérrez S et al (2008) Evaluation of abduction range of motion and avoidance of inferior scapular impingement in a reverse shoulder model. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17(4):608–615

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gutiérrez S et al (2008) Hierarchy of stability factors in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466(3):670–676

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Gutiérrez S et al (2011) Effects of tilt and glenosphere eccentricity on baseplate/bone interface forces in a computational model, validated by a mechanical model, of reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20(5):732–739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Affonso J et al (2012) Complications of the reverse prosthesis: prevention and treatment. Instr Course Lect 61:157–168

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Werner CM et al (2005) Treatment of painful pseudoparesis due to irreparable rotator cuff dysfunction with the Delta III reverse-ball-and-socket total shoulder prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(7):1476–1486

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Frankle M et al (2005) The reverse shoulder prosthesis for glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency. A minimum two-year follow-up study of sixty patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(8):1697–1705

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Guery J et al (2006) Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Survivorship analysis of eighty replacements followed for five to ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(8):1742–1747

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Simovitch RW et al (2007) Impact of fatty infiltration of the teres minor muscle on the outcome of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(5):934–939

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Simovitch RW et al (2007) Predictors of scapular notching in patients managed with the Delta III reverse total shoulder replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(3):588–600

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Grassi FA et al (2009) Six-year experience with the Delta III reverse shoulder prosthesis. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 17(2):151–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Young SW et al (2009) The SMR reverse shoulder prosthesis in the treatment of cuff-deficient shoulder conditions. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18(4):622–626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Boileau P et al (2011) Bony increased-offset reversed shoulder arthroplasty: minimizing scapular impingement while maximizing glenoid fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(9):2558–2567

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Favard L et al (2011) Reverse prostheses in arthropathies with cuff tear: are survivorship and function maintained over time? Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(9):2469–2475

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Bries AD et al (2012) Accuracy of obtaining optimal base plate declination in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21(12):1770–1775

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Coe MP et al (2012) The cost-effectiveness of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty compared with hemiarthroplasty for rotator cuff tear arthropathy. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21(10):1278–1288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Day JS et al (2012) Polyethylene wear in retrieved reverse total shoulder components. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21(5):667–674

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lawrence TM et al (2012) Patient reported activities after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: part II. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21(11):1464–1469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ek ET et al (2013) Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears in patients younger than 65 years old: results after five to fifteen years. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22(9):1199–1208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ji JH et al (2013) Early clinical results of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in the Korean population. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22(8):1102–1107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Young SW et al (2013) Comparison of functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty with those of hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of cuff-tear arthropathy: a matched-pair analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(10):910–915

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wiater BP et al (2013) Early outcomes of staged bilateral reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a case-control study. Bone Joint J 95-B(9):1232–1238

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Mulieri P et al (2010) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tear without glenohumeral arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(15):2544–2556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sadoghi P et al (2011) Impact of previous rotator cuff repair on the outcome of reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20(7):1138–1146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Valenti P et al (2011) Do less medialized reverse shoulder prostheses increase motion and reduce notching? Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(9):2550–2557

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Nolan BM, Ankerson E, Wiater JM (2011) Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty improves function in cuff tear arthropathy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(9):2476–2482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Jobin CM et al (2012) Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for cuff tear arthropathy: the clinical effect of deltoid lengthening and center of rotation medialization. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21(10):1269–1277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Leung B et al (2012) Functional outcome of hemiarthroplasty compared with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of rotator cuff tear arthropathy. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21(3):319–323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Frankle M et al (2006) The reverse shoulder prosthesis for glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency. A minimum two-year follow-up study of sixty patients surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(Suppl 1 Pt 2):178–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Longo UG et al (2011) Scoring systems for the functional assessment of patients with rotator cuff pathology. Sports Med Arthrosc 19(3):310–320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. MacDermid JC, Solomon P, Prkachin K (2006) The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index demonstrates factor, construct and longitudinal validity. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 7:12

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Boileau P et al (2005) Grammont reverse prosthesis: design, rationale, and biomechanics. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14(1 Suppl S):147S–161S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Nyffeler RW et al (2004) Analysis of a retrieved delta III total shoulder prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86(8):1187–1191

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Berton A et al (2015) The effect of humeral version on teres minor muscle moment arm, length, and impingement in reverse shoulder arthroplasty during activities of daily living. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 24(4):578–586

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Goutallier D et al (1995) Fatty infiltration of disrupted rotator cuff muscles. Rev Rhum Engl Ed 62(6):415–422

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Longo UG et al (2011) Latissimus dorsi tendon transfer for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears: a systematic review. Sports Med Arthrosc 19(4):428–437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Grammont PM, Baulot E (1993) Delta shoulder prosthesis for rotator cuff rupture. Orthopedics 16(1):65–68

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Grammont PM et al (1987) Etude et realization d’une novelle prothese d’epaule. Rheumatologie 39:17–22

    Google Scholar 

  52. Gulotta LV et al (2012) Humeral component retroversion in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21(9):1121–1127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Stephenson DR et al (2011) Effect of humeral component version on impingement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20(4):652–658

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Henninger HB et al (2012) Effect of deltoid tension and humeral version in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21(4):483–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Sirveaux F et al (2004) Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff. Results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86(3):388–395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Lawrence TM et al (2012) Patient reported activities after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: part II. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21(11):1464–1469

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Petrillo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Petrillo, S., Longo, U.G., Papalia, R. et al. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears and cuff tear arthropathy: a systematic review. Musculoskelet Surg 101, 105–112 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-017-0474-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-017-0474-z

Keywords

Navigation