Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Detection of Malingered ADHD Using the MMPI-2-RF

  • Published:
Psychological Injury and Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined the utility of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory—2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) validity scales for detecting feigning and exaggeration of attention-deficit/hyperactive disorder (ADHD) among college students. Under a simulation study design, participants with and without ADHD were assigned to perform honestly or to feign or exaggerate deficits related to ADHD while completing self-report symptom inventories. Participants instructed to feign produced symptom profiles similar to honest clinical profiles and more severe than honest nonclinical profiles. Participants with ADHD instructed to exaggerate produced less severe profiles than those instructed to feign and more severe profiles than clinical controls. MMPI-2-RF scale Fp-r showed potential for use in malingered ADHD detection at a revised cut score, which was significantly lower than the cut score suggested in the test manual; use of the revised cut score will require further validation. Scales F-r, Fs, and FBS-r did not classify well, but should be assessed in future studies of malingered ADHD. Detection of exaggeration was consistently poorer than detection of feigning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alfano, K., & Boone, K. B. (2007). The use of effort tests in the context of actual versus feigned attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and learning disability. In Boone (Ed.), Assessment of feigned cognitive impairment: A neuropsychological perspective (pp. 366–383). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2008). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF): Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, D. T. R., & Schipper, L. J. (2007). Detection of feigned psychiatric symptoms during forensic neuropsychological evaluations. In G. J. Larrabee (Ed.), Assessment of Malingered Neuropsychological Deficits (pp. 226–263). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booksh, R. L. (2005). Ability of college students to simulate ADHD on measures of attention. (Doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University, 2005). URI No. 3199715

  • Butcher, J. N., Graham, J. R., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Tellegen, A., Dahlstrom, W. G., & Kaemmer, B. (2001). MMPI-2: Manual for administration and scoring (Revth ed.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camara, W. J., Nathan, J. S., & Puente, A. E. (2000). Psychological test usage: Implications in professional psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 31, 141–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conners, C. K., Erhardt, D., & Sparrow, E. (1999). CAARS: Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scales technical manual. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSantis, A. D., & Hane, A. C. (2010). “Adderall is definitely not a drug”: Justifications for the illegal use of ADHD stimulants. Substance Use & Misuse, 45, 31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeSantis, W., & Noar. (2008). Illicit use of prescription ADHD medications on a college campus: A multimethodological approach. Journal of American College Health, 57(3), 315–324.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Erhardt, D., Epstein, J. N., Conners, C. K., Parker, J. D. A., & Siterenios, G. (1999). Self-ratings of ADHD symptoms in adults: II. Reliability, validity, and diagnostic sensitivity. Journal of Attention Disorders, 3, 153–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, A. G. (2007). ADHD rating scales’ susceptibility to faking in a college student sample. Dissertation Abstracts International, 68, 620. (UMI No. 3248343)

  • Gervais, R. O., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Wygant, D. B., & Sellbom, M. (2010). Incremental validity of the MMPI-2-RF over-reporting scales and RBS in assessing the veracity of memory complaints. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 25(4), 274–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, A. G. (2006). Adults faking ADHD: You must be kidding! ADHD Report, 14, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, A. G., Edwards, M. J., & Parker, K. C. H. (2007). Identifying students faking ADHD: Preliminary findings and strategies for detection. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22, 577–588.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochberg, Y. (1988). A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika, 75(4), 800–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jachimowicz, G., & Geiselman, R. E. (2004). Comparison of ease of falsification of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder diagnosis using standard behavioral rating scales. Cognitive Science Online, 2, 6–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leark, R. A., Dixon, D., Hoffman, T., & Huynh, D. (2002). Fake bad test response bias on the Test of Variables of Attention. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 17, 335–342.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, S. E., Knight, J., Teter, C. J., & Wechsler, H. (2005). Non-medical use of prescription stimulants among US college students: Prevalence and correlates from a national survey. Addiction, 99, 96–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, J. M. (1998). Educational accommodations: A university administrator's view. In M. Gordon and S. Keiser (Eds.), Accommodations in higher education under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): A no-nonsense guide for clinicians, educators, administrators, and lawyers (pp. 20–45).

  • Miller, H. A. (2001). Miller-Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (M-FAST): Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morey, L. C. (2007). The Personality Assessment Inventory professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, J. L., Well, A. D., & Lorch, R. F. (2010). Research Design and Statistical Analysis (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, C. A. (2003). Detection of malingering in assessment of adult ADHD. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 18, 379–395.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rabin, L. A., Barr, W. B., & Burton, L. A. (2005). Assessment practices of clinical neuropsychologists in the United States and Canada: A survey of INS, NAN, and APA Division 40 members. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20, 33–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R. (2008). Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sollman, M. J., Ranseen, J. D., & Berry, D. T. R. (2010). Detection of ADHD in college students. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 325–335.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, B. K., May, K., & Galbally, L. (2007). Symptom exaggeration by college adults in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and learning disorder assessments. Applied Neuropsychology, 14, 189–207.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sumanti, M., Boone, K., Savodnik, I., & Gorsuch, R. (2006). Noncredible psychiatric and cognitive symptoms in a workers' compensation 'stress' claim sample. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 20(4), 754–765.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tellegen, A., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2008). The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form: Technical manual. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tellegen, A., Ben-Porath, Y. S., McNulty, J. L., Arbisi, P. A., Graham, J. R., & Kaemmer, B. (2003). The MMPI-2 Restructured Clinical (RC) Scales: Development, validation, and interpretation. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (2001). Wechsler Test of Adult Reading: Manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, B. P., Becker-Blease, K. A., & Grace-Bishop, K. (2006). Stimulant medication use, misuse, and abuse in an undergraduate and graduate student sample. Journal of American College Health, 54, 261–268.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wygant, D., Ben-Porath, Y., Arbisi, P., Berry, D., Freeman, D., & Heilbronner, R. (2009). Examination of the MMPI-2 restructured form (MMPI-2-RF) validity scales in civil forensic settings: Findings from simulation and known group samples. Archives Of Clinical Neuropsychology, 24(7), 671–680.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by a dissertation research grant from the American Psychological Association.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David T. R. Berry.

Additional information

This research was based on data also used in a doctoral dissertation by Lindsey J. Jasinski.

Appendices

Appendix A: Instructions for FGN group

Congratulations! You have been selected for a chance to win $50 cash!

Today you will complete a series of psychological tests much like a clinician would use to test you for attention-deficit/hyperactive disorder (ADHD). Normally, you would be asked to try your best on these tests. That is not what we want you to do today. Instead, we want you to perform on the tests exactly how you think someone with ADHD would perform. That is, you should try to take the tests in such a way that you look like you have ADHD. The tests have scales designed to detect people who are feigning, so be careful not to be too obvious. If you can take the tests in such a way that you are classified as having ADHD without the examiner knowing you are faking, you will receive $50 cash at the end of testing. It will help if you imagine the following scenario:

You have a friend on campus who has just been diagnosed with ADHD. She is prescribed a stimulant drug (like Ritalin or Adderall) that makes her concentrate better and stay awake more easily. Studying becomes much easier for her and takes less time, while her grades have improved. On top of that, the University gives her extra time to complete exams and other assignments because she has ADHD. Because schoolwork is easier, she is able to socialize more often. She tells you that all she had to do was take a few tests to receive her diagnosis. You feel you could really use some extra time on exams and assignments, and it would be great to have some medication to help you study faster, so you decide you will try to get a diagnosis, too. You search the internet for information on ADHD, and you make an appointment for testing.

The next few pages contain the information you would find in an internet search for ADHD.

[After preparation]You will now be introduced to the person who will complete testing with you.

Please take the following tests as if you are trying to convince someone that you have ADHD. You should respond to the test items in a way that makes clear that you have ADHD. The examiner who tests you will not know your role, so please do not give it away!

Remember, if you are successful at deceiving the tests without being detected by the examiner as faking, you will win $50!

If you have any questions, please take time to ask me right now.

Appendix B: Instructions for EXAG group

Congratulations! You have been selected for a chance to win $50 cash!

Today you will complete a series of psychological tests much like a clinician would use to test you for attention-deficit/hyperactive disorder (ADHD). Normally, you would be asked to try your best on these tests. That is not what we want you to do today. Instead, we want you try to take the tests in such a way as to make absolutely sure that you look like you have ADHD. The tests have scales designed to detect people who are feigning, so be careful not to be too obvious. If you can take the tests in such a way that you are classified as having ADHD without the examiner knowing you are faking, you will receive $50 cash at the end of testing. Remember, you must look like you have ADHD without being so obvious that the examiner will know! It may help if you imagine the following scenario:

You have a friend on campus who has just been diagnosed with ADHD. The University gives her extra time to complete exams and other assignments because she has ADHD. She tells you that all she had to do was take a few tests to receive her accommodations. You have also been diagnosed with ADHD, and you feel you could really use some extra time on exams and assignments. Even though you already have a diagnosis, you have to take the tests through the University in order to qualify for accommodations, so you make an appointment for testing. You are concerned that the tests might wrongly say you don’t have ADHD, so you want to be extra convincing during testing. You want to be certain that you will receive accommodations, so you search the internet for information on ADHD so you can look as typical as possible when you take the tests.

[After preparation]You will now be introduced to the person who will complete testing with you.

Please take the following tests as if you are trying to convince someone who might not trust your diagnosis that you have ADHD. You should respond to the test items in a way that makes clear that you do. The examiner who tests you will not know your role, so please do not give it away!

Remember, if you are successful at convincing the tests without being detected as faking, you will win $50!

If you have any questions, please take time to ask me right now.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harp, J.P., Jasinski, L.J., Shandera-Ochsner, A.L. et al. Detection of Malingered ADHD Using the MMPI-2-RF. Psychol. Inj. and Law 4, 32–43 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-011-9100-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-011-9100-9

Keywords

Navigation