Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The MMPI-2 Symptom Validity Scale (FBS) is an Empirically-Validated Measure of Over-reporting in Personal Injury Litigants and Claimants: reply to William et al. (2009)

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:
Psychological Injury and Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 24 November 2009

Abstract

We respond briefly to Williams et al.'s (Psychological Injury and the Law 2:182–197, 2009) most recent effort to critique the MMPI-2 Symptom Validity scale, noting that the authors repeat many of the unfounded claims and conclusions of Butcher et al. (Psychological Injury and the Law 1:191–209, 2008) while ignoring and/or reflecting a misunderstanding of many of the points raised in our rebuttal. Rather than repeat our detailed responses to their initial review, we limit this comment to addressing new points Williams et al. (Psychological Injury and the Law 2:182–197, 2009) bring up and offer a succinct summary of the issues raised in this exchange.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. K. Bianchini, K. Greve, and P. Kaufmann were invited members of the AACN consensus committee.

References

  • Armstrong, D. (2008). Malingerer test roils personal-injury law: “Fake Bad Scale” bars real victims, its critics contend. The Wall Street Journal, p. A1.

  • Ben-Porath, Y. S., Greve, K. W., Bianchini, K. J., & Kaufmann, P. M. (2009). The MMPI-2 symptom validity scale (FBS) is an empirically-validated measure of over-reporting in personal injury litigants and claimants: reply to Butcher et al. (2008). Psychological Injury and the Law, 2(1), 62–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianchini, K. J., Houston, R. J., Greve, K. W., Irvin, T. R., Black, F. W., Swift, D. A., et al. (2003a). Malingered neurocognitive dysfunction in neurotoxic exposure: an application of the slick criteria. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 45, 1087–1099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianchini, K. J., Greve, K. W., & Love, J. M. (2003b). Definite malingered neurocognitive dysfunction in moderate/severe traumatic brain injury. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 17, 574–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchini, K. J., Etherton, J. L., & Greve, K. W. (2004). Diagnosing cognitive malingering in patients with work-related pain: four cases. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 4, 65–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianchini, K. J., Greve, K. W., & Glynn, G. (2005). On the diagnosis of malingered pain-related disability: lessons from cognitive malingering research. The Spine Journal, 5, 404–417.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boone, K. B. (2007). Assessment of feigned cognitive impairment: a neuropsychological perspective. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boone, K. B., & Lu, P. H. (2003). Noncredible cognitive performance in the context of severe brain injury. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 17, 244–254.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, J. N., Arbisi, P. A., Atlis, M. M., & McNulty, J. L. (2003). The construct validity of the Lees-Haley Fake-Bad Scale (FBS): does this scale measure somatic malingering and feigned emotional distress? Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 18, 473–485.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, J. N., Gass, C. S., Cumella, E., Kally, Z., & Williams, C. L. (2008). Potential bias in MMPI-2 assessments using the Fake Bad Scale (FBS). Psychological Injury and the Law, 1, 191–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greve, K. W., Ord, J., Curtis, K. L., Bianchini, K. J., & Brennan, A. (2008). Detecting malingering in traumatic brain injury and chronic pain: a comparison of three forced-choice symptom validity tests. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 22, 896–918.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greve, K. W., Ord, J. S., Bianchini, K. J., & Curtis, K. L. (2009). The prevalence of malingering in chronic pain patients referred for psychological evaluation in a medico-legal context. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 90, 1117–1126.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heilbronner, R. L. & Sweet, J. J., Morgan, J. E., Larrabee, G. J., Millis, S. & Conference Participants (2009). American Academy of clinical neuropsychology consensus conference statement on neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering, The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23, 1093–1129.

  • Larrabee, G. J. (2003). Detection of malingering using atypical performance patterns on standard neuropsychological tests. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 17, 410–425.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larrabee, G. J. (2007). Assessment of malingered neuropsychological deficits. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larrabee, G. J. (2008). Aggregation across multiple indicators improves the detection of malingering: relationship to likelihood ratios. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 22, 666–679.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larrabee, G. J., Greiffenstein, M. F., Greve, K. W., & Bianchini, K. J. (2007). Refining diagnostic criteria for malingering. In G. J. Larrabee (Ed.), Assessment of malingered neuropsychological deficits (pp. 334–371). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. (2009). Fued over famed test erupts at the U. Star Tribune, p. A1.

  • Limbaugh-Kirker & Kirker v Dicosta (2009). Case #06-CA-00706, Florida 20th circuit in and for Lee County, Florida.

  • Meyers, J. E., & Volbrecht, M. E. (2003). A validation of multiple malingering detection methods in a large clinical sample. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 18, 261–276.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nason v. Shafranski, (September 11, 2008 Ruling), Florida 19th Circuit, St. Lucie County.

  • Slick, D. J., Sherman, E. M. S., & Iverson, G. L. (1999). Diagnostic criteria for malingering neurocognitive dysfunction: proposed standards for clinical practice and research. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 13, 545–561.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • United States v. Bitton (July 1, 2008 Memorandum Decision and Order) Case No. 2:05-CR-661 TS United States District Court of Utah, Central Division.

  • Upchurch v. Broward Co. School Bd., (2008) January 24, 2008 Deposition of Dr. James N. Butcher.

  • Vickery, C. E., Berry, D. T. R., Dearth, C. S., Vagnini, V. L., Baser, R. E., Cragar, D. E., et al. (2004). Head injury and the ability to feign neuropsychological deficits. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19, 37–48.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Victor, T. L., Boone, K. B., Serpa, J. G., Buehler, J., & Ziegler, E. A. (2009). Interpreting the meaning of multiple symptom validity test failure. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23, 297–313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. L., Butcher, J. M., Gass, C. S., Cumella, E., & Kally, Z. (2009). Inaccuracies about the MMPI-2 Fake Bad Scale in the reply by Ben-Porath, Greve, Bianchini, and Kaufman (2009). Psychological Injury and the Law, 2, 182–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon v. TK Power (2008), Case 06-CA-003088, Florida 4th Circuit, Duval County.

Download references

Disclosure

Yossef Ben-Porath is a paid consultant to the publisher of the MMPI instruments, the University of Minnesota Press, and their distributor, Pearson. He receives royalties on sales of the MMPI-2-RF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yossef S. Ben-Porath.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12207-009-9051-6

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ben-Porath, Y.S., Greve, K.W., Bianchini, K.J. et al. The MMPI-2 Symptom Validity Scale (FBS) is an Empirically-Validated Measure of Over-reporting in Personal Injury Litigants and Claimants: reply to William et al. (2009). Psychol. Inj. and Law 3, 77–80 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-009-9049-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-009-9049-0

Keywords

Navigation