Skip to main content
Log in

Better Safe than Sorry. Does Agency Moderate the Relevance of Safety Perceptions for the Subjective Well-Being of Young Children?

  • Published:
Child Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article explores the subjective well-being (SWB) of eight-year-old children in relation to two aspects important to young people’s lives: perceptions of safety and agency. Research has shown that safety perceptions among children are positively correlated with SWB. Building on the capabilities approach, this paper argues that not only is the achieved functioning of being safe important to well-being, but so are substantive opportunities to decide whether or how to achieve that functioning (agency). As young children’s ability to convert capabilities into functionings largely depends on their parents or guardians, current research has regarded children as mere recipients of functionings without considering children’s agency. This paper advances our understanding of children’s SWB by explicitly considering children’s agency in regard to their safety. Using data from the second wave of the ISCWeB project for eight-year-olds in 16 countries, the paper follows three aims: First, to examine the relationship between safety perception in three different areas and SWB. Second, to investigate the relationship between children’s agency and their SWB. Third, to explore how agency and safety interact in influencing SWB. The results show that children’s agency and their perceived safety at home, in their neighborhood and at school each contribute to their SWB. Further, first empirical evidence is provided on a moderating effect of agency on the relationship between neighborhood safety and wellbeing. The paper makes a case for the relevance of considering children’s agency and alludes to the importance of discriminating between safety in different life domains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Hofferth and Sandberg (2001) and Casey et al. (2016) report for 9- to 12-year-old Americans resp. 12–15 years-old Australians that children spend around 20% (20%) of their time in school, around 30% (30%) in free-time activities and the rest with their family, including sleep.

  2. The 8-year-old dataset includes children between six and ten years of age, who were surveyed using the questionnaire for the 8-year-olds. Overall, 75% of children in the dataset are 8 years old, 23% are seven or nine years old, and only less than 2% are six or ten years of age.

  3. In countries marked with an asterisk* the study took place in only parts of the country (Rees et al. 2016).

  4. The instructions for the plot were provided by Wenzelburger et al. (2014).

References

  • Archard, D. (2015). Children, adults, autonomy and well-being. In A. Bagattini & C. M. Macleod (Eds.), The nature of children's well-being: theory and practice (pp. 3–14). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballet, J., Biggeri, M., & Comim, F. (2011). Children’s agency and the capability approach: a conceptual framework. In M. Biggeri, J. Ballet, & F. Comim (Eds.), Children and the capability approach (pp. 22–45). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Arieh, A., & Shimon, E. (2014). Subjective wellbeing and perceptions of safety among Jewish and Arab children in Israel. Children and Youth Services Review, 44(C), 100–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.05.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Arieh, A., McDonell, J., & Attar-Schwartz, S. (2009). Safety and home–school relations as indicators of children well being: whose perspective counts? Social Indicators Research, 90(3), 339–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9267-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benbenishty, R., & Astor, R. A. (2005). School violence in context: culture, neighborhood, family, school, and gender. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Biggeri, M., & Karkara, R. (2014). Transforming children’s rights into real freedom: a dialogue between children’s rights and the capability approach from a life cycle perspective. In D. Stöcklin & J.-M. Bonvin (Eds.), Children's rights and the capability approach: challenges and prospects (pp. 19–41). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggeri, M., Libanora, R., Mariani, S., & Menchini, L. (2006). Children conceptualizing their capabilities: results of a survey conducted during the first children's world congress on child labour. Journal of Human Development, 7(1), 59–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649880500501179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggeri, M., Ballet, J., & Comim, F. (2011). Children and the capability approach (studies in childhood and youth). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Casas, F., Bello, A., González, M., & Aligué, M. (2013). Children’s subjective well-being measured using a composite index: what impacts Spanish first-year secondary education students’ subjective well-being? Child Indicators Research, 6(3), 433–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-013-9182-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casey, M., Harvey, J., Telford, A., Eime, R., Mooney, A., & Payne, W. (2016). Patterns of time use among regional and rural adolescent girls: associations with correlates of physical activity and health-related quality of life. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 19(11), 931–935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2016.02.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cecil-Karb, R., & Grogan-Kaylor, A. (2009). Childhood body mass index in community context: neighborhood safety, television viewing, and growth trajectories of BMI. Health & Social Work, 34(3), 169–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chirkov, V., Ryan, R. M., Kim, Y., & Kaplan, U. (2003). Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: a self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 97–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clery, E., Tsang, T., & Vizard, P. (2014). The children’s measurement framework: a new indicator-based tool for monitoring children’s equality and human rights. Child Indicators Research, 7(2), 321–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-013-9224-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. (1996). The domains of life satisfaction: an attempt to order chaos. Social Indicators Research, 38(3), 303–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Springer Science + Business Media.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Delhey, J., & Steckermeier, L. C. (2016). The good life, affluence, and self-reported happiness: introducing the good life index and debunking two popular myths. World Development, 88, 50–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.07.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domínguez-Serrano, M., & del Moral Espín, L. (2016). From relevant capabilities to relevant indicators: Defining an indicator system for children’s well-being in Spain. Child Indicators Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-016-9415-x.

  • Dworkin, G. (1988). The theory and practice of autonomy (Cambridge studies in philosophy). Cambridge: University Press.

  • Fattore, T., Mason, J., & Watson, E. (2009). When children are asked about their well-being: towards a framework for guiding policy. Child Indicators Research, 2(1), 57–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-008-9025-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García, S., & Ritterbusch, A. (2015). Child poverty in Colombia: construction of a multidimensional measure using a mixed-method approach. Child Indicators Research, 8(4), 801–823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-014-9274-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González, M., Casas, F., Figuer, C., Malo, S., & Viñas, F. (2012). Satisfaction with present safety and future security as components of personal well-being among young people: relationships with other psychosocial constructs. In D. Webb & E. Wills-Herrera (Eds.), Subjective well-being and security (pp. 253–290). Dodrecht: Springer Netherlands.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Graf, G. (2016). Conceptions of childhood, agency and the wellbeing of children. In G. Schweiger & G. Graf (Eds.), The well-being of children: philosophical and social scientific approaches (pp. 20–33). Warsaw: De Gruyter Open.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graf, G., & Schweiger, G. (2016). Introduction: conceptualizing children’s well-being. In G. Schweiger & G. Graf (Eds.), The well-being of children: philosophical and social scientific approaches (pp. 1–18). Warsaw: De Gruyter Open.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofferth, S. L., & Sandberg, J. F. (2001). How American children spend their time. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(2), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00295.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISCWeb. (2013-14). ISCWeB - Children’s Worlds – International Survey of Children’s Well-being. [Dataset]. Available at: www.isciweb.org (subscription). Accessed: 15.01.2017.

  • Khoury-Kassabri, M., Benbenishty, R., Avi Astor, R., & Zeira, A. (2004). The contributions of community, family, and school variables to student victimization. American Journal of Community Psychology, 34(3–4), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-004-7414-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancy, D. (2012). Unmasking children’s agency. Anthropol Children, 1(2), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansdown, G. (2005). The evolving capacities of the child. (Innocenti insight, 11). Florence: Save the Children. UNICEF.

  • Lee, B. J., & Yoo, M. S. (2015). Family, school, and community correlates of children’s subjective well-being: an international comparative study. Child Indicators Research, 8(1), 151–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-014-9285-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, R., Cohen, L. R., Modzeleski, W., Kann, L., Collins, J. L., & Kolbe, L. J. (1999). School violence, substance use, and availability of illegal drugs on school property among US high school students. Journal of School Health, 69(9), 347–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.1999.tb06427.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, C. M. (2010). Primary goods, capabilities, and children. In H. Brighouse & I. Robeyns (Eds.), Measuring justice: primary goods and capabilities (pp. 174–192). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mayall, B. (2000). The sociology of childhood in relation to children’s rights. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 8(3), 243–259. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718180020494640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milam, A. J., Furr-Holden, C. D., & Leaf, P. J. (2010). Perceived school and neighborhood safety, neighborhood violence and academic achievement in urban school children. The Urban Review, 42(5), 458–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-010-0165-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molnar, B. E., Gortmaker, S. L., Bull, F. C., & Buka, S. L. (2004). Unsafe to play? Neighborhood disorder and lack of safety predict reduced physical activity among urban children and adolescents. American Journal of Health Promotion: AJHP, 18(5), 378–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noble, R., Sornberger, M., Toste, J., Heath, N., & McLouth, R. (2011). Safety first: the role of trust and school safety in non-suicidal self-injury. McGill Journal of Education, 46(3), 423–441. https://doi.org/10.7202/1009175ar.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2014). Gerechtigkeit oder Das gute Leben. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2015). How's life? Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qvortrup, J. (2005). Varieties of childhood. In J. Qvortrup (Ed.), Studies in modern childhood: society, agency, culture (pp. 1–20). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rees, G., Andresen, S., & Bradshaw, J. (2016). Children’s views on their lives and wellbeing in 16 countries: a report on the children’s worlds survey of children aged eight years old, 2013–15. York: Children’s Worlds Project (ISCWeB).

    Google Scholar 

  • Robeyns, I. (2005). The capability approach: a theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 93–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/146498805200034266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1985). Well-being, agency and freedom: the Dewey lectures 1984. The Journal of Philosophy, 82(4), 169. https://doi.org/10.2307/2026184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2001). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2003). The role of early childhood investment in development. In R. Morán (Ed.), Escaping the poverty trap: investing in children in Latin America (pp. 75–80). Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2005). Human rights and capabilities. Journal of Human Development, 6(2), 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649880500120491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2007). Children and human rights. Indian Journal of Human Development, 1(2), 235–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, G. K., & Kenney, M. K. (2013). Rising prevalence and neighborhood, social, and behavioral determinants of sleep problems in US children and adolescents, 2003–2012. Sleep Disorders, 2013, 394320. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/394320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spilsbury, J. C. (2005). We don't really get to go out in the front yard: children's home range and neighborhood violence. Children’s Geographies, 3(1), 79–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733280500037281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spilsbury, J. C., Korbin, J. E., & Coulton, C. J. (2009). Mapping children’s neighborhood perceptions: implications for child indicators. Child Indicators Research, 2(2), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-009-9032-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spilsbury, J. C., Korbin, J. E., & Coulton, C. J. (2012). “Subjective” and “objective” views of neighborhood danger & well-being: the importance of multiple perspectives and mixed methods. Child Indicators Research, 5(3), 469–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-012-9165-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stöcklin, D., & Bonvin, J.-M. (2014). Introduction. In D. Stöcklin & J.-M. Bonvin (Eds.), Children's rights and the capability approach: challenges and prospects (pp. 1–18). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Children's Society (2012). The good childhood report 2012. A review of our children's wellbeing. https://www.childrenssociety.org.uk/sites/default/files/tcs/good_childhood_report_2012_final.pdf.

  • The Children's Society (2014). The good childhood report 2014. https://www.childrenssociety.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/the_good_childhood_report_2014_-_final.pdf.

  • Tiliouine, H. (2015). School bullying victimisation and subjective well-being in Algeria. Child Indicators Research, 8(1), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-014-9286-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenbroeck, M., & Bouverne-De Bie, M. (2006). Children’s agency and educational norms: a tensed negotiation. Childhood: A Global Journal of Child Research, 13(1), 127–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visak, T. (2016). Does welfare trump freedom? A normative evaluation of contextualism about how to promote welfare. In G. Schweiger & G. Graf (Eds.), The wellbeing of children: philosophical and social scientific approaches (pp. 34–48). Warsaw: De Gruyter Open.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weir, L. A., Etelson, D., & Brand, D. A. (2006). Parents’ perceptions of neighborhood safety and children’s physical activity. Preventive Medicine, 43(3), 212–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.03.024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenzelburger, G., Jäckle, S., & König, P. (2014). Weiterführende statistische Methoden für Politikwissenschaftler. Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung mit Stata. Berlin: De Gruyter Oldenbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. C. (2004). Improving patients’ health through supporting the autonomy of patients and providers. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 233–254). Rochester: University of Rochester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolley, M. E., & Grogan-Kaylor, A. (2006). Protective family factors in the context of neighborhood. Promoting positive school outcomes. Family Relations, 55(1), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2006.00359.x.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The data used in this publication come from the second wave of Children’s World: International Survey of Children’s Wellbeing (ISCWeB). (www.isciweb.org). The views expressed here are those of the author. They are not necessarily those of ISCWeB.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leonie C. Steckermeier.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 4 Mean and standard deviation of variables included in the analysis by country

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Steckermeier, L.C. Better Safe than Sorry. Does Agency Moderate the Relevance of Safety Perceptions for the Subjective Well-Being of Young Children?. Child Ind Res 12, 29–48 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-017-9519-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-017-9519-y

Keywords

Navigation