Abstract
A recent discourse of girlhood, that of alpha girl and empowerment, has emerged in US popular literature with claims that adolescent girls are uniquely positioned to become the new economic, cultural and social winners of the twenty-first century. Similar to Sheryl Sandberg’s story in Lean In, Alpha girls embody both traditional masculine characteristics, such as competitiveness and independence, with traditional features of femininity such as collaboration, according to psychologist Dan Kindlon, author of Alpha Girls: Understanding the New American Girl and How She is Changing the World. However, little research has been conducted that explores the alpha girl discourse in the day-to-day lives of adolescent girls, deemed alpha, in US public school classrooms. Using interview and observation data, this paper examines how Kindlon’s supposed alpha girls and their middle school teacher make sense of and live this notion of empowerment, and argues that their experiences both complicate and reify the alpha girl discourse.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aapola, S., Gonick, M., & Harris, A. (2005). Young femininity: Girlhood, power and social change. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
American Association of University Women. (1992). How schools shortchange girls: The AAUW report. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women Educational Foundation.
Bettie, J. (2003). Women without class. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Bettis, P. J., & Adams, N. G. (2003). The Power of the preps and a cheerleading equity policy. Sociology of Education, 76(2), 128–142.
Bettis, P. J., & Adams, N. G. (2005a). Geographies of girlhood: Identities in-between. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Press.
Bettis, P. J., & Adams, N. G. (2005b). Girls in groups: The preps and the sex mob try out for womanhood. In Geographies of girlhood: Identities in-between (pp. 69–84). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Press.
Bettis, P., & Roe, M. F. (2008). Reading girls: Living literacy and girl power. Research on Middle Level Education Online, 32(1), 1–18.
Brooks, D. (2005). Mind over muscle. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/.
Charles, C. (2007). Exploring “girl power”: Gender, literacy and the textual practices of young women attending an elite school. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 6(2), 72–88.
Currie, D. H., Kelly, D. M., & Pomerantz, S. (2009). ‘Girl power’: Girls reinventing girlhood. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Davies, B. (2000). A body of writing 1990–1999. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
Eckert, P. (1989). Jocks and burnouts: Social categories and identity in the high school. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Fraser, N. (2013). How feminism became capitalism’s handmaiden—And how to reclaim it. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/.
Harris, A. (2004). All about the girl. New York, NY: Routledge.
Harris, A. (2004). Future girl. New York, NY: Routledge.
Hooks, B. (2004). The will to change: Men, masculinity, and love. New York, NY: Atria Books.
Inness, S. (1998). Millennium girls: Today’s girls around the world. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Kenway, J., Willis, S., Blackmore, J., & Rennie, L. (1994). Making ‘Hope Practical’ rather than ‘Despair Convincing’: Feminist post-structuralism, gender reform and educational change. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 15(2), 187–210.
Kindlon, D. (2006). Alpha girls: Understanding the new American girl and how she is changing the world. New York, NY: Rodale.
Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart. New York, NY: Routledge.
Maxwell, C., & Aggleton, P. (2010). The bubble of privilege. Young, privately educated women talk about social class. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 31(1), 3–15.
McRobbie, A. (2009). The aftermath of feminism. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Meadows, S. (2002). Meet the gamma girls. Newsweek, 44–50.
Merten, D. (1997). The meaning of meanness: Popularity, competition and conflict among junior high school girls. Sociology of Education, 70, 175–191.
Pipher, M. (1994). Reviving Ophelia: Saving the selves of adolescent girls. New York, NY: Penguln Group.
Sandberg, S. (2013). Lean in: Women, work and the will to lead. New York, NY: Random House.
Simmons, R. (2011). Odd girl out. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Spencer, R., Porche, M., & Tolman, D. (2003). We’ve come along way-maybe: New challenges for gender equity in the Classroom. Teachers College Record, 105(9), 1774–1807.
Stepp, L. (2002). Alpha girl. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/.
Tanenbaum, L. (2000). Slut! Growing up female with a bad reputation. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers.
Tanenbaum, L. (2015). I am not a slut: Slut-shaming in the age of the internet. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers.
Tasker, Y., & Negra, D. (2007). Interrogating postfeminism: Gender and the politics of popular culture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Tavris, C. (2002). Are girls really as mean as books say they are? The Chronicle of Higher Education, B7–B9.
Thomas, M. E. (2011). Multicultural girlhood: Racism, sexuality, and the conflicted spaces of American education. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Walkerdine, V., Lucey, H., & Melody, J. (2001). Growing up girl: Psychosocial explorations of gender and class. New York, NY: New York University Press.
Weedon, C. (1998). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Weis, L. (2008). The way class works: Readings on school, family, and the economy. New York, NY: Routledge.
Wiseman, R. (2009). Queen bees and wannabes: Helping your daughter survive cliques, gossip, boyfriends, and the new realities of girl world. New York, NY: Random House.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bettis, P., Ferry, N.C. & Roe, M. Lord of the Guys: Alpha Girls and the Post-feminist Landscape of American Education. Gend. Issues 33, 163–181 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-016-9153-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-016-9153-x