Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Lord of the Guys: Alpha Girls and the Post-feminist Landscape of American Education

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Gender Issues Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A recent discourse of girlhood, that of alpha girl and empowerment, has emerged in US popular literature with claims that adolescent girls are uniquely positioned to become the new economic, cultural and social winners of the twenty-first century. Similar to Sheryl Sandberg’s story in Lean In, Alpha girls embody both traditional masculine characteristics, such as competitiveness and independence, with traditional features of femininity such as collaboration, according to psychologist Dan Kindlon, author of Alpha Girls: Understanding the New American Girl and How She is Changing the World. However, little research has been conducted that explores the alpha girl discourse in the day-to-day lives of adolescent girls, deemed alpha, in US public school classrooms. Using interview and observation data, this paper examines how Kindlon’s supposed alpha girls and their middle school teacher make sense of and live this notion of empowerment, and argues that their experiences both complicate and reify the alpha girl discourse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aapola, S., Gonick, M., & Harris, A. (2005). Young femininity: Girlhood, power and social change. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  2. American Association of University Women. (1992). How schools shortchange girls: The AAUW report. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women Educational Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bettie, J. (2003). Women without class. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bettis, P. J., & Adams, N. G. (2003). The Power of the preps and a cheerleading equity policy. Sociology of Education, 76(2), 128–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bettis, P. J., & Adams, N. G. (2005a). Geographies of girlhood: Identities in-between. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bettis, P. J., & Adams, N. G. (2005b). Girls in groups: The preps and the sex mob try out for womanhood. In Geographies of girlhood: Identities in-between (pp. 69–84). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Press.

  7. Bettis, P., & Roe, M. F. (2008). Reading girls: Living literacy and girl power. Research on Middle Level Education Online, 32(1), 1–18.

  8. Brooks, D. (2005). Mind over muscle. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/.

  9. Charles, C. (2007). Exploring “girl power”: Gender, literacy and the textual practices of young women attending an elite school. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 6(2), 72–88.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Currie, D. H., Kelly, D. M., & Pomerantz, S. (2009). ‘Girl power’: Girls reinventing girlhood. New York, NY: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Davies, B. (2000). A body of writing 1990–1999. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Eckert, P. (1989). Jocks and burnouts: Social categories and identity in the high school. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fraser, N. (2013). How feminism became capitalism’s handmaidenAnd how to reclaim it. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/.

  14. Harris, A. (2004). All about the girl. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Harris, A. (2004). Future girl. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hooks, B. (2004). The will to change: Men, masculinity, and love. New York, NY: Atria Books.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Inness, S. (1998). Millennium girls: Today’s girls around the world. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kenway, J., Willis, S., Blackmore, J., & Rennie, L. (1994). Making ‘Hope Practical’ rather than ‘Despair Convincing’: Feminist post-structuralism, gender reform and educational change. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 15(2), 187–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kindlon, D. (2006). Alpha girls: Understanding the new American girl and how she is changing the world. New York, NY: Rodale.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Maxwell, C., & Aggleton, P. (2010). The bubble of privilege. Young, privately educated women talk about social class. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 31(1), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. McRobbie, A. (2009). The aftermath of feminism. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Meadows, S. (2002). Meet the gamma girls. Newsweek, 44–50.

  24. Merten, D. (1997). The meaning of meanness: Popularity, competition and conflict among junior high school girls. Sociology of Education, 70, 175–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pipher, M. (1994). Reviving Ophelia: Saving the selves of adolescent girls. New York, NY: Penguln Group.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sandberg, S. (2013). Lean in: Women, work and the will to lead. New York, NY: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Simmons, R. (2011). Odd girl out. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Spencer, R., Porche, M., & Tolman, D. (2003). We’ve come along way-maybe: New challenges for gender equity in the Classroom. Teachers College Record, 105(9), 1774–1807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Stepp, L. (2002). Alpha girl. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/.

  30. Tanenbaum, L. (2000). Slut! Growing up female with a bad reputation. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tanenbaum, L. (2015). I am not a slut: Slut-shaming in the age of the internet. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tasker, Y., & Negra, D. (2007). Interrogating postfeminism: Gender and the politics of popular culture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Tavris, C. (2002). Are girls really as mean as books say they are? The Chronicle of Higher Education, B7–B9.

  34. Thomas, M. E. (2011). Multicultural girlhood: Racism, sexuality, and the conflicted spaces of American education. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Walkerdine, V., Lucey, H., & Melody, J. (2001). Growing up girl: Psychosocial explorations of gender and class. New York, NY: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Weedon, C. (1998). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Weis, L. (2008). The way class works: Readings on school, family, and the economy. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wiseman, R. (2009). Queen bees and wannabes: Helping your daughter survive cliques, gossip, boyfriends, and the new realities of girl world. New York, NY: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicole C. Ferry.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bettis, P., Ferry, N.C. & Roe, M. Lord of the Guys: Alpha Girls and the Post-feminist Landscape of American Education. Gend. Issues 33, 163–181 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-016-9153-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-016-9153-x

Keywords

Navigation