Skip to main content
Log in

Memory distortion in group recall

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Earlier we reported (Basden, Basden, Bryner, ...Thomas, 1997) that, in comparison with nominal groups (three people tested individually), three-person collaborative groups recalled fewer presented words but intruded more nonpresented words. In the present research, Experiment 1 showed that when presented words were associatively related to critical nonpresented words, collaboration inhibited recall of presented words but did not influence recall of critical nonpresented words. Experiment 2 showed that with categorized lists, recall of high taxonomic frequency critical nonpresented words was greater for collaborative groups than for nominal groups. Collaboration did not inhibit recall of presented words, presumably because guessing supplemented recall in collaborative groups. Greater false recall in collaborative than in nominal groups appears to result from activation of superordinate-to-item associations rather than item-to-item associations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, V. L., & Bragg, B. W. (1968). Effect of group pressure on memory. The Journal of Psychology, 69, 19–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W., & Postman, L. J. (1945). The basic psychology of rumor. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 8, 61–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alper, A., Buckhout, R., Chern, S., & Slomovits, M. (1976). Eyewitness identification: Accuracy of individual vs. composite recollection of a crime. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 8, 147–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, F. (1932). Remembering. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basden, B. H., Basden, D. R., Bryner, S., & Thomas, R. L., III (in press). A comparison of group and individual remembering: Does collaboration disrupt retrieval strategies? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1176–1189.

  • Battig, W. F., & Montague, W. E. (1969). Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension for the Connecticut category norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs, 80 (3, Pt 2).

  • Betz, A. L., Skowronski, J. J., & Ostrom, T. M. (1996). Shared realities: Social influence and stimulus memory. Social Cognition, 14, 113–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, N. K., Stephenson, G. M., & Kniveton, B. H. (1990). Social remembering: Quantitative aspects of individual and collaborative remembering by police officers and students. British Journal of Psychology, 81, 73–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 17–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 51, 629–636.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, J. M., Java, R. I., & Richardson-Klavehn, A. (1996). How level of processing really influences awareness in recognition memory. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 114–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. W., & Kozloff, E. E. (1973). False recognitions of associates of converging versus repeated words. American Journal of Psychology, 86, 133–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartwick, J., Sheppard, B. H., & Davis, J. H. (1982). Group remembering: Research and implications. In Guzzo, R. (Ed.). Improving group decision making in organizations (pp. 41–72). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinsz, V. B. (1990). Cognitive and consensus processes in group recognition memory performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 59, 705–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollin, C. R., & Clifford, B. R. (1983). Eyewitness testimony: The effects of discussion on recall accuracy and agreement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13, 234–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, R. R., & Einstein, G. O. (1981). Relational and item-specific information in memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 497–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S. & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. K., & Suengas, A. G. (1989). Reality monitoring judgments of other people's memories. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27, 107–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, D. S., & Read, J. D. (1994). Psychotherapy and memories of childhood sexual abuse: A cognitive perspective. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8, 281–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meudell, P. R., Hitch, G. J., & Boyle, M. M. (1995). Collaboration in recall: Do pairs of people cross-cue each other to produce new memories? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 141–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, D. G., Elie, C. J., Blackwell, J. M., & Neuschatz, J. S. (1996). Memory illusions: Recalling, recognizing, and recollecting events that never occurred. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 261–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perlmutter, H. V. (1953). Group memory of meaningful material. Journal of Psychology, 35, 361–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perlmutter, H. V., & de Montmollin, G. (1952). Group learning of nonsense syllables. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 762–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajaram, S. (1993). Remembering and knowing: Two means of access to the personal past. Memory and Cognition, 21, 89–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, K. J., & Roediger, H. L., III (1997). Associative processes in false recall and false recognition. Psychological Science, 8, 231–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roenker, D. L., Thompson, C. P., & Brown, S. C. (1971). Comparison of measures for the estimation of clustering in free recall. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 45–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roediger, H. L., III, Jacoby, D.,&, McDermott, K.B. (1996). Misinformation effects in recall: Creating false memories through repeated retrieval. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 300–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roediger, H. L., III, & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 803–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roediger, H. L., III, & Neely, J. H. (1982). Retrieval blocks in episodic and semantic memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 213–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roenker, D. L., Thompson, C. P., & Brown, S. C. (1971). Comparison of measures for the estimation of clustering in free recall. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 45–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, D. L. (1996). Searching for Memory. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, D. L., Verfaellie, M., & Pradere, D. (1996). The neuropsychology of memory illusions: False recall and recognition in amnesic patients. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 319–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, D. M. & Watkins, M. J. (1996). Response conformity in recognition testing. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 481–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, M. E. (1932). A comparison of individuals and small groups in the rational solution of complex problems. American Journal of Psychology, 44, 491–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, G. M., Clark, N. K., & Wade, G. S. (1986). Meetings make evidence? An experimental study of collaborative and individual recall of a simulated police interrogation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1113–1122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, G. M., Brandstatter, H. & Wagner, W. (1983). An experimental study of social performance and delay on the testimonial validity of story recall. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 175–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychologist, 26, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollrath, D. A., Sheppard, B. H., Hinsz, V. B., & Davis, J. H. (1989). Memory performance by decision making groups and individuals. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 289–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warnick, D. H., & Sanders, G. S. (1980). The effects of group discussion on eyewitness accuracy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10, 249–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weldon, M. S., & Bellinger, K. D. (1997). Collective memory: The nature of individual and collaborative recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, in press.

  • Yuker, H. E. (1955). Group atmosphere and memory. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 17–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara H. Basden.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Basden, B.H., Basden, D.R., Thomas, R.L. et al. Memory distortion in group recall. Curr Psychol 16, 225–246 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-997-1001-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-997-1001-4

Keywords

Navigation