Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Validation of a Chinese version of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire and development of a short form based on item response theory

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research aimed to validate a Chinese version of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ-C) and develop a short form based on classic test theory and Item Response Theory (IRT). 539 participants were recruited for the study, with 499 of them yielding valid data. The age range of the participants was from 18 to 71 years. Results demonstrated high test-retest reliability and high internal consistency of FFMQ-C. Based on the full-scale results, a 15-item short-form scale (FFMQ-C-SF) was developed using both classic test theory and IRT. The short form also had good internal consistency. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) supported the five-factor structure of the FFMQ-C and FFMQ-C-SF with adequate model fit. Validity was indicated by significant correlations between the two mindfulness scales and theoretically related constructs (e.g., emotional intelligence and experiential avoidance). Our findings indicate that FFMQ-C and FFMQ-C-SF can be used to measure mindfulness among the Chinese population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Abraham, J., & Barker, K. (2015). Exploring gender difference in motivation, engagement and enrolment behaviour of senior secondary physics students in New South Wales. Research in Science Education, 45(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9413-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, D., Dizon, D., Jooste, K., Li, Z., Salvador, M., & Yao, X. (2018). Mindfulness in nursing students: The five facet mindfulness questionnaire in samples of nursing students in China, the Philippines, and South Africa. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 27(3), 975–986. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., & Allen, K. B. (2004). Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: The Kentucky inventory of mindfulness skills. Assessment, 11(3), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191104268029.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191105283504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Lykins, E., Button, D., Krietemeyer, J., Sauer, S., Walsh, E., Duggan, D., & Williams, J. M. G. (2008). Construct validity of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire in meditating and nonmeditating samples. Assessment, 15(3), 329–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191107313003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, F. B. (2001). The basics of item response theory: ERIC.

  • Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., Segal, Z. V., Abbey, S., Speca, M., Velting, D., & Devins, G. (2004). Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(3), 230–241. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.bph077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohlmeijer, E., Ten Klooster, P. M., Fledderus, M., Veehof, M., & Baer, R. (2011). Psychometric properties of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire in depressed adults and development of a short form. Assessment, 18(3), 308–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191111408231.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822–848. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. A. (2003). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Penn State worry questionnaire: Multiple factors or method effects? Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41(12), 1411–1426. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00059-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bujang, M. A., & Baharum, N. (2017). A simplified guide to determination of sample size requirements for estimating the value of intraclass correlation coefficient: A review. Archives of Orofacial Science, 12(1).

  • Cao, J., Ji, Y., & Zhu, Z. (2013). Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the acceptance and action questionnaire-second edition (AAQ-II) in college students. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 27(11), 873–877.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, L. E., & Garland, S. N. (2005). Impact of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) on sleep, mood, stress and fatigue symptoms in cancer outpatients. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 12(4), 278–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327558ijbm1204_9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cebolla, A., Garcia-Palacios, A., Soler, J., Guillén, V., Baños, R., & Botella, C. (2012). Psychometric properties of the Spanish validation of the five facets of mindfulness questionnaire (FFMQ). The European Journal of Psychiatry, 26(2), 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327558ijbm1204_9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., Gershon, R., Cook, K., Reeve, B., Ader, D., Fries, J. F., Bruce, B., Rose, M., & PROMIS Cooperative Group. (2007). The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Medical Care, 45(5 Suppl 1), S3–S11. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000258615.42478.55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, P., Hember, M., Symes, J., Peters, E., Kuipers, E., & Dagnan, D. (2008). Responding mindfully to unpleasant thoughts and images: Reliability and validity of the Southampton mindfulness questionnaire (SMQ). British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 47(4), 451–455. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466508X314891.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, M. S., Charoensuk, S., Gilbert, B. D., Neary, T. J., & Pearce, K. L. (2009). Mindfulness in Thailand and the United States: A case of apples versus oranges? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65(6), 590–612. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20580.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, M. S., Neuser, N. J., Michael, P. G., & Baitmangalkar, A. (2012). Exploring the psychometric properties of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire. Mindfulness, 3(2), 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-011-0086-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 284–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dam, N. T. V., Earleywine, M., & Borders, A. (2010). Measuring mindfulness? An item response theory analysis of the mindful attention awareness scale. Personality & Individual Differences, 49(7), 805–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PAID.2010.07.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Ayala, R. J. (2013). The theory and practice of item response theory: Guilford Publications.

  • de Bruin, E. I., Topper, M., Muskens, J. G., Bögels, S. M., & Kamphuis, J. H. (2012). Psychometric properties of the five facets mindfulness questionnaire (FFMQ) in a meditating and a non-meditating sample. Assessment, 19(2), 187–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191112446654.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Y.-Q., Liu, X.-H., Rodriguez, M. A., & Xia, C.-Y. (2011). The five facet mindfulness questionnaire: Psychometric properties of the Chinese version. Mindfulness, 2(2), 123–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-011-0050-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelen, M. O., & Reeve, B. B. (2007). Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement. Quality of Life Research, 16(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-007-9198-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenlohr-Moul, T. A., Walsh, E. C., Charnigo, R. J., Lynam, D. R., & Baer, R. A. (2012). The "what" and the "how" of dispositional mindfulness: Using interactions among subscales of the five-facet mindfulness questionnaire to understand its relation to substance use. Assessment, 19(3), 276–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191112446658.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, X., Miller, B. C., Park, K.-E., Winward, B. W., Christensen, M., Grotevant, H. D., & Tai, R. H. (2006). An exploratory study about inaccuracy and invalidity in adolescent self-report surveys. Field Methods, 18(3), 223–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/152822X06289161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, G., Hayes, A., Kumar, S., Greeson, J., & Laurenceau, J.-P. (2007). Mindfulness and emotion regulation: The development and initial validation of the cognitive and affective mindfulness scale-revised (CAMS-R). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 29(3), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-006-9035-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, A. C., Wood, M. D., Stein, L., & Rossi, J. S. (2010). Measuring mindfulness and examining its relationship with alcohol use and negative consequences. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 24(4), 608–616. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021742.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Giovannini, C., Giromini, L., Bonalume, L., Tagini, A., Lang, M., & Amadei, G. (2014). The Italian five facet mindfulness questionnaire: A contribution to its validity and reliability. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 36(3), 415–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-013-9403-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giromini, L., Colombarolli, M. S., Brusadelli, E., & Zennaro, A. (2017). An Italian contribution to the study of the validity and reliability of the trait meta-mood scale. Journal of Mental Health, 26(6), 523–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2017.1340621.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gu, J., Strauss, C., Bond, R., & Cavanagh, K. (2015). How do mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and mindfulness-based stress reduction improve mental health and wellbeing? A systematic review and meta-analysis of mediation studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 37, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2015.01.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gu, J., Strauss, C., Crane, C., Barnhofer, T., Karl, A., Cavanagh, K., & Kuyken, W. (2016). Examining the factor structure of the 39-item and 15-item versions of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire before and after mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for people with recurrent depression. Psychological Assessment, 28(7), 791–802. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000263.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. M., & Feldman, G. (2004). Clarifying the construct of mindfulness in the context of emotion regulation and the process of change in therapy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(3), 255–262. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.bph080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K., Wilson, K. G., Bissett, R. T., Pistorello, J., Toarmino, D., Polusny, M. A., Dykstra, T. A., Batten, S. V., Bergan, J., Stewart, S. H., Zvolensky, M. J., Eifert, G. H., Bond, F. W., Forsyth, J. P., Karekla, M., & McCurry, S. M. (2004). Measuring experiential avoidance: A preliminary test of a working model. The Psychological Record, 54(4), 553–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2009). Acceptance and commitment therapy: American Psychological Association Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, S. G., Sawyer, A. T., Witt, A. A., & Oh, D. (2010). The effect of mindfulness-based therapy on anxiety and depression: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78(2), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018555.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hou, J., Wong, S. Y.-S., Lo, H. H.-M., Mak, W. W.-S., & Ma, H. S.-W. (2014). Validation of a Chinese version of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire in Hong Kong and development of a short form. Assessment, 21(3), 363–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113485121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kabat-Zinn, J. (1982). An outpatient program in behavioral medicine for chronic pain patients based on the practice of mindfulness meditation: Theoretical considerations and preliminary results. General Hospital Psychiatry, 4(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/0163-8343(82)90026-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illness. Delta Trade Paperback.

  • Kabat-Zinn, J. (1994). Wherever you go, there you are: Mindfulness meditation in everyday life. Hyperion.

  • Kabat-Zinn, J. (2000). Indra's net at work: The mainstreaming of dharma practice in society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., Matsumoto, H., & Norasakkunkit, V. (1997). Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self: Self-enhancement in the United States and self-criticism in Japan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(6), 1245–1267. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.72.6.1245.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y. (2015). The relationship of mindfulness, Meta-emotion, Perfectionism, Life Satisfaction of College Students Harbin Engineering University.

  • Lilja, J. L., Frodi-Lundgren, A., Hanse, J. J., Josefsson, T., Lundh, L.-G., Sköld, C., Hansen, E., & Broberg, A. G. (2011). Five facets mindfulness questionnaire—Reliability and factor structure: A Swedish version. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 40(4), 291–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2011.580367.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lilja, J. L., Lundh, L.-G., Josefsson, T., & Falkenström, F. (2013). Observing as an essential facet of mindfulness: A comparison of FFMQ patterns in meditating and non-meditating individuals. Mindfulness, 4(3), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-012-0111-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linehan, M. M. (2018). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder: Guilford publications.

  • Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems: Routledge.

  • Marlatt, G. A., & Donovan, D. M. (2005). Relapse prevention: Maintenance strategies in the treatment of addictive behaviors: Guilford press.

  • Marsh, H. W., Ellis, L. A., Parada, R. H., Richards, G., & Heubeck, B. G. (2005). A short version of the self description questionnaire II: Operationalizing criteria for short-form evaluation with new applications of confirmatory factor analyses. Psychological Assessment, 17(1), 81–102. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.17.1.81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Pons, M. (1997). The relation of emotional intelligence with selected areas of personal functioning. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 17(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.2190/68VD-DFXB-K5AW-PQAY.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medsker, G. J., Williams, L. J., & Holahan, P. J. (1994). A review of current practices for evaluating causal models in organizational behavior and human resources management research. Journal of Management, 20(2), 439–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-2063(94)90022-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pallozzi, R., Wertheim, E., Paxton, S., & Ong, B. (2017). Trait mindfulness measures for use with adolescents: A systematic review. Mindfulness, 8(1), 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-2063(94)90022-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, L. G., & Pbert, L. (1992). Effectiveness of a meditation-based stress reduction program in the treatment of anxiety disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 149(7), 936–943. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.149.7.936.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Qi, Y., Li, C., & Li, A. (2003). The Revision and Application of Trait Meta-Mood Scale in 1000 Recruits. Health psychology Journal, 11(3), 164–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizopoulos, D. (2006). ltm: An R package for latent variable modeling and item response theory analyses. Journal of Statistical Software, 17(5), 1-25, doi:https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v017.i05.

  • Salovey, P., Mayer, J. D., Goldman, S. L., Turvey, C., & Palfai, T. P. (1995). Emotional attention, clarity, and repair: Exploring emotional intelligence using the trait meta-mood scale. J.w.pennebaker Emotion Disclosure & Health, 125-154, https://doi.org/10.1037/10182-006.

  • Schmidt, S. (2011). Mindfulness in east and west–is it the same? In Neuroscience, Consciousness and Spirituality (pp. 23-38): Springer.

  • Segal, Z. V., & Teasdale, J. (2018). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression: Guilford publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, Z., Ran, Y., He, W., Liu, H., Zhou, X., Chao, X., et al. (2018). Modify the Chinese version of the voice symptom scale by item response theory. Chinese Journal of Health Statisitics, 35(6), 831–833.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. E., Richardson, J., Hoffman, C., & Pilkington, K. (2005). Mindfulness-based stress reduction as supportive therapy in cancer care: Systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(3), 315–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03592.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Su, C.-T., & Parham, L. D. (2002). Generating a valid questionnaire translation for cross-cultural use. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56(5), 581–585. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.56.5.581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugiura, Y., Sato, A., Ito, Y., & Murakami, H. (2012). Development and validation of the Japanese version of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire. Mindfulness, 3(2), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-011-0082-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, B., Zhong, C., Sun, H., Zhang, N., & Wang, W. (2019). Effects of brief mindfulness training on recognition of emotional pictures in college students. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 33(5), 386–392. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2019.05.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, Y. Y., & Posner, M. I. (2015). The neuroscience of mindfulness meditation. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16(4), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3916.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tomfohr, L. M., Pung, M. A., Mills, P. J., & Edwards, K. (2015). Trait mindfulness is associated with blood pressure and interleukin-6: Exploring interactions among subscales of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire to better understand relationships between mindfulness and health. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 38(1), 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3916.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tran, U. S., Glück, T. M., & Nader, I. W. (2013). Investigating the five facet mindfulness questionnaire (FFMQ): Construction of a short form and evidence of a two-factor higher order structure of mindfulness. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 69(9), 951–965. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.21996.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walach, H., Buchheld, N., Buttenmüller, V., Kleinknecht, N., & Schmidt, S. (2006). Measuring mindfulness—The Freiburg mindfulness inventory (FMI). Personality and Individual Differences, 40(8), 1543–1555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.11.025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H. (2012). Physical self-satisfaction and mindfulness in Chinese college women. Science of Social Psychology, 27(2), 81–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeidan, F., Grant, J., Brown, C., McHaffie, J., & Coghill, R. (2012). Mindfulness meditation-related pain relief: Evidence for unique brain mechanisms in the regulation of pain. Neuroscience Letters, 520(2), 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2012.03.082.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology and Behavioral sciences, Zhejiang University, No.148 Tianmushan Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310028, People’s Republic of China

    Tingfei Zhu & Shulin Chen

  2. Department of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA

    Chuansheng Chen

Authors
  1. Tingfei Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chuansheng Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shulin Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shulin Chen.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Zhejiang University research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 25 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, T., Chen, C. & Chen, S. Validation of a Chinese version of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire and development of a short form based on item response theory. Curr Psychol 42, 4212–4224 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01720-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01720-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation