Abstract
Assuming the importance of a social dimension in appraisal of emotion, here we investigate how social presence impact emotional interference effects. This modulation is hypothesized both because social presence is expected to facilitate emotion recognition and to increases executive control functions. In one experiment participants perform two different emotional Stroop tasks that use either emotional words or emotional facial expressions as targets versus distractors, either in a co-action or in an isolated setting. Results show that the social presence reduces interference effects. However the evidence of increases of control in presence of others is less clear when the distractor is an emotional face (versus an emotional word) and this happens particularly for angry expressions. Faces and the expression of emotional anger attentional capture seem not to be overcome by an increase of control promoted by the presence of others, suggesting the higher relevance of these stimuli in social settings.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Augustinova, M., & Ferrand, L. (2012). The influence of mere social presence on Stroop interference: New evidence from the semantically-based Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1213–1216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.04.014.
Augustinova, M., & Ferrand, L. (2014). Automaticity of word reading: Evidence from the semantic Stroop paradigm. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 343–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414540169.
Averill, J. R. (1980). A constructivist view of emotion. In R. Plutchik & H. Kellerman (Eds.), Theories of emotion (pp. 305–339). New York: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-558701-3.50018-1.
Aviezer, H., Ensenberg, N., & Hassin, R. R. (2017). The inherently contextualized nature of facial emotion perception. Current Opinion in Psychology, 17, 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.06.006.
Bar-Haim, Y., Lamy, D., Pergamin, L., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2007). Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic study. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.1.
Baron, R. S. (1986). Distraction-conflict theory: Progress and problems. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60211-7.
Barrett, L. F., Mesquita, B., & Gendron, M. (2011). Context in emotion perception. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(5), 286–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411422522.
Beall, P. M., & Herbert, A. M. (2008). The face wins: Stronger automatic processing of affect in facial expressions than words in a modified Stroop task. Cognition & Emotion, 22(8), 1613–1642. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930801940370.
Belletier, C., Davranche, K., Tellier, I. S., Dumas, F., Vidal, F., Hasbroucq, T., & Huguet, P. (2015). Choking under monitoring pressure: Being watched by the experimenter reduces executive attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(5), 1410–1416. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0804-9.
Belletier, C., Normand, A., Camos, V., Barrouillet, P., & Huguet, P. (2019). Choking under experimenter’s presence: Impact on proactive control and practical consequences for psychological science. Cognition, 189, 60–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.03.018.
Blascovich, J., Mendes, W. B., Hunter, S. B., & Salomon, K. (1999). Social facilitation" as challenge and threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(1), 68–77. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.68.
Bond, C. F., & Titus, L. J. (1983). Social facilitation: A meta-analysis of 241 studies. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 265–292. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.94.2.265.
Braver, T. S. (2012). The variable nature of cognitive control: A dual mechanisms framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(2), 106–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.010.
Compton, R. J. (2003). The interface between emotion and attention: A review of evidence from psychology and neuroscience. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 2(2), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534582303002002003.
Etkin, A., Egner, T., Peraza, D. M., Kandel, E. R., & Hirsch, J. (2006). Resolving emotional conflict: A role for the rostral anterior cingulate cortex in modulating activity in the amygdala. Neuron, 51, 871–882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.12.003.
Evers, C., Fischer, A. H., Rodriguez Mosquera, P. M., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2005). Anger and social appraisal: A “spicy” sex difference? Emotion, 5(3), 258–266. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.5.3.258.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146.
Fischer, A. H., Rodriguez Mosquera, P. M., van Vianen, A. E. M., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2004). Gender and culture differences in emotion. Emotion, 4(1), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.4.1.87.
Fonseca, R., & Garcia-Marques, T. (2013). Back to basics: Socially facilitated situated cognition. Social Cognition, 31, 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2013.31.2.147.
Fox, E., Lester, V., Russo, R., Bowles, R. J., Pichler, A., & Dutton, K. (2000). Facial expressions of emotion: Are angry faces detected more efficiently? Cognition & Emotion, 14(1), 61–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999300378996.
Fridlund, A. J. (1991). Sociality of solitary smiling: Potentiation by an implicit audience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(2), 229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.229.
Fridlund, A. J. (1994). Human facial expression: An evolutionary view. San Diego, CA: Academic Press Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org/record/1994-98273-000.
Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2004). The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 133(1), 101–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.1.101.
Gabay, S., & Henik, A. (2008). The effects of expectancy on inhibition of return. Cognition, 106(3), 1478–1486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.007.
Garcia-Marques, T., Fernandes, A., Fonseca, R., & Prada, M. (2015). Social presence and the composite face effect. Acta Psychologica, 158, 61–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.04.001.
Gehricke, J. G., & Shapiro, D. (2000). Reduced facial expression and social context in major depression: discrepancies between facial muscle activity and self-reported emotion. Psychiatry Research, 95(2), 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.63.6.962.
Haas, B. W., Omura, K., Constable, R. T., & Canli, T. (2006). Interference produced by emotional conflict associated with anterior cingulate activation. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 6, 152–156. https://doi.org/10.3758/cabn.6.2.152.
Haxby, H., & Gobbini. (2000). The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(6), 223–233.
Haxby, J. V., Hoffman, E. A., & Gobbini, M. I. (2002). Human neural systems for face recognition and social communication. Biological Psychiatry, 51(1), 59–67.
Hess, U., Banse, R., & Kappas, A. (1995). The intensity of facial expression is determined by underlying affective state and social situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(2), 280–288. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.2.280.
Hoffman, E. A., & Haxby, J. V. (2000). Distinct representations of eye gaze and identity in the distributed human neural system for face perception. Nature Neuroscience, 3(1), 80–84. https://doi.org/10.1038/71152.
Huguet, P., Galvaing, M. P., Monteil, J. M., & Dumas, F. (1999). Social presence effects in the Stroop task: Further evidence for an attentional view of social facilitation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1011–1025. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.77.5.1011.
Jakobs, E., Fischer, A. H., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1997). Emotional experience as a function of social context: The role of the other. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 21(2), 103–130. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024904019590.
Klauer, K. C., Herfordt, J., & Voss, A. (2008). Social presence effects on the Stroop task: Boundary conditions and an alternative account. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 469–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2007.02.009.
MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109(2), 163–203. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163.
Manstead, A. S. R. (1991). Emotion in social life. Cognition & Emotion, 5(5–6), 353–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939108411047.
Mumenthaler, C., & Sander, D. (2012). Social appraisal influences recognition of emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1118–1135. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026885.
Nummenmaa, L., & Calvo, M. G. (2015). Dissociation between recognition and detection advantage for facial expressions: A meta-analysis. Emotion, 15, 243–256. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000042.
Ohman, A., Lundqvist, D., & Esteves, F. (2001). The face in the crowd revisited: A threat advantage with schematic stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 381–396.
Ovaysikia, S., Tahir, K. A., Chan, J. L., & DeSouza, J. F. X. (2011). Word wins over face: Emotional Stroop effect activates the frontal cortical network. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 234. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2010.00234.
Palanica, A., & Itier, R. J. (2012). Attention capture by direct gaze is robust to context and task demands. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 36(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-011-0128-z.
Palermo, R., & Rhodes, G. (2007). Are you always on my mind? A review of how face perception and attention interact. Neuropsychologia, 45, 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA.
Parkinson, B., Briner, R. B., Reynolds, S., & Totterdell, P. (1995). Time frames for mood: Relations between momentary and generalized ratings of affect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(4), 331–339.
Pishyar, R., Harris, L. M., & Menzies, R. G. (2004). Attentional bias for words and faces in social anxiety. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 17(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615800310001601458.
Pool, E., Brosch, T., Delplanque, S., & Sander, D. (2016). Attentional bias for positive emotional stimuli: A meta-analytic investigation. Psychological Bulletin, 142(1), 79–106. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000026.
Preston, S. D., & Stansfield, R. B. (2008). I know how you feel: Task-irrelevant facial expressions are spontaneously processed at a semantic level. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, 54–64. https://doi.org/10.3758/cabn.8.1.54.
Putman, P., Hermans, E., & van Honk, J. (2004). Emotional Stroop performance for masked angry faces: It's BAS, not BIS. Emotion, 4, 305–311. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.4.3.305.
Ridderinkhof, K. R., Scheres, A., Oosterlaan, J., & Sergeant, J. A. (2005). Delta plots in the study of individual differences: New tools reveal response inhibition deficits in AD/HD that are eliminated by methylphenidate treatment. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 197–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.114.2.197.
Ridderinkhof, R. K. (2002). Micro-and macro-adjustments of task set: Activation and suppression in conflict tasks. Psychological Research, 66, 312–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-002-0104-7.
Ro, T., Russell, C., & Lavie, N. (2001). Changing faces: A detection advantage in the flicker paradigm. Psychological Science, 12(1), 94–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00317.
Roelofs, K., Bakvis, P., Hermans, E. J., van Pelt, J., & van Honk, J. (2007). The effects of social stress and cortisol responses on the preconscious selective attention to social threat. Biological Psychology, 75(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.09.002.
Sharma, D., Booth, R., Brown, R., & Huguet, P. (2010). Exploring the temporal dynamics of social facilitation in the Stroop task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(1), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.1.52.
Shaver, P., Schwartz, J., Kirson, D., & O'connor, C. (1987). Emotion knowledge: Further exploration of a prototype approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1061–1086. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1061.
Strand, M., Oram, M. W., & Hammar, Å. (2013). Emotional information processing in major depression remission and partial remission: Faces come first. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 20(2), 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/09084282.2012.670159.
Tamietto, M., & de Gelder, B. (2010). Neural bases of the non-conscious perception of emotional signals. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(10), 697–709. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2889.
Tottenham, N., Tanaka, J. W., Leon, A. C., McCarry, T., Nurse, M., Hare, T. A., & Nelson, C. (2009). The NimStim set of facial expressions: Judgments from untrained research participants. Psychiatry Research, 168, 242–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2008.05.006.
Vrana, S. R., & Gross, D. (2004). Reactions to facial expressions: Effects of social context and speech anxiety on responses to neutral, anger, and joy expressions. Biological Psychology, 66(1), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2003.07.004.
Vuilleumier, P. (2005). How brains beware: Neural mechanisms of emotional attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(12), 585–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.10.011.
Vuilleumier, P., & Righart, R. (2011). Attention and automaticity in processing facial expressions. In G. Rhodes, A. Calder, M. Johnson, & J. V. Haxby (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Face Perception. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199559053.013.0023.
Wirth, B. E., & Wentura, D. (2018). Attentional bias towards angry faces is moderated by the activation of a social processing mode in the general population. Cognition and Emotion, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2018.1561423.
Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149(3681), 269–274. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.149.3681.269.
Zajonc, R. B., & Sales, S. M. (1966). Social facilitation of dominant and subordinate responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2(2), 160–168.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia under Grant PTDC/PSI-GER/28850/2017 and Grant UID/PSI/04810/2013.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Ethical Statement
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Comissão de Ética (Ethics Committee) from ISPA – Instituto Universitário, Lisbon, Portugal (Parecer do Projecto PTDC/PSI-GER/28850/2017), and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fernandes, A., Garcia-Marques, T., Prada, M. et al. Emotional interference in isolation and in others’ presence. Curr Psychol 40, 5783–5792 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00534-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00534-0