Skip to main content
Log in

The Mediating Role of Needs Satisfaction for Prosocial Behavior and Autonomy Support

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines gender differences in compliant/anonymous prosocial behaviors and perceived autonomy support. The mediation effects of needs satisfaction on relationships between perceived autonomy support and prosocial behaviors in Turkish culture are also tested. A total of 420 freshmen, sophomore, and junior students (210 female, 202 male) from various departments at a small state university in Turkey participated in the study. They were first, third and fourth year students and the mean age was 21.87 (SD = 1.71; range = 19–31). Parental Autonomy Support Scale (Soenens et al. Developmental Psychology, 43, 633–646, 2007), the Learning Climate Questionnaire (Williams and Deci Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 767-779 1996), the Basic Needs Satisfaction in General Scale (Deci and Ryan Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268 2000; Gagné 2003), and the Prosocial Tendencies Measure (Carlo and Randall Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31, 31-44 2002) were used to collect data. With respect to gender differences, a One-Way ANOVA analysis showed that women scored higher than men regarding compliant and anonymous prosocial behaviors. Additionally, mediation analyses revealed that women perceived that they were the recipient of more autonomy support from their university teachers than men. No significant difference was found in respect to the provision of autonomous support from parents, nor with respect to basic needs satisfaction. The analysis of mediation effects of needs satisfaction showed that relationships between compliant and anonymous prosocial behaviors and perceived autonomy support from parents and teachers were mediated by basic needs satisfaction. These results were discussed in the framework of Self Determination Theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aktaş, V., & Güvenç, G. B. (2006). Kız ve erkek ergenlerde saldırgan ve olumlu sosyal davranışlar ile yaş, ilişkisel bağlam ve kişiler arası duyarlılık arasındaki ilişkiler. Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(2), 233–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviors predicting students’ engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 261–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, C. M., Padilla-Walker, L. M., Madsen, S. D., & Nelson, L. J. (2008). The impact of maternal relationship quality on emerging adults’ prosocial tendencies: Indirect effects via regulation of prosocial values. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 581–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. D. (1998). Altruism and prosocial behavior. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 282–316).

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84, 740–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böckler, A., Tusche, A., & Singer, T. (2016). The structure of human prosociality: Differentiating altruistically motivated, norm motivated, strategically motivated, and self-reported prosocial behavior. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(6), 530–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlo, G., & Randall, B. A. (2001). Are all prosocial behaviors equal? A socioecological developmental conception of prosocial behavior. In F. Columbus (Ed.), Advances in Psychology Research, volume II (pp. 151–170). New York: Nova Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlo, G., & Randall, B. A. (2002). The development of a measure of prosocial behaviors for late adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31, 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlo, G., Fabes, R. A., Laible, D., & Kupanoff, K. (1999). Early adolescence and prosocial/moral behavior II: The role of social and contextual influences. Journal of Early Adolescence, 19, 133–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlo, G., Hausmann, A., Christiansen, S., & Randall, B. A. (2003). Sociocognitive and behavioral correlates of a measure of prosocial tendencies for adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescece, 23, 107–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çelikkaleli, Ö., & Gündoğdu, M. (2005). Psychological needs of students of the faculty of education. [Eğitim fakültesi öğrencilerinin psikolojik ihtiyaçları]. Inönü University Educational Faculty Journal, 6(9), 43–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chirkov, V., & Ryan, R. M. (2001). Parent and teacher autonomy-support in Russian and U.S. adolescents: Common effects on well-being and academic motivation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(5), 618–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cihangir-Çankaya, Z. (2009). Autonomy support, basic psychological need satisfaction and subjecive well-being: Self-determination theory [Özerklik desteği, temel psikolojik ihtiyaçların doyumu ve öznel iyi olma: Öz belirleme kuramı]. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 4(31), 23–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, S. E., & Markus, H. R. (1999). The cultural constitution of personality. In L. H. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 378–396). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains. Canadian Psychology, 49(1), 14–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Crowley, M. (1986). Gender and helping: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 283–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberly, M. B., & Montemayor, R. (1998). Doing good deeds: An examination of adolescent prosocial behavior in the context of parent/adolescent relationships. Journal of Adolescent Research, 13, 403–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1998). Prosocial development. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed., pp. 701–778). New York: Wiley.

  • Eisenberg, N., & Murphy, B. (1995). Parenting and children’s moral development. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting (Vol. 4, pp. 227–257). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Spinrad, T. L. (2006). Prosocial development. In W. Damon, R.M. Lerner (Eds.), & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3: Social, emotional and personality development (6th ed., pp. 646–718). Hoboken: Wiley.

  • Fabes, R.A., & Eisenberg, N. (1996). Age and Gender Differences in Prosocial Behavior: A Meta Analytic Examination. Arizona State University: Unpublished manuscript.

  • Fabes, R. A., Carlo, G., Kupanoff, K., & Laible, D. (1999). Early adolescence and Prosocial/moral behavior I: The role of individual processes. Journal of Early Adolescence, 19, 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, Y. L., Kasser, T., & Jahng, S. (2011). Differences in life satisfaction and school satisfaction among adolescents from three nations: The role of perceived autonomy support. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(3), 649–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, M. (2003). The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engagement. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 199–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Göregenli, M. (1997). Individualist-collectivist tendencies in a Turkish sample. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28, 787–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M. (2008). Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 48–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A.M., & Berg, J.M. (2010). Prosocial motivation at work: How making a difference makes a difference. Forthcoming in K. Cameron and G. Spreitzer (Eds.), Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship. Oxford University Press.

  • Grolnick, W. S., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. (1991). Inner resources for school achievement: Motivational mediators of children’s perceptions of their parents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 508–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grolnick, W. S., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1997). Internalization within the family: The self-determination theory perspective. In J. E. Grusec & L. Kuczynski (Eds.), Parenting and children’s internalization of values: A handbook of contemporary theory (pp. 78–99). London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gündoğdu, R., & Yavuzer, Y. (2012). Examining subjective well-being and psychological needs of students at the educational faculty according to demographic variables [Eğitim fakültesi öğrencilerinin öznel iyi oluş ve psikolojik ihtiyaçlarının demografik değişkenlere göre incelenmesi.]. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Educational Faculty Journal, 23, 115–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepach, R., Vaish, A., & Tomasello, M. (2013). A new look at children’s prosocial motivation. Infancy, 18(1), 67–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagitcibasi, Ç. (2010). Benlik, Aile ve İnsan Gelişimi: Kültürel Psikoloji. İstanbul: Koç Universitesi Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagitcibasi, C., & Ataca, B. (2005). Value of children and family change: A three decade portrait of from Turkey. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(3), 317–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagitcibasi, C., Ataca, B., & Diri, A. (2005). The Turkish family and value of children: Trends over time. In G. Trommsdorff & B. Nauck (Eds.), The value of children in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 91–120). Berlin: Pabst Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanat-Maymon, M., & Assor, A. (2010). Perceived maternal control and responsiveness to distress as predictors of young adults’ empathic responses. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 33–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kesici, Ş., Üre Ö., Bozgeyikli, H. & Sünbül, A. M. (2003). Temel psikolojik ihtiyaçlar ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirliği. VII. Ulusal PDR Kongresi Bildiri Özetleri Kitabı, Malatya.

  • Kındap, Y. (2011). A longitudinal study of the relationship between supportive parenting, social adjustment and self-determination level among adolescents on the basis of self Determination Theory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Psychology, Hacettepe University.

  • Kındap, Y., Öztürk, P. & Sayıl, M. (2011). Öğretmenin ergeni destekleyici ve kontrol edici sınıf uygulamaları ve ergenin akademik uyumu arasındaki ilişkide özerk motivasyonun aracı rolü. V. Psikoloji Lisansüstü Öğrencileri Kongresinde sunulmuş sözel bildiri, İstanbul.

  • Kocayoruk, E. (2012a). The perception of parents and well-being of adolescents: Link with basic psychological need satisfaction. Social and Behavioral Science, 46, 3624–3628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kocayoruk, E. (2012b). Self-determination theory and relationship between perception of parents and emotional well-being of adolescents. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 4(37), 24–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krevins, J., & Gibbs, J. C. (1996). Parents’ use of inductive discipline: Relationships to children’s empathy and pro-social behavior. Child Development, 67, 3263–3277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumru, A. (2002). Prosocial behavior within the family context and its correlates among Turkish early adolescents. ETD collection for University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Paper AAI3074086. Lincoln: University of Nebraska.

  • Kumru, A., Carlo, G., & Edwards, C. P. (2004). Olumlu sosyal davranışların ilişkisel, kültürel, bilişsel ve duyuşsal bazı değişkenlerle ilişkisi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 19(54), 109–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laible, D., Carlo, G., & Raffaelli, M. (2000). The differential impact of parent and peer attachment on adolescent adjustment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 29, 45–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, S. F., Jimerson, S., Kikas, E., Cefai, C., Veiga, F. H., Nelson, B., & Zollneritsch, J. (2012). Do girls and boys perceive themselves as equally engaged in school? The results of an international study from 12 countries. Journal of School Psychology, 50, 77–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lietaert, S., Roorda, D., Laevers, F., Verschueren, K., & De Fraine, B. (2015). The gender gap in student engagement: The role of teachers' autonomy support, structure, and involvement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 498–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, B. S. C., & Wang, C. K. J. (2009). Perceived autonomy support, behavioural regulations in physical education and physical activity intention. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10(1), 52–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lochbaum, M., & Jean-Noel, J. (2016). Perceived autonomy-support instruction and student outcomes in physical education and leisure-time: A meta-analytic review of correlates. RICYDE Revista internacional de ciencias del deporte, 43(12), 29–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martela, F., & Ryan, R. M. (2015). The benefits of benevolence: Basic psychological needs, beneficence, and the enhancement of well-being. Journal of Personality, 84, 750–764. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. G. (1997). Cultural conceptions of duty: Implications for motivation and morality. In D. Munro, J. F. Schumaker, & A. C. Carr (Eds.), Motivation and culture (pp. 178–192). Boston: Routledge Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özdikmenli-Demir, G. (2009). Üniversite öğrencilerinin kimlik gelişiminde sosyal ve kimlik sermayelerinin rolü. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.

  • Pakaslahti, L., & Keltikangas-Järvinen, L. (2001). Peer-attributed prosocial behavior among aggressive/preferred, aggressive/nonpreferred non-aggressive/preferred, and non-aggressive/nonpreferred adolescents. Personality & Individual Differences, 30, 903–916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavey, L., Greitemeyer, T., & Sparks, P. (2011). Highlighting relatedness promotes Prosocial motives and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(7), 905–917. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211405994.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, G. (2008). Perceived parental conditional regard and autonomy support as predictors of young adults’ self-versus other-oriented prosocial tendencies. Journal of Personality, 76(3), 513–534.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, G., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Bibi, U. (2011). Prevention of school bullying: The important role of autonomy-supportive teaching and internalization of pro-social values. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 654–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749–761.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., Stiller, J. D., & Lynch, J. H. (1994). Representations of relationships to teachers, parents, and friends as predictors of academic motivation and self-esteem. Journal of Early Adolescence, 14(2), 226–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarı, İ (2016). Evaliation of the researcers on the basic psychological needs in terms of gender: A meta-analytic review. [Temel psikolojik ihtiyaçlar üzerine Türkiye’de yapılan araştırmaların cinsiyet açısından değerlendirilmesi: Bir meta analiz çalışması]. Paper presented International Conference of Strategic Research in Social Science and Education, At Antalya.

  • Şimşek, Ö. F., & Yalıncetin, B. (2010). I feel unique, therefore I am: The development and preliminary validation of the personal sense of uniqueness (PSU) scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 576–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soenens, B., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2005). Antecedents and outcomes of self-determination in three life domains: The role of parents’ and teachers’ autonomy support. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34, 589–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., Luyckx, K., Goossens, L., Beyers, W., et al. (2007). Conceptualizing parental autonomy support: Adolescent perceptions of promotion of independence versus promotion of volitional functioning. Developmental Psychology, 43, 633–646.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sosic-Vasic, Z., Keis, O., Lau, M., Spitzer, M., & Streb, J. (2015). The impact of motivation and teachers’ autonomy support on children’s executive functions. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 146. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00146.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Vansteenkiste, M., Sierens, E., Soenens, B., Goossens, L., Dochy, F., Aelterman, N., & Beyers, W. (2012). Identifying configurations of perceived autonomy support and structure: Associations with self- regulated learning, motivation and problem behavior. Learning and Instruction, 22(6), 431–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Extrinsic rewards undermine altruistic tendencies in 20-month-olds. Developmental Psychology, 44(6), 1785–1788.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, N., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). When helping helps: Autonomous motivation for Prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 222–244.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. C., & Deci, E. L. (1996). Internalization of biopsychosocial values by medical students: A test of self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 767–779.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. C., Gagné, M., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). Facilitating autonomous motivation for smoking cessation. Health Psychology, 21, 40–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, M. M. (2008). Perceptions of parental involvement and autonomy support: Their relations with self-regulation, academic performance, substance use and resilience among adolescents. North American Journal of Psychology, 10(3), 497–518.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yeliz Kındap-Tepe.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kındap-Tepe, Y., Aktaş, V. The Mediating Role of Needs Satisfaction for Prosocial Behavior and Autonomy Support. Curr Psychol 40, 5212–5224 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00466-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00466-9

Keywords

Navigation