Abstract
This study examines gender differences in compliant/anonymous prosocial behaviors and perceived autonomy support. The mediation effects of needs satisfaction on relationships between perceived autonomy support and prosocial behaviors in Turkish culture are also tested. A total of 420 freshmen, sophomore, and junior students (210 female, 202 male) from various departments at a small state university in Turkey participated in the study. They were first, third and fourth year students and the mean age was 21.87 (SD = 1.71; range = 19–31). Parental Autonomy Support Scale (Soenens et al. Developmental Psychology, 43, 633–646, 2007), the Learning Climate Questionnaire (Williams and Deci Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 767-779 1996), the Basic Needs Satisfaction in General Scale (Deci and Ryan Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268 2000; Gagné 2003), and the Prosocial Tendencies Measure (Carlo and Randall Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31, 31-44 2002) were used to collect data. With respect to gender differences, a One-Way ANOVA analysis showed that women scored higher than men regarding compliant and anonymous prosocial behaviors. Additionally, mediation analyses revealed that women perceived that they were the recipient of more autonomy support from their university teachers than men. No significant difference was found in respect to the provision of autonomous support from parents, nor with respect to basic needs satisfaction. The analysis of mediation effects of needs satisfaction showed that relationships between compliant and anonymous prosocial behaviors and perceived autonomy support from parents and teachers were mediated by basic needs satisfaction. These results were discussed in the framework of Self Determination Theory.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aktaş, V., & Güvenç, G. B. (2006). Kız ve erkek ergenlerde saldırgan ve olumlu sosyal davranışlar ile yaş, ilişkisel bağlam ve kişiler arası duyarlılık arasındaki ilişkiler. Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(2), 233–264.
Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviors predicting students’ engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 261–278.
Barry, C. M., Padilla-Walker, L. M., Madsen, S. D., & Nelson, L. J. (2008). The impact of maternal relationship quality on emerging adults’ prosocial tendencies: Indirect effects via regulation of prosocial values. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 581–591.
Batson, C. D. (1998). Altruism and prosocial behavior. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 282–316).
Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84, 740–756.
Böckler, A., Tusche, A., & Singer, T. (2016). The structure of human prosociality: Differentiating altruistically motivated, norm motivated, strategically motivated, and self-reported prosocial behavior. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(6), 530–541.
Carlo, G., & Randall, B. A. (2001). Are all prosocial behaviors equal? A socioecological developmental conception of prosocial behavior. In F. Columbus (Ed.), Advances in Psychology Research, volume II (pp. 151–170). New York: Nova Science.
Carlo, G., & Randall, B. A. (2002). The development of a measure of prosocial behaviors for late adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31, 31–44.
Carlo, G., Fabes, R. A., Laible, D., & Kupanoff, K. (1999). Early adolescence and prosocial/moral behavior II: The role of social and contextual influences. Journal of Early Adolescence, 19, 133–147.
Carlo, G., Hausmann, A., Christiansen, S., & Randall, B. A. (2003). Sociocognitive and behavioral correlates of a measure of prosocial tendencies for adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescece, 23, 107–134.
Çelikkaleli, Ö., & Gündoğdu, M. (2005). Psychological needs of students of the faculty of education. [Eğitim fakültesi öğrencilerinin psikolojik ihtiyaçları]. Inönü University Educational Faculty Journal, 6(9), 43–53.
Chirkov, V., & Ryan, R. M. (2001). Parent and teacher autonomy-support in Russian and U.S. adolescents: Common effects on well-being and academic motivation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(5), 618–635.
Cihangir-Çankaya, Z. (2009). Autonomy support, basic psychological need satisfaction and subjecive well-being: Self-determination theory [Özerklik desteği, temel psikolojik ihtiyaçların doyumu ve öznel iyi olma: Öz belirleme kuramı]. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 4(31), 23–31.
Cross, S. E., & Markus, H. R. (1999). The cultural constitution of personality. In L. H. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 378–396). New York: Guilford.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains. Canadian Psychology, 49(1), 14–23.
Eagly, A. H., & Crowley, M. (1986). Gender and helping: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 283–308.
Eberly, M. B., & Montemayor, R. (1998). Doing good deeds: An examination of adolescent prosocial behavior in the context of parent/adolescent relationships. Journal of Adolescent Research, 13, 403–432.
Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1998). Prosocial development. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed., pp. 701–778). New York: Wiley.
Eisenberg, N., & Murphy, B. (1995). Parenting and children’s moral development. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting (Vol. 4, pp. 227–257). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Spinrad, T. L. (2006). Prosocial development. In W. Damon, R.M. Lerner (Eds.), & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3: Social, emotional and personality development (6th ed., pp. 646–718). Hoboken: Wiley.
Fabes, R.A., & Eisenberg, N. (1996). Age and Gender Differences in Prosocial Behavior: A Meta Analytic Examination. Arizona State University: Unpublished manuscript.
Fabes, R. A., Carlo, G., Kupanoff, K., & Laible, D. (1999). Early adolescence and Prosocial/moral behavior I: The role of individual processes. Journal of Early Adolescence, 19, 5–16.
Ferguson, Y. L., Kasser, T., & Jahng, S. (2011). Differences in life satisfaction and school satisfaction among adolescents from three nations: The role of perceived autonomy support. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(3), 649–661.
Gagné, M. (2003). The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engagement. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 199–223.
Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331–362.
Göregenli, M. (1997). Individualist-collectivist tendencies in a Turkish sample. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28, 787–794.
Grant, A. M. (2008). Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 48–58.
Grant, A.M., & Berg, J.M. (2010). Prosocial motivation at work: How making a difference makes a difference. Forthcoming in K. Cameron and G. Spreitzer (Eds.), Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship. Oxford University Press.
Grolnick, W. S., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. (1991). Inner resources for school achievement: Motivational mediators of children’s perceptions of their parents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 508–517.
Grolnick, W. S., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1997). Internalization within the family: The self-determination theory perspective. In J. E. Grusec & L. Kuczynski (Eds.), Parenting and children’s internalization of values: A handbook of contemporary theory (pp. 78–99). London: Wiley.
Gündoğdu, R., & Yavuzer, Y. (2012). Examining subjective well-being and psychological needs of students at the educational faculty according to demographic variables [Eğitim fakültesi öğrencilerinin öznel iyi oluş ve psikolojik ihtiyaçlarının demografik değişkenlere göre incelenmesi.]. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Educational Faculty Journal, 23, 115–131.
Hayes, A. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.
Hepach, R., Vaish, A., & Tomasello, M. (2013). A new look at children’s prosocial motivation. Infancy, 18(1), 67–90.
Kagitcibasi, Ç. (2010). Benlik, Aile ve İnsan Gelişimi: Kültürel Psikoloji. İstanbul: Koç Universitesi Yayınları.
Kagitcibasi, C., & Ataca, B. (2005). Value of children and family change: A three decade portrait of from Turkey. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(3), 317–137.
Kagitcibasi, C., Ataca, B., & Diri, A. (2005). The Turkish family and value of children: Trends over time. In G. Trommsdorff & B. Nauck (Eds.), The value of children in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 91–120). Berlin: Pabst Science.
Kanat-Maymon, M., & Assor, A. (2010). Perceived maternal control and responsiveness to distress as predictors of young adults’ empathic responses. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 33–46.
Kesici, Ş., Üre Ö., Bozgeyikli, H. & Sünbül, A. M. (2003). Temel psikolojik ihtiyaçlar ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirliği. VII. Ulusal PDR Kongresi Bildiri Özetleri Kitabı, Malatya.
Kındap, Y. (2011). A longitudinal study of the relationship between supportive parenting, social adjustment and self-determination level among adolescents on the basis of self Determination Theory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Psychology, Hacettepe University.
Kındap, Y., Öztürk, P. & Sayıl, M. (2011). Öğretmenin ergeni destekleyici ve kontrol edici sınıf uygulamaları ve ergenin akademik uyumu arasındaki ilişkide özerk motivasyonun aracı rolü. V. Psikoloji Lisansüstü Öğrencileri Kongresinde sunulmuş sözel bildiri, İstanbul.
Kocayoruk, E. (2012a). The perception of parents and well-being of adolescents: Link with basic psychological need satisfaction. Social and Behavioral Science, 46, 3624–3628.
Kocayoruk, E. (2012b). Self-determination theory and relationship between perception of parents and emotional well-being of adolescents. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 4(37), 24–37.
Krevins, J., & Gibbs, J. C. (1996). Parents’ use of inductive discipline: Relationships to children’s empathy and pro-social behavior. Child Development, 67, 3263–3277.
Kumru, A. (2002). Prosocial behavior within the family context and its correlates among Turkish early adolescents. ETD collection for University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Paper AAI3074086. Lincoln: University of Nebraska.
Kumru, A., Carlo, G., & Edwards, C. P. (2004). Olumlu sosyal davranışların ilişkisel, kültürel, bilişsel ve duyuşsal bazı değişkenlerle ilişkisi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 19(54), 109–125.
Laible, D., Carlo, G., & Raffaelli, M. (2000). The differential impact of parent and peer attachment on adolescent adjustment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 29, 45–59.
Lam, S. F., Jimerson, S., Kikas, E., Cefai, C., Veiga, F. H., Nelson, B., & Zollneritsch, J. (2012). Do girls and boys perceive themselves as equally engaged in school? The results of an international study from 12 countries. Journal of School Psychology, 50, 77–94.
Lietaert, S., Roorda, D., Laevers, F., Verschueren, K., & De Fraine, B. (2015). The gender gap in student engagement: The role of teachers' autonomy support, structure, and involvement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 498–518.
Lim, B. S. C., & Wang, C. K. J. (2009). Perceived autonomy support, behavioural regulations in physical education and physical activity intention. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10(1), 52–60.
Lochbaum, M., & Jean-Noel, J. (2016). Perceived autonomy-support instruction and student outcomes in physical education and leisure-time: A meta-analytic review of correlates. RICYDE Revista internacional de ciencias del deporte, 43(12), 29–47.
Martela, F., & Ryan, R. M. (2015). The benefits of benevolence: Basic psychological needs, beneficence, and the enhancement of well-being. Journal of Personality, 84, 750–764. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12215.
Miller, J. G. (1997). Cultural conceptions of duty: Implications for motivation and morality. In D. Munro, J. F. Schumaker, & A. C. Carr (Eds.), Motivation and culture (pp. 178–192). Boston: Routledge Kegan Paul.
Özdikmenli-Demir, G. (2009). Üniversite öğrencilerinin kimlik gelişiminde sosyal ve kimlik sermayelerinin rolü. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.
Pakaslahti, L., & Keltikangas-Järvinen, L. (2001). Peer-attributed prosocial behavior among aggressive/preferred, aggressive/nonpreferred non-aggressive/preferred, and non-aggressive/nonpreferred adolescents. Personality & Individual Differences, 30, 903–916.
Pavey, L., Greitemeyer, T., & Sparks, P. (2011). Highlighting relatedness promotes Prosocial motives and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(7), 905–917. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211405994.
Roth, G. (2008). Perceived parental conditional regard and autonomy support as predictors of young adults’ self-versus other-oriented prosocial tendencies. Journal of Personality, 76(3), 513–534.
Roth, G., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Bibi, U. (2011). Prevention of school bullying: The important role of autonomy-supportive teaching and internalization of pro-social values. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 654–666.
Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749–761.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020.
Ryan, R. M., Stiller, J. D., & Lynch, J. H. (1994). Representations of relationships to teachers, parents, and friends as predictors of academic motivation and self-esteem. Journal of Early Adolescence, 14(2), 226–249.
Sarı, İ (2016). Evaliation of the researcers on the basic psychological needs in terms of gender: A meta-analytic review. [Temel psikolojik ihtiyaçlar üzerine Türkiye’de yapılan araştırmaların cinsiyet açısından değerlendirilmesi: Bir meta analiz çalışması]. Paper presented International Conference of Strategic Research in Social Science and Education, At Antalya.
Şimşek, Ö. F., & Yalıncetin, B. (2010). I feel unique, therefore I am: The development and preliminary validation of the personal sense of uniqueness (PSU) scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 576–581.
Soenens, B., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2005). Antecedents and outcomes of self-determination in three life domains: The role of parents’ and teachers’ autonomy support. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34, 589–604.
Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., Luyckx, K., Goossens, L., Beyers, W., et al. (2007). Conceptualizing parental autonomy support: Adolescent perceptions of promotion of independence versus promotion of volitional functioning. Developmental Psychology, 43, 633–646.
Sosic-Vasic, Z., Keis, O., Lau, M., Spitzer, M., & Streb, J. (2015). The impact of motivation and teachers’ autonomy support on children’s executive functions. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 146. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00146.
Vansteenkiste, M., Sierens, E., Soenens, B., Goossens, L., Dochy, F., Aelterman, N., & Beyers, W. (2012). Identifying configurations of perceived autonomy support and structure: Associations with self- regulated learning, motivation and problem behavior. Learning and Instruction, 22(6), 431–439.
Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Extrinsic rewards undermine altruistic tendencies in 20-month-olds. Developmental Psychology, 44(6), 1785–1788.
Weinstein, N., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). When helping helps: Autonomous motivation for Prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 222–244.
Williams, G. C., & Deci, E. L. (1996). Internalization of biopsychosocial values by medical students: A test of self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 767–779.
Williams, G. C., Gagné, M., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). Facilitating autonomous motivation for smoking cessation. Health Psychology, 21, 40–50.
Wong, M. M. (2008). Perceptions of parental involvement and autonomy support: Their relations with self-regulation, academic performance, substance use and resilience among adolescents. North American Journal of Psychology, 10(3), 497–518.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kındap-Tepe, Y., Aktaş, V. The Mediating Role of Needs Satisfaction for Prosocial Behavior and Autonomy Support. Curr Psychol 40, 5212–5224 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00466-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00466-9