Skip to main content
Log in

The Subjective Risk Intelligence Scale. The Development of a New Scale to Measure a New Construct

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Living in a risky society, in which risk and uncertainty are the rule rather than the exception implies that individuals need to develop new psychological resources to face unpredictable changes and to consider risk and uncertainty as opportunities. This study presents a new definition of the construct of Subjective Risk Intelligence and a new scale to measure this construct, composed of four dimensions: imaginative capability, problem-solving self-efficacy, positive attitude toward uncertainty, and emotional stress vulnerability. The structure and the concurrent and discriminant validity of the scale have been verified, and have demonstrated good psychometric features. Indications for future research and applications in interventions are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apgar, D. (2006). Risk intelligence: Learning to manage what we don’t know. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64, 359–372.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. (1994). Advanced topics in structural equation models. In Advanced methods of marketing research, Edited by Richard P. Bagozzi, Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers: 1–51.

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Edwards, J. R. (1998). A general approach for representing constructs in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1), 45–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1992). Exercise of personal agency through the self-efficacy mechanism. In This chapter includes revised and expanded material presented as an invited address at the annual meeting of the British Psychological Society, St. Andrews, Scotland, Apr 1989. Hemisphere publishing Corp.

  • Baron, R. A. (2008). The role of affect in the entrepreneurial process. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 328–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-On, R. (1997). The emotional quotient inventory (EQ-i): Technical manual. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-On, R. (2010). Emotional intelligence: An integral part of positive psychology. South African Journal of Psychology, 40(1), 54–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2007). Liquid times: Living in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumann, A. A., & Odum, A. L. (2012). Impulsivity, risk taking, and timing. Behavioural Processes, 90(3), 408–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2012.04.005.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Beaney, M. (2005). Imagination and creativity. Milton Keynes: Open University.

  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1999). World risk society. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino: Multivariate Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berenbaum, H., Bredemeier, K., & Thompson, R. J. (2008). Intolerance of uncertainty: Exploring its dimensionality and associations with need for cognitive closure, psychopathology, and personality. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 22, 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2007.01.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, P. L. (1996). Against the gods: The remarkable story of risk. Inc: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besser, A., & Shackelford, T. K. (2007). Mediation of the effects of the big five personality dimensions on negative mood and confirmed affective expectations by perceived situational stress: A quasi-field study of vacationers. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(7), 1333–1346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.10.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betoret, F. D., & Artiga, A. G. (2010). Barriers perceived by teachers at work, coping strategies, self-efficacy and burnout. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13(02), 637–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bimrose, J., & Hearne, L. (2012). Resilience and career adaptability: Qualitative studies of adult career counseling. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81(3), 338–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.08.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bimrose, J., Barnes, S. A., & Hughes, D. (2008). Adult career progression and advancement: A five year study of the effectiveness of guidance. Coventry: Warwick Institute for Employment Research and the Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills.

  • Blalock, J., & Joiner, T. E. (2000). Interaction of cognitive avoidance coping and stress in predicting depression/anxiety. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 24, 47–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bright, J. E. H., & Pryor, R. G. L. (2005). The chaos theory of careers: A user’s guide. The Career Development Quarterly, 53, 291–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bright, J. E. H., & Pryor, R. G. L. (2008). Shiftwork: A chaos theory of careers agenda for change in career counselling. Australian Journal of Career Development, 17(3), 168–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845310362221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bright, J. E. H., Pryor, R. G. L., & Harpham, L. (2005). The role of chance events in career decision making. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 561–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2004.05.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunevicius, A., Katkute, A., & Bunevicius, R. (2008). Symptoms of anxiety and depression in medical students and in humanities students: Relationship with big-five personality dimensions and vulnerability to stress. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 54(6), 494–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764008090843.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2008). Testing for multigroup equivalence of a measuring instrument: A walk through the process. Psicothema, 20, 872–882.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equations modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications and programming (2nd ed.). NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardena, E., Koopman, C., Classen, C., & Spiegel, D. (1996). Psychometric review of the Stanford acute stress reaction questionnaire (SASRQ). Measurement of stress, trauma, and adaptation. Sidran Press, Lutherville, 293-295.

  • Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1988). A control-process perspective on anxiety. Anxiety Research, 1(1), 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 267–283.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2006). Creativity versus conscientiousness: Which is a better predictor of student performance? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(4), 521–531. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, G. W. (2008). Testing equivalence in the structure, means, and variances of higher order constructs with structural equation modeling. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 593–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Models, 9, 233–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor-Smith, J. K., & Flachsbart, C. (2007). Relations between personality and coping: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 1080–1107.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Craparo, G. (2015). Inconsci, coscienza e desiderio. Carocci: L’incertezza in psicoanalisi. Roma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craparo, G. (2016). Elogio dell’incertezza. Saggi psicoanalitici. Milano: Mimesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craparo, G., Magnano, P., & Faraci, P. (2014). Psychometric properties of the Italian version of self-report emotional intelligence test (SREIT). TPM, 21(2), 121–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewett, T. (2006). Exploring the role of risk in employee creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 40(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2006.tb01265.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1990). Risk as a forensic resource. Daedalus, 119, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1992). Risk and blame: Essays in cultural theory. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugas, M. J., Letarte, H., Rhéaume, J., Freeston, M. H., & Ladouceur, R. (1995). Worry and problem solving: Evidence of a specific relationship. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 19(1), 109–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugas, M. J., Freeston, M. H., & Ladouceur, R. (1997). Intolerance of uncertainty and problem orientation in worry. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 21(6), 593–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugas, M. J., Gosselin, P., & Ladouceur, R. (2001). Intolerance of uncertainty and worry: Investigating specificity in a nonclinical sample. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 25(5), 551–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugas, M. J., Buhr, K., & Ladouceur, R. (2004). The role of intolerance of uncertainty in etiology and maintenance. In R. G. Heimberg, C. L. Turk, & D. S. Mennin (Eds.), Generalized anxiety disorder: Advances in research and practice (pp. 143–163). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ee, J., Seng, T. O., & Kwang, N. A. (2007). Styles of creativity: Adaptors and innovators in a Singapore context. Asia Pacific Education Review, 8(3), 364–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03026466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D. (2012). Risk Intelligence. In S. Roeser, R. Hillerbrand, P. Sandin, & M. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of Risk Theory (pp. 604–620). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5.

  • Eysenck, H. J., & Furnham, A. (1993). Personality and the Barron-welsh art scale. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 76, 837–838.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fidler, L. A., & Johnson, J. D. (1984). Communication and innovation implementation. Academy of Management Review, 9, 704–711.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folkmann, M. N. (2010). Enabling creativity. Imagination in design processes. Paper presented at the 1st international conference on design creativity ICDC, Kobe, Japan.

  • Foo, M. D. (2011). Emotions and entrepreneurial opportunity evaluation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35, 375–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, A. & Paton, K. (2007). Barriers’ to Participation in Higher Education? Depends who you ask and how. Paper presented at BERA Annual Conference, London 6-8 September.

  • Funston, F., & Wagner, S. (2010). Surviving and thriving in uncertainty: Creating the risk intelligent enterprise. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., & Bachtiar, V. (2008). Personality and intelligence as predictors of creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(7), 613–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gist, M. E. (1987). Self-efficacy: Implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 12(3), 472–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greco, V., & Roger, D. (2003). Uncertainty, stress, and health. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 1057–1068.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guastello, S. J., Guastello, D. D., & Hanson, C. A. (2004). Creativity, mood disorders, and emotional intelligence. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 38(4), 260–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guido, G., Peluso, A. M., Capestro, M., & Miglietta, M. (2015). An Italian version of the 10-item big five inventory: An application to hedonic and utilitarian shopping values. Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 135–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrickx, L., & Vlek, C. (1991). Perceived control, nature of risk information, and risk taking. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 4, 235–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, G., & Sorrentino, R. M. (1999). Uncertainty orientation and the big five personality structure. Journal of Research in Personality, 33(2), 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1999.2244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holahan, C. J., & Moos, R. H. (1986). Personality, coping, and family resources in stress resistance: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(2), 389.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., Phillips, J. M., & Hedlund, J. (1994). Decision risk in dynamic two- stage contexts: Beyond the status quo. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 592–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, J. L., & McArdle, J. J. (1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement equivalence in aging research. Experimental Aging Research, 18, 117–144.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J., Allum, N., & Gaskell, G. (2006). Bridging levels of analysis in risk perception research : The case of the fear of crime. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalan, A., & Kleiner, B. H. (1995). New developments in developing creativity. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 10, 20–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerusalem, M., & Schwarzer, R. (1992). Self-efficacy as a resource factor in stress appraisal processes. In R. Schwarzer (Ed.), Self-efficacy: Thought control of action (pp. 195–213). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). L1SREL 7: A guide to the program and applications. Chicago: SPSS Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., Jackson, C. L., Shaw, J. C., Scott, B. A., & Rich, B. L. (2007). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: The integral role of individual differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 107–127.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karwowski, M., Lebuda, I., Wisniewska, E., & Gralewski, J. (2013). Big five personality traits as the predictors of creative self efficacy and creative personal identity: Does gender matter? The Journal of Creative Behavior, 47(3), 215–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, K. E. (2006). Relationship between the five-factor model of personality and the scale of creative attributes and behavior: A validation study. Individual Differences Research, 4, 299–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, L. A., McKee Walker, L., & Broyles, S. J. (1996). Creativity and the five-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 203, 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1996.0013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirton, M. J. (1999). Kirton adaption-innovation inventory manual (3rd ed.). Berkhamsted: Occupational Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. New York: Hart, Schaffner and Marx.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krell, E. (2010). Risk chat: What is risk intelligence? http://Businessfinancemag.Com/Article/Riskchat-What-Risk- intelligence-0621.

  • Krueger, N. J., & Dickson, P. R. (1994). How believing in ourselves increases risk taking: Perceived self-efficacy and opportunity recognition. Decision Sciences, 25(3), 385–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, J. T., McGraw, A. P., Mellers, B. A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). The agony of victory and thrill of defeat: Mixed emotional reactions to disappointing wins and relieving losses. Psychological Science, 15(5), 325–330.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leccardi, C. (2006). Facing uncertainty, temporality and biographies in the new century. In C. Leccardi & R. Elisabetta (Eds.), A new youth? Young people, generations and family life (pp. 15–40). Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2000). Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgment and choice. Cognition & Emotion, 14, 473–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J. S., Gonzalez, R. M., Small, D. A., & Fischhoff, B. (2003). Effects of fear and anger on perceived risks of terrorism: A national field experiment. Psychological Science, 14, 144–150.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, W. S., Hsu, Y., & Liang, C. (2014). The mediator effects of conceiving imagination on academic performance of design students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-013-9244-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lion, R., Meertens, R. M., & Bot, I. (2002). Priorities in information desire about unknown risks. Risk Analysis, 22, 765–776.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Magnano, P., Paolillo, A., Platania, S., & Santisi, G. (2017). Courage as a potential mediator between personality and coping. Personality and Individual Differences, 111, 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2006). Integration of multidimensional self-concept and core personality constructs: Construct validation and relations to well-being and achievement. Journal of Personality, 74, 403–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00380.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martindale, C., & Dailey, A. (1996). Creativity. Primary process cognition and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 409–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martuccelli, D. (2006). Forgé par l’Épreuve. L’Individu dans la France Contemporaine. Paris: Armand Colin.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258–1265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meade, A. W., Johnson, E. C., & Braddy, P. W. (2008). Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 568–592.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mellers, B. A., Schwartz, A., & Weber, E. U. (1997). Do risk attitudes reflect in the eye of the beholder? In A. A. J. Marley (Ed.), Choice, decision and measurement (pp. 57–71). New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, M. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58(4), 525–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikolajczak, M., Luminet, O., & Menil, C. (2006). Predicting resistance to stress: Incremental validity of trait emotional intelligence over alexithymia and optimism. Psicothema, 18(Suplemento), 79-88.

  • Mishra, S., & Lalumière, M. L. (2011). Individual differences in risk-propensity: Associations between personality and behavioral measures of risk. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(6), 869–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.11.03.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mousavi, S., & Gigerenzer, G. (2014). Risk, uncertainty, and heuristics. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1671–1678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.02.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, M. R. (1995). Diagnosing measurement equivalence in cross-national research. Journal of International Business Studies, 26, 573–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, J. R., Henderson-King, D. H., & Henderson-King, E. I. (1997). Facing technological risks: The importance of individual differences. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakata, C., & Sivakumar, K. (1996). National culture and new product development: An integrative review. The Journal of Marketing, 60, 61–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, N., Fenton-O’Creevy, M., Soane, E., & Willman, P. (2002). Risk propensity and personality. London Business School, Open University Business School and Said Business School Oxford, London.

  • Nicholson, N., Soane, E., Fenton-O’Creevy, M., & Willman, P. (2005). Personality and domain-specific risk taking. Journal of Risk Research, 8(2), 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/1366987032000123856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastorelli, C., Vecchio, G. M., & Boda, G. (2001). Autoefficacia nelle life skills: soluzione dei problemi e comunicazione interpersonale. In G. V. Caprara (Ed.), La Valutazione dell’Autoefficacia (pp. 137–146). Trento: Erickson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlova, E. M., & Kornilova, T. V. (2013). Creativity and tolerance for uncertainty predict the engagement of emotional intelligence in personal decision making. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 6(4), 34–46. 10.11621/pir.2013.0403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennings, J. M. E., & Smidts, A. (2000). Assessing the construct validity of risk attitude. Management Science, 46(10), 1337–1348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrides, K. V., & Furnham, A. (2003). Trait emotional intelligence: Behavioral validation in two studies of emotion recognition and reactivity to mood induction. European Journal of Personality, 17, 39–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podoynitsyna, K., Van der Bij, H., & Song, M. (2012). The role of mixed emotions in the risk perception of novice and serial entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 36(1), 115–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00476.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polman, R., Borkoles, E., & Nicholls, A. R. (2010). Type D personality, stress, and symptoms of burnout: The influence of avoidance coping and social support. British Journal of Health Psychology, 15(3), 681–696.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raffaelli, M., & Crockett, L. J. (2003). Sexual risk taking in adolescence: The role of self-regulation and attraction to risk. Developmental Psychology, 39(6), 1036–1046. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.39.6.1036.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the big five inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raykov, T. (1998). Coefficient alpha and composite reliability with interrelated non homogeneous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 375–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiter-Palmon, R., Illies, J. J., & Kobe-Cross, L. M. (2009). Conscientiousness is not always a good predictor of performance: The case of creativity. The International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving, 19(2), 27–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrmann, B. (2005). Risk Attitude Scales: Concepts, Questionnaires, Utilizations. Project Report: University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657–687.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (2014). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. San Diego: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salanova, M., Grau, R., & Martinez, I. (2005). Demandas laborales y conductas de afrontamiento: El rol modulador de la autoeficacia profesional [labour demands and coping behavior: The modulator role of the professional self-efficacy]. Psicothema, 17(3), 390–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salovey, P., Bedell, B. T., Detweiler, J. B., & Mayer, J. D. (1999). Coping intelligently. Coping, 141–164.

  • Sánchez-Ruiz, M. J., Hernández-Torrano, D., Pérez-González, J. C., Batey, M., & Petrides, K. V. (2011). The relationship between trait emotional intelligence and creativity across subject domains. Motivation and Emotion, 35(4), 461–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savickas, M. L., & Porfeli, E. J. (2012). Career adapt-abilities scale: Construction, reliability, and measurement equivalence across 13 countries. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 661–673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutte, N. S., Malouff, J. M., Hall, L. E., Haggerty, D. J., Cooper, J. T., Golden, C. J., & al. (1998). Development and validation of a measure of emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 167–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzer, R. (2014). Self-efficacy: Thought control of action. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzer, R., Knoll, N., & Rieckmann, N. (2004). Social support. Health psychology, 158, 181. (Book).

  • Sen, A. K., & Hagtvet, K. A. (1993). Correlations among creativity, intelligence, personality, and academic achievement. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 77, 497–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shalley, C. E. (1995). Effects of coaction, expected evaluation, and goal setting on creativity and productivity. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 483–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shalley, C.E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G.R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933–958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sica, C., Magni, C., Ghisi, M., Altoè, G., & Sighinolfi, C. (2008). Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced-Nuova Versione Italiana (COPE-NVI): uno strumento per la misura degli stili di coping. Psicoterapia Cognitiva e Comportamentale, 14, 27–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvia, P. J., Nusbaum, E. C., Berg, C., Martin, C., & O’Connor, A. (2009). Openness to experience, plasticity, and creativity: Exploring lower-order, high-order, and interactive effects. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(6), 1087–1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.04.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J. (1995). Measurement issues in cross-national research. Journal of International Business Studies, 26, 597–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sitkin, S. B., & Weingart, L. R. (1995). Determinants of risky decision making behavior: A test of the mediating role of risk perceptions and propensity. Academy of Management Journal, 38(6), 1573–1592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236, 280–285.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., & Peters, E. (2006). Risk perception and affect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(6), 322–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00461.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorrentino, R. M., & Short, J. C. (1986). Uncertainty orientation, motivation, and cognition. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 379–403). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorrentino, R. M., Hewitt, E. C., & Raso-Knott, P. A. (1992). Risk-taking in games of chance and skill: Informational and affective influences on choice behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 522–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavridou, A., & Furnham, A. (1996). The relationship between psychoticism, trait-creativity and the attentional mechanism of cognitive inhibition. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 143–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, J.-B., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-National Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1), 78–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiger, J. H. (1989). EzPATH: A supplementary module for SYSTAT and SYGRAPH. Evanston: SYSTAT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suls, J. (2001). Affect, stress, and personality. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Handbook of affect and social cognition (pp. 392–409). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sung, S. Y., & Choi, J. N. (2009). Do big five personality factors affect individual creativity ? The moderating role of extrinsic motivation. Social Behavior and Personality, 37(7), 941–956. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2009.37.7.941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tesluk, P. E., Farr, J. L., & Klein, S. R. (1997). Influences of organizational culture and climate on individual creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 31, 27–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, D. (2003). Cohen on Kant’s aesthetic judgements. British Journal of Aesthetics, 43(1), 75–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieira, M. M., Pappàmikail, L., & Resende, J. (2013). Forced to deal with the future: Uncertainty and risk in vocational choices among Portuguese secondary school students. The Sociological Review, 61(4), 745–768. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlek, C., & Stallen, P. J. (1981). Judging risk and benefits in the small and in the large. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 28, 235–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollrath, M., & Torgersen, S. (2000). Personality types and coping. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 367–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volz, K. G., & Gigerenzer, G. (2012). Cognitive processes in decisions under risk are not the same as in decisions under uncertainty. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfradt, U., & Pretz, J. E. (2001). Individual differences in creativity: Personality, story writing, and hobbies. European Journal of Personality, 15(4), 297–310. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt, G. (1990). Risk-taking and risk-avoiding behavior: The impact of some dispositional and situational variables. The Journal of Psychology, 124, 437–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, H., & Seibert, S. E. (2006). The big five personality dimensions and entrepreneurial status: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 259–271.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, H., Seibert, S. E., & Hills, G. E. (2005). The mediating role of self-efficacy in the development of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1265–1272.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 682–696.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M. (1979). Sensation seeking: Beyond the optimal level of arousal. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M. (2007). Sensation-seeking and risky behavior. Washington: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giuseppe Craparo.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

All authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Appendix

Appendix

Risk Intelligence Scale

Below you will find statements about some behaviors or mental states. Please mark with an X your level of agreement with respect to your life experience. Remember that there are no right or wrong answers.

Troverai di seguito alcune affermazioni che descrivono comportamenti o stati d’animo. Indica su una scala a 5 livelli quanto sei d’accordo con esse in rapporto alla tua esperienza. Non esistono risposte giuste o sbagliate; prova a rispondere sinceramente, mettendo una crocetta X su una delle cinque caselle.

 

Per nulla d’accordo

Poco d’accordo

Mediamente d’accordo

Molto d’accordo

Totalmente d’accordo

Strongly disagree

Slightly agree

Moderately agree

Agree

Strongly agree

1. Sono capace di individuare soluzioni positive di fronte ai problemi

1

2

3

4

5

I am able to identify positive solutions to problems.

2. L’incertezza su come evolverà una situazione, mi paralizza

1

2

3

4

5

The uncertainty about possible developments of a situation paralyzes me.

3. Credo di essere in grado di inventare nuove procedure anziché limitarmi a seguire quelle stabilite da altri

1

2

3

4

5

To be able to create new procedures, I think for myself instead of following procedures established by others.

4. Le situazioni del tutto nuove mi spaventano

1

2

3

4

5

Totally new situations scare me.

5. Di fronte ad un problema inaspettato, la mia prima reazione è di paura

1

2

3

4

5

Fear is my first reaction when there is an unforeseen problem.

6. Mi sento in grado di prendere decisioni anche quando non possiedo tutte le informazioni

1

2

3

4

5

I feel able to make decisions even when I don’t have all the information.

7. I nuovi progetti mi stimolano subito nuove idee

1

2

3

4

5

New projects cause me to have new ideas.

8. Se rifletto su un nuovo progetto, riesco a proporre idee diverse

1

2

3

4

5

When I am thinking about a new project, I am able to propose different points of view.

9. Quando mi si presenta un problema, mi sento in grado di trovare rapidamente una chiave di lettura

1

2

3

4

5

When I face a problem, I am able to rapidly find an interpretation.

10. Ho idee originali rispetto agli altri

1

2

3

4

5

I have original ideas compared to others.

11. Mi sento in grado di cavarmela bene, anche in circostanze che non avevo previsto

1

2

3

4

5

I do all right, even in unexpected circumstances.

12. Ho una ricca diversità di idee

1

2

3

4

5

I am full of ideas.

13. In un nuovo progetto, cerco approcci non tradizionali

1

2

3

4

5

With a new project, I look for untraditional approaches.

14. Tendo a scoraggiarmi di fronte agli imprevisti

1

2

3

4

5

I tend to be discouraged when there are accidents.

15. Sono in grado di trovare soluzioni nuove di fronte ad un problema

1

2

3

4

5

I am able to find new solutions when I am facing a problem.

16. Ho paura del cambiamento

1

2

3

4

5

I am afraid of change.

17. Sono in grado di risolvere un problema da solo

1

2

3

4

5

I am capable of finding solutions to problems myself.

18. Quando sono preoccupato/a per qualcosa, ho difficoltà a concentrarmi su tutto il resto

1

2

3

4

5

When I feel fearful about something, I have difficulty concentrating on everything.

19. I miei stati d’animo influiscono sulle mie attività di studio/lavoro

1

2

3

4

5

My mental state affects my work/school performance.

20. Quando sono di cattivo umore mi riesce difficile fare qualsiasi cosa

1

2

3

4

5

When I am in a bad mood, I have difficulty doing everything.

21. Mi sento sicuro delle mie capacità

1

2

3

4

5

I am sure about my abilities.

Emotional stress vulnerability: items 18, 19, and 20.

Negative attitude toward uncertainty: items 2, 4, 5, 14, and 16.

Imaginative capability: items 3, 7, 8, 10, 12, 13, and 15.

Problem-solving self-efficacy: items 1, 6, 9, 11, 17, 21.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Craparo, G., Magnano, P., Paolillo, A. et al. The Subjective Risk Intelligence Scale. The Development of a New Scale to Measure a New Construct. Curr Psychol 37, 966–981 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9673-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9673-x

Keywords

Navigation