Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Emotion Regulation of Others and Self (EROS): The Development and Validation of a New Individual Difference Measure

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research on affect regulation has blossomed in recent years. However, the lack of validated scales assessing individual differences in the use of strategies to achieve alternative types of affect regulation, e.g., the regulation of others’ affect and the worsening of affect, has hampered research on these important processes. This paper presents the development and validation of a brief new measure of individual differences in the use of strategies to regulate one’s own and other people’s feelings: the Emotion Regulation of Others and Self (EROS) scale. Two distinct samples (N = 551 and N = 227) confirmed a four-factor structure: intrinsic affect-improving, intrinsic affect-worsening, extrinsic affect-improving and extrinsic affect-worsening. In line with predictions, these factors were associated with existing measures of affect regulation, personality and affect. Both intrinsic factors were positively associated with emotional exhaustion, while all factors except extrinsic affect-improving were positively associated with health-related impairments. Convergence between self- and other-reported scores on the extrinsic factors in a third sample (N = 50 dyads) demonstrated further evidence of validity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, J. M., & Huffcutt, A. I. (2003). A review and evaluation of exploratory factor analysis practices in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 6, 147–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diefendorff, J. M., Croyle, M. H., & Gosserand, R. H. (2005). The dimensionality and antecedents of emotional labor strategies. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 339–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., Guthrie, I. K., & Reiser, M. (2000). Dispositional emotionality and regulation: their role in predicting quality of social functioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 136–157.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, G. C., Joormann, J., & Johnson, S. L. (2008). Responses to positive affect: a self-report measure of rumination and dampening. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 32, 507–525.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, L. E., Monahan, K., & Berger, C. (1999). A laughing matter? The uses of humor in medical interactions. Motivation and Emotion, 23, 154–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garnefski, N., Kraaij, V., & Spinhoven, Ph. (2001). Negative life events, cognitive emotion regulation and depression. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 1311–1327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grandey, A. A. (2003). When “the show must go on”: surface acting and deep acting as determinants of emotional exhaustion and peer-rated service delivery. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 86–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J. J. (1998). Antecedent- and response-focused emotion regulation: divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 224–237.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 348–362.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J. J., & Muñoz, R. F. (1995). Emotion regulation and mental health. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 2, 151–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J. J., & Thompson, R. (2007). Emotion regulation: Conceptual foundations. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 3–24). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koole, S. L. (2009). The psychology of emotion regulation: an integrative review. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 4–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1981). The measurement of experienced burnout. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 2, 99–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, G., Jones, D. M., & Chamberlain, A. G. (1990). Refining the measurement of mood: the UWIST Mood adjective checklist. British Journal of Psychology, 81, 17–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikolajczak, M., Petrides, K. V., Coumans, N., & Luminet, O. (2009). An experimental investigation of the moderating effects of trait emotional intelligence on laboratory-induced stress. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 9, 455–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muraven, M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychological Bulletin, 126, 247–259.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Niven, K., Totterdell, P., & Holman, D. (2007). Changing moods and influencing people: the use and effects of emotional influence behaviors at HMP Grendon. Prison Service Journal, 172, 39–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niven, K., Totterdell, P., & Holman, D. (2009). A conceptual classification of controlled interpersonal affect regulation strategies. Emotion, 9, 498–509.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Morrow, J. (1991). A prospective study of depression and posttraumatic stress symptoms after a natural disaster: the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 115–121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, B., & Totterdell, P. (1999). Classifying affect regulation strategies. Cognition and Emotion, 13, 277–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrott, W. G. (1993). Beyond hedonism: Motives for inhibiting good moods and for maintaining bad moods. In D. M. Wegner & J. W. Pennebaker (Eds.), Handbook of mental control (pp. 278–305). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D. (1983). Sphere-specific measures of perceived control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1253–1265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, K. F. V., & Power, M. J. (2007). A new self-report measure of emotion regulation in adolescents: the regulation of emotions questionnaire. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 14, 145–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: a 10-item short version of the Big Five inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 203–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riediger, M., Schmiedek, F., Wagner, G. G., & Lindenberger, U. (2009). Seeking pleasure and seeking pain: age-related differences in pro- and contra-hedonic motivation from adolescence to old age. Psychological Science, 20, 1529–1535.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sukhodolsky, D. G., Golub, A., & Cromwell, E. N. (2001). Development and validation of the Anger Rumination Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 689–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamir, M. (2005). Don't worry, be happy? Neuroticism, trait-consistent affect regulation, and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 449–461.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tett, R. P., Fox, K. E., & Wang, A. (2005). Development and validation of a self-report measure of emotional intelligence as a multidimensional trait domain. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 859–888.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thoits, P. A. (1996). Managing the emotions of others. Symbolic Interaction, 19, 85–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Totterdell, P., & Leach, D. (2001). Negative mood regulation expectancies and sports performance: an investigation involving professional cricketers. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2, 249–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vangelisti, A. L., Daly, J. A., & Rudnick, J. R. (1991). Making people feel guilty in conversations: techniques and correlates. Human Communication Research, 18, 3–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (1996). A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Medical Care, 34, 220–233.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The support of the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) UK is gratefully acknowledged (RES-060-25-0044: “Emotion regulation of others and self [EROS]”). We also thank Adam Thompson, Nadia Hanif and Paul Woodhead for their help with data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen Niven.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Niven, K., Totterdell, P., Stride, C.B. et al. Emotion Regulation of Others and Self (EROS): The Development and Validation of a New Individual Difference Measure. Curr Psychol 30, 53–73 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-011-9099-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-011-9099-9

Keywords

Navigation