Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of the psychometric properties of two forgiveness scales

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined the psychometric properties of two forgiveness scales using participants enrolled at a Midwestern Catholic university (N = 328). The Forgiveness Scale is a 15—item Likert-type scale designed to measure forgiveness toward an of-fender. The Forgiveness Likelihood Scale is a 10—item Likert-type scale designed to measure tendency to forgive across situations. Factor analyses revealed that the For-giveness Scale contains two subscales (i.e., Absence of Negative, Presence of Posi-tive) and the Forgiveness Likelihood Scale consists of a single factor. Both scales have adequate internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Both subscales of the Forgiveness Scale were significantly correlated in the expected direction with mea-sures of forgiveness, religiousness, anger, hope, religious well-being, existential well-being, and social desirability. The Forgiveness Likelihood Scale was significantly correlated in the expected direction with measures of forgiveness, religiousness, trait anger, religious well-being, and social desirability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Mabuk, R. H., Enright, R. D., & Cardis, P. A. (1995). Forgiveness education with parentally love-deprived late adolescents. Journal of Moral Education, 24, 427–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, C. W. (1983). Spiritual well-being: Conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 11, 330–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enright, R. D., Gassin, E. A., & Wu, C. (1992). Forgiveness: A developmental view. Journal of Moral Education, 21, 99–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enright, R. D., & the Human Development Study Group (1991). The moral development of forgiveness. In W. Kurtines & J. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of Moral Behavior and Development (Vol. 1, pp. 123–152). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enright, R. D., & the Human Development Study Group (1994). Piaget on the moral development of forgiveness. Human Development, 37, 63–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, S. (1998). Forgiveness and reconciliation: The importance of understanding how they differ. Counseling & Values, 42, 200–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, S. R., & Enright, R. D. (1996). Forgiveness as an intervention with incest survivors. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 983–992.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gorsuch, R. L., & Hao, J. Y. (1993). Forgiveness: An exploratory factor analysis and its relationships to religious variables. Review of Religious Research, 34, 333–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hebl, J. H., & Enright, R. D. (1993). Forgiveness as a psychotherapeutic goal with elderly females. Psychotherapy, 30, 658–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoge, D. R. (1972). A validated intrinsic religious motivation scale. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 11, 369–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luskin, F., & Thoresen, C. E. (1997). The effects of forgiveness training on psychosocial factors in college age adults. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.

  • McCullough, M. E., Hoyt, W. T., & Rachal, K. C. (2000). What we know (and need to know) about assessing forgiveness constructs. In M.E. McCullough, K. I. Pargament, & C. E. Thoresen (Eds.) Forgiveness: Theory, research and practice (pp. 65–88). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, M. E., Pargament, K. I., & Thoresen, C. E. (2000). The psychology of forgiveness: History, conceptual issues, and overview. In M.E. McCullough, K. I. Pargament, & C. E. Thoresen (Eds.) Forgiveness: Theory, research and practice (pp. 1–14). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, M. E., Rachal, K. C., Sandage, S. J., Worthington, E. L., Brown, S. W., & Hight, T. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: II. Theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1586–1603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. F., & Powers, M. J. (1988). Development of an instrument to measure hope. Nursing Research, 37, 6–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paloma, M. M., & Gallup, G. H., Jr. (1991). Varieties of prayer: A survey report. Philadelphia: Trinity Press International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rye, M.S. (1998). Evaluation of a secular and a religiously integrated forgiveness group therapy program for college students who have been wronged by a romantic partner. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rye, M. S., Pargament, K. L., Ali, M. A., Beck, G. L., Dorff, E. N., Hallisey, C., Narayanan, V., Williams, J. G. (2000). Religious perspectives on forgiveness. In M.E. McCullough, K. I. Pargament, & C. E. Thoresen (Eds.) Forgiveness: Theory, research and practice (pp. 17–40). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker, A., & Bolt, M. (1977). The Rokeach Value Survey and perceived Christian values. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 5, 139–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smedes, L. B. (1996). The art of forgiving. Nashville, TN: Moorings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D., Jacobs, G., Russell, S., & Crane, R. S. (1983). Assessment of anger: The State-Trait Anger Scale. In J. N. Butcher, & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (pp. 161–189). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subkoviak, M. J., Enright, R. D., Wu, C., Gassin, E. A., Freedman, S., Olson, L. M., & Sarinopoulos, I. (1995). Measuring interpersonal forgiveness in late adolescence and middle adulthood. Journal of Ado-lescence, 18, 641–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoresen, C. E., Luskin, F., & Harris, A. H. S. (1998). Science and forgiveness interventions: reflections and recommendations. In E. L. Worthington, Jr. (Ed.), Dimensions of forgiveness: Psychological re-search & theological perspectives (pp.163–190). Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenstra, G. (1992). Psychological concepts of forgiveness. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 11, 160–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, S. H. (1989). The development of a scale to measure forgiveness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Fuller Graduate School of Psychology, Pasadena, CA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark S. Rye.

Additional information

The authors thank Sarah Danko, Anne Hovancsek, Carla Kmett, Jennifer Martin, and Colleen Ryan for their assistance. We kindly request that researchers who use the forgiveness scales evaluated in this study provide us with a summary of their psychometric data for the scales. The idea for creating the Forgiveness Likelihood Scale was based upon the Willingness to Forgive Scale (Hebl & Enright, 1993).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rye, M.S., Loiacono, D.M., Folck, C.D. et al. Evaluation of the psychometric properties of two forgiveness scales. Curr Psychol 20, 260–277 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-001-1011-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-001-1011-6

Keywords

Navigation