Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Are Behavioral Measures of Self-Control and the Grasmick Self-Control Scale Measuring the Same Construct? A Meta-Analysis

  • Published:
American Journal of Criminal Justice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Grasmick attitudinal scale of self-control (Grasmick, Tittle, Bursik, & Arneklev, Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 5–29, 1993) is one of the more commonly used measures in research on Gottfredson and Hirschi’s (1990) self-control concept. What has yet to be determined is whether the Grasmick scale correlates as well with crime and delinquency as behavioral measures of self-control and whether the Grasmick scale correlates better with these behavioral measures than it does with crime and delinquency. A meta-analysis was performed on 13 samples obtained from published research where the Grasmick scale, a behavioral or consequences measure of self-control, and an estimate of crime or delinquency were all administered to participants. All analyses were computed with Comprehensive Meta-Analysis, Version 2 (Borenstein, Hedges, Higgins, & Rothstein, 2005) software. The results of the meta-analysis revealed that the Grasmick scale and behavioral/consequences measures of self-control achieved comparable correlations with concurrent measures of crime and delinquency but correlated no higher with each other than they did with crime and delinquency. Four possible interpretations of these results are considered: (1) the self-control concept advanced by Gottfredson and Hirschi is a tautology; (2) the attitudinal and behavioral/consequences measures of self-control are measuring different constructs; (3) self-control is a multidimensional construct; (4) self-report measures of behavioral self-control are inadequate for assessing low self-control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

*Signifies Studies Included in the Current Meta-Analysis

  • Akers, R. L. (1991). Self-control as a general theory of crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 7, 201–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Arneklev, B. J., Elis, L., & Medlicott, S. (2006). Testing the general theory of crime: Comparing the effects of “imprudent behavior” and an attitudinal indicator of “low self-control”. Western Criminology Review, 7, 41–55.

  • Benda, B. B. (2005). The robustness of self-control in relation to form of delinquency. Youth & Society, 36, 418–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, M. L., & Moore, E. (1992). Are white-collar and common offenders the same? An empirical and theoretical critique of a recently proposed general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 29, 251–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Boman, J. H., & Gibson, C. L. (2011). Does the measurement of peer deviance change the relationship between self-control and deviant behavior? An analysis of friendship pairs. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 521–530.

  • Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2005). Comprehensive Meta-analysis: Version 2 [Computer software]. Englewood, NJ: Biostat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapple, C. L., & Hope, T. L. (2003). An analysis of the self-control and criminal versatility of gang and dating violence offenders. Violence and Victims, 18, 671–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, D. J., & Michie, C. (1997). An item response theory analysis of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. Psychological Assessment, 9, 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cretacci, M. A., Rivera, C. J., & Ding, F. (2009). Self-Control and Chinese deviance: A look behind the bamboo curtain. Journal of the South Asian Society of Criminology and Victimology, 4, 131–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeCamp, W. (2015). Why so many questions? Measurement issues and the attitudinal self-control scale. Deviant Behavior, 36, 463–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *DeLisi, M., Hochstetler, A., Higgins, G. E., Beaver, K. M., & Graeve, C. M. (2008). Toward a general theory of criminal justice: Low self-control and offender noncompliance. Criminal Justice Review, 33, 141–158.

  • Delisi, M., Hochstetler, A. L., & Murphy, D. S. (2003). Self-control behind bars: A validation study of the Grasmick et al. scale. Justice Quarterly, 20, 241–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egger, M., Davey, S. G., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315, 629–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, T. D., Cullen, F. T., Burton, V. S., Dunaway, R. G., & Benson, M. L. (1997). The social consequences of self-control: Testing the general theory of crime. Criminology, 35, 475–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J. J., & Giever, D. (1995). Self-control and its manifestations among university students: An empirical test of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory. Justice Quarterly, 12, 231–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glasman, L. R., & Albarracin, D. (2006). Forming attitudes that predict future behavior: A meta-analysis of the attitude-behavior relation. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 778–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, M., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grasmick, H. G., Tittle, C. R., Bursik, R. J., Jr., & Arneklev, B. K. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Gunter, W. D., & Bakken, N. W. (2012). The many measurements of self-control: How re-operationalized self-control compares. European Journal of Criminology, 9, 309–322.

  • Hay, C., & Forrest, W. (2006). The development of self-control: Examining self-control theory’s stability thesis. Criminology, 44, 739–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, G. E. (2007). Examining the original Grasmick scale: A Rasch model approach. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 157–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21, 1539–1558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T. (2004). Self-control and crime. In R. F. Baumeister & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (pp. 537–552). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M. (1993). Commentary: Testing the general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 47–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Jennings, W. G., Park, M., Tomsich, E. A., Gover, A. R., & Akers, R. L. (2011). Assessing the overlap in dating violence perpetration and victimization among South Korean college students: The influence of social learning and self-control. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 188–206.

  • Kort-Butler, L. A., Tyler, K. A., & Melander, L. A. (2011). Childhood maltreatment, parental monitoring, and self-control among homeless young adults: Consequences for negative social outcomes. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 1244–1264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, S. J. (1995). Attitudes and the prediction of behavior: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 58–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, B. (2003). An empirical examination of the construct validity of two alternative self-control measures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 674–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meldrum, R. C., Young, J. T. N., Hay, C., & Flexon, J. L. (2012). Does self-control influence maternal attachment? A reciprocal effects analysis from early childhood through middle adolescence. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 28, 673–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Morris, R. G., Gerber, J., & Menard, S. (2011). Social bonds, self-control, and adult criminality: A nationally representative assessment of Hirschi’s revised self-control theory. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 584–599.

  • O’Gorman, J. G., & Baxter, E. (2002). Self-control as a personality measure. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 533–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payton, M. E., Greenstone, M. H., & Schenker, N. (2003). Overlapping confidence intervals or standard error intervals: What do they mean in terms of statistical significance? Journal of Insect Science, 3, 34. 6 pp.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, J. L., & Zill, N. (1986). Marital disruption, parent–child relationships, and behavioral problems in children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 48, 295–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Piquero, A. R., & Bouffard, J. A. (2007). Something old, something new: A preliminary investigation of Hirschi’s redefined self-control. Justice Quarterly, 24, 1–27.

  • Piquero, A. R., Jennings, W. G., & Farrington, D. P. (2010). On the malleability of self-control: Theoretical and policy implications regarding a general theory of crime. Justice Quarterly, 27, 803–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Piquero, N. L., Schoepfer, A., & Langton, L. (2010). Completely out of control or the desire to be in complete control? How low self-control and desire for control relate to corporate offending. Crime and Delinquency, 56, 627–647.

  • Pratt, T. C., & Cullen, F. T. (2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 38, 931–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, T. C., Turner, M., & Piquero, A. R. (2004). Parental socialization and community context: A longitudinal analysis of the structural sources of self-control. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 41, 219–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Rocque, M., Posick, C., & Zimmerman, G. M. (2013). Measuring up: Assessing the measurement properties of two self-control scales. Deviant Behavior, 34, 534–556.

  • Rosenthal, R. (1979). The “file drawer problem” and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tittle, C. R., Ward, D. A., & Grasmick, H. G. (2003). Self-control and crime/deviance: Cognitive vs. behavioral measures. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19, 333–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. G., & Piquero, A. R. (2002). The stability of self-control. Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 457–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullrich, S., & Coid, J. (2010). Antisocial personality disorder—Stable and unstable subtypes. Journal of Personality Disorders, 24, 171–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, G. D. (2012). Psychopathy and crime: Testing the incremental validity of PCL-R measured psychopathy as a predictor of general and violent recidivism. Law and Human Behavior, 36, 404–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, G. D. (2015a). Crime continuity and psychological inertia: Testing the cognitive mediation and additive postulates with male adjudicated delinquents. Journal of Quantitative Criminology. doi:10.1007/s10940-015-9262-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, G. D. (2015b). Early childhood temperament, maternal monitoring, reactive criminal thinking and the origin(s) of low self-control. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43, 369–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, G. D. (2015c). Short-term goals and physically hedonistic values as mediators of the past-crime-future-crime relationship. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 20, 81–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Ward, J. T., Gibson, C. L., Bowman, J., & Leite, W. L. (2010). Assessing the validity of the retrospective behavioral self-control scale: Is the general theory of crime stronger than the evidence suggests? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 336–357.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank the following individuals for providing information not found in several of the published reports used in this meta-analysis: Jeffrey Bouffard, Matt DeLisi, Whitney Gunter, Wesley Jennings, and Alex Piquero.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Criminal Justice, Kutztown University, Kutztown, PA, 19530-0730, USA

    Glenn D. Walters

Authors
  1. Glenn D. Walters
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Glenn D. Walters.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Walters, G.D. Are Behavioral Measures of Self-Control and the Grasmick Self-Control Scale Measuring the Same Construct? A Meta-Analysis. Am J Crim Just 41, 151–167 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-015-9317-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-015-9317-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation