Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Early Stimulation and Language Development of Economically Disadvantaged Young Children

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Indian Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To examine the effect of home stimulation on the language functioning of young children from low income families.

Methods

The language functioning of 102 children (Mean age = 3.3 y, SD = 1.3) was assessed by the communication sub-scale of the Indian Developmental Inventory (IDI). Home visits were made to assess the quality of stimulation provided by parents to children. Seven items measuring stimulation of the child were selected from the Mohite Home Environment Inventory, a scale measuring the quality of home environment.

Results

Nearly 16 % of children from economically disadvantaged homes had language delay. Children with language delay as compared to children with adequate language skills had significantly lower stimulation at home (t = 2.59, P = 0.01), specifically parents were significantly less likely to praise their child (25 % vs. 52 %, χ 2 = 4.03, P = 0.045) or provide verbal stimulation (44 % vs. 72 %, χ 2 = 4.95, P = 0.026). Multivariate stepwise regression analysis revealed that 18 % of the variance in the communication developmental quotient (DQs) of children was accounted by stimulation and age of the child (F = 10.47, P = 0.000).

Conclusions

Programs that seek to increase early stimulation for disadvantaged children by providing cognitive-linguistic enriched learning experiences would go a long way in paving the way for improved language, cognition and school performance in young children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pratham Education Foundation. Annual status of education report (rural). Provisional. New Delhi: Pratham Resource Centre; 2011. pp. 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Grantham-McGregor S, Cheung YB, Cueto S, Glewwe P, Richter L, Strupp B; International Child Development Steering Group. Developmental potential in first 5 years for children in developing countries. Lancet. 2007;369:60–70.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sidhu M, Malhi P, Jerath J. Multiple risks and early language development. Indian J Pediatr. 2010;77:391–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sood N. Malnourishment among children in India: Linkages with cognitive development and school participation. CREATE pathways to access series, research monograph number 25. Sussex: Centre for International Education; 2010. pp. 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Walker SP, Wachs TD, Gardner JM, Lozoff B, Wasserman GA, Pollitt E, et al. Child development: Risk factors for adverse outcomes in developing countries. Lancet. 2007;369:145–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shonkoff JP. Building a new bio-developmental framework to guide the future of early childhood policy. Child Dev. 2010;81:357–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bentley ME, Vazir S, Engle PL, Balakrishna N, Johnson S, Creed-Kanashiro H, et al. A home-based educational intervention to caregivers in South India to improve complementary feeding and responsive feeding, and psychosocial stimulation increases dietary intake, growth and development of infants. In Experimental Biology Meetings, Anaheim, California; 2010. Abstract 564.14

  8. Walker SP, Wachs TD, Grantham-McGregor S, Black MM, Nelson CA, Huffman SL, et al. Inequality in early childhood: Risk and protective factors for early child development. Lancet. 2011;378:1325–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gupta SK, Bansal D, Malhi P, Das R. Developmental profile in children with iron deficiency anemia and its changes after therapeutic iron supplementation. Indian J Pediatr. 2010;77:375–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Maulik PK, Darmstadt GL. Community-based interventions to optimize early childhood development in low resource settings. J Perinatol. 2009;29:531–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Engle PL, Fernald LC, Alderman H, Behrman J, O’Gara C, Yousafzai A, et al. Strategies for reducing inequalities and improving developmental outcomes for young children in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet. 2011;378:1339–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bornstein MH, Britto PR, Nonoyama-Tarumi Y, Ota Y, Petrovic O, Putnick DL. Child development in developing countries: Introduction and methods. Child Dev. 2012;83:16–31.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sidhu M, Malhi P, Jerath J. Construction of a developmental assessment battery for indian children. Presented at the 36th National Annual Conference of the Indian Association of Clinical Psychologists, Bangalore, India; February 2010.

  14. Mohite P. Mohite’s home environment inventory: Child’s observation technique. Agra: National Psychological Corporation; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kumar N, Shekhar C, Kumar P, Kundu AS. Kuppuswamy socioeconomic status scale-updating for 2007. Indian J Pediatr. 2007;74:1131–2.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Feitelson D, Goldstein Z. Patterns of book ownership and reading to young children in Israeli school oriented and non-school-oriented families. Read Teach. 1986;39:924–30.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gottfried A. Home environment and early cognitive development: Integration, meta-analysis, and conclusions. In: Gottfried A, ed. Home Environment and Early Cognitive Development. Orlando: Academic; 1984. pp. 329–42.

  18. Stothard SE, Snowling MJ, Bishop DV, Chipchase BB, Kaplan CA. Language-impaired preschoolers: A follow-up into adolescence. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998;41:407–18.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Conti-Ramsden GM, Durkin K, Simkin Z, Knox E. Specific language impairment and school outcomes: Identifying and explaining variability at the end of compulsory education. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2009;44:15–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Law J, Boyle J, Harris F, Harkness A, Nye C. The relationship between the natural history and prevalence of primary speech and language delays: Findings from a systematic review of the literature. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2000;35:165–88.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Anjali SD. Social class and language development. In: Mohanty KA, Misra G, eds. Psychology of Poverty and Disadvantage. New Delhi: Concept Publishing Company; 2000. pp. 141–56.

  22. Law J, McBean K, Rush R. Communication skills in a population of primary school-aged children raised in an area of pronounced social disadvantage. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2011;46:657–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. McPhillips M, Jordan-Black JA. The effect of social disadvantage on motor development in young children: A comparative study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2007;48:1214–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Manocha A. Maternal stimulation level and intervention. Stud Home Comm Sci. 2008;2:87–92.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bornstein MH, Putnick DL. Cognitive and socio-emotional caregiving in developing countries. Child Dev. 2012;83:46–61.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schady N. Parents’ education, mothers’ vocabulary, and cognitive development in early childhood: Longitudinal evidence from Ecuador. Am J Public Health. 2011;101:2299–307.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Walker SP, Chang SM, Powell CA, Grantham-McGregor SM. Effects of early childhood psychosocial stimulation and nutritional supplementation on cognition and education in growth-stunted Jamaican children: Prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2005;366:1804–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Grantham-McGregor SM, Walker SP, Chang SM, Powell CA. Effects of early childhood supplementation with and without stimulation on later development in stunted Jamaican children. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;66:247–53.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Vazir S, Engle P, Balakrishna N, Griffiths PL, Johnson SL, Creed-Kanashiro H, et al. Cluster-randomized trial on complementary and responsive feeding education to caregivers found improved dietary intake, growth and development among rural Indian toddlers. Matern Child Nutr. 2013;9:99–117.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Misra G, Mohanty KA. Consequences of poverty and disadvantage: A review of Indian studies. In: Mohanty KA, Misra G, eds. Psychology of Poverty and Disadvantage. New Delhi: Concept Publishing Company; 2000. pp. 121–48.

Download references

Conflict of Interest

None.

Role of Funding Source

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatrics, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Sector 12, Chandigarh, 160012, India

    Prahbhjot Malhi

  2. Department of Psychology, MCM DAV College for Women, Chandigarh, India

    Manjit Sidhu

  3. Department of Pediatrics, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

    Bhavneet Bharti

Authors
  1. Prahbhjot Malhi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Manjit Sidhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bhavneet Bharti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prahbhjot Malhi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Malhi, P., Sidhu, M. & Bharti, B. Early Stimulation and Language Development of Economically Disadvantaged Young Children. Indian J Pediatr 81, 333–338 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-013-1154-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-013-1154-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation