Abstract
Introduction
It may be assumed that congenital absence of a certain sensory function would affect the processing of remaining sensory processes. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate chemosensory brain responsiveness both electrophysiologically and psychophysically in congenitally blind or deaf individuals.
Methods
Fourteen blind, 13 deaf, and 10 control subjects were recruited to this study. Psychophysical assessment of olfactory function was performed via “Sniffin’ Sticks” test. In this test, olfactory threshold, discrimination, identification, and total scores were compared between blind, deaf, and control subjects. In addition, electrophysiological assessment of olfactory function was performed via event-related potentials to olfactory and trigeminal stimuli.
Results
The “Sniffin’ Sticks” test indicated frequent hyposmia in the deaf group. Discrimination and total scores of the deaf group were significantly lower than the control group. On the other hand, there were no significant differences between blind and control groups. Threshold and total scores of the deaf group were significantly lower than the blind group. There were no significant differences in amplitudes and latencies of any chemosensory-evoked potential components for both stimuli between the groups.
Conclusions
The deaf subjects appear to have lower olfactory test scores than blind and control subjects. Application of stimulants in a more complex setup may help to disentangle the various changes in chemosensory processing in the absence of other sensory channels.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Auer ET, Bernstein LE, Sungkarat W, Singh M (2007) Vibrotactile activation of the auditory cortices in deaf versus hearing adults. Neuroreport 18:645–648. doi:10.1097/WNR.0b013e3280d943b9
Bolognini N, Cecchetto C, Geraci C et al (2012) Hearing shapes our perception of time: temporal discrimination of tactile stimuli in deaf people. J Cogn Neurosci 24:276–286. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00135
Cuevas I, Plaza P, Rombaux P et al (2009) Odour discrimination and identification are improved in early blindness. Neuropsychologia 47:3079–3083. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.07.004
Cuevas I, Plaza P, Rombaux P et al (2011) Chemosensory event-related potentials in early blind humans. B-ENT 7:11–17
Diekmann H, Walger M, von Wedel H (1994) Sense of smell in deaf and blind patients. HNO 42:264–269
Doty R (2009) The olfactory system and its disorders. Semin Neurol 29:074–081. doi:10.1055/s-0028-1124025
Erdogan I (2011) Behavioral odor data in sensory disabled individuals. Masters Degree Thesis, Dokuz Eylul University
Föcker J, Hölig C, Best A, Röder B (2015) Neural plasticity of voice processing: evidence from event-related potentials in late-onset blind and sighted individuals. Restor Neurol Neurosci 33:15–30. doi:10.3233/RNN-140406
Gagnon L, Schneider FC, Siebner HR et al (2012) Activation of the hippocampal complex during tactile maze solving in congenitally blind subjects. Neuropsychologia 50:1663–1671. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.03.022
Hötting K, Rösler F, Röder B (2004) Altered auditory-tactile interactions in congenitally blind humans: an event-related potential study. Exp Brain Res 159:370–381. doi:10.1007/s00221-004-1965-3
Hummel T, Sekinger B, Wolf SR et al (1997) ’Sniffin’ sticks’: olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odor identification, odor discrimination and olfactory threshold. Chem Senses 22:39–52
Kobal G, Klimek L, Wolfensberger M et al (2000) Multicenter investigation of 1,036 subjects using a standardized method for the assessment of olfactory function combining tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 257:205–211
Kupers R, Beaulieu-Lefebvre M, Schneider FC et al (2011) Neural correlates of olfactory processing in congenital blindness. Neuropsychologia 49:2037–2044. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.03.033
Luers JC, Mikolajczak S, Hahn M et al (2014) Do the blinds smell better? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 271:1933–1937. doi:10.1007/s00405-013-2816-2
Murphy C, Cain WS (1986) Odor identification: the blind are better. Physiol Behav 37:177–180. doi:10.1016/0031-9384(86)90402-6
Obretenova S, Halko MA, Plow EB et al (2010) Neuroplasticity associated with tactile language communication in a deaf-blind subject. Front Hum Neurosci 3:60. doi:10.3389/neuro.09.060.2009
Oniz A, Erdogan I, Bayazit O, Ozgoren M (2011) An examination of behavioral odor data in sensory disabled individuals. Front Neurosci. doi:10.3389/conf.fnins.2011.85.00004
Oniz A, Erdogan I, Ikiz AO et al (2013) The modified Sniffin’ sticks test in turkish population based on odor familiarity survey. J Neuro Sci Turk 30:270–280
Ozgoren M, Guducu C, Oniz A (2011) The chemosensory responses in blind, deaf and healthy humans. Front Neurosci. doi:10.3389/conf.fnins.2011.85.00003
Ozgoren M, Guducu C, Bezircioglu T et al (2012) Multimodal sensory evoked potentials in blind, deaf and healthy individuals. Int J Psychophysiol 85:427. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.07.165
Ptito M, Kupers R (2005) Cross-modal plasticity in early blindness. J Integr Neurosci 4:479–488
Rombaux P, Huart C, De Volder AG et al (2010) Increased olfactory bulb volume and olfactory function in early blind subjects. NeuroReport 21:1069–1073. doi:10.1097/WNR.0b013e32833fcb8a
Rosenbluth R, Grossman ES, Kaitz M (2000) Performance of early-blind and sighted children on olfactory tasks. Perception 29:101–110
Sadato N, Pascual-Leone A, Grafman J et al (1996) Activation of the primary visual cortex by braille reading in blind subjects. Nature 380:526–528. doi:10.1038/380526a0
Schwenn O, Hundorf I, Moll B et al (2002) Do blind persons have a better sense of smell than normal sighted people? Klin Monatsblätter Für Augenheilkd 219:649–654. doi:10.1055/s-2002-35167
Smith RS, Doty RL, Burlingame GK, McKeown DA (1993) Smell and taste function in the visually impaired. Percept Psychophys 54:649–655
Stevenson RJ (2010) An initial evaluation of the functions of human olfaction. Chem Senses 35:3–20. doi:10.1093/chemse/bjp083
Weeks R, Horwitz B, Aziz-Sultan A et al (2000) A positron emission tomographic study of auditory localization in the congenitally blind. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci 20:2664–2672
Acknowledgments
The authors want to thank you R. Ugras Erdogan for technical support, we also thank Prof. Dr. Thomas Hummel for his valuable remarks with the study setup and manuscript. We are grateful to the directors, teachers, consultants, and more specifically the students of Tulay Aktas Schools for Hearing Disabled and Asik Veysel School for Visually Impaired. This study was supported by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) with 108S113 project and also by Dokuz Eylul University, Department of Scientific Research Projects with 2012.KB.SAG.083 project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Dokuz Eylul University and all participants and their parents gave their informed consent for the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guducu, C., Oniz, A., Ikiz, A.O. et al. Chemosensory Function in Congenitally Blind or Deaf Teenagers. Chem. Percept. 9, 8–13 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12078-015-9199-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12078-015-9199-2