Skip to main content
Log in

Chemosensory Function in Congenitally Blind or Deaf Teenagers

  • Published:
Chemosensory Perception

Abstract

Introduction

It may be assumed that congenital absence of a certain sensory function would affect the processing of remaining sensory processes. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate chemosensory brain responsiveness both electrophysiologically and psychophysically in congenitally blind or deaf individuals.

Methods

Fourteen blind, 13 deaf, and 10 control subjects were recruited to this study. Psychophysical assessment of olfactory function was performed via “Sniffin’ Sticks” test. In this test, olfactory threshold, discrimination, identification, and total scores were compared between blind, deaf, and control subjects. In addition, electrophysiological assessment of olfactory function was performed via event-related potentials to olfactory and trigeminal stimuli.

Results

The “Sniffin’ Sticks” test indicated frequent hyposmia in the deaf group. Discrimination and total scores of the deaf group were significantly lower than the control group. On the other hand, there were no significant differences between blind and control groups. Threshold and total scores of the deaf group were significantly lower than the blind group. There were no significant differences in amplitudes and latencies of any chemosensory-evoked potential components for both stimuli between the groups.

Conclusions

The deaf subjects appear to have lower olfactory test scores than blind and control subjects. Application of stimulants in a more complex setup may help to disentangle the various changes in chemosensory processing in the absence of other sensory channels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Auer ET, Bernstein LE, Sungkarat W, Singh M (2007) Vibrotactile activation of the auditory cortices in deaf versus hearing adults. Neuroreport 18:645–648. doi:10.1097/WNR.0b013e3280d943b9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolognini N, Cecchetto C, Geraci C et al (2012) Hearing shapes our perception of time: temporal discrimination of tactile stimuli in deaf people. J Cogn Neurosci 24:276–286. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuevas I, Plaza P, Rombaux P et al (2009) Odour discrimination and identification are improved in early blindness. Neuropsychologia 47:3079–3083. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.07.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuevas I, Plaza P, Rombaux P et al (2011) Chemosensory event-related potentials in early blind humans. B-ENT 7:11–17

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Diekmann H, Walger M, von Wedel H (1994) Sense of smell in deaf and blind patients. HNO 42:264–269

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doty R (2009) The olfactory system and its disorders. Semin Neurol 29:074–081. doi:10.1055/s-0028-1124025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdogan I (2011) Behavioral odor data in sensory disabled individuals. Masters Degree Thesis, Dokuz Eylul University

  • Föcker J, Hölig C, Best A, Röder B (2015) Neural plasticity of voice processing: evidence from event-related potentials in late-onset blind and sighted individuals. Restor Neurol Neurosci 33:15–30. doi:10.3233/RNN-140406

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon L, Schneider FC, Siebner HR et al (2012) Activation of the hippocampal complex during tactile maze solving in congenitally blind subjects. Neuropsychologia 50:1663–1671. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.03.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hötting K, Rösler F, Röder B (2004) Altered auditory-tactile interactions in congenitally blind humans: an event-related potential study. Exp Brain Res 159:370–381. doi:10.1007/s00221-004-1965-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hummel T, Sekinger B, Wolf SR et al (1997) ’Sniffin’ sticks’: olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odor identification, odor discrimination and olfactory threshold. Chem Senses 22:39–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kobal G, Klimek L, Wolfensberger M et al (2000) Multicenter investigation of 1,036 subjects using a standardized method for the assessment of olfactory function combining tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 257:205–211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kupers R, Beaulieu-Lefebvre M, Schneider FC et al (2011) Neural correlates of olfactory processing in congenital blindness. Neuropsychologia 49:2037–2044. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.03.033

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luers JC, Mikolajczak S, Hahn M et al (2014) Do the blinds smell better? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 271:1933–1937. doi:10.1007/s00405-013-2816-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy C, Cain WS (1986) Odor identification: the blind are better. Physiol Behav 37:177–180. doi:10.1016/0031-9384(86)90402-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Obretenova S, Halko MA, Plow EB et al (2010) Neuroplasticity associated with tactile language communication in a deaf-blind subject. Front Hum Neurosci 3:60. doi:10.3389/neuro.09.060.2009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oniz A, Erdogan I, Bayazit O, Ozgoren M (2011) An examination of behavioral odor data in sensory disabled individuals. Front Neurosci. doi:10.3389/conf.fnins.2011.85.00004

    Google Scholar 

  • Oniz A, Erdogan I, Ikiz AO et al (2013) The modified Sniffin’ sticks test in turkish population based on odor familiarity survey. J Neuro Sci Turk 30:270–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozgoren M, Guducu C, Oniz A (2011) The chemosensory responses in blind, deaf and healthy humans. Front Neurosci. doi:10.3389/conf.fnins.2011.85.00003

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozgoren M, Guducu C, Bezircioglu T et al (2012) Multimodal sensory evoked potentials in blind, deaf and healthy individuals. Int J Psychophysiol 85:427. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.07.165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ptito M, Kupers R (2005) Cross-modal plasticity in early blindness. J Integr Neurosci 4:479–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rombaux P, Huart C, De Volder AG et al (2010) Increased olfactory bulb volume and olfactory function in early blind subjects. NeuroReport 21:1069–1073. doi:10.1097/WNR.0b013e32833fcb8a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbluth R, Grossman ES, Kaitz M (2000) Performance of early-blind and sighted children on olfactory tasks. Perception 29:101–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sadato N, Pascual-Leone A, Grafman J et al (1996) Activation of the primary visual cortex by braille reading in blind subjects. Nature 380:526–528. doi:10.1038/380526a0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schwenn O, Hundorf I, Moll B et al (2002) Do blind persons have a better sense of smell than normal sighted people? Klin Monatsblätter Für Augenheilkd 219:649–654. doi:10.1055/s-2002-35167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith RS, Doty RL, Burlingame GK, McKeown DA (1993) Smell and taste function in the visually impaired. Percept Psychophys 54:649–655

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson RJ (2010) An initial evaluation of the functions of human olfaction. Chem Senses 35:3–20. doi:10.1093/chemse/bjp083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weeks R, Horwitz B, Aziz-Sultan A et al (2000) A positron emission tomographic study of auditory localization in the congenitally blind. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci 20:2664–2672

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors want to thank you R. Ugras Erdogan for technical support, we also thank Prof. Dr. Thomas Hummel for his valuable remarks with the study setup and manuscript. We are grateful to the directors, teachers, consultants, and more specifically the students of Tulay Aktas Schools for Hearing Disabled and Asik Veysel School for Visually Impaired. This study was supported by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) with 108S113 project and also by Dokuz Eylul University, Department of Scientific Research Projects with 2012.KB.SAG.083 project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murat Ozgoren.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Dokuz Eylul University and all participants and their parents gave their informed consent for the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guducu, C., Oniz, A., Ikiz, A.O. et al. Chemosensory Function in Congenitally Blind or Deaf Teenagers. Chem. Percept. 9, 8–13 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12078-015-9199-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12078-015-9199-2

Keywords

Navigation