Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Snapshots of Mixtures of Affective Experiences in a Day: Findings from the Health and Retirement Study

  • Published:
Journal of Population Ageing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 2009, a representative subsample of participants in the Health and Retirement Study (HRS: N = 5333; Age 50–101) responded to a short day reconstruction self-administered questionnaire that asked about their time and experiences on seven activities the previous day. We evaluate the quality and reliability of responses to this 10-min measure of experienced well-being and compare the properties and correlates of three intensity-based composites reflecting mixtures of activity-linked affective experiences (Activity-Positive Affect, Activity-Negative Affect, and Net Affect), and a frequency-based index, Activity Affective Complexity, that summarizes the proportion of activities that include a mixture of positive and negative affective experiences regardless of intensity. On average, older adults reported that 36 % of the activities in their day provided some mixture of feelings (e.g., interested and frustrated). Regression models revealed differential associations for the four constructs of affective well-being with socio-demographic factors, physical and mental health, and proximal indicators of the day’s context. We conclude that the HRS short day reconstruction measure is reliable and discuss the conceptual issues in assessing, summarizing, and interpreting the complexity of emotional experience in older adults.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Time Use Survey (ATUS) (2010). Well-being Module Questionnaire. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics and U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/tus/wbmquestionnaire.pdf.

  • Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being. New York: Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Belli, R. F., Stafford, F. P., & Alwin, D. F. (2009). Calendar and time diary: Methods in life course research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradburn, N. M., Rips, L. J., & Shevell, S. K. (1987). Answering autobiographical questions: the impact of memory and inferences on surveys. Science, 236, 157–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., & Berntson, G. G. (1994). Relation between attitudes and evaluative space: a critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 401–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., & Gardner, W. L. (1999). Emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 191–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, M. C., Parisi, J. M., Xia, J., Xue, Q.-L., Rebok, G. W., Bandeen-Roche, K., & Fried, L. P. (2012). Lifestyle activities and memory: variety may be the spice of life. The Women’s Health and Aging Study II. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 18, 286–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carstensen, L. L. (1993). Motivation for social contact across the life span: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. In J. E. Jacobs (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: 1992, developmental perspectives on motivation (Vol. 40, pp. 209–254). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carstensen, L. L., Pasupathi, M., Mayr, U., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2000). Emotional experience in everyday life across the adult life span. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 644–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chida, Y., & Steptoe, A. (2008). Positive psychological well-being and mortality: a quantitative review of prospective observational studies. Psychosomatic Medicine, 70(7), 741–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craik, F. I. M., & Rose, N. S. (2012). Memory encoding and aging: a neurocognitive perspective. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 36(7), 1729–1739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Chan, M. (2011). Happy people live longer: subjective well-being contributes to health and longevity. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-being, 3(1), 1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Tay, L. (2013). Review of the Day Reconstruction Method (DRM). Social Indicators Research, Published online 01 March 2013.

  • Diener, E., Sandvik, E., & Pavot, W. (2009). Happiness is the frequency, not the intensity, of positive versus negative affect. In E. Diener (Ed.), Assessing well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener (pp. 213–231). New York: Springer. Social Indicators Research Series Nr. 39.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dockray, S., Grant, N., Stone, A. A., Kahneman, D., Wardle, J., & Steptoe, A. (2010). A comparison of affect ratings obtained with ecological momentary assessment and the day reconstruction method. Social Indicators Research, 99, 269–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fratiglioni, L., Paillord-Borg, S., & Winblad, B. (2004). An active and socially integrated lifestyle in late life may protect against dementia. The Lancet: Neurology, 3, 343–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology, 2, 300–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, L. K. (2010). Still happy after all these years: research frontiers on subjective well-being in later life. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 65, 331–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamermesh, D. S. (2005). Routine. European Economic Review, 49, 29–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertzog, C., Kramer, A. F., Wilson, R. S., & Lindenberger, U. (2009). Enrichment effects on adult cognitive development. Psychology Science in the Public Interest, 9, 1–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juster, F. T., Ono, H., & Stafford, F. P. (2003). An assessment of alternative measures of time use. Sociological Methodology, 33, 19–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juster, F. T., & Stafford, F. P. (Eds.). (1985). Time, goods, and well-being. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Survey Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: the day reconstruction method. Science, 306, 1776–1780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Schkade, D. A., Fischler, C., Krueger, A. B., & Krilla, A. (2010). The structure of well-being in two cities: Life satisfaction and experienced happiness in Columbus, Ohio; and Rennes, France. In E. Diener, J. F. Helliwell, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), International differences in well-being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, S., Ford, A. B., Moskowitz, A. W., Jackson, B. A., & Jaffe, M. W. (1963). Studies of illness in the aged. The index of ADL: A standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA, 185, 914–919.

  • Krantz-Kent, R., & Stewart, J. (2007). How do older Americans spend their time. Monthly Labor Review, 130, 8–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, A. B., Kahneman, D., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2009a). National time accounting: The currency of life. In A. B. Krueger (Ed.), Measuring the subjective well-being of nations: National accounts of time use and well-being (Vol. Ch. 1, pp. 9–86). Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, A. B., Kahneman, D., Fischler, C., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2009b). Time use and subjective well-being in France and the U.S. Social Indicators Research, 93, 7–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, A. B., & Schkade, D. A. (2008). The reliability of subjective well-being measures. Journal of Public Economics, 92(8), 1833–1845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuppens, P., Tuerlinckx, F., Russell, J. A., & Feldman Barrett, L. (2012) The relation between valence and arousal in subjective experience. Psychological Bulletin, Online First Publication, December 10, 2012. doi:10.1037/a0030811

  • Lachman, M. E., & Weaver, S. L. (1997). Midlife Development Inventory (MIDI) personality scales: Scale construction and scoring. Unpublished Technical Report. Brandeis University. (http://www.brandeis.edu/projects/lifespan/scales.html).

  • Larson, R., Zuzanek, J., & Mannell, R. (1985). Being alone versus being with people: disengagement in the daily experience of older adults. Journal of Gerontology, 40, 375–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, M. P., & Brody, E. M. (1969). Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist, 9, 179–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindquist, K. A., & Barrett, L. F. (2008). Emotional complexity. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, & L. F. Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (3rd ed., pp. 513–530). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein, G., O’Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (2005). Projection bias in predicting future utility. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 1209–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G. S. (1983). Limited dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miret, M., Caballero, F. F., Mathur, A., Naidoo, N., Kowal, P., Ayuso-Mateos, J. L., & Chatterji, S. (2012). Validation of a measure of subjective well-being: an abbreviated version of the Day Reconstruction Method. PLOS One, 7(8), e43887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, M. S., & Lawton, M. P. (1982). Time budgets of older people: a window on four lifestyles. Journal of Gerontology, 37, 115–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagi, S. Z. (1976). An epidemiology of disability among adults in the United States. The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly. Health and Society, 439–467.

  • Powell, K. E., Paluch, A. E., & Blair, S. N. (2011). Physical activity for health: What kind? How much? How intense? On top of what? Annual Review of Public Health, 32, 349–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressman, S. D., & Cohen, S. (2005). Does positive affect influence health? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 925–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J., & Godbey, G. (1997). Time for life: The surprising ways Americans use their time. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Röcke, C., Li, S.-C., & Smith, J. (2009). Intraindividual variability in positive and negative affect over 45 days: do older adults fluctuate less than young adults? Psychology and Aging, 24, 863–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosow, I., & Breslau, N. (1966). A Guttman health scale for the aged. Journal of Gerontology, 21, 556–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161–1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schimmack, U., & Diener, E. (1997). Affect intensity: separating intensity and frequency in repeatedly measured affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1313–1329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J., Ryan, L.H., Becker, S., & Gonzalez, R. (2011). New survey measures of time use and experienced well-being for older adults. Retrieved from http://sites.isr.umich.edu/DNN/Portals/27/Docs/ROBUST%20Bulletin.pdf.

  • Smith, J., Fisher, G., Ryan, L., Clarke, P. House, J., & Weir, D. (2013). HRS Psychosocial and Lifestyle Questionnaire 2006–2010: Documentation Report. Retrieved from http://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/sitedocs/userg/HRS2006–2010SAQdoc.pdf.

  • Steffick, D. E. (2000). Documentation of Affective Functioning Measures in the Health and Retirement Study. Retrieved from http://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/sitedocs/userg/dr-005.pdf.

  • Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J-P. (2009) Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress [http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/en/documents.htm].

  • Stone, A. A., Schwartz, J. E., Schwarz, N., Schkade, D., Krueger, A., & Kahneman, D. (2006). A population approach to the study of emotion: diurnal rhythms of a working day examined with the Day Reconstruction Method (DRM). Emotion, 6, 139–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, A. A., Schwartz, J. E., Broderick, J. E., & Deaton, A. (2010). A snapshot of the age distribution of psychological well-being in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 107(22), 9985–9990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, L., Chan, D., & Diener, E. (2013). The metrics of societal happiness. Social Indicators Research, (published, online June 6, 2013).

  • Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J., & Rasinski, K. (2000). The psychology of survey response. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ver Ploeg, M., Altonji, J., Bradburn, N., DaVanzo, J., Nordhaus, W., & Samaniego, F. (Eds.). (2000). Time-use measurement and research: Report of a workshop. Washington DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waidmann, T., & Freeman, V. (2006). The daily activities of the community-dwelling elderly: Evidence from the American time use survey. United States Department of Health and Human Services: Office of disability, aging and long-term care policy.

  • Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1992). Affects separable and inseparable: on the hierarchical arrangement of negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 489–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1994). The PANAS-X: Manual for the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule—Expanded Form. Unpublished manuscript. University of Iowa, Iowa City. Retrieved from http://www.midss.org/content/panas-x-manual-positive-and-negative-affect-schedule.

  • Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1997). Measurement and mismeasurement of mood: recurrent and emergent issues. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 267–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Wiese, D., Vaidya, J., & Tellegen, A. (1999). The two general activation systems of affect: structural findings, evolutionary considerations, and psychobiological evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 820–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. S., & Bennett, D. A. (2003). Cognitive activity and risk of Alzheimer’s disease. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 87–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2005). Affective forecasting: knowing what to want. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 131–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by funding from the National Institute of Aging at the National Institutes of Health (grant number R01 AG040635). The HRS (Health and Retirement Study) is sponsored by the National Institute on Aging (grant number NIA U01AG009740) and is conducted by the University of Michigan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, 426 Thompson Street, Ann Arbor, MI, 48104, USA

    Jacqui Smith, Lindsay H. Ryan, Tara L. Queen, Sandra Becker & Richard Gonzalez

Authors
  1. Jacqui Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lindsay H. Ryan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tara L. Queen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sandra Becker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Richard Gonzalez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacqui Smith.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, J., Ryan, L.H., Queen, T.L. et al. Snapshots of Mixtures of Affective Experiences in a Day: Findings from the Health and Retirement Study. Population Ageing 7, 55–79 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12062-014-9093-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12062-014-9093-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation