Abstract
The quest for effective medicines is very old. In modern times two important tools have been developed to evaluate efficacy of drugs: superiority and non-inferiority types of clinical trials. The former tests the null hypothesis of μ (the difference between a tested drug and comparator) ≤ 0 against μ > 0; the latter tests the null hypothesis of μ ≤ - Δ against, μ > - Δ, where Δ is the clinical difference from the comparator. In a superiority trial, a new drug is tested against a placebo; in a non-inferiority trial, a new drug is tested against active treatment. In this paper, arguments are presented to show that a superiority trial against a placebo is scientifically sound but ethically unacceptable, whereas a non-inferiority trial against active treatment is ethically sound but scientifically not reliable. Switching from a superiority type of trial with placebo to a non-inferiority trial with an active-control — following the latest revision of Declaration of Helsinki — is in practice switching from the violation of the uncertainty principle to uncertainty of results. Given human and financial resources, it appears an academic question as to which is more unethical: to violate patients’ rights or to produce results without scientific value. All presented considerations lead to the conclusion that the use of a superiority trial of design with an active control instead of placebo will satisfy scientific needs, expectation of patients, and the ancient quest for effective medicines.
In the era of Good (Clinical, Laboratory, Manufacture) Practice, the attention of those performing clinical trials is focused on the procedure, not always on its essence. However even the excellent performance of a trial which is not worth doing is fruitless.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hrobjartsson, A. & Gøtzsche, P.C. (2001) Is placebo powerless? The New England Journal of Medicine 344: 1594–1602.
Berkowitz, B.A. & Katzung, B.G. (2001) Basic & Clinical evaluation of new drugs, in: Katzung, B.G. ed. Basic & Clinical Pharmacology. Lange Medical Books/McGraw-Hill, New York: 64–74.
Szumowski, W. Historia Medycyny. Gebethner i Wolf, Kraków, 1935.
Holy Bible Genesis XXIII. 16.
Aras, G (2001) Superiority, noninferiority, equivalence, and bioequivalence — revisited. Drug Information Journal 35: 1157–1164.
Emanuel, E.J. & Miller, F.G. (2001) The ethics of placebo-controlled trials — a middle ground. The New England Journal of Medicine 345: 915–919.
Temple, R. & Ellenberg, S.S. (2000) Placebo controlled trials and active-control trials in the evaluation of new treatments. Part 1: Ethical and scientific issues. Annals of Internal Medicine 133: 455–463.
Rothman, K.J. & Michelis, K.B. (1994) The continuing unethical use of placebo controls. The New England Journal of Medicine 331: 394–398.
Rudowski, W. (1980) World Health Organization Biomedical Research Guidelines and the Conduct of Clinical Trials. Journal of Medical Ethics: 58–66.
The CAST Investigators (1989) Preliminary report: effect of encainide and flecainide on mortality in randomized trial of arrhythmia suppression after myocardial infarction. The New England Journal of Medicine 321: 406–412.
Hulley, S., Grady, D., Bush, T., Furberg, C., Riggs, B. & Hulley, S. (1989) Randomized trial of estrogen plus progestin for secondary prevention of coronary artery disease in women. Journal of American Medical Association 280: 605–611.
Ling, Y.-L., Chern, H.-D., Chu, M.-L. (2002) Placebo controlled clinical trials are as ethical as active controlled trials even if effective therapies exist. Drug Information Journal 36: 739–741.
Green, B.M., Taylor, H.R., Cupp, E.W., Murphy, R.P., White, A.T., Aziz, M.A., Schulz-Key, H., D’Anna, S., Newland, H.S., Goldschmidt, L.P., Auer, C., Hansos, A.P., Freeman, S.V., Reber, E.W., Williams, N.P. (1985) Comparison of ivermectin and diethylcarbamazine in treatment of onchocerciasis. The New England Journal of Medicine 313: 133–138.
Mason, J.K. & McCall Smith, R.A. (1994) Law and Medical Ethics. Butterworth, London, Dublin, Edinburgh.
Scrip (2003) No. 2827: 20.
Koch, A. & Rohmel, J. (2002) The impact of sloppy study to conduct on noninferiority studies. Drug Information Journal 36: 3–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Spławiński, J., Kuźniar, J. Clinical trials: active control vs placebo — What is ethical?. SCI ENG ETHICS 10, 73–79 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-004-0065-x
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-004-0065-x