Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of Aggression and Bullying on Children and Adolescents: Implications for Prevention and Intervention

  • Child and Adolescent Disorders (TD Benton, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Psychiatry Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Peer aggression and bullying is of considerable importance given the large number of youth involved with or witnesses to this behavior and the association with maladjustment and other negative outcomes. This article reviews current literature on aggression and bullying among school-age youth, including subtypes and differentiating between aggression and bullying. We then highlight important considerations for intervening and preventing these behaviors. Finally, implications for psychiatrists, other mental health professionals, and providers are discussed in an effort to provide specific strategies to help youth, families, and schools more successfully navigate the challenges that aggression and bullying often cause.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Bryn S. Stop Bullying Now! A federal campaign for bullying preventin and intervention. J School Violence. 2011;10(2):213–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Srabstein J, Joshi P, Due P, et al. Prevention of public health risks linked to bullying: A need for a whole community approach. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2008;20(2):185–99.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang J, Iannotti RJ, Nansel TR. School bullying among adolescents in the United States: physical, verbal, relational, and cyber. J Adolesc Health. 2009;45(4):368–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Spriggs AL, Iannotti RJ, Nansel TR, Haynie DL. Adolescent bullying involvement and perceived family, peer and school relations: commonalities and differences across race/ethnicity. J Adolesc Health. 2007;41(3):283–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nansel TR, Overpeck M, Pilla RS, Ruan WJ, Simons-Morton B, Scheidt P. Bullying behaviors among US youth: prevalence and associations with psychosocial adjustment. JAMA. 2001;285(16):2094–100.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Broidy LM, Nagin DS, Tremblay RE, et al. Developmental trajectories of childhood disruptive behaviors and adolescent delinquency: a six-site, cross-national study. Dev Psychol. 2003;39:222–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Huesmann LR, Eron LD, Dubow EF. Childhood predictors of adult criminality: are all risk factors reflected in childhood aggressiveness? CBMH. 2002;12(3):185–208.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Leschied A, Chiodo D, Nowicki E, Rodger S. Childhood predictors of adult criminality: a meta-analysis drawn from the prospective longitudinal literature. Can J Crimin Crim Just. 2008;50(4):435–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dodge KA, Lansford JE, Burks VS, et al. Peer rejection and social information-processing factors in the development of aggressive behavior problems in children. Child Dev. 2003;74(2):374–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Loeber R, Farrington DP. Young children who commit crime: epidemiology, developmental origins, risk factors, early interventions, and policy implications. Dev Psychopathol. 2000;12(4):737–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Olweus D. Bullying at school. Oxford: Blackwell; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  12. • Ybarra ML, Boyd D, Korchmaros JD, Oppenheim JK. Defining and measuring cyberbullying within the larger context of bullying victimization. J Adolesc Health. 2012;51(1):53–8. This article found differences in prevelance rates of bullying depending on the way in which it was measured. Specifically, if the word “bully” was used, if a definition with behaviors was used or neither. When using neither, prevelance rates were higher. This article also discusses the use of questions related to differential power and repetition.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Swearer SM, Siebecker AB, Johnsen-Frerichs LA, Wang C. Assessment of bullying/victimization: the problem of comparability across studies and across methodologies. In: Jimerson SR, Swearer SM, Espelage DL, editors. Handbook of bullying in schools: an international perspective. New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group; 2010. p. 305–27.

    Google Scholar 

  14. • Sawyer AL, Bradshaw CP, O'Brennan LM. Examining ethnic, gender, and developmental differences in the way children report being a victim of 'bullying' on self-report measures. J Adolesc Health. 2008;43(2):106–14. This study found ethnic differences in prevelance rates of bullying comparing a behavior-based measure and a definitional based measure (i.e., one that included the term “bully”).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Crick NR, Grotpeter JK. Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Dev. 1995;66(3):710–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Crick NR, Ostrov JM, Kawabata Y. Relational aggression and gender: an overview. In: Flannery DJ, Vazsonyi AT, Waldman ID (eds) The Cambridge handbook of violent behavior and aggression. Cambridge:, New York; 2007, pp.245–59.

  17. • Spieker SJ, Campbell SB, Vandergrift N, et al. Relational aggression in middle childhood: predictors and adolescent outcomes. Soc Dev. 2012;21(2):354–75. This article used longitudinal data to examine gender differences in the development of relational and physical aggression.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. •• Card NA, Stucky BD, Sawalani GM, Little TD. Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: a meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Dev. 2008;79(5):1185–229. Thorough review of literature (prior to 2008) related to direct and indirect (including relational) aggression; highlights correlates in the literature related to each form and specific findings related to age and gender.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Williams JR, Fredland N, Han H-R, Campbell JC, Kub JE. Relational aggression and adverse psychosocial and physical health symptoms among urban adolescents. Public Health Nurs. 2009;26(6):489–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Herrenkohl TI, Catalano RF, Hemphill SA, Toumbourou JW. Longitudinal examination of physical and relational aggression as precursors to later problem behaviors in adolescents. Violence Vict. 2009;24(1):3–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Skara S, Pokhrel P, Weiner MD, Sun P, Dent CW, Sussman S. Physical and relational aggression as predictors of drug use: gender differences among high school students. Addict Behav. 2008;33(12):1507–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gini G, Pozzoli T. Association between bullying and psychosomatic problems: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2009;123(3):1059–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Marini ZA, Dane AV, Bosacki SL. YLC-CURA. Direct and indirect bully-victims: differential psychosocial risk factors associated with adolescents involved in bullying and victimization. Aggress Behav. 2006;32(6):551–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Klomek AB, Marrocco F, Kleinman M, Schonfeld IS, Gould MS. Bullying, depression, and suicidality in adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2007;46(1):40–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. • Hubbard JA, McAuliffe MD, Morrow MT, Romano LJ. Reactive and proactive aggression in childhood and adolescence: precursors, outcomes, processes, experiences, and measurement. J Pers. 2010;78(1):95–118. This article reviews the literature on proactive and reactive aggression, including subtypes of aggression, familial precursors, associated behavioral outcomes, and the correlates of social–cognitive and emotional process.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bloomquist ML, Schnell SV. Helping children with aggression and conduct problems: best practices for intervention. New York: Guilford Press; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fite PJ, Colder CR. Proactive and reactive aggression and peer delinquency: implications for prevention and intervention. J Early Adolesc. 2007;27(2):223–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lenhardt A, Purcell K, Smith A, Zickuhr K. Social media & mobile internet use among teens and young adults; 2010. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Social-Media-and-Young-Adults.aspx?r=1. Accessed 17 January 2013.

  29. Lenhardt A. Teens, smartphones, and texting; 2012. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Teens-and-smartphones.aspx. Accessed 17 January 2013.

  30. Calvete E, Orue I, Estévez A, Villardón L, Padilla P. Cyberbullying in adolescents: modalities and aggressors’ profile. Comp Hum Behav. 2010;26(5):1128–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mishna F, Cook C, Gadalla T, Daciuk J, Solomon S. Cyber bullying behaviors among middle and high school students. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2010;80(3):362–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ybarra ML, Mitchell KJ. Prevalence and frequency of Internet harassment instigation: implications for adolescent health. J Adolesc Health. 2007;41:189–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Li Q. New bottle but old wine: a research of cyberbullying in schools. Comp Hum Behav. 2007;23(4):1777–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. •• Leff SS, Waasdorp TE, Crick NR. A review of existing relational aggression programs: strengths, limitations, and future directions. School Psychol Rev. 2010;39(4):508–35. Reviews the developmental research related to nine published school-based relational aggression prevention and intervention programs. Each program’s strengths and limitations are discussed, and includes implications for school psychologists.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Crick NR. Relational aggression: the role of intent attributions, feelings of distress, and provocation type. Dev Psychopathol. 1995;7(2):313–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Crick NR, Grotpeter JK, Bigbee MA. Relationally and physically aggressive children's intent attributions and feelings of distress for relational and instrumental peer conflicts. Child Dev. 2002;73:1134.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Murray-Close D, Crick NR. Gender differences in the association between cardiovascular reactivity and aggressive conduct. Int J Psychophysiol. 2007;65(2):103–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. • Leff SS, Waasdorp TE, Paskewich B, et al. The Preventing Relational Aggression in Schools Everyday Program: a preliminary evaluation of acceptability and impact. School Psychol Rev. 2010;39(4):569–87. Presents findings from a preliminary randomized controlled trial of a program to reduce relational aggression using a classroom-based curriculum specifically designed for inner-city, minority youth.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kuppens S, Grietens H, Onghena P, Michiels D, Subramanian SV. Individual and classroom variables associated with relational aggression in elementary-school aged children: A multilevel analysis. J School Psychol. 2008;46(6):639–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Vasey MW, Dalgleish T, Silverman WK. Research on information-processing factors in child and adolescent psychopathology: a critical commentary. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2003;32(1):81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Dodge KA, Pettit G. A biopsychosocial model of the development of chronic conduct problems in adolescence. Dev Psychol. 2003;39(2):349–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Crick NR, Werner NE. Response decision processes in relational and overt aggression. Child Dev. 1998;69(6):1630–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Smith PK, Monks CP. Concepts of bullying: Developmental and cultural aspects. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2008;20(2):101–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. •• Ttofi MM, Farrington DP. Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: a systematic and meta-analytic review. J Exp Crim. 2011;7(1):27–56. Recent review of programming to reduce bullying indicating that school-based bullying programs are effective. Specifically, programs that are intensive, include parents/community, have firm disciplinary methods/policies, and improved playground supervision were the most effective.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. • Pearce N, Cross D, Monks H, Waters S, Falconer S. Current evidence of best practice in whole-school bullying intervention and its potential to inform cyberbullying interventions. Aust J Guid Couns. 2011;21(1):1–21. This article further corroborated findings of past meta-analyses of bullying programming indicating that there are six indicators for a successful bullying program, such as a supportive school culture, school–family–community parterships, and proactive policies, procedures, and practices.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. • Polanin JR, Espelage DL, Pigott TD. A meta-analysis of school-based bullying prevention programs' effects on bystander intervention behavior. School Psychol Rev. 2012;41(1):47–65. Recent review of programming to reduce bullying with a focus on bystander interventions. Results indicated that programs did effectively increase bystander behavior in bullying situtations, underscoring the importance of an ecolgical approach to bullying prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Bronfenbrenner U. The ecology of human development: experiments by nature and design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Espelage DL, Swearer SM. A social-ecological model for bullying prevention and intervention: understanding the impact of adults in the social ecology of youngsters. In: Jimerson SR, Swearer SM, Espelage DL, editors. Handbook of bullying in schools: an international perspective. New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis; 2010. p. 61–72.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ayers S, Wagaman M, Geiger J, Bermudez-Parsai M, Hedberg E. Examining school-based bullying interventions using multilevel discrete time hazard modeling. Prev Sci. 2012;13(5):539–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. •• Bradshaw CP, Waasdorp TE. Measuring and changing a "culture of bullying". School Psychol Rev. 2009;38(3):356–61. Discusses the importance of definitions and terminology when measuring bullying, school context as it relates to the bullying climate, and highlights that changing a culture/climate of bullying may be a slow process.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Bradshaw CP, Debnam K, Koth CW, Leaf P. Preliminary validation of the implementation phases inventory for assessing fidelity of Schoolwide Positive Behavior Supports. J Pos Behav Interv. 2009;11(3):145–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Durlak J, DuPre E. Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. Am J Commun Psychol. 2008;41(3):327–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Olweus D, Limber SP, Flerx VC, Mullin N, Riese J, Snyder M. Olweus bullying prevention program: schoolwide guide. Center City: Hazelden; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Olweus D, Limber SP. The Olweus Bullying Prevention Program: implementation and evaluation over two decades. In: Jimerson SR, Swearer SM, Espelage DL, editors. Handbook of bullying in schools: an international perspective. New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis; 2010. p. 377–401.

    Google Scholar 

  55. • Olweus D, Limber SP. Bullying in school: Evaluation and dissemination of the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2010;80(1):124–34. Discusses compelling reviews of large-scale studies of the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program that were done in Norwegian schools. Also discusses the more inconsistent results obtained from assessments of the program in the USA.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Bauer NS, Lozano P, Rivara FP. The effectiveness of the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program in public middle schools: A controlled trial. J Adolesc Health. 2007;40(3):266–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. • Hong JS. Feasibility of the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program in low-income schools. J School Violence. 2009;8(1):81–97. Discusses the importance of adaptation of programming for lower class, minority youth when using programming that was designed for upper/middle-class schools, such as the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Committee for Children. Steps to Respect program guide: Review of research; 2005. http://www.cfchildren.org/Portals/0/STR/STR_DOC/Research_Review_STR.pdf. Accessed 17 January 2013.

  59. Low S, Frey KS, Brockman CJ. Gossip on the playground: Changes associated with universal intervention, retaliation Beliefs, and supportive Friends. School Psychol Rev. 2010;39(4):536–51.

    Google Scholar 

  60. • Brown EC, Low S, Smith BH, Haggerty KP. Outcomes from a school-randomized controlled trial of Steps to Respect: A bullying prevention program. School Psychol Rev. 2011;40(3):423–43. This article presents results from a randomized control trial of Steps to Respect showing positive effects on school climate, less physical bullying, and bullying-related problems.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Frey KS, Hirschstein MK, Edstrom LV, Snell JL. Observed reductions in school bullying, nonbullying aggression, and destructive bystander behavior: a longitudinal evaluation. J Educ Psychol. 2009;101(2):466–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Leff SS, Angelucci J, Goldstein AB, Cardaciotto L, Paskewich B, Grossman MB. Using a participatory action research model to create a school-based intervention program for relationally aggressive girls—The Friend to Friend Program. In: Zins JE, Elias MJ, Maher CA, editors. Bullying, victimization, and peer harassment: a handbook of prevention and intervention. New York: Haworth Press; 2007. p. 199–218.

    Google Scholar 

  63. •• Leff SS, Gullan RL, Paskewich BS, et al. An initial evaluation of a culturally adapted social problem-solving and relational aggression prevention program for urban African-American relationally aggressive girls. J Prevent Intervent Commun. 2009;37(4):260–74. This article presents findings from an initial study of the Friend to Friend Program (F2F) within two urban schools. Findings suggest that program reduces relational and physical aggression and increases peer likeability for relationally aggressive third to fifth grade youth participating in F2F compared with similar aggressive girls randomized to a referral to the school counselor as needed (control group). In addition, girls in F2F have proven to be better problem-solvers and are less lonely than similar girls randomized to the control condition.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Rigby K, Smith PK. Is school bullying really on the rise? Soc Psychol Educ. 2011;14(4):441–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Mishna F, Cook C, Saini M, Wu MJ, MacFadden R. Interventions to prevent and reduce cyber abuse of youth: a systematic review. Res Soc Work Pract. 2011;21(1):5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Suzuki K, Asaga R, Sourander A, Hoven CW, Mandell D. Cyberbullying and adolescent mental health. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2012;24(1):27–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Solberg M, Olweus D. Prevalence estimation of school bullying with the Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire. Aggressive Behav. 2003;29(3):239–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Smith PK, Mahdavi J, Carvalho M, Fisher S, Russell S, Tippett N. Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2008;49(4):376–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Mishna F, Saini M, Solomon S. Ongoing and online: Children and youth's perceptions of cyber bullying. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2009;31(12):1222–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Bollmer JM, Milich R, Harris MJ, Maras MA. A friend in need: the role of friendship quality as a protective factor in peer victimization and bullying. J Interpers Violence. 2005;20(6):701–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Hodges EVE, Boivin M, Vitato F, Bukowski WM. The power of friendship: Protection against an escalating cycle of peer victimization. Dev Psychol. 1999;35:94–101.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Leff SS, Costigan T, Power TJ. Using participatory research to develop a playground-based prevention program. J School Psychol. 2004;42(1):3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Bay-Hinitz AK, Peterson RF, Quilitch HR. Cooperative games: a way to modify aggressive and cooperative behaviors in young children. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994;27(3):435–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Murphy HA, Hutchison JM, Bailey JS. Behavioral school psychology goes outdoors: the effect of organized games on playground aggression. J Appl Behav Anal. 1983;16(1):29–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Colvin G, Sugai G, Good III RH, Lee Y-Y. Using active supervision and precorrection to improve transition behaviors in an elementary school. School Psychol Quart. 1997;12(4):344–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Haydon T, DeGreg J, Maheady L, Hunter W. Using active supervision and precorrection to improve transition behaviors in a middle school classroom. J Evidence Based Pract School. 2012;13(1):81–94.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Roderick C, Pitchford M, Miller A. Reducing aggressive playground behaviour by means of a school-wide raffle'. Educ Psychol Pract. 1997;13(1):57–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Mayeux L, Sandstrom MJ, Cillessen AHN. Is being popular a risky proposition? J Res Adolesc. 2008;18(1):49–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Waasdorp TE, Baker CN, Paskewich BS, Leff SS. The examination of forms of aggression, leadership, and social status among urban youth. J Youth Adolesc (in press).

  80. Farmer TW, Xie H. Aggression and school social dynamics: the good, the bad, and the ordinary. J School Psychol. 2007;45(5):461–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. • Neal JW. Social aggression and social position in middle childhood and early adolescence: Burning bridges or building them? J Early Adolesc. 2010;30(1):122–37. This article provides a theoretical discussion of the applicability of social dominance theory to social aggression and social position.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. • Waasdorp TE, Bradshaw CP, Duong J. The link between parents' perceptions of the school and their responses to school bullying: Variation by child characteristics and the forms of victimization. J Educ Psychol. 2011;103(2):324–35. This article examines what factors are associated with parents’ response to their child’s being victimized at school, such as contacting the school or the bully’s parent, or doing nothing. Results indicate that the school climate and the form of bullying the child experienced (direct or indirect) affects the liklihood of proactively responding to their child’s bullying.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Rigby K, Barnes A. The victimised student's dilemma: To tell or not to tell. Youth Stud Austr. 2002;21(3):33–6.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Kowalski RM, Limber SP, Agatston PW. Cyber bullying: bullying in the digital age. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Parris L, Varjas K, Meyers J, Cutts H. High school students’ perceptions of coping with cyberbullying. Youth Soc. 2012;44(2):284–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatrics, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, 3535 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA

    Stephen S. Leff & Tracy Evian Waasdorp

  2. University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Stephen S. Leff

  3. The Philadelphia Collaborative Violence Prevention Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Stephen S. Leff

Authors
  1. Stephen S. Leff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tracy Evian Waasdorp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen S. Leff.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Child and Adolescent Disorders

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leff, S.S., Waasdorp, T.E. Effect of Aggression and Bullying on Children and Adolescents: Implications for Prevention and Intervention. Curr Psychiatry Rep 15, 343 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-012-0343-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-012-0343-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation