Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Behavioral inhibition: A neurobiological perspective

  • Published:
Current Psychiatry Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Behavioral inhibition (BI) during early childhood has been associated with subsequent development of anxiety disorders. However, understanding of the neuroanatomical substrates of BI in humans generally has not kept pace with that of anxiety disorders. Recent interpretations and implementations of Gray’s and Kagan’s concepts of BI are examined from the perspective of current neurobiological models. Particular attention is given to evidence pointing to conceptual and operational limitations of self-report scales purported to measure trait BI in adults, and especially to inconsistent correlations between such behavioral inhibition system (BIS) scores and amygdala and autonomic responses to fear- or startle-inducing stimuli. Evidence showing a dissociation of both BI and trait anxiety from the amygdala is considered. Possible reasons for the poor association between BIS and trait anxiety self-report scale scores and predicted physiological outputs of the BIS are identified. Reasons to distinguish between the neural bases of BI as against trait anxiety also are discussed. The need to critically examine the role of the amygdala in BI and trait anxiety, as well as to consider other brain areas that appear to be involved in subserving these emotional traits, is emphasized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Fox NA, Henderson HA, Marshall PJ, et al.: Behavioral inhibition: linking biology and behavior in a developmental framework. Annu Rev Psychol 2005, 56:235–262. The most recent substantial review of BI from a biological perspective. It includes an intriguing discussion on research into event-related potentials and BI in children.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tillfors M: Why do some individuals develop social phobia? A review with emphasis on the neurobiological influences. Nord J Psychiatry 2004, 58:267–276. A brief but very clear review of current knowledge regarding cortical and subcortical substrates, roles, and mechanisms underlying fear and anxiety.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Neal JA, Edelman RJ: The etiology of social phobia: toward a developmental profile. Clin Psychol Rev 2003, 23:761–786. Includes a brief review of BI that is outstanding for its fresh and critical perspective of the literature.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schwartz CE, Wright CI, Shin LM, et al.: Inhibited and uninhibited infants “grown up”: adult amygdalar response to novelty. Science 2003, 300:1952–1953. An fMRI study entailing the follow-up of subjects with childhood BI to adulthood makes this a unique paper in the neurobiology of BI literature.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Marshall J, Stevenson-Hinde J: Behavioral inhibition: physiological correlates. In International Handbook of Social Anxiety: Concepts, Research and Interventions Relating to the Self and Shyness. Edited by Crozier WR, Alden LE. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons; 2001:53–76.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Moehler E, Kagan J, Brunner R, et al.: Association of behavioral inhibition with hair pigmentation in a European sample. Biol Psychol 2006 [Epub ahead of print].

  7. Turner SM, Biedel DC, Wolff PL: Is behavioral inhibition related to the anxiety disorders? Clin Psychol Rev 1996, 16:157–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schwartz CE, Snidman NS, Kagan J: Adolescent social anxiety as an outcome of inhibited temperament in childhood. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1999, 53:1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fox NA, Nichols KE, Henderson HA, et al.: Evidence for a gene-environment interaction in predicting behavioral inhibition in middle childhood. Psychol Sci 2005, 16:921–926. A recent study examining the interaction effect between the short and long 5-HTT polymorphisms and maternal support on risk for childhood BI.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rothbart MK, Ellis LK, Posner MI: Temperament and selfregulation. In Handbook of Self-Regulation: Research, Theory, and Applications. New York: Guilford Press; 2004:357–370.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gray JA: The Neuropsychology of Anxiety: an Enquiry into the Functions of the Septo-Hippocampal System, edn 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1982

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gray JA, McNaughton N: The Neuropsychology of Anxiety, edn 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  13. McNaughton N, Gray JA: The neurobiology of behavioral inhibition. In Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience of Psychopathology. Edited by Barch D. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006, In press. A detailed and up-to-date presentation of the Gray-McNaughton neuropharmacologic theory of the BIS and its relation to anxiety disorders.

    Google Scholar 

  14. McNaughton N, Gray JA: Anxiolytic action on the behavioral inhibition system implies multiple types of arousal contribute to anxiety. J Affect Disord 2000, 61:161–176.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Aranda L, Santin LJ, Begega A, et al.: Supramammillary and adjacent nuclei lesions impair spatial working memory and induce anxiolytic behavior. Behav Brain Res 2006, 167:156–164.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Moore R, Gale A, Morris PH, Forrester D: Theta phase locking across the neocortex reflects cortico-hippocampal recursive communication during goal conflict resolution. Int J Psychophysiol 2005 [Epub ahead of print].

  17. Garcia-Koll C, Kagan J, Reznick JS: Behavioral inhibition in young children. Child Dev 1984, 50:915–922.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kagan J, Reznick JS, Snidman N: Temperamental inhibition in early childhood. In The Study of Temperament: Changes, Continuities, and Challenges. Edited by Plomin R, Dunn J. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum; 1985:53–65.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ledoux JE: The Emotional Brain. New York: Simon & Schuster; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Davis M: Neural systems involved in fear-potentiated startle. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1989, 563:165–183.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kagan J, Snidman N: Temperamental factors in human development. Am Psychol 1991, 46:856–862.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Carver CS, White TL: Behavioural inhibition, behavioural activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: the BIS/BAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol 1994, 67:319–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Caseras X, Avila C, Torrubia R: The measurement of individual differences in behavioral inhibition and behavioral activation systems: a comparison of personality scales. Pers Individ Dif 2003, 34:999–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cogswell A, Alloy LB, van Dulmen MHM, Fresco DM: A psychometric evaluation of behavioral inhibition and approach self-report measures. Pers Individ Dif 2006, In press.

  25. Torrubia R, Avila C, Molto J, Caseras X: The Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire (SPSRQ) as a measure of Gray’s anxiety and impulsivity dimensions. Pers Individ Dif 2001, 31:837–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fullana MA, Caseras X, Riba J, et al.: Influence of individual differences in Behavioral Inhibition System on the magnitude and time course of the fear-potentiated startle. Int J Psychophysiol 2006, In press.

  27. Zinbarg RE, Mohlman J: Individual differences in the acquisition of affectively valenced associations. J Pers Soc Psychol 1998, 74:1024–1040.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Corr PJ, Wilson GD, Fotiadou M, et al.: Personality and affective modulation of the startle reflex. Pers Individ Dif 1995, 19:543–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. O’Connor RM, Colder CR, Hawk LW, Jr: Confirmatory factor analysis of the Sensitivity to Punishment, Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire. Pers Individ Dif 2004, 37:985–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hofmann SG, Kim HJ: Anxiety goes under the skin: behavioral inhibition, anxiety, and autonomic arousal in speech anxious males. Pers Individ Dif 2006, In press.

  31. Dawson ME, Schell AM, Filion DL: The electrodermal system. In Handbook of Psychophysiology, edn 2. Edited by Cacciopo JT, Tassinary LG, Bernston GG. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2000:200–223.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Bradley MM: Emotion and motivation. In Handbook of Psychophysiology, edn 2. Edited by Cacciopo JT, Tassinary LG, Bernston GG. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2000:602–642.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Grillon C, Baas J: A review of the modulation of the startle reflex by affective states and its application in psychiatry. Clin Neurophysiol 2003, 114:1557–1579.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Grillon C, Ameli R, Foot M, Davis M: Fear-potentiated startle: relationship to the level of state/trait anxiety in healthy subjects. Biol Psychiatry 1993, 33:566–574.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Hawk LW, Kowmas AD: Affective modulation and prepulse inhibition of startle among undergraduates high and low in behavioral inhibition and approach. Psychophysiology 2003, 40:131–138.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Caseras X, Fullana MA, Riba J, et al.: Influence of individual differences in Behavioral Inhibition System and stimulus content (fear versus blood-disgust) on affective startle reflex modulation. Biol Psychol 2006 [Epub ahead of print].

  37. Cornwell BR, Johnson L, Berardi L, Grillon C: Anticipation of public speaking in virtual reality reveals a relationship between trait social anxiety and startle reactivity. Biol Psychiatry 2006 [Epub ahead of print].

  38. Phan KL, Fitzgerald DA, Nathan PJ, Tancer ME: Association between amygdala hyperactivity to harsh faces and severity of social anxiety in generalized social phobia. Biol Psychiatry 2006, 59:424–429.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bertolino A, Arciero G, Rubino V, et al.: Variation of human amygdala response during threatening stimuli as a function of 5′HTTLPR genotype and personality style. Biol Psychiatry 2005, 57:1517–1525.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Ledoux JE: Emotion circuits in the brain. Annu Rev Neurosci 2000, 23:155–184.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Davidson RJ: What does prefrontal cortex “do” in affect: perspectives on frontal EEG asymmetry research. Biol Psychol 2004, 67:219–233.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Jackson D, Mueller CJ, Dolski I, et al.: Now you feel it now you don’t: frontal brain electrical asymmetry and individual differences in emotion regulation. Psychol Sci 2003, 14:612–617. An investigation of the eye-blink SR in relation to frontal EEG asymmetry notable for the sophisticated use of autonomic responses as opposed to self-report scales in the investigation of individual differences in emotional regulation. One of several studies led by Richard Davidson implicating the PFC in trait emotion.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Davidson RJ, Jackson D, Kalin NH: Emotion, plasticity, context and regulation: perspectives from affective neuroscience. Psychol Bull 2000, 126:890–909.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. vanHonkJ, Peper JS, Schutter DJ: Testosterone reduces unconscious fear but not consciously experienced anxiety: implications for the disorders of fear and anxiety. Biol Psychiatry 2005, 58:218–225. One of the major brain targets of testosterone is the amygdala. In this study, testosterone administration in normal healthy females reduced unconscious fear as measured by a masked emotional stroop task. However, no differences in cognitive anxiety, tension anxiety, and CW-BIS between placebo and testosterone conditions were found.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Sutton SK, Davidson RJ: Prefrontal brain asymmetry: a biological substrate of the behavioural approach and inhibition systems. Psychol Sci 1997, 8:204–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Harmon-Jones E, Allen JJB: Behavioural activation sensitivity and resting frontal EEG asymmetry: covariation of putative indicators related to risk of mood disorders. J Abnorm Psychol 1997, 106:159–163.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Coan JA, Allen JJB: Frontal EEG asymmetry and the behavioral activation and inhibition systems. Psychophysiology 2003, 40:106–114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Hewig J, Hagemann D, Seifert J, et al.: The relation of cortical activity and BIS/BAS on the trait level. Biol Psychol 2006, 71:42–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Davidson RJ, Marshall JR, Tomarken AJ, Henriques JB: While a phobic waits: regional brain electrical and autonomic activity in social phobics during anticipation of public speaking. Biol Psychiatry 2000, 47:85–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Kalin NH, Shelton SE, Davidson RJ, Kelley AE: The primate amygdala mediates acute fear but not the behavioral and physiological components of anxious temperament. J Neurosci 2001, 21:2067–2074. An elegant and meticulously performed ethological brain lesion study on rhesus monkeys providing compelling evidence against amygdala as a substrate for trait anxiety.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Schwerdtfeger A: Trait anxiety and autonomic indicators of the processing of threatening information: a cued S1-S2 paradigm. Biol Psychol 2006, 72:59–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Blackhart GC, Minnix JA, Kline JP: Can EEG asymmetry patterns predict future development of anxiety and depression? A preliminary study. Biol Psychol 2006, 72:46–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Kalin NH, Shelton SE, Fox AS, et al.: Brain regions associated with the expression and contextual regulation of anxiety in primates. Biol Psychiatry 2005, 58:796–804. A unique study showing an association between brainstem, thalamic, and PFC regions, but not the amygdala, and the regulation of freezing behavior (BI) in rhesus monkeys.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Smoller JW, Yamaki LH, Fagerness JA, et al.: The corticotropin-releasing hormone gene and behavioral inhibition in children at risk for panic disorder. Biol Psychol 2005, 57:1485–1492.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Hariri AR, Weinberger DR: Imaging genomics. Br Med Bull 2003, 65:259–270.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Hirschfield-Becker DR, Biederman J, Faraone SV, et al.: Lack of association between behavioral inhibition and psychosocial adversity factors in children at risk for anxiety disorders. Am J Psychiatry 2004, 161:547–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Coan JA, Allen JJ, McKnight PE: A capability model of individual differences in frontal EEG asymmetry. Biol Psychol 2006, 72:198–207. This recent semitheoretical paper presents evidence and argues in favor of a “capability” model that takes individual-condition interactions into account and against the general trait or “dispositional” model that doesn’t.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. MRC/UCT Medical Imaging Research Unit, Division of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa

    Barak E. Morgan MBBCh, PhD

Authors
  1. Barak E. Morgan MBBCh, PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barak E. Morgan MBBCh, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morgan, B.E. Behavioral inhibition: A neurobiological perspective. Curr Psychiatry Rep 8, 270–278 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-006-0062-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-006-0062-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation