Abstract
Purpose of Review
The aim of the study is to assess historical anatomical and functional definitions of Wernicke’s area in light of modern lesion and neuroimaging data.
Recent Findings
“Wernicke’s area” has become an anatomical label usually applied to the left posterior superior temporal gyrus and adjacent supramarginal gyrus. Recent evidence shows that this region is not critical for speech perception or for word comprehension. Rather, it supports retrieval of phonological forms (mental representations of phoneme sequences), which are used for speech output and short-term memory tasks. Focal damage to this region produces phonemic paraphasia without impairing word comprehension, i.e., conduction aphasia. Neuroimaging studies in recent decades provide evidence for a widely distributed temporal, parietal, and frontal network supporting language comprehension, which does not include the anatomically defined Wernicke area.
Summary
The term Wernicke’s area, if used at all, should not be used to refer to a zone critical for speech comprehension.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
DeWitt I, Rauschecker JP. Wernicke’s area revisited: parallel streams and word processing. Brain Lang. 2013;127(2):181–91.
Binder JR. The Wernicke area: modern evidence and a reinterpretation. Neurology. 2015;85:2170–5.
• Mesulam MM, Thompson CK, Weintraub S, Rogalski EJ. The Wernicke conundrum and the anatomy of language comprehension in primary progressive aphasia. Brain. 2015;138(8):2423–37. This study uses data from a large cohort of patients with primary progressive aphasia to examine the neural correlates of language comprehension, concluding that word comprehension depends mainly on the left anterior temporal lobe.
• Tremblay P, Dick AS. Broca and Wernicke are dead, or moving past the classic model of language neurobiology. Brain Lang. 2016;162:60–71. This paper presents interesting survey data on current use of the terms Broca's area and Wernicke's area among language scientists and clinicians, and argues that a lack of agreement renders these terms largely meaningless.
Wernicke C. Der aphasische Symptomenkomplex. Cohn & Weigert: Breslau; 1874.
Lichtheim L. On aphasia. Brain. 1885;7:433–84.
Henschen SE. On the hearing sphere. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh). 1918-1919;1:423–86.
Bastian HC. On different kinds of aphasia, with special reference to their classification and ultimate pathology. Br Med J. 1887;2:931–6. 85-90
Déjerine J. Anatomie des centres nerveux. Paris: Rueff; 1895.
Pick A. Aphasia. Berlin: Springer; 1931.
Kleist K. Sensory aphasia and amusia. London: Pergamon Press; 1962.
Starr MA. The pathology of sensory aphasia, with an analysis of fifty cases in which Broca’s centre was not diseased. Brain. 1889;12:82–101.
Marie P. On aphasia in general and agraphia in particular according to the teaching of Professor Charcot. Reprinted from Le Progres Medical, Series 2, 1888; 7: 81-84. Pierre Marie's Papers on Speech Disorders. New York: Hafner; 1971.
Goldstein K. Language and language disturbances. New York: Grune & Stratton; 1948.
Penfield W, Roberts L. Speech and brain-mechanisms. New York: Atheneum; 1959.
Bogen JE, Bogen GM. Wernicke’s region—where is it? Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1976;290:834–43.
Geschwind N. Aphasia. N Engl J Med. 1971;284(12):654–6.
Geschwind N, Levitsky W. Human brain: left-right asymmetries in temporal speech region. Science. 1968;161:186–7.
Wada JA, Clarke R, Hamm A. Cerebral hemispheric asymmetry in humans. Arch Neurol. 1975;32:239–46.
Steinmetz H, Volkmann J, Jäncke L, Freund H-J. Anatomical left-right asymmetry of language-related temporal cortex is different in left- and right-handers. Ann Neurol. 1991;29:315–9.
Galaburda AM, LeMay M, Kemper T, Geschwind N. Right-left asymmetries in the brain. Structural differences between the hemispheres may underlie cerebral dominance. Science. 1978;199:852–6.
Witelson SF, Kigar DL. Sylvian fissure morphology and asymmetry in men and women: bilateral differences in relation to handedness in men. J Comp Neurol. 1992;323:326–40.
Foundas AL, Leonard CM, Gilmore R, et al. Planum temporale asymmetry and language dominance. Neuropsychologia. 1994;32:1225–31.
Benson DF. Aphasia, alexia and agraphia. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1979.
Mayeux R, Kandel ER. Natural language, disorders of language, and other localizable disorders of cognitive function. In: Kandel ER, Schwartz J, editors. Principles of Neural Science. 2nd ed. New York: Elsevier Science Publishing Co.; 1985. p. 688–703.
Mesulam MM. Large-scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language, and memory. Ann Neurol. 1990;28:597–613.
Benson DF, Sheremata WA, Bouchard R, et al. Conduction aphasia. A clinicopathological study. Arch Neurol. 1973;28:339–46.
Boller F. Destruction of Wernicke’s area without language disturbance. A fresh look at crossed aphasia. Neuropsychologia. 1973;11:243–6.
Damasio H, Damasio AR. The anatomical basis of conduction aphasia. Brain. 1980;103:337–50.
Palumbo CL, Alexander MP, Naeser MA. CT scan lesion sites associated with conduction aphasia. In: Kohn SE, editor. Conduction aphasia. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1992. p. 51–75.
Axer H, Keyserlingk AG, Berks G, Keyserlingk DF. Supra- and infrasylvian conduction aphasia. Brain Lang. 2001;76:317–31.
Fridriksson J, Kjartansson O, Morgan PS, et al. Impaired speech repetition and left parietal lobe damage. J Neurosci. 2010;30:11057–61.
• Buchsbaum BR, Baldo J, D’Esposito M, et al. Conduction aphasia, sensory-motor integration, and phonological short-term memory: an aggregate analysis of lesion and fMRI data. Brain Lang. 2011;119:119–28. This paper presents a multi-faceted review and meta-analysis of neuroimaging data regarding phonological processing.
Anderson JM, Gilmore R, Roper S, et al. Conduction aphasia and the arcuate fasciculus: a reexamination of the Wernicke-Geschwind model. Brain Lang. 1999;70:1–12.
Quigg M, Fountain NB. Conduction aphasia elicited by stimulation of the left posterior superior temporal gyrus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999;66:393–6.
Corina DP, Loudermilk BC, Detwiler L, et al. Analysis of naming errors during cortical stimulation mapping: implications for models of language representation. Brain Lang. 2010;115:101–12.
Roux FE, Durand JB, Jucla M, et al. Segregation of lexical and sub-lexical reading processes in the left perisylvian cortex. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50665.
Levelt WJM. Speaking: from intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1989.
Caplan D, Waters G. Issues arising regarding the nature and consequences of reproduction conduction aphasia. In: Kohn SE, editor. Conduction aphasia. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1992. p. 117–49.
Wilshire CE, McCarthy RA. Experimental investigations of an impairment in phonological encoding. Cogn Neuropsychol. 1996;13(7):1059–98.
Dell GS, Schwartz MF, Martin N, et al. Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychol Rev. 1997;104(4):801–38.
• Acheson DJ, Hamidi M, Binder JR, Postle BR. A common neural substrate for language production and verbal working memory. J Cogn Neurosci. 2011;23:1358–67. This study presents combined fMRI and transcranial magnetic stimulation evidence for a common posterior STG localization for phonological representation and phonological short-term memory .
Booth JR, Burman DD, Meyer JR, et al. Functional anatomy of intra- and cross-modal lexical tasks. NeuroImage. 2002;16:7–22.
Xu B, Grafman J, Gaillard WD, et al. Neuroimaging reveals automatic speech coding during perception of written word meaning. NeuroImage. 2002;17(2):859–70.
Hickok G, Buchsbaum B, Humphries C, Muftuler T. Auditory-motor interaction revealed by fMRI: speech, music, and working memory in area Spt. J Cogn Neurosci. 2003;15(5):673–82.
Indefrey P, Levelt WJM. The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition. 2004;92(1–2):101–44.
Buchsbaum BR, Olsen RK, Koch P, Berman KF. Human dorsal and ventral auditory streams subserve rehearsal-based and echoic processes during verbal working memory. Neuron. 2005;48(4):687–97.
Burton MW, Locasto PC, Krebs-Noble D, Gullapalli RP. A systematic investigation of the functional neuroanatomy of auditory and visual phonological processing. NeuroImage. 2005;26(3):647–61.
Graves WW, Grabowski TJ, Mehta S, Gordon JK. A neural signature of phonological access: distinguishing the effects of word frequency from familiarity and length in overt picture naming. J Cogn Neurosci. 2007;19(4):617–31.
Bruno JL, Zumberge A, Manis FR, et al. Sensitivity to orthographic familiarity in the occipito-temporal region. NeuroImage. 2008;39:1988–2001.
Wilson SM, Isenberg AK, Hickok G. Neural correlates of word production stages delineated by parametric modulation of psycholinguistic variables. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009;30:3596–608.
Wilson LB, Tregellas JR, Slason E, et al. Implicit phonological priming during visual word recognition. NeuroImage. 2011;55(2):724–31.
• Pillay SB, Stengel BC, Humphries C, et al. Cerebral localization of impaired phonological retrieval during rhyme judgment. Ann Neurol. 2014;76:738–46. This study presents lesion evidence linking the classical Wernicke's area with pre-articulatory (i.e., silent) retrieval of phonological word forms.
Gorno-Tempini ML, Brambati SM, Ginex V, et al. The logopenic/phonological variant of primary progressive aphasia. Neurology. 2008;71(16):1227–34.
Rohrer JD, Ridgway GR, Crutch SJ, et al. Progressive logopenic/phonological aphasia: erosion of the language network. NeuroImage. 2010;49:984–93.
Leyton CE, Ballard KJ, Piguet O, Hodges JR. Phonologic errors as a clinical marker of the logopenic variant of PPA. Neurology. 2014;82(18):1620–7.
Blumstein SE, Baker E, Goodglass H. Phonological factors in auditory comprehension in aphasia. Neuropsychologia. 1977;15:19–30.
Blumstein SE, Tartter VC, Nigro G, Statlender S. Acoustic cues for the perception of place of articulation in aphasia. Brain Lang. 1984;22:128–49.
Boatman D, Hart J, Lesser RP, et al. Right hemisphere speech perception revealed by amobarbital injection and electrical interference. Neurology. 1998;51(2):458–64.
Hickok G, Okada K, Barr W, et al. Bilateral capacity for speech sound processing in auditory comprehension: evidence from Wada procedures. Brain Lang. 2008;107:179–84.
Buchman AS, Garron DC, Trost-Cardamone JE, et al. Word deafness: one hundred years later. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1986;49:489–99.
Poeppel D. Pure word deafness and the bilateral processing of the speech code. Cogn Sci. 2001;25:679–93.
Binder JR, Frost JA, Hammeke TA, et al. Human temporal lobe activation by speech and nonspeech sounds. Cereb Cortex. 2000;10:512–28.
Liebenthal E, Binder JR, Spitzer SM, et al. Neural substrates of phonemic perception. Cereb Cortex. 2005;15:1621–31.
• DeWitt I, Rauschecker JP. Phoneme and word recognition in the auditory ventral stream. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:E505–14. This careful meta-analysis of fMRI speech perception studies provides strong evidence that auditory cortex specialized for speech perception lies anterior to the classical Wernicke's area .
Scott SK, Blank C, Rosen S, Wise RJS. Identification of a pathway for intelligible speech in the left temporal lobe. Brain. 2000;123:2400–6.
Binder JR. Wernicke aphasia: a disorder of central language processing. In: D’Esposito ME, editor. Neurological foundations of cognitive neuroscience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2002. p. 175–238.
Kertesz A, Lau WK, Polk M. The structural determinants of recovery in Wernicke’s aphasia. Brain Lang. 1993;44:153–64.
Dronkers NF, Redfern BB, Ludy CA. Lesion localization in chronic Wernicke’s aphasia. Brain Lang. 1995;51:62–5.
Damasio H, Tranel D, Grabowski T, et al. Neural systems behind word and concept retrieval. Cognition. 2004;92:179–229.
Dronkers NF, Wilkins DP, Van Valin RD, et al. Lesion analysis of the brain areas involved in language comprehension. Cognition. 2004;92:145–77.
Thothathiri M, Kimberg DY, Schwartz MF. The neural basis of reversible sentence comprehension: evidence from voxel-based lesion symptom mapping in aphasia. J Cogn Neurosci. 2012;24(1):212–22.
Damasio H. Cerebral localization of the aphasias. In: Sarno MT, editor. Acquired aphasia. Orlando: Academic Press; 1981. p. 27–50.
Kertesz A, Sheppard A, MacKenzie R. Localization in transcortical sensory aphasia. Arch Neurol. 1982;39:475–8.
Alexander MP, Hiltbrunner B, Fischer RS. Distributed anatomy of transcortical sensory aphasia. Arch Neurol. 1989;46:885–92.
Rapcsak SZ, Rubens AB. Localization of lesions in transcortical aphasia. In: Kertesz A, editor. Localization and neuroimaging in neuropsychology. San Diego: Academic Press; 1994. p. 297–329.
Otsuki M, Soma Y, Koyama A, et al. Transcortical sensory aphasia following left frontal infarction. J Neurol. 1998;245:69–76.
Maeshima S, Osawa A, Nakayama Y, Miki J. Transcortical sensory aphasia following infarction in the left frontal lobe. Eur Neurol. 2004;52(2):125–8.
Sethi NK, Burke L, Torgovnick J, Arsura E. Transcortical sensory aphasia as a result of left frontal cortical-subcortical infarction. A case report. Eur Neurol. 2007;57(1):52–3.
Hodges JR, Patterson K, Oxbury S, Funnell E. Semantic dementia: progressive fluent aphasia with temporal lobe atrophy. Brain. 1992;115:1783–806.
Rohrer JD, Warren JD, Modat M, et al. Patterns of cortical thinning in the language variants of frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Neurology. 2009;72:1562–9.
Rogalski E, Cobia D, Harrison TM, et al. Progression of language decline and cortical atrophy in subtypes of primary progressive aphasia. Neurology. 2011;76:1804–10.
Bozeat S, Lambon Ralph MA, Patterson K, et al. Nonverbal semantic impairment in semantic dementia. Neuropsychologia. 2000;38:1207–15.
Rogers TT, Garrard P, McClelland JL, et al. Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: a neuropsychological and computational investigation. Psychol Rev. 2004;111(1):205–35.
Patterson K, Nestor PJ, Rogers TT. Where do you know what you know? The representation of semantic knowledge in the human brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8:976–87.
Binder JR, Desai R, Conant LL, Graves WW. Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cereb Cortex. 2009;19:2767–96.
Thompson-Schill SL, D’Esposito M, Aguirre GK, Farah MJ. Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: a reevaluation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:14792–7.
Wagner AD, Pare-Blagoev EJ, Clark J, Poldrack RA. Recovering meaning: left prefrontal cortex guides semantic retrieval. Neuron. 2001;31:329–38.
Novick JM, Trueswell JC, Thompson-Schill SL. Cognitive control and parsing: reexamining the role of Broca’s area in sentence comprehension. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience. 2005;5(3):263–81.
Jefferies E, Lambon Ralph MA. Semantic impairment in stroke aphasia versus semantic dementia: a case-series comparison. Brain. 2006;129:2132–47.
Damasio AR. Time-locked multiregional retroactivation: a systems-level proposal for the neural substrates of recall and recognition. Cognition. 1989;33:25–62.
Simmons WK, Barsalou LW. The similarity-in-topography principle: reconciling theories of conceptual deficits. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2003;20(3):451–86.
Meyer K, Damasio A. Convergence and divergence in a neural architecture for recognition and memory. Trends Neurosci. 2009;32(7):376–82.
Binder JR, Desai RH. The neurobiology of semantic memory. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011;15(11):527–36.
Meteyard L, Rodriguez Cuadrado S, Bahrami B, Vigliocco G. Coming of age: a review of embodiment and the neuroscience of semantics. Cortex. 2012;48:788–804.
Fernandino L, Binder JR, Desai RH, et al. Concept representation reflects multimodal abstraction: a framework for embodied semantics. Cereb Cortex. 2016;26:2018–34.
•• Turken AU, Dronkers NF. The neural architecture of the language comprehension network: converging evidence from lesion and connectivity analyses. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience. 2011;5:Article 1. This paper presents a thorough, multimodal examination of connectivity within a broadly distributed network supporting sentence comprehension, suggesting a special role for the posterior left MTG in this function.
Pillay SB, Binder JR, Humphries C, et al. Lesion localization of speech comprehension deficits in chronic aphasia. Neurology. 2017;88(10):970–5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Jeffrey R. Binder declares no potential conflicts of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Behavior
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Binder, J.R. Current Controversies on Wernicke’s Area and its Role in Language. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 17, 58 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-017-0764-8
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-017-0764-8