Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Measures of Glycemic Variability and Links with Psychological Functioning

  • Published:
Current Diabetes Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The goal of this article is to review the recent literature on measures of glycemic variability, links between glycemic variability and psychological functioning, and methods for examining these links. A number of commonly used measures of glycemic variability are reviewed and compared, including recently proposed methods. Frequently used measures of glycemic variability are also discussed in the context of research that uses continuous glucose monitoring for the collection of blood glucose data. The results of previous studies that have examined the link between psychological functioning and glycemic variability within relatively short-term time frames are reviewed. Methods for examining glycemic variability and its link with psychological functioning are discussed so that important research questions can be addressed to aid in understanding the effect of changes in psychological functioning on glycemic variability and vice versa in future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Hirsch IB, Brownlee M: Should minimal blood glucose variability become the gold standard of glycemic control? J Diabetes Complications 2005, 19:178–181.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brownlee M, Hirsch IB: Glycemic variability: a hemoglobin A1c-independent risk factor for diabetic complications. JAMA 2006, 295:1707–1708.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kilpatrick ES, Rigby AS, Atkin SL: The effect of glucose variability on the risk of microvascular complications in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2006, 29:1486–1490.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kovatchev BP: Is glycemic variability important to assessing antidiabetes therapies? Curr Diab Rep 2006, 6:350–356.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. • Monnier L, Colette C: Glycemic variability: should we and can we prevent it? Diabetes Care 2008, 31:S150–S154. This paper builds a convincing case for why glycemic variability is important and should be prevented. Biologic pathways between glycemic variability and diabetic complications are emphasized.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Monnier L, Colette C, Owens DR: Glycemic variability: the third component of the dysglycemia in diabetes. Is it important? How to measure it? J Diabetes Sci Technol 2008, 2:1094–1100.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. • Kilpatrick ES: Arguments for and against the role of glucose variability in the development of diabetic complications. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2009, 3:649–655. This paper provides an especially balanced case for and against glycemic variability and its role in diabetic complications. Ultimately, the ambiguous conclusions in this article concerning the importance of glycemic variability mirror the larger state of the field at the present time.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kovacs M, Obrosky DS, Goldston D, Drash A: Major depressive disorder in youths with IDDM. A controlled prospective study of course and outcome. Diabetes Care 1997, 20:45–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Grey M, Whittemore R, Tamborlane W: Depression in type 1 diabetes in children: natural history and correlates. J Psychosom Res 2002, 53:907–911.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kokkonen J, Taanila A, Kokkonen E-R: Diabetes in adolescence: the effect of family and psychologic factors on metabolic control. Nordic J Psychiatry 1997, 51:165–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Helgeson VS, Siminerio L, Escobar O, Becker D: Predictors of metabolic control among adolescents with diabetes: a 4-year longitudinal study. J Pediatr Psychol 2009, 34:254–270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hood KK, Huestis S, Maher A, et al.: Depressive symptoms in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: association with diabetes-specific characteristics. Diabetes Care 2006, 29:1389–1391.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schlichtkrull J, Munck O, Jersild M: The M-value, an index of blood sugar control in diabetics. Acta Med Scand 1965, 177:95–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Service FJ, Molnar GD, Rosevear JW, et al.: Mean amplitude of glycemic excursions, a measure of diabetic instability. Diabetes 1970, 19:644–655.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kovatchev BP, Cox DJ, Gonder-Frederick L, Clarke WL: Methods for quantifying and monitoring blood glucose profiles exemplified by an examination of blood glucose patterns in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther 2002, 4:295–303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. McDonnell CM, Donath SM, Vidmar SI, et al.: A novel approach to continuous glucose analysis utilizing glycemic variation. Diabetes Technol Ther 2005, 7:253–263.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Molnar GD, Taylor WF, Ho MM: Day-to-day variation of continuously monitored glycaemia. Diabetologia 1972, 8:342–348.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rodbard D: New and improved methods to characterize glycemic variability using continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther 2009, 11: 551–565.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rodbard D: Interpretation of continuous glucose monitoring data: Glycemic variability and quality of glycemic control. Diabetes Technol Ther 2009, 11:S55–S67.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Siegelaar SE, Holleman F, Hoekstra JB, DeVries JH: Glucose variability: does it matter? Endocr Rev 2010, 31:171–182.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kilpatrick ES, Rigby AS, Atkin SL: A1C variability and the risk of microvascular complications in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2008, 31:2198–2202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Clarke W, Kovatchev B: Statistical tools to analyze continuous glucose monitoring data. Diabetes Technol Ther 2009, 11:S45–S54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group: The effect of continuous glucose monitoring in well-controlled type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2009, 32:1378–1383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Miller M, Strange P: Use of Fourier models for analysis and interpretation of continuous glucose monitoring glucose profiles. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2007, 1:630–638.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cox DJ, McCall A, Kovatchev B, et al.: Effects of blood glucose rates of changes on perceived mood and cognitive symptoms in insulin-treated type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2007, 30:2001–2002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hermanns N, Scheff C, Kulzer B, et al.: Association of glucose levels and glucose variability with mood in type 1 diabetic patients. Diabetologia 2007, 50:930–933.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gonder-Frederick LA, Cox DJ, Bobbitt SA, Pennebaker, JA: Mood changes associated with blood glucose fluctuations in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Health Psychol 1989, 8:45–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. • Skaff MM, Mullan JT, Hoffman L, et al.: Daily negative mood affects fasting glucose in type 2 diabetes. Health Psychol 2009, 28:265–272. This is one of first studies to investigate the lead-lag relationship of mood and blood glucose values in diabetes using the time series methods. The primary finding was that negative effect on a particular day was associated with higher blood glucose values on the next day.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Singer JD, Willett JB: Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling Change and Event Occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Walls TA, Schafer JL: Models for Intensive Longitudinal Data. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  31. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group [no authors listed]. New Engl J Med 1993, 329:977–986.

Download references

Acknowledgment

Dr. Joseph R. Rausch is supported by a National Institutes of Health grant (No. R21 NR010857-01) and is a Co-Investigator.

Disclosure

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA

    Joseph R. Rausch

Authors
  1. Joseph R. Rausch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph R. Rausch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rausch, J.R. Measures of Glycemic Variability and Links with Psychological Functioning. Curr Diab Rep 10, 415–421 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-010-0152-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-010-0152-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation