Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Classification of wounds of the diabetic foot

  • Published:
Current Diabetes Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A classification system should be thought of as a diagnostic language. Ideally, this language should be used by a large, diverse population of clinicians to guide therapy and ultimately predict outcome. The diabetic foot ulcer is widely known to be the prime precipitant of lower extremity amputations. Its description and classification is the first step toward widespread standardization of treatment and prevention.

This article chronologically describes the major diabetic foot wound classification systems devised over the previous generation, discussing each of their attributes and their shortcomings, with an emphasis on an evidence basis for care. It is our hope that discussions such as this one will ultimately lead to a diagnostic and therapeutic lingua franca for diabetic foot wounds and a commensurate reduction in the unconscionably high prevalence of amputations, which we now currently face.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Pecoraro RE, Reiber GE, Burgess EM: Pathways to diabetic limb amputation: basis for prevention. Diabetes Care 1990, 13:513–521.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Birke JA, Novick A, Patout CA, Coleman WC: Healing rates of plantar ulcers in leprosy and diabetes. Lepr Rev 1992, 63:365–374.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Grayson ML, Balaugh K, Levin E, Karchmer AW: Probing to bone in infected pedal ulcers. A clinical sign of underlying osteomyelitis in diabetic patients. J Am Med Assoc 1995, 273:721–723.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Consensus Development Conference on Diabetic Foot Wound Care: April 7–8, 1999, Boston, Massachusetts. American Diabetes Association [no authors listed]. Diabetes Care 1999, 22:1354–1360.

  5. Mayfield JA, Reiber GE, Nelson RG, Greene T: A foot risk classification system to predict diabetic amputation in pima Indians. Diabetes Care 1996, 19:704–709.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Reiber GE, Pecoraro RE, Koepsell TD: Risk factors for amputation in patients with diabetes mellitus: a case control study. Ann Intern Med 1992, 117:97–105.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. International working group on the diabetic foot: International Consensus on the Diabetic Foot. Maastricht: International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot; 1999. A consensus document of a leading group of scientists on the diabetic foot, intended for global implementation. It includes a risk classification and definitions of various topics of the diabetic foot.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shea JD: Pressure sores: classification and management. Clin Orthop 1975, 112:89–100.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Doughty D: Management of pressure sores. J Enterostomal Ther 1984, 15:39–44.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yarkony GM, Kirk PM, Carlson C, et al.: Classification of pressure ulcers. Arch Dermatol 1990, 126:1218–1219.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Meggitt B: Surgical management of the diabetic foot. Br J Hosp Med 1976, 16:227–332.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wagner FW: The dysvascular foot: a system for diagnosis and treatment. Foot Ankle 1981, 2:64–122.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Calhoun JH, Cantrell J, Cobos J, et al.: Treatment of diabetic foot infections: Wagner classification, therapy, and outcome. Foot Ankle 1988, 9:101–106.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Forrest RD, Gamborg-Nielsen P: Wound assessment in clinical practice: a critical review of methods and their application. Acta Med Scand 1984, 687:69–74.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Knighton DR, Ciresi KF, Fiegel VD, et al.: Classification and treatment of chronic nonhealing wounds: successful treatment with autologous platelet-derived wound healing factors (PDWHF). Ann Surg 1986, 204:332–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pecoraro RE, Reiber GE: Classification of wounds in diabetic amputees. Wounds 1990, 2:65–73.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jeffcoate WJ, Macfarlane RM, Fletcher EM: The description and classification of diabetic foot lesions. Diabet Med 1993, 10:676–679.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Macfarlane RM, Jeffcoate WJ: Classification of diabetic foot ulcers: the S(AD) SAD system. Diabetic Foot 1999, 2:123–131. One of the newer and innovative classifications on the diabetic foot.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Arlt B, Protze J: Diabetic foot. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd 1997, 114:528–532.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pratt TC: Gangrene and infection in the diabetic. Med Clin North Am 1965, 40:987–992.

    Google Scholar 

  21. LoGerfo FW, Coffman JD: Vascular and microvascular disease of the foot in diabetes. N Engl J Med 1984, 311:1615–1619.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Williams HT, Hutchinson KJ, Brown GD: Gangrene of the feet in diabetics. Arch Surg 1974, 198:609–611.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bacharach J, Rooke T, Osmundson P, Glovizzki P: Predictive value of transcutaneous oxygen pressure and amputation success by use of supine and elevation measurements. J Vasc Surg 1992, 15:558–563.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Carter S: Elective foot surgery in limbs with arterial disease. Clin Orthop 1993, 289:228–236.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Apelqvist J, Castenfors J, Larsson J: Prognostic value of ankle and toe blood pressure levels in outcome of diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetes Care 1989, 12:373–378.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Orchard TJ, Strandness DE: Assessment of peripheral vascular disease in diabetes: report and recommendation of an international workshop. Diabetes Care 1993, 83:685–695.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lavery LA, Armstrong DG, Harkless LB: Classification of diabetic foot wounds. J Foot Ankle Surg 1996, 35:528–531.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Harkless LB: Validation of a diabetic wound classification system: the contribution of depth, infection, and vascular disease to the risk of amputation. Diabetes Care 1998, 21:855–859. The first study that suggested that advances in wound depth and comorbid conditions (infection and/or ischemia) eventuated in a higher prevalence of high-level lower extremity amputation.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Oyibo SO, Jude EB, Tarawneh I, et al.: A comparison of two diabetic foot ulcer classification systems: the Wagner and the University of Texas wound classification systems. Diabetes Care 2001, 24:84–88. A study that compares the Wagner classification with the UT classification, two of the most important classifications.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Armstrong DG, Nguyen HC, Lavery LA, et al.: Offloading the diabetic foot wound: a randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Care 2001, in press.

  31. Van AckerK: The diabetic foot. A challenge for policy-makers and health care professionals [PhD dissertation]. Antwerp: University of Antwerp; 2000. Van Acker developed a classification system that looks very promising and novel. It needs a prospectively set-up study to evaluation its prognostic value.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Armstrong, D.G., Peters, E.J.G. Classification of wounds of the diabetic foot. Curr Diab Rep 1, 233–238 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-001-0039-1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-001-0039-1

Keywords

Navigation