Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Risk Scores for Predicting Outcomes in Valvular Heart Disease: How Useful?

  • Published:
Current Cardiology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Risk scoring tools have been developed from clinical databases to predict expected patient mortality from cardiac surgical procedures. The risk algorithms have been developed and validated from variables that have been demonstrated to be predictive of mortality. At least six risk models have been developed from different databases measuring outcomes of cardiac surgery. These algorithms have then been used to select very high risk patients for conventional aortic valve replacement (AVR) who would be appropriate candidates for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The two most common risk models used for TAVI selection are the logistic EuroSCORE (LES) and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality (STS-PROM) algorithms. Although both models are accurate in predicting mortality in low-risk patients, the LES has been clearly demonstrated to overpredict expected mortality by a factor of three in high-risk candidates for AVR. Various factors that also impact mortality but are not included in either algorithm include liver disease, frailty, porcelain aorta, and previous radiation. Despite these shortcomings, risk algorithms are effective models for predicting risk, with the STS-PROM being more accurate in high-risk patients. Ultimately, a new risk algorithm specific for TAVI will need to be developed once sufficient databases are developed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Cowper DC, Kubal JD, Maynard C, Hynes DM. A primer and comparative review of major US mortality databases. Ann Epidemiol. 2002;12:462–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hannan EL, Racz MJ, Jollis JG, Peterson ED. Using Medicare claims data to assess provider quality for CABG surgery: does it work well enough? Health Serv Res. 1997;31:659–78.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hannan EL, Kilburn H Jr, Lindsey ML, Lewis R. Clinical versus administrative data bases for CABG surgery. Does it matter? Med Care. 1992;30:892–907.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mack MJ, Herbert M, Prince S, Dewey TM,Magee MJ, Edgerton JR. Does reporting of coronary artery bypass grafting from administrative databases accurately reflect actual clinical outcomes? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;129:1309–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shahian DM, Silverstein T, Lovett AF, Wolf RE, Normand SL. Comparison of clinical and administrative data sources for hospital coronary artery bypass graft surgery report cards. Circulation. 2007;115:1518–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Geissler HJ, Hölzl P, Marohl S, Kuhn-Régnier F, Mehlhorn U, Südkamp M, et al. Risk stratification in heart surgery: comparison of six score systems. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000;17:400–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Roques F, Nashef SA, Michel P, Gauducheau E, de Vincentiis C, Baudet E, Cortina J, David M, Faichney A, Gabrielle F, Gams E, Harjula A, Jones MT, Pintor PP, Salamon R, Thulin L. Risk factors and outcomes in European cardiac surgery: analysis of the EuroSCORE multinational database of 19030 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;15:816–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Roques F, Nashef SA, Michel P, EuroSCORE study group. Risk factors for early mortality after valve surgery in Europe in the 1990s: lessons from the EuroSCORE pilot program. J Heart Valve Dis. 2001;10:572–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ambler G, Omar RZ, Royston P, Kinsman R, Keogh BE, Taylor KM. Generic, simple risk stratification model for heart valve surgery. Circulation 2005;112:224–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Edwards FH, Peterson ED, Coombs LP, et al. Prediction of operative mortality after valve replacement surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:885–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hannan EL, Wu C, Bennett EV, et al. Risk index for predicting in-hospital mortality for cardiac valve surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:921–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jin R, Grunkemeier GL, Starr A. Validation and refinement of mortality risk models for heart valve surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:471–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kuduvalli M, Grayson AD, Au J, Grotte G, Bridgewater B, Fabri BM. A multi-centre additive and logistic risk model for in-hospital mortality following aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007;31:607–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nowicki ER, Birkmeyer NJ, Weintraub RW, et al. Multivariable prediction of in-hospital mortality associated with aortic and mitral valve surgery in Northern New England. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:1966–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nowicki ER, Birkmeyer NJ, Weintraub RW, Leavitt BJ, Sanders JH, Dacey LJ, Hannan EL, Wu C, Bennett EV, Carlson RE, Culliford AT, Gold JP, et al. Risk index for predicting in-hospital mortality for cardiac valve surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:921–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nashef SA, Roques F, Hammill BG, Peterson ED, Michel P, Grover FL, et al; EurpSCORE Project Group. Validation of European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) in North American cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002;22:101–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Grube E, Buellesfeld L, Mueller R, Sauren B, Zickmann B, Nair D, Beucher H, Felderhoff T, Iversen S, Gerckens U. Progress and current status of percutaneous aortic valve replacement: results of three device generations of the CoreValve Revalving system. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2008;1:167–175.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Webb JG, Altwegg L, Boone RH, Cheung A, Ye J, Lichtenstein S, Lee M, Masson JB, Thompson C, Moss R, Carere R, Munt B, Nietlispach F, Humphries K. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: impact on clinical and valve-related outcomes. Circulation. 2009;119:3009–3016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rodes-Cabau J, Webb JG, Cheung A, Ye J, Dumont E, Feindel CM, Osten M, Natarajan MK, Velianou JL, Martucci G, DeVarennes B, Chisholm R, Peterson MD, Lichtenstein SV, Nietlispach F, Doyle D, DeLarochelliere R, Teoh K, Chu V, Dancea A, Lachapelle K, Cheema A, Latter D, Horlick E. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for the treatment of severe symptomatic aortic stenosis in patients at very high or prohibitive surgical risk: acute and late outcomes of the multicenter Canadian experience. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:1080–1090.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Thomas M, Schymik G, Walther T, Himbert D, Lefevre T, Treede H, Eggebrecht H, Rubino P, Michev I, Lange R, Anderson WN, Wendler O. Thirty-day results of the SAPIEN aortic Bioprosthesis European Outcome (SOURCE) Registry: A European registry of transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the Edwards SAPIEN valve. Circulation. 2010;122:62–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tamburino C, Capodanno D, Mule M, Scarabelli M, Cammalleri V, Barbanti M, Calafiore A, Ussia G. Procedural success and 30-day clinical outcomes after percutaneous aortic valve replacement using current third-generation self-expanding CoreValve prosthesis. J Invasive Cardiol. 2009;21:93–98.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Piazza N, Grube E, Gerckens U, den Heijer P, Linke A, Luha O, Ramondo A, Ussia G, Wenaweser P, Windecker S, Laborde JC, de Jaegere P, Serruys PW. Procedural and 30-day outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the third generation (18 Fr) corevalve revalving system: results from the multicentre, expanded evaluation registry 1-year following CE mark approval. EuroIntervention. 2008;4:242–249.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. •• O’Brien SM, Shahian DM, Filardo G, et al, for the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Quality Measurement Task Force. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 2—isolated valve surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 88(Suppl):23–42. This is a detailed summary of the STS-PROM risk model for isolated valve surgery.

  24. Shahian DM, O’Brien SM, Filardo G, et al, for the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Quality Measurement Task Force. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 3—valve plus coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2009;88(Suppl):43–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Collart F, Feier H, Kerbaul F, Mouly-Bandini A, Riberi A, Mesana TG, et al. Valvular surgery in octogenarians: operative risk factors, evaluation of EuroSCORE and long term results. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005;27:276–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. • Brown ML, Schaff HV, Sarano ME, Li Z, Sundt TM, Dearani JA, Mullany CJ, Orszulak TA. Is the European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation model valid for estimating the operative risk of patients considered for percutaneous aortic valve replacement? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;136:566–71. This is a clear demonstration of the inadequacy of the LES risk algorithm with increasing risk in surgical AVR.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Leontyev S, Walther T, Borger M, Lehmann S, Funkat AK, Rastan A, Kempfert J, Falk V, Mohr FW. Aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: utility of risk stratification with EuroSCORE. Ann Thorac Surg 2009;87: 1440–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Osswald BR, Gegouskov V, Badowski-Zyla D, Tochtermann U, Thomas G, Hagl S, Blackstone EH. Overestimation of aortic valve replacement risk by EuroSCORE: implications for percutaneous valve replacement. Eur Heart J 2009;30(1):74–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. • Dewey TM, Brown DB, Ryan WH, Herbert MA, Prince SL, Mack MJ. Reliability of risk algorithms in predicting early and late operative outcomes in high risk patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;135:180–7. This retrospective review of the highest-risk patients undergoing surgical AVR demonstrates the overprediction of risk by the LES and the underprediction by the STS-PROM.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wendt D, Osswald BR, Kayser K, Thielmann, M, Tossios P, Massoudy P, Kamler M, Jakob H. Society of Thoracic Surgeons Score Is Superior to the EuroSCORE Determining Mortality in High Risk Patients Undergoing Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 2009; 88: 468–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kalavrouziotis D, Li D, Buth KJ Légaré JF: The European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) is not appropriate for withholding surgery in high-risk patients with aortic stenosis: a retrospective cohort study Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 2009, 4:32 doi:10.1186/1749-8090-4-32

  32. Ranucci M, Castelvecchio S, Menicanti L, Scolleta S, Biagioli B, Giomarelli P. An adjusted EuroSCORE model for high-risk patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009;36:791–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Dewey TM, Herbert MA Predicting operative risk: a worthy task—an elusive goal Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., November 2009; 36: 797–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Coeytaux RM, Williams JW, Gray RN, Wang A Percutaneous Heart Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis: State of the Evidence Ann Intern Med September 7, 2010 153:314–324.

Download references

Disclosure

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Mack.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mack, M.J. Risk Scores for Predicting Outcomes in Valvular Heart Disease: How Useful?. Curr Cardiol Rep 13, 107–112 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-010-0167-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-010-0167-9

Keywords

Navigation