Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gender bias and special education referrals

  • Part II Diagnostic Issues
  • Published:
Annals of Dyslexia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Referrals for special education determine who receives special education services. The most common referring agents are regular education teachers. Today, there is a large discrepancy between the number of females to males found in learning disabilities programs. However, studies have found the number of female and male students with learning disabilities in schools is more proportional than enrollment in special education suggests. The position of this paper is that gender bias among referring agents is a major factor in the unequal distribution of males and females in learning disabilities programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berry, C., Shaywitz, S., and Shaywitz, B. 1985. Girls with attention deficit disorder: A silent minority? A report on behavioral and cognitive characteristics. Pediatrics 76(5):801–09.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, J., and Rahbar, M. 1994. Prevalence of reading failure in boys compared with girls. Psychology in the Schools 31:66–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavale, K., and Reese, J. 1992. The character of learning disabilities: An Iowa profile. Learning Disabilities Quarterly 15:74–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leinhardt, G., Seewald, A., and Zigmond, N. 1982. Sex and race differences in learning disabilities classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology 74(6):835–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J. 1993. Learning Disabilities: Theories, Diagnosis & Teaching Strategies. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massachusetts Department of Education 1991. 766 Regulations. Boston: Massachusetts Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellard, D., and Byrne, M. 1993. Learning disabilities referrals, eligibility outcomes, and services in community colleges: A four year summary. Learning Disabilities Quarterly 16:199–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naiden, N. 1976. Ratio of boys to girls among disabled readers. The Reading Teacher Feb. 1976, 439–42

  • Nass, R. 1993. Sex differences in learning abilities and disabilities. Annals of Dyslexia 43:61–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennington, B. 1988. November. Genotype and phenotype analysis of familial dyslexia. Paper presented at the 39th conference of The Orton Dyslexia Society. Tampa, FL. As cited in Vogel 1990.

  • Sadker, M., and Sadker, D. 1994. Failing at Fairness: How Our Schools Cheat Girls. New York: Touchstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaywitz, S., Shaywitz, B., Fletcher, J., and Escobar, M. 1990. Prevalence of reading disability in boys and girls: Results of the Connecticut longitudinal study. Journal of the American Medical Association 264(8):998–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smart, D., Sanson, A., and Prior, M. 1996. Connections between reading disability and behavior problems: Testing temporal and causal hypotheses. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 24(3):363–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, S. 1990. Gender differences in intelligence, language, visual-motor abilities, and accademic achievement in students with learning disabilities: A review of the literature. Journal of Learning Disabilities 23:44–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wadsworth, S., DeFries, J., Stevenson, J., Gilger, J., and Pennington, B. 1992. Gender ratios among reading-disabled children and their siblings as a function of parental impairment. Journal of Child Psychiatry 33:1229–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M., and Gow, D. 1985/86. A longitudinal investigation of gender differences in language and reading development. First Language 6:81–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ysseldyke, J., Thurlow, M., Graden, J., Wesson, K., Algozzine, B., and Deno, S. 1983. Generalizations from five years of research on assessment and decision making: The University of Minnesota Institute. Exceptional Children Quarterly 4(1):75–93.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anderson, K.G. Gender bias and special education referrals. Ann. of Dyslexia 47, 151–162 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-997-0024-8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-997-0024-8

Keywords

Navigation