Skip to main content
Log in

Longitudinal twin study of early reading development in three countries: Preliminary results

  • Part II Genetic And Neurophysiological Aspects
  • Published:
Annals of Dyslexia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We have initiated parallel longitudinal studies in Australia (Byrne, PI), the United States (Olson, PI), and Norway (Samuelsson, PI) of identical and fraternal twins who are being tested in preschool for prereading skills, and in kindergarten, first grade, and second grade for the development of early reading, spelling, and related cognitive skills. Comparisons of the similarities of identical and fraternal twins will reveal the relative influence of genetic, shared family environment, and nonshared environment on individual differences at and across different stages of development. Family and twin-specific environmental information is also being directly assessed through parent questionnaires and observations by testers. Most of the data collected so far have been from preschool twins (146 in Australia, 284 in the United States, and 70 in Norway). Preliminary analyses for the preschool cognitive measures showed reliable genetic influences on phonological awareness and several measures of memory and learning. In contrast, vocabulary, grammar, and morphology showed significant shared environment and negligible genetic effects. A print knowledge composite showed both genetic and shared environment influence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, W., & Sheslow, D. (1990). Wide range assessment of memory and learning. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berko, J. (1958). The child’s learning of English morphology. Word, 14, 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boada, R., Willcutt, E. G., Tunick, R. A., Chhabildas, N. A., Olson, R. K., DeFries, J. C., & Pennington, B. F. (in press). A twin study of the etiology of high reading ability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal.

  • Bradley, D. (1999). Personal communication.

  • Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1983). Categorising sounds and learning to read—A causal connection. Nature, 301, 419–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. (1998). The foundation of literacy: The child’s acquisition of the alphabetic principle. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B., & Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1989). Phonemic awareness and letter knowledge in the child’s acquisition of the alphabetic principle. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 313–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B., & Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1990). Acquiring the alphabetic principle: A case for teaching recognition of phoneme identity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 805–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B., & Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1991). Evaluation of a program to teach phonemic awareness to young children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 451–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B., Fielding-Barnsley, R., & Ashley, L. (2000). Effects of preschool phoneme identity training after six years: Outcome level distinguished from rate of response. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 659–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B., Fielding-Barnsley, R., Ashley, L., & Larsen, K. (1997). Assessing the child’s and the environment’s contribution to reading acquisition: What we know and what we don’t know. In B. Blachman (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention (pp. 265–285). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F. (1987). The use of morphological knowledge in spelling derived forms by learning-disabled and normal students. Annals of Dyslexia, 27, 90–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catts, H. W. (1989). Speech production deficits in developmental dyslexia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 422–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catts, H. W. (1993). The relationship between speech-language impairments and reading disabilities. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 948–958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clay, M. (1975). The early detection of reading difficulties: A diagnostic survey. Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, C. J., Knopik, V. S., Olson, R. K., Wadsworth, S. J., & DeFries, J. C. (2001). Genetic and environmental influences on rapid naming and reading ability: A twin study. Annals of Dyslexia, 51, 241258.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFries, J. C., & Alarcon, M. (1996). Genetics of specific reading disability. Mental Retardation and Developmental Dissabilities Research Reviews, 2, 3947.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFries, J. C., Alarcon, M., & Olson, R. K. (1997). Genetics and dyslexia: Developmental differences in the etiologies of reading and spelling deficits. In C. Hulme & M. Snowling (Eds.), Dyslexia: Biological bases, identification, & intervention (pp. 20–37). London: Whurr Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbro, C., Borstrøm, I., & Petersen, D. K. (1998). Predicting dyslexia from kindergarten: The importance of distinctness of phonological representations of lexical items. Reading Research Quarterly, 33, 36–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, K. M. (1973). A comparison of the similarities in language skills of identical and fraternal twins. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, S. E., Francks, C., Marlow, A. J., MacPhie, L., Williams, D. F., Cardon, L. R., Ishikawa-Brush, Y., Talcott, J. B., Richardson, A. J., Gayán, J., Olson, R. K., Pennington, B. F., Smith, S. D., DeFries, J. C., Stein, J. F., & Monaco, A. P. (2002). Genome-wide scans in independent samples reveal strong convergent evidence for a chromosome 18 quantitative-trait locus influencing developmental dyslexia. Nature Genetics, 30, 86–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, J. P., & Glenister, J. M. (1992). The hundred pictures naming test. Hawthorn, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foch, T. T., & Plomin, R. (1980). Specific cognitive abilities in 5- to 12-year-old twins. Behavior Genetics, 10, 507–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, A., Frith, U., & Snowling, M. J. (2000). Precursors of literacy delay among children at genetic risk for dyslexia. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 203–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gathercole, S. E., & Adams, A. (1993). Phonological working memory in very young children. Developmental Psychology, 29, 770–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gathercole, S., & Baddeley, A. (1989). Evaluation of the role of phonological STM in the development of vocabulary in children: A longitudinal study. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 200–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gathercole, S., & Baddeley, A, (1996). The children’s test of nonword repetition-revised. New York: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gayán, J., & Olson, R. K. (2001). Genetic and environmental influences on orthographic and phonological skills in children with reading disabilities. Developmental Neuropsychology, 20(2), 487–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gayán, J., & Olson, R.K. (under review). Genetic and environmental influences in individual differences in printed word recognition.

  • Gayán, J., Smith, S. D., Cherny, S. S., Cardon, L. R., Fulker, D. W., Kimberling, W. J., Olson, R. K., Pennington, B., & DeFries, J. C. (1999). Large quantitative trait locus for specific language and reading deficits in chromosome 6p. American Journal of Human Genetics, 64, 157–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grigorenko, E. L., & Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Dynamic Testing. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 75–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hindson, B. A. (2001). Linguistic and cognitive characteristics of preschool children at risk for reading disability. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonigan, C. R. (2000). Personal communication.

  • Lyytinen, H. (1997). In search of the precursors of dyslexia: A prospective study of children at risk for reading problems. In C. Hulme & M. Snowling (Eds.), Dyslexia: Biology, cognition and intervention (pp. 97–107). London: Whurr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Man, J. (2000). Alpha beta: How 26 letters shaped the western world. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, P. L., & Black, K. N. (1984). Hereditary and environmental influences on preschool twins’ language skills. Developmental Psychology, 20, 303–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. J., & Kirk, S. A. (1961). The Illinois test of psycholinguistic abilities. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morais, J., Cary, L., Alegria, J., & Bertelson, P. (1979). Does awareness of speech as a sequence of phonemes arise spontaneously? Cognition, 7, 323–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neale, M. C. (1999). Mx: Statistical modeling (5th ed.). Richmond, VA: Department of Psychiatry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neale, M. C., & Cardon, L. R. (1992). Methodology for genetic studies of twins and families, NATO ASI series. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, R. C., & Bilbro, W. C., (1966). The diagnosis of twin zygosity. Acta Genetica, 16, 265–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R. K., Forsberg, H., & Wise, B. (1994). Genes, environment, and the development of orthographic skills. In V. W. Berninger (Ed.), The varieties of orthographic knowledge I: Theoretical and developmental issues (pp. 27–71). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R. K., Wise, B., Conners, F., Rack, J., & Fulker, D. (1989). Specific deficits in component reading and language skills: Genetic and environmental influences. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 339–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennington, B. F., & Lefly, D. L. (2001). Early reading development in children at family risk for dyslexia. Child Development, 72, 816–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sattler, J.M. (1988). Assessment of children. San Diego, CA: Jerome M. Sattler, Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarborough, H. S. (1991a). Early syntactic development of dyslexic children. Annals of Dyslexia, 41, 207–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarborough, H. S. (1991b). Antecedents to reading disability: Preschool language development and literacy experiences of children from dyslexic families. Reading and Writing, 3, 219–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarborough, H. S. (1998). Early detection of children at risk for reading disabilities: Phonological awareness and other promising predictors. In B. K. Shapiro, P. J. Accardo, & A. J. Capute (Eds.), Specific reading disability: A view of the spectrum (pp. 75–119). Timonium, MD: York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, N. L. (2000). Entwined Lives: Twins and what they tell us about human behavior. New York: Plume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stromswold, K. (2001). The heritability of language: A review and metaanalysis of twin, adoption, and linkage studies. Language, 77, 647–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, H. L., & Siegel, L. (2001). Learning disabilities as a working memory deficit. Issues in Education, 7, 1–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). The comprehensive test of phonological processes (CTOPP). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1989). Manual for the Wechsler preschool and primary scale of intelligence-revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcutt, E. G., Pennington, B. F., Smith, S. D., Cardon, L. R., Gayn, J., Knopic, V. S., Olson, R. K., & DeFries, J. C. (2002). Quantitative trait locus for reading disability on chromosome 6p is pleiotropic for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. American Journal of Medical Genetics (Neuropsychiatric Genetics), 114, 260–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. (1999). The question of naming-speed deficits in developmental reading disabilities: An introduction to the double-deficit hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. W. (1987). Woodcock reading mastery tests-revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Brian Byrne or Richard K. Olson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Byrne, B., Delaland, C., Fielding-Barnsley, R. et al. Longitudinal twin study of early reading development in three countries: Preliminary results. Ann. of Dyslexia 52, 47–73 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-002-0006-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-002-0006-9

Keywords

Navigation