Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The utility of stent on strings in clinical practice

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Various types of ureteric stents are used in the management of ureteric stones. Stents on strings (SOS) are an attractive option as they may be removed without the need for instrumentation. There is some hesitation using SOS due to perceived complications and the risk of premature dislodgement. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of SOS compared with the conventional stent (CS).

Methods

A retrospective review was performed on all ureteric stents removed in the urology department over a 7-month period. Only stents inserted during the endoscopic management of ureteric stones were included in analysis. Patients were contacted to identify the incidence of those seeking medical attention while the stent was in situ or within 2 weeks of stent removal. A basic cost analysis was performed.

Results

One hundred and sixty cases were identified (98 CS, 62 SOS). No SOS was dislodged prematurely. One SOS was removed cystoscopically due to a broken string. There was no significant difference in the number of patients with SOS seeking medical attention following stent placement compared with those with CS (38.1% (12/51) vs 25.6% (22/86), p = 0.48). There was an estimated cost saving of €23,790 associated with the use of SOS during the study period (€390/case). The use of SOS created additional capacity which was utilised for diagnostic cystoscopy.

Conclusion

The SOS appeared to be well tolerated and showed similar complication rates as the CS. The use of SOS resulted in a significant cost saving and increased the availability of cystoscopy for other indications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Haleblian G, Kijvikai K, De Rosette J, Preminger G (2008) Ureteral stenting and urinary Stone management : a systematic review. J Urol 179(February):424–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Finney RP (1978) Experience with new double J ureteral catheter stent. J Urol 120(6):678–681

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fröhlich M, Fehr J, Sulser T, Eberli D, Mortezavi A (2017) Extraction strings for ureteric stents: is there an increased risk for urinary tract infections? Surg Infect 18(8):sur.2017.165. https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2017.165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bockholt NA, Wild TT, Gupta A, Tracy CR (2012) Ureteric stent placement with extraction string : no strings attached? BJU Int (1–5). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11219.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu H, Pan W, Zhang N (2018) Ureteral stent removal using an extraction string after uncomplicated ureteroscopy: a cost-benefit analysis. Urol J 15(6):329–332. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v0i0.4469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Barnes KT, Bing MT, Tracy CR (2014) Do ureteric stent extraction strings affect stent-related quality of life or complications after ureteroscopy for urolithiasis: a prospective randomised control trial. BJU Int 113(4):605–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Inoue T, Okada S, Hamamoto S, Yoshida T, Murota T, Matsuda T (2018) Impact of ureteral stent removal by string on patient’s quality of life and complications at post-ureteroscopy for urolithiasis: a controlled trial. BJU Int 124:314–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14622

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim DJ, Son JH, Jang SH, Lee JW, Cho DS, Lim CH (2015) Rethinking of ureteral stent removal using an extraction string; what patients feel and what is patients’ preference?: a randomized controlled study. BMC Urol 15(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-015-0114-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shigemura K, Yasufuku T, Yamanaka K, Yamahsita M, Arakawa S, Fujisawa M (2012 Aug) How long should double J stent be kept in after ureteroscopic lithotripsy? Urol Res 40(4):373–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Paul CJ, Brooks NA, Ghareeb GM, Tracy CR (2017) Pilot study to determine optimal stent duration following ureteroscopy: three versus seven days. Curr Urol 11(2):97–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Doersch KM, Elmekresh A, Machen GL, El Tayeb MM (2018) The use of a string with a stent for self-removal following ureteroscopy: a safe practice to remain. Arab J Urol 16(4):435–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2018.04.005

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. O’Connell L, Broe MP, Rooney D, Elhag S, Cheema I, McGuire BB (2018) Magnetic stent removal in a nurse led clinic; a nine month experience. Ir Med J 111(2):687

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Althaus AB, Li K, Pattison E, Eisner B, Pais V, Steinberg P (2015) Rate of dislodgment of ureteral stents when using an extraction string after endoscopic urological surgery. J Urol 193(6):2011–2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.12.087

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin 24, Ireland

    Olwyn E. Lynch, Elaine J. Redmond, Mohammud S. Inder, Robert J. Flynn, Arun Z. Thomas, Lisa G. Smyth & Rustom P. Manecksha

  2. Department of Surgery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

    Rustom P. Manecksha

Authors
  1. Olwyn E. Lynch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elaine J. Redmond
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohammud S. Inder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Robert J. Flynn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Arun Z. Thomas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Lisa G. Smyth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Rustom P. Manecksha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elaine J. Redmond.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval was obtained from the local Research Ethics Committee.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lynch, O.E., Redmond, E.J., Inder, M.S. et al. The utility of stent on strings in clinical practice. Ir J Med Sci 189, 283–287 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-019-02079-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-019-02079-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation