Skip to main content
Log in

Is the Irish bedside best?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The use of the bedside to teach the art of clinical medicine is controversial. Rising student numbers can limit patient availability. Studies examining inpatient attitudes to bedside teaching are few.

Aims

We examined inpatients’ attitudes to bedside teaching of undergraduate medical students.

Methods

The study was carried out in a 439-bed teaching hospital. A questionnaire, numerically scored (0–10), was prospectively administered to 102 consecutive patients involved in bedside teaching of undergraduate medical students.

Results

The results were available from 92 patients. Patients enjoyed the teaching process (mean score 9.13 ± 1.16) and benefited from a better understanding of their illness (7.11 ± 2.57). Patients appreciated their role in educating future doctors (mean score 9.52 ± 1.11) but demonstrated less confidence in their personal contribution to the teaching process (7.81 ± 1.89).

Conclusions

Inpatients are very willing participants in bedside teaching of undergraduate medical students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thibault GE (1997) Bedside rounds revisited. N Engl J Med 336(16):1174–1175 PMID: 9099664

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Saunder G (1980) The importance of the history in the medical clinic and the cost of unnecessary tests. Am Heart J 100:928–931 [PMID: 7446394]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahmed K, El-Bagir M (2002) What is happening to bedside clinical teaching? Med Educ 36(12):1185–1188. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Linfors EW, Neelon FA (1980) Sounding boards: the case for bedside rounds. N Engl J Med 303(21):1230–1233 PMID: 7421951

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lehmann LS, Brancati FL, Chen MC, Roter D, Dobs AS (1997) The effect of bedside case presentations on patient’s perceptions of their medical care. N Engl J Med 336(16):1150–1155 PMID: 9099660

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Benson J, Quince T, Hibble A, Fanshawe T, Emery J (2005) Impact on patients of expanded, general practice based, student teaching: observational and qualitative study. Br Med J 331(7508):89 PMID: 15996965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gleeson F (1997) Assessment of clinical competence using the objective structured long examination record (OSLER). Med Teach 19:7–14. doi:10.3109/01421599709019339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang-Chen RM, Barnas GP, Sigmann P, Riendl PA, Young MA (1989) Bedside case presentations: why patients like them but learners don’t. J Gen Intern Med 4:284–287 [PMID: 2760696]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. La Combe MA (1997) On bedside teaching. Ann Intern Med 126(3):217–220 PMID: 9027273

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. L. Callaly.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Callaly, E.L., Yusra, M., Sreenan, S. et al. Is the Irish bedside best?. Ir J Med Sci 179, 179–182 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-009-0436-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-009-0436-z

Keywords

Navigation