Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The association between partner support and psychological distress among prostate cancer survivors in a nationwide study

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Survivorship Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Up to 38 % of prostate cancer survivors experience significant psychological distress; 6–16 % are diagnosed with depression or anxiety disorders. Support from a relationship partner can ameliorate psychological distress, but many studies treat relationship status as a dichotomous predictor without accounting for level of support provided by the partner.

Methods

The current study is a secondary analysis of a sample of 292 prostate cancer survivors recruited by nine Community Clinical Oncology Program (CCOP) sites around the USA to a larger randomized controlled trial. Self-reported distress was measured at a baseline visit using the Profile of Mood States (POMS) and partner support was measured using the Social Network and Support Assessment (SNSA). Post hoc groups consisting of unmarried survivors, married survivors with low partner support (SNSA scores below the median), and married survivors with high partner support (SNSA scores above the median) were compared on distress using univariate and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) analyses.

Results

Married prostate cancer survivors with high partner support reported significantly lower levels of psychological distress than the other two groups on the total distress scale (16.20–19.19 points lower, p < 0.001). After adjusting for multiple comparisons, this pattern was also seen for subscales of distress.

Conclusions

This study highlights the importance of assessing both partner support and marital status when evaluating a survivor’s psychosocial functioning and support network.

Implications for Cancer Survivors

Assessing support could improve understanding of the association between partner support and prostate cancer survivors’ psychological distress and could lead to interventions to bolster support and reduce distress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Cancer Society. Prostate Cancer Key Statistics. 2013. http://www.cancer.org/cancer/prostatecancer/. Accessed 8/5/13.

  2. Steginga SK, Occhipinti S, Gardiner RA, Yaxley J, Heathcote P. Prospective study of men’s psychological and decision-related adjustment after treatment for localized prostate cancer. Urology. 2004;63(4):751–6. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2003.11.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kunkel EJ, Bakker JR, Myers RE, Oyesanmi O, Gomella LG. Biopsychosocial aspects of prostate cancer. Psychosomatics. 2000;41(2):85–94. doi:10.1176/appi.psy.41.2.85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Holland JC, Bultz BD. The NCCN guideline for distress management: a case for making distress the sixth vital sign. J Nat Compr Cancer Netw. 2007;5(1):3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  5. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: survivorship. 2013. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/survivorship.pdf. Accessed October 21, 2014.

  6. Balderson N, Towell T. The prevalence and predictors of psychological distress in men with prostate cancer who are seeking support. Br J Health Psychol. 2003;8(Pt 2):125–34. doi:10.1348/135910703321649114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bisson JI, Chubb HL, Bennett S, Mason M, Jones D, Kynaston H. The prevalence and predictors of psychological distress in patients with early localized prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2002;90(1):56–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cliff AM, MacDonagh RP. Psychosocial morbidity in prostate cancer: II. A comparison of patients and partners. BJU Int. 2000;86(7):834–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gaston-Johansson F, Lachica EM, Fall-Dickson JM, Kennedy MJ. Psychological distress, fatigue, burden of care, and quality of life in primary caregivers of patients with breast cancer undergoing autologous bone marrow transplantation. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2004;31(6):1161–9. doi:10.1188/04.ONF. 1161-1169.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Roth AJ, Kornblith AB, Batel-Copel L, Peabody E, Scher HI, Holland JC. Rapid screening for psychologic distress in men with prostate carcinoma: a pilot study. Cancer. 1998;82(10):1904–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pirl WF, Mello J. Psychological complications of prostate cancer. Oncology. 2002;16(11):1448–53. discussion 53–4, 57–8, 67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gaugler JE, Hanna N, Linder J, Given CW, Tolbert V, Kataria R, et al. Cancer caregiving and subjective stress: a multi-site, multi-dimensional analysis. Psychooncology. 2005;14(9):771–85. doi:10.1002/pon.916.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Badger T, Segrin C, Dorros SM, Meek P, Lopez AM. Depression and anxiety in women with breast cancer and their partners. Nurs Res. 2007;56(1):44–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. National Cancer Institute. Support for cancer caregivers: when someone you love is being treated for cancer. Bethesda: National Institutes of Health; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  15. AARP Public Policy Institute. Valuing the invaluable: 2011 update - the growing contributions and costs of family caregiving. 2011.

  16. Sherman DW, Haber J, Hoskins CN, Budin WC, Maislin G, Cater J, et al. Differences in physical, emotional, and social adjustment of intimate, family, and nonfamily patient-partner dyads based on a breast cancer intervention study. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2009;36(4):E185–97. doi:10.1188/09.ONF. E185-E197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Regan TW, Lambert SD, Kelly B, McElduff P, Girgis A, Kayser K, et al. Cross-sectional relationships between dyadic coping and anxiety, depression, and relationship satisfaction for patients with prostate cancer and their spouses. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;96(1):120–7. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2014.04.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Banthia R, Malcarne VL, Varni JW, Ko CM, Sadler GR, Greenbergs HL. The effects of dyadic strength and coping styles on psychological distress in couples faced with prostate cancer. J Behav Med. 2003;26(1):31–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Manne S, Badr H, Zaider T, Nelson C, Kissane D. Cancer-related communication, relationship intimacy, and psychological distress among couples coping with localized prostate cancer. J Cancer Surviv Res Pract. 2010;4(1):74–85. doi:10.1007/s11764-009-0109-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Eton DT, Lepore SJ, Helgeson VS. Psychological distress in spouses of men treated for early-stage prostate carcinoma. Cancer. 2005;103(11):2412–8. doi:10.1002/cncr.21092.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Segrin C, Badger TA, Harrington J. Interdependent psychological quality of life in dyads adjusting to prostate cancer. Health Psychol Off J Div Health Psychol Am Psychol Assoc. 2012;31(1):70–9. doi:10.1037/a0025394.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wortman CB, Dunkel-Schetter C. Interpersonal relationships and cancer: a theoretical analysis. J Soc Issues. 1979;35(1):120–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Slevin ML, Nichols SE, Downer SM, Wilson P, Lister TA, Arnott S, et al. Emotional support for cancer patients: what do patients really want? Br J Cancer. 1996;74(8):1275–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Queenan JA, Feldman-Stewart D, Brundage M, Groome PA. Social support and quality of life of prostate cancer patients after radiotherapy treatment. Eur J Cancer Care. 2010;19(2):251–9. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2354.2008.01029.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ringdal GI, Ringdal K, Jordhoy MS, Kaasa S. Does social support from family and friends work as a buffer against reactions to stressful life events such as terminal cancer? Palliat Support Care. 2007;5(1):61–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gore JL, Krupski T, Kwan L, Maliski S, Litwin MS. Partnership status influences quality of life in low-income, uninsured men with prostate cancer. Cancer. 2005;104(1):191–8. doi:10.1002/cncr.21139.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Giese-Davis J, Waller A, Carlson LE, Groff S, Zhong L, Neri E, et al. Screening for distress, the 6th vital sign: common problems in cancer outpatients over one year in usual care: associations with marital status, sex, and age. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:441. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-12-441.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mellon S, Kershaw TS, Northouse LL, Freeman-Gibb L. A family-based model to predict fear of recurrence for cancer survivors and their caregivers. Psychooncology. 2007;16(3):214–23. doi:10.1002/pon.1074.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Northouse LL, Mood DW, Schafenacker A, Montie JE, Sandler HM, Forman JD, et al. Randomized clinical trial of a family intervention for prostate cancer patients and their spouses. Cancer. 2007;110(12):2809–18. doi:10.1002/cncr.23114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Purnell JQ, Palesh OG, Heckler CE, Adams MJ, Chin N, Mohile S, et al. Racial disparities in traumatic stress in prostate cancer patients: secondary analysis of a National URCC CCOP Study of 317 men. Support Care Cancer Off J Multinatl Assoc Support Care Cancer. 2011;19(7):899–907. doi:10.1007/s00520-010-0880-3.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Clark JA, Wray N, Brody B, Ashton C, Giesler B, Watkins H. Dimensions of quality of life expressed by men treated for metastatic prostate cancer. Soc Sci Med. 1997;45(8):1299–309.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Linden W, Yi D, Barroetavena MC, MacKenzie R, Doll R. Development and validation of a psychosocial screening instrument for cancer. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005;3:54. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-3-54.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Fobair P, Koopman C, DiMiceli S, O’Hanlan K, Butler LD, Classen C, et al. Psychosocial intervention for lesbians with primary breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2002;11(5):427–38. doi:10.1002/pon.624.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Seeman TE, Berkman LF. Structural characteristics of social networks and their relationship with social support in the elderly: who provides support. Soc Sci Med. 1988;26(7):737–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Maxwell SE, Delaney HD. Designing experiments and analyzing data: a model comparison perspective. 2nd ed. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Chambers SK, Schover L, Nielsen L, Halford K, Clutton S, Gardiner RA, et al. Couple distress after localised prostate cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2013. doi:10.1007/s00520-013-1868-6.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Blazina C, Watkins CE. Masculine gender role conflict: effects on college men’s psychological well-being, chemical substance usage, and attitudes toward help-seeking. J Couns Psychol. 1996;43(4):461–5. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.43.4.461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Eisler RM, Skidmore JR. Masculine gender-role stress. Scale development and component factors in the appraisal of stressful situations. Behav Modif. 1987;11(2):123–36. doi:10.1177/01454455870112001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Nicholas DR. Men, masculinity, and cancer: risk-factor behaviors, early detection, and psychosocial adaptation. J Am Coll Health. 2000;49(1):27–33. doi:10.1080/07448480009596279.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hagedoorn M, Buunk BP, Kuijer RG, Wobbes T, Sanderman R. Couples dealing with cancer: role and gender differences regarding psychological distress and quality of life. Psychooncology. 2000;9(3):232–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kohler N, Friedrich M, Gansera L, Holze S, Thiel R, Roth S, et al. Psychological distress and adjustment to disease in patients before and after radical prostatectomy. Results of a prospective multi-centre study. Eur J Cancer Care. 2014. doi:10.1111/ecc.12186.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Chambers SK, Ferguson M, Gardiner RA, Aitken J, Occhipinti S. Intervening to improve psychological outcomes for men with prostate cancer. Psychooncology. 2013;22(5):1025–34. doi:10.1002/pon.3095.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Pirl WF, Greer JA, Goode M, Smith MR. Prospective study of depression and fatigue in men with advanced prostate cancer receiving hormone therapy. Psychooncology. 2008;17(2):148–53. doi:10.1002/pon.1206.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Mead DE. Marital distress, co-occurring depression, and marital therapy: a review. J Marital Fam Ther. 2002;28(3):299–314.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Jacobson NS, Dobson K, Fruzzetti AE, Schmaling KB, Salusky S. Marital therapy as a treatment for depression. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991;59(4):547–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Gupta M, Coyne JC, Beach SRH. Couples treatment for major depression: critique of the literature and suggestions for some different directions. J Fam Ther. 2003;25(4):317–46. doi:10.1111/1467-6427.00253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Spanier GB. Measuring dyadic adjustment: new scales for assessing quality of marriage and similar dyads. J Marriage Fam. 1976;38(1):15–28. doi:10.2307/350547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by grant U10 CA37420 (PI: Morrow).

Conflict of interest

Drs. Kamen, Mustian, Heckler, Janelsins, Peppone, Mohile, McMahon, Lord, Flynn, Weiss, Spiegel, and Morrow declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Informed consent

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5). Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles Kamen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kamen, C., Mustian, K.M., Heckler, C. et al. The association between partner support and psychological distress among prostate cancer survivors in a nationwide study. J Cancer Surviv 9, 492–499 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-015-0425-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-015-0425-3

Keywords

Navigation