Abstract
Purpose
The term cancer survivor can refer to individuals from diagnosis through the rest of their life. However, not all people with cancer identify as a survivor, and underlying factors and correlates are yet to be well-explored empirically.
Methods
Study 1 surveyed men in a prostate cancer peer support network (n = 514), exploring psychosocial variables related to adopting a survivor identity. Study 2 interviewed 160 women with breast cancer in an online support group and collected observational data, assessing how survivor identity relates to perceptions of and participation in online support groups.
Results
For men, survivor identity (35 %) was related to lower levels of threat appraisal (p = .000), more deliberate rumination (p = .042), gaining greater understanding of cancer experience through peers (p = .041) and a higher, though marginally significant, level of posttraumatic growth (p = .052). Women adopting a survivor identity (50 %) had higher rates of online support group posts (p = .048), a greater feeling of mattering to the group (p = .002), rated the group as more helpful (p = .004 to .01) and had less difficulty in relating to the group (p = .002) than women not identifying as a survivor.
Conclusions
Survivor identity was related to active and positive engagement with peers, and cognitive processing.
Implications for cancer survivors
While the cancer survivor metaphor may be salient for some people diagnosed with cancer, many did not associate with the term, highlighting the complexity surrounding survivorship discourse and the need to be sensitive to unique individual needs in psychosocial interventions that involve groups.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Reisfield GM, Wilson GR. Use of metaphor in the discourse on cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(19):4024–7.
National Cancer Institute. Milestone (1971): President Nixon declares war on cancer [cited 2013 22nd April]; Available from: http://dtp.nci.nih.gov/timeline/noflash/milestones/M4_Nixon.htm
National Cancer Institute. About cancer survivorship research: History. 2012 [cited 2013 22nd April]; Available from: http://dccps.nci.nih.gov/ocs/history.html
National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship. Our History 2013 [cited 2013 30th April]; Available from: http://www.canceradvocacy.org/about-us/our-history/
Feuerstein M. Optimizing cancer survivorship. J Cancer Surviv. 2007;1:1–4.
National Cancer Institute. About survivorship research: Survivorship definitions. 2012 [cited 2013 22nd April]; Available from: http://dccps.nci.nih.gov/ocs/definitions.html
Bellizzi KM, Blank TO. Cancer-related identity and positive affect in survivors of prostate cancer. J Cancer Surviv. 2007;1:44–8.
Park CL, Zlateva I, Blank TO. Self-identity after cancer: “Survivor”, “victim”, “patient”, and “person with cancer”. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24 Suppl 2:430–5.
Deimling GT, Bowman KF, Wagner LJ. Cancer survivorship and identity among long-term survivors. Cancer Investig. 2007;25:758–65.
Chambers SK et al. Survivor identity after colorectal cancer: antecedents, prevalence and outcomes. Psycho-Oncology. 2012;21(9):962–9.
Jagielski CH et al. A phoenix rising: who considers herself a “survivor” after a diagnosis of breast cancer? J Cancer Surviv. 2012;6:451–7.
Kaiser K. The meaning of the survivor identity for women with breast cancer. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67:79–87.
Khan NF et al. Interpretation and acceptance of the term ‘cancer survivor’: a United Kingdom-based qualitative study. Eur J Cancer Care. 2012;21:177–86.
McGrath P, Holewa H. What does the term ‘survivor’ mean to individuals diagnosed with a haematological malignancy? Findings from Australia. Support Care Cancer. 2012;20:3287–95.
Sontag S. Illness as metaphor. New York: Farrar, Straus, Giroux; 1978.
Morris BA, Campbell M, Dwyer M, Dunn J, Chambers SK. Survivor identity and post-traumatic growth after participating in challenge-based peer support programmes. Br J Health Psychol. 2011;16:660–74.
Stanton AL, Bower JE, Low CA. Posttraumatic growth model: sociocultural considerations. In: Calhoun LG et al., editors. Handbook of posttraumatic growth: research and practice. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2006. p. 138–75.
Calhoun LG, Tedeschi RG. Posttraumatic growth in clinical practice. New York: Routledge; 2013.
Davies B, Harre R. Positioning and personhood. In: Harre R, van Langenhove L, editors. Positioning theory. Oxford: Blackwell; 1998.
Sabiston CM, McDonough MH, Crocker PRE. Psychological experiences of breast cancer survivors involved in dragon boat program: exploring links to positive psychological growth. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2007;29:419–38.
Burke P. Identity processes and social stress. Am Sociol Rev. 1991;56:836–49.
Lepore SJ, Kernan W. Positive life change and the social context of illness: an expanded social-cognitive processing model. In: Park CL et al., editors. Medical illness and positive life change: can crisis lead to personal transformation? Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2009. p. 139–52.
Ussher JM et al. A qualitative analysis of reasons for leaving, or not attending, a cancer support group. Soc Work Health Care. 2008;47(1):14–29.
Roesch SC, Rowley AA. Evaluating and developing a multidimensional, dispositional measure of appraisal. J Pers Assess. 2005;85(2):188–96.
Phinney JS, Ong AD. Conceptualisation and measurement of ethnic identity: current status and future direction. J Couns Psychol. 2007;54(3):271–81.
Cann A et al. The core beliefs inventory: a brief measure of disruption in the assumptive world. Anxiety, Stress Coping. 2010;23:19–34.
Cann A et al. Assessing posttraumatic cognitive activity: the event related rumination inventory. Anxiety, Stress Coping. 2011;24(2):137–56.
Tedeschi RG, Calhoun LG. The posttraumatic growth inventory: measuring the positive legace of trauma. J Trauma Stress. 1996;9:455–71.
Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 6th ed. Boston: Pearson; 2012.
Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1988.
Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67:361–70.
Lepore SJ et al. Standard versus prosocial online support groups for distressed breast cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:379–86.
Winzelberg AJ et al. Evaluation of an internet support group for women with primary breast cancer. Cancer. 2003;97(5):1164–73.
Lieberman MA et al. Electronic support groups for breast carcinoma: a clinical trial of effectiveness. Cancer. 2003;97(4):920–5.
Marcus FM. Mattering: its measurement and theoretical significance for social psychology. In: Paper presented in Annual meeting of the Eastern Sociological Association. Cincinnati: OH; 1991.
Rosenberg M, McCullough BC. Mattering: inferred significance and mental health among adolescents. Res Community Ment Health. 1981;2:163–82.
Lieberman MA. Understanding how groups work: a study of homogenous peer group failures. Int J Group Psychother. 1990;40:31–52.
Lieberman MA, Golant M. Leader behaviors as perceived by cancer patients in professionally directed support groups and outcomes. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice. 2002;6:267–76.
Lieberman MA, Yalom ID, Miles M. Encounter groups: first facts. New York: Basic Books; 1973.
Zebrack B. Cancer survivors and quality of life: a critical review of the literature. Oncol Nurse Forum. 2000;27:1395–401.
Lepore SJ, Revenson RA. Social constraints on disclosure and adjustment to cancer. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2007;1(1):313–33.
Lepore SJ. A social-cognitive processing model of emotional adjustment to cancer. In: Baum A, Andersen B, editors. Psychosocial interventions for cancer. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2001. p. 99–118.
Harwood J, Sparks L. Social identity and health: an intergroup communication approach to cancer. Health Commun. 2003;15:145–59.
Zebrack BJ. Cancer survivor identity and quality of life. Cancer Pract. 2000;8:238–42.
Lakoff G, Johnsen M. Metaphors we live by. London: The University of Chicago Press; 2003.
Kagitcibasi C. Autonomy and relatedness in cultural context: implications for self and family. J Cross-Cult Psychol. 2005;36:403–22.
Chambers SK et al. Intervening to improve psychological outcomes for men with prostate cancer. Psycho-Oncology. 2013;22(5):1025–34.
Lepore SJ et al. Improving quality of life in men with prostate cancer: a randomized controlled trial of group education interventions. Health Psychol. 2003;22(5):443–52.
Mayer KU. The sociology of life course and lifespan psychology: diverging or convering pathways? In: Stauginger UM, Lindenberger U, editors. Understanding human development: dialogues with lifespan psychology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2003. p. 463–81.
Acknowledgement
The authors wish to thank the Brisbane Prostate Support Network, the Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia, Cancer Council Queensland and the National Cancer Institute of the National Institute of Health (Grant CA15887) for their support and assistance in this project. Prof. Suzanne Chambers is supported by an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship.
Conflict of interest
The authors wish to state that they have no conflicts of interest to declare in regards to this submission to the Journal of Cancer Survivorship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Morris, B.A., Lepore, S.J., Wilson, B. et al. Adopting a survivor identity after cancer in a peer support context. J Cancer Surviv 8, 427–436 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-014-0355-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-014-0355-5