Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Potential gonadotoxicity of treatment in relation to quality of life and mental well-being of male survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Survivorship Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Results of earlier studies concerning quality of life (QOL) and psychosocial coping of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) survivors have been inconsistent. Some treatments for ALL affect testicular function and we hypothesized that this may influence the QOL and psychosocial coping of male survivors. Our aims were to assess the QOL and psychosocial coping of male long-term ALL survivors and to evaluate the effect of both testosterone level and the potential gonadotoxicity of various treatment modalities on them.

Methods

Fifty-two male long-term survivors treated for childhood ALL at Helsinki University Hospital between 1970 and 1995, and 56 age- and gender-matched controls were studied. The participants completed a self-report questionnaire including questions on sociodemographics, RAND-36 to assess QOL, General Health Questionnaire and Beck Depression Inventory to assess mental well-being, and CAGE to assess alcohol abuse/dependence. Testosterone levels were measured, and treatment details were reviewed.

Results

ALL survivors in general had QOL close to that of controls or population norms. Decreased QOL was seen in physical health-related subscales, and vitality and emotional well-being were lowered in survivors with more gonadotoxic treatment modalities. No single independent factor in the treatment or the level of testosterone could, however, be found to clearly explain the variation in QOL scores of the survivors. Mental well-being of most of the survivors was good, but a subgroup with previous cyclophosphamide treatment or testicular irradiation showed increased risk of psychiatric morbidity.

Conclusions

The male ALL survivors generally cope well, but increased focus on specific risk groups seems to be necessary. Further studies using patient interviews would probably point out issues concerning the QOL and psychosocial coping of ALL survivors, which may not emerge in these screening studies.

Implications for Cancer Survivors

In general, more attention should be paid for physical functioning of childhood ALL survivors. Increased focus should also be on QOL and mental well-being of survivors with more gonadotoxic treatment modalities and those whose diagnosis was made in their adolescence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harila MJ, Salo J, Lanning M, Vilkkumaa I, Harila-Saari AH. High health-related quality of life among long-term survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2010;55:331–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Apajasalo M, Sintonen H, Siimes MA, Hovi L, Holmberg C, Boyd H, et al. Health-related quality of life of adults surviving malignancies in childhood. Eur J Cancer. 1996;32A:1354–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Maunsell E, Pogany L, Barrera M, Shaw AK, Speechley KN. Quality of life among long-term adolescent and adult survivors of childhood cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2527–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zeltzer LK, Lu Q, Leisenring W, Tsao JC, Recklitis C, Armstrong G, et al. Psychosocial outcomes and health-related quality of life in adult childhood cancer survivors: a report from the childhood cancer survivor study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:435–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Goldberg DP, Williams P. A user’s guide to the general health questionnaire. Basingstoke: NFER-Nelson; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hardy GE, Shapiro DA, Haynes CE, Rick JE. Validation of the general health questionnaire-12: using a sample of employees from England’s health care services. Psychol Assess. 1999;11:159–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Beck AT, Rush AJ, Shaw BF. Emery G cognitive therapy of depression. New York: Guilford; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Beck AT, Steer RA, Garbin MG. Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: twenty-five years of evaluation. Clin Psychol Rev. 1988;8:77–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Holi MM, Marttunen M, Aalberg V. Comparison of the GHQ-36, the GHQ-12 and the SCL-90 as psychiatric screening instruments in the Finnish population. Nord J Psychiatry. 2003;57:233–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mari JJ, Williams P. A comparison of the validity of two psychiatric screening questionnaires (GHQ-12 and SRQ-20) in Brazil, using relative operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Psychol Med. 1985;15:651–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Goldberg DP, Gater R, Sartorius N, Ustun TB, Piccinelli M, Gureje O, et al. The validity of two versions of the GHQ in the WHO study of mental illness in general health care. Psychol Med. 1997;27:191–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ewing JA. Detecting alcoholism. The CAGE questionnaire. JAMA. 1984;252:1905–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fiellin DA, Reid MC, O’Connor PG. Screening for alcohol problems in primary care: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:1977–89.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hays RD, Sherbourne CD, Mazel RM. The RAND 36-item health survey 1.0. Health Econ. 1993;2:217–27.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Aalto AM, Aro AR, Teperi J. RAND-36 terveyteen liittyvän elämänlaadun mittarina. Mittarin luotettavuus ja suomalaiset väestöarvot. 1999.

  16. Hays RD, Morales LS. The RAND-36 measure of health-related quality of life. Ann Med. 2001;33:350–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jahnukainen K, Heikkinen R, Henriksson M, Cooper TG, Puukko-Viertomies LR, Makitie O. Semen quality and fertility in adult long-term survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:837–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sundberg KK, Doukkali E, Lampic C, Eriksson LE, Arvidson J, Wettergren L. Long-term survivors of childhood cancer report quality of life and health status in parity with a comparison group. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2010;55:337–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wright MJ, Galea V, Barr RD. Proficiency of balance in children and youth who have had acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Phys Ther. 2005;85:782–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mackie E, Hill J, Kondryn H, McNally R. Adult psychosocial outcomes in long-term survivors of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and Wilms’ tumour: a controlled study. Lancet. 2000;355:1310–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zebrack BJ, Zeltzer LK, Whitton J, Mertens AC, Odom L, Berkow R, et al. Psychological outcomes in long-term survivors of childhood leukemia, Hodgkin’s disease, and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a report from the childhood cancer survivor study. Pediatrics. 2002;110:42–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Harila MJ, Niinivirta TI, Winqvist S, Harila-Saari AH. Low depressive symptom and mental distress scores in adult long-term survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2011;33:194–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Frobisher C, Lancashire ER, Reulen RC, Winter DL, Stevens MC, Hawkins MM, et al. Extent of alcohol consumption among adult survivors of childhood cancer: the British childhood cancer survivor study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19:1174–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Temming P, Jenney ME. The neurodevelopmental sequelae of childhood leukaemia and its treatment. Arch Dis Child. 2010;95:936–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Harila-Saari AH, Lahteenmaki PM, Pukkala E, Kyyronen P, Lanning M, Sankila R. Scholastic achievements of childhood leukemia patients: a nationwide, register-based study. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3518–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Holmqvist AS, Wiebe T, Hjorth L, Lindgren A, Ora I, Moell C. Young age at diagnosis is a risk factor for negative late socio-economic effects after acute lymphoblastic leukemia in childhood. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2010;55:698–707.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mody R, Li S, Dover DC, Sallan S, Leisenring W, Oeffinger KC, et al. Twenty-five-year follow-up among survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a report from the childhood cancer survivor study. Blood. 2008;111:5515–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Langeveld NE, Ubbink MC, Last BF, Grootenhuis MA, Voute PA, De Haan RJ. Educational achievement, employment and living situation in long-term young adult survivors of childhood cancer in the Netherlands. Psychooncology. 2003;12:213–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Marjut Grainger for statistical assistance. This work was funded by the Foundation of Nona and Kullervo Väre, Children’s Cancer Trust in memoriam of Emilia Heinonen, The National Graduate School of Clinical Investigation, and The Foundation of Wilho Kyttä. Study sponsors had no involvement in the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Päivi Maria Lähteenmäki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gunn, M.E., Lähteenmäki, P.M., Puukko-Viertomies, LR. et al. Potential gonadotoxicity of treatment in relation to quality of life and mental well-being of male survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Cancer Surviv 7, 404–412 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-013-0285-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-013-0285-7

Keywords

Navigation