Abstract
Clinical judgment is a foundation of medical practice and lies at the heart of a physician’s knowledge, expertise and skill. Although clinical judgment is an active part of all medical fields, thus including diagnosis and therapy, communication and decision making, it is still poorly defined. It can be considered a synthesis of intuition (mainly based on Gestalt principles) and an analytical approach. Gestalt perception finds its rationale in the evidence that perception of any given object or experience exhibits intrinsic qualities that cannot be completely reduced to visual, auditory, tactile, olfactory, or gustatory components. Thus, perceptions are not constructed in a “bottom-up” fashion from such elements, but are instead globally perceived, in a more “top-down” fashion. Gestalt perception, if cautiously and carefully combined with structured (techno)logical tools, would permit one to defoliate the often too-many-branches built diagnostic trees, and help physicians to better develop their competency. On the other hand, the practice of evidence-based medicine lies in the integration of individual clinical expertise and judgment with the best available external clinical evidence from systematic research. This article is aimed at providing some general concepts about Gestalt perception, and to discuss some aspects of clinical practice potentially influenced by this approach.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
(2005) Royal College of Physicians. Doctors in society: medical professionalism in a changing world. Report of a Working Party of the Royal College of Physicians of London, London
Miller JI (2005) The complete cardiothoracic surgeon: qualities of excellence. Ann Thoracic Surg 78:2–8
Ofri D (2006) The practice of medicine: neither science nor art. Lancet 367:807–808
Kienle GS, Kiene H (2011) Clinical judgement and the medical profession. J Eval Clin Pract 17:621–627
Sbrojavacca R (2012) “What, diagnosis?” Between Bayes and biases. Intern Emerg Med 7(Suppl. 3):S173–S179
Lippi G, Cervellin G, Plebani M (2014) The ten commandments of laboratory testing for emergency physicians. Clin Chem Lab Med 52:183–187
Cervellin G, Rastelli G, Lippi G (2013) Swept away and squashed between myth based medicine and eminence based medicine. Metaphor of medical meta-cognition. What are we doing wrong with our patient? Rec Prog Med 104:545–553
Miller LW (2008) Heart failure: who we treat versus who we study. Cardiol Clin 26:113–125
Murthy VH, Krumholz HM, Gross CP (2004) Participation in cancer clinical trials: race-, sex-, and age-based disparities. JAMA 291:2720–2726
Van Spall HG, Toren A, Kiss A, Fowler RA (2007) Eligibility criteria of randomized controlled trials published in high-impact general medical journals: a systematic sampling review. JAMA 297:1233–1240
Casazza G, Costantino G, Duca P (2010) Clinical decision making: an introduction. Intern Emerg Med 5:547–552
Kotaska A (2004) Inappropriate use of randomised trials to evaluate complex phenomena: case study of vaginal breech delivery. Br Med J 329:1036–1039
Rothwell PM (2005) External validity of randomised controlled trials: ‘To whom do the results of this trials apply?’. Lancet 365:82–93
Horrobin DF (2002) Effective clinical innovation: an ethical imperative. Lancet 359:1857–1858
Vandenbroucke JP (2001) In defence of case reports and case series. Ann Intern Med 134:330–334
Grimes DA, Schulz KF (2002) Descriptive studies: what they can and cannot do. Lancet 359:145–149
Sagan C (1997) The Demon-Haunted World: science as a candle in the dark, 1st edn. Ballantine, New York
Ash MG, Woodward WR (1998) Gestalt psychology in German culture, 1890–1967: Holism and the Quest for Objectivity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Henry SG (2006) Recognizing tacit knowledge in medical epistemology. Theor Med Bioeth 27:187–213
Feddock CA (2007) The lost art of clinical skills. Am J Med 120:374–378
Halonen JS, Santrock JW (1996) Psychology: contexts of behavior, 2nd edn. Brown and Benchmark, Chicago
Pinna B, Sirigu L (2011) The accentuation principle of visual organization and the illusion of musical suspension. Seeing Perceiving 24:595–621
Klapp ST, Jagacinski RJ (2011) Gestalt principles in the control of motor action. Psych Bull 137:443–462
No Authors listed (1999) Dyspnea. Mechanisms, assessment, and management: a consensus statement. Am Rev Resp Crit Care Med 159:321–340
Parshall MB, Schwartzstein RM, Adams L, Banzett RB, Manning HL, Bourbeau J, Calverley PM, Gift AG, Harver A, Lareau SC, Mahler DA, Meek PM, O’Donnell DE (2012) An official American Thoracic Society statement: update on the mechanisms, assessment, and management of dyspnea. American Thoracic Society Committee on Dyspnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 185:435–452
Hennessey A, Setyono DA, Lau WB, Fields JM (2012) A patient with a large pulmonary saddle embolus eluding both clinical Gestalt and validated decision rules. Ann Emerg Med 59:521–523
Penaloza A, Verschuren F, Meyer G, Quentin-Georget S, Soulie C, Thys F, Roy PM (2013) Comparison of the unstructured clinician Gestalt, the wells score, and the revised geneva score to estimate pretest probability for suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Emerg Med 62:117–124
Stevens SM (2012) Review: Gestalt or clinical decision rules have limited sensitivity and specificity for detecting acute PE. Ann Intern Med 156:JC1–JC11
Prado M, Fiorelli EM, Wu MA, Sandrone G, Tobaldini E (2013) Nothing as it seems. Todd’s paralysis. Intern Emerg Med 8:425–426
Gigerenzer G, Gaissmaier W (2011) Heuristic decision making. Annu Rev Psychol 62:451–482
Brighton H, Gigerenzer G (2012) Homo heuristicus: less-is-more effects in adaptive cognition. Malays J Med Sci 19:6–16
Koontz NA, Gunderman RB (2008) Gestalt theory: implications for radiology education. Am J Radiol 190:1156–1160
Drew T, Evans K, Võ ML, Jacobson FL, Wolfe JM (2013) Informatics in radiology. What can you see in a single glance and how might this guide visual search in medical images? RadioGraphics 33:263–274
Peabody FW (1927) The care of the patient. JAMA 88:877–882
Becker MC, Galla JM, Nissen SE (2011) Left main trunk coronary artery dissection as a consequence of inaccurate coronary computed tomographic angiography. Arch Intern Med 171:698–701
Redberg R, Katz M, Grady D (2011) Diagnostic tests: another frontier for less is more: or why talking to your patient is a safe and effective method of reassurance. Arch Intern Med 171:619–623
Elstein AS (2000) Clinical problem solving and decision psychology. Acad Med 75(Suppl 10):134–136
Rennig J, Bilalic M, Huberle E, Karnath HO, Himmelbach M (2013) The temporo-parietal junction contributes to global gestalt perception. Evidence from studies in chess experts. Front Hum Neurosci 7:513. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00513
Ritzinger B, Huberle E, Karnath HO (2012) Bilateral theta-burst TMS to influence global Gestalt perception. PLoS ONE 7(10):e47820
Jefferys WH, Berger JO (1991) Ockham’s razor and Bayesian statistics. Am Sci 80:64–72
Elia F, Pagnozzi F, Laface B, Aprà F, Roccatello D (2013) A victim of Occam’s razor. Intern Emerg Med 8:767–768
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cervellin, G., Borghi, L. & Lippi, G. Do clinicians decide relying primarily on Bayesians principles or on Gestalt perception? Some pearls and pitfalls of Gestalt perception in medicine. Intern Emerg Med 9, 513–519 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-014-1049-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-014-1049-8