Skip to main content
Log in

Accelerometer-Measured Versus Self-Reported Physical Activity Levels and Sedentary Behavior in Women Before and 9 Months After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) patients report significant pre- to post-surgery increases in physical activity (PA). Conversely, objectively assessed PA does not increase after RYGB. The aim of the study was to compare self-reported and accelerometer-measured changes in moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) and exercise from pre- to post-surgery, in women undergoing RYGB.

Methods

Forty-three women with an average pre-surgery body mass index of 39.2 kg/m2 (SD 3.1) were recruited at Swedish hospitals. PA was measured by the Actigraph GT3X+ and by a previously validated short PA questionnaire, at home visits 3 months before and 9 months after surgery, thus limiting seasonal effects.

Results

Self-reported time spent in exercise increased with 75 % and time spent in MVPA increased with 51 %, whereas accelerometer-assessed time spent in exercise increased with 0.9 % and time spent in MVPA increased with 2.1 %, from before to after surgery. Correlations comparing accelerometers with the questionnaire were 0.35 (P = 0.02) for MVPA and 0.13 (P = 0.4) for exercise before RYGB and 0.52 (P ≤ 0.001) for MVPA and 0.12 (P = 0.4) for exercise after RYGB.

Conclusions

Pre- to post-RYGB surgery increases in self-reported PA were not confirmed by accelerometer-measured PA. Thus, health care workers should use objective measures of PA in patients undergoing RYGB, in order to assess whether patients achieve sufficient levels of PA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Welch G, Wesolowski C, Piepul B, et al. Physical activity predicts weight loss following gastric bypass surgery: findings from a support group survey. Obes Surg. 2008;18(5):517–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jacobi D, Ciangura C, Couet C, et al. Physical activity and weight loss following bariatric surgery. Obes Rev: Off J Int Assoc Study Obes. 2011;12(5):366–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sjostrom L. Review of the key results from the Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) trial—a prospective controlled intervention study of bariatric surgery. J Intern Med. 2013;273(3):219–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Colquitt JL, Pickett K, Loveman E, et al. Surgery for weight loss in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;8:CD003641.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. WHO. Global recommendations on physical activity for health. Geneva: WHO Press; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fogelholm M. Physical activity, fitness and fatness: relations to mortality, morbidity and disease risk factors. A systematic review. Obes Rev: Off J Int Assoc Study Obes. 2010;11(3):202–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Iannelli A, Martini F, Rodolphe A, et al. Body composition, anthropometrics, energy expenditure, systemic inflammation, in premenopausal women 1 year after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2013;28(2):500–7. doi:10.1007/s00464-013-3191-1.

  8. Szulc P, Munoz F, Marchand F, et al. Rapid loss of appendicular skeletal muscle mass is associated with higher all-cause mortality in older men: the prospective MINOS study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;91(5):1227–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Josbeno DA, Jakicic JM, Hergenroeder A, et al. Physical activity and physical function changes in obese individuals after gastric bypass surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis: Off J Am Soc Bariatric Surg. 2010;6(4):361–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bond DS, Jakicic JM, Unick JL, et al. Pre- to postoperative physical activity changes in bariatric surgery patients: self report vs. objective measures. Obesity. 2010;18(12):2395–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Berglind DWM, Eriksson U, Thorell A, et al. Longitudinal assessment of physical activity in women undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2015;25(1):119–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. King WC, Hsu JY, Belle SH, et al. Pre- to postoperative changes in physical activity: report from the longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery-2 (LABS-2). Surg Obes Relat Dis: Off J Am Soc Bariatric Surg. 2012;8(5):522–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Colles SL, Dixon JB, O’Brien PE. Hunger control and regular physical activity facilitate weight loss after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2008;18(7):833–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Reid RE, Carver TE, Andersen KM, et al. Physical activity and sedentary behavior in bariatric patients long-term post-surgery. Obes Surg. 2015;25(6):1073–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jakicic JM, Polley BA, Wing RR. Accuracy of self-reported exercise and the relationship with weight loss in overweight women. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30(4):634–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lagersted-Olsen J, Korshoj M, Skotte J, et al. Comparison of objectively measured and self-reported time spent sitting. Int J Sports Med. 2013;35(6):534–40. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1358467.

  17. Duncan GE, Sydeman SJ, Perri MG, et al. Can sedentary adults accurately recall the intensity of their physical activity? Prev Med. 2001;33(1):18–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. King WC, Belle SH, Eid GM, et al. Physical activity levels of patients undergoing bariatric surgery in the Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery study. Surg Obes Relat Dis: Off J Am Soc Bariatric Surg. 2008;4(6):721–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Olbers T, Lonroth H, Fagevik-Olsen M, et al. Laparoscopic gastric bypass: development of technique, respiratory function, and long-term outcome. Obes Surg. 2003;13(3):364–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. O’Connell SE, Griffiths PL, Clemes SA. Seasonal variation in physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep in a sample of UK adults. Ann Hum Biol. 2014;41(1):1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Norman A, Bellocco R, Bergstrom A, et al. Validity and reproducibility of self-reported total physical activity—differences by relative weight. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001;25(5):682–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Orsini N, Bellocco R, Bottai M, et al. Validity of self-reported total physical activity questionnaire among older women. Eur J Epidemiol. 2008;23(10):661–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Santos-Lozano A, Marin PJ, Torres-Luque G, et al. Technical variability of the GT3X accelerometer. Med Eng Phys. 2012;34(6):787–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, et al. Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(1):181–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Choi L, Liu Z, Matthews CE, et al. Validation of accelerometer wear and nonwear time classification algorithm. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(2):357–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Trost SG, McIver KL, Pate RR. Conducting accelerometer-based activity assessments in field-based research. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(11 Suppl):S531–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Santos-Lozano A, Santin-Medeiros F, Cardon G, et al. Actigraph GT3X: validation and determination of physical activity intensity cut points. Int J Sports Med. 2013;34(11):975–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hanggi JM, Phillips LR, Rowlands AV. Validation of the GT3X ActiGraph in children and comparison with the GT1M ActiGraph. Aust J Sci Med Sport/Sports Med Aust. 2013;16(1):40–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Karlsson J, Taft C, Ryden A, et al. Ten-year trends in health-related quality of life after surgical and conventional treatment for severe obesity: the SOS intervention study. Int J Obes (Lond). 2007;31(8):1248–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Canning KL, Brown RE, Jamnik VK, et al. Individuals underestimate moderate and vigorous intensity physical activity. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e97927.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. de Souza SA, Faintuch J, Sant’anna AF. Effect of weight loss on aerobic capacity in patients with severe obesity before and after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2010;20(7):871–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Martin CK, Das SK, Lindblad L, et al. Effect of calorie restriction on the free-living physical activity levels of nonobese humans: results of three randomized trials. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2011;110(4):956–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Joosen AM, Gielen M, Vlietinck R, et al. Genetic analysis of physical activity in twins. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;82(6):1253–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bond DS, Thomas JG, Unick JL, et al. Self-reported and objectively measured sedentary behavior in bariatric surgery candidates. Surg Obes Relat Dis: Off J Am Soc Bariatric Surg. 2013;9(1):123–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ward DS, Evenson KR, Vaughn A, et al. Accelerometer use in physical activity: best practices and research recommendations. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(11 Suppl):S582–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lyden K, Kozey Keadle SL, Staudenmayer JW, et al. Validity of two wearable monitors to estimate breaks from sedentary time. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(11):2243–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Donnelly JE, Blair SN, Jakicic JM, et al. American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand. Appropriate physical activity intervention strategies for weight loss and prevention of weight regain for adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(2):459–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Sjostrom L, Lindroos AK, Peltonen M, et al. Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(26):2683–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bond DS, Phelan S, Wolfe LG, et al. Becoming physically active after bariatric surgery is associated with improved weight loss and health-related quality of life. Obesity. 2009;17(1):78–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Nakamura KM, Haglind EG, Clowes JA, et al. Fracture risk following bariatric surgery: a population-based study. Osteoporos Int: J Established Result Cooperation Between Eur Found Osteoporos Natl Osteoporos Found USA. 2014;25(1):151–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Bass S, Pearce G, Bradney M, et al. Exercise before puberty may confer residual benefits in bone density in adulthood: studies in active prepubertal and retired female gymnasts. J Bone Miner Res: Off J Am Soc Bone and Miner Res. 1998;13(3):500–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Prince SA, Adamo KB, Hamel ME, et al. A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008;5:56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Lyzwinski LN. A systematic review and meta-analysis of mobile devices and weight loss with an intervention content analysis. J Pers Med. 2014;4(3):311–85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Berglind.

Ethics declarations

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Funding

This study was funded by a grant to Finn Rasmussen from the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research (grant number: 2008–0654), Stockholm County Council (ALF), NovoNordisk fund, The National School in Caring Sciences at Karolinska Institutet (NFV).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Berglind, D., Willmer, M., Tynelius, P. et al. Accelerometer-Measured Versus Self-Reported Physical Activity Levels and Sedentary Behavior in Women Before and 9 Months After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. OBES SURG 26, 1463–1470 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1971-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1971-5

Keywords

Navigation